Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on Gandhian
Analysis of mohandas gandhi
Analysis of mohandas gandhi
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on Gandhian
Orwell manipulates the audience’s perception of sainthood by mentioning a very popular and saint-like person, Gandhi. Many believe he is a symbol of wisdom, peace, and life-fulfillment. Thus, many will respect his sayings and his life choices. So, when Orwell reveals to the audience that Gandhi has actually “behaved in an inconsiderate way to his wife and children…on three occasions,” it is shocking. Orwell emphasizes this emotion of surprise by stating proof as to how Gandhi has misbehaved, such as letting his family die. Much like a court trial, the side with the most shocking evidence is what persuades the jury to support that side. The emotion of surprise catches people off-guard and vulnerable to whatever is going to happen next
Socrates and Winston both have similarities in their pursuit for the truth and response to their treatment of death but have different views on ethics in society. In 1984, Winston pursued truth and justice because he wanted freedom from the Party. In The Apology, Socrates seek justice or sense of truth so that the people of Athens have the freedom to expand their knowledge and produce their own truth. The similarities between Winston and Socrates is that they both accept their treatment of death. In contrast they have different reactions to what they think it means to be ethical in their society.
George Orwell once offered this definition of heroism: ordinary people doing whatever they can to change social systems that do not respect human decency, even with the knowledge that they can’t possibly succeed.
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, one of the greatest Indian leaders, followed his chosen principles and personal values devoutly. He was pure vegetarian, lived humbly and in simple attire, and promoted equality among all. Mahatma Gandhi’s blind commital to his following of his ethics was criticized by some people, one of whom was George Orwell. George Orwell wrote a passage making the argument that people should accept human imperfection (for life and love) than “loyally” adhere to “sainthood.” Orwell uses strong, noticebly-patterned diction and specific passage structure, to effectively develop his position.
I think that Orwell’s use of strong but subtle ethos and pathos arguments in his depictions of the world that Winston lives in is effective in convincing the reader against totalitarian governmental structures.
"For every text a context" and only through referral to the non-literary world can we understand the motivation behind the literary. In a time of Nazism, Stalin and Civil War in Europe, Orwell's disillusionment towards politics and society rapidly increased and his ideas and criticisms were published in various essays regarding politics and literary traditions. When he became unwell towards the end of his life, he wrote 1984 as an expression of both his own views and as a parallel to Zamyatin's We, a novel concerned with Russian communism and portraying a very similar storyline. He "characterised the ordinary man as a victim." ; he viewed humanity as whole to be inside Jonah's whale, to "feel no impulse to alter or control the process that [they are] undergoing." This passivity of existence was the chief example from which he was able to draw the lack of individualism and the virtual extinction of it in his literary land of Oceania.
Every day, each individual will look back on decisions he or she have made and mature from those experiences. Though it takes time to realize these choices, the morals and knowledge obtained from them are priceless. In George Orwell’s nonfictional essay, “Shooting an Elephant”, a young Orwell was stationed in Burma for the British imperial forces, tasked to deal with an elephant who destroyed various parts of the village Moulmein while its owner was away. Backed by second thoughts and a crowd of thousands, he finds himself shooting the elephant and reflecting that it was not justified; however, it was a choice pushed by his duty and the people. Written with a fusion of his young and old self’s outlook on shooting the elephant, Orwell’s essay is a sensational read that captivates his audience and leaves them questioning his decision.
Howe, Tom. "George Orwell." British Writers Volume VII. Ed. Ian Scott-Kilvert. New York: Scribner, 1984. 273-287.
People in United states tend to ignore the complex problems the country is facing but focuses on the dominance of the country. People only looks at the surface of the United States and neglects problem about poverty. The bigger cities, like Los Angeles and New York, are mostly impacted by the poverty. It is important to recognize the impact of the poverty in order to understand the complex problem of the United States. In George Orwell’s “Down and Out in Paris and London”, the author provides a vivid image of the poverty and the impact on the people’s daily lives. In 1933 London and Paris, the condition of the poverty was much critical due to lack of support from the government. When we compare the 21st century poverty
“I had never realised what it means to destroy a healthy, conscious man.” After reading and understanding George Orwell’s feelings through his experiences in his essay “A Hanging.” We come to realize that George Orwell, a visitor from the European establishment, gets the opportunity to participate in the execution of a Hindu man. The author is degraded by what he has witnessed and experienced, and decides to share his feelings with the rest of the establishment through his writings.
...Shooting an Elephant. According to what Orwell is trying to impose, his target audience seems to be youth, adults, and politicians as imperialism is more reflected off of people under these categories. As a police officer, Orwell teaches his readers that imperialism is the worst way to govern a country as it is harmful to an individual’s way of thinking and value of morality in society. He proved that in an imperialism based system, no one is actually dominant over one another as they all end up being slaves of each other. This results in demolished and demoralized society. Orwell achieves his goal outstandingly by playing with rhetorical devices, tone, diction, and sentence structure to generate the feeling in the audience the way he desires. In result, Orwell brilliantly uses the incident of killing an elephant to describe the negative effects of imperialism.
Eric Arthur Blair, commonly known under the pseudonym George Orwell, led a fascinating life, from working as a member of the Indian Imperial Police Force, to experiencing poverty firsthand in both London and Paris, to fighting in the Spanish Civil War. Orwell’s diverse life experiences gave him very strong political opinions that carried through to his writing career, during which he addressed issues such as education, poverty, and communism. George Orwell was a master of the modern political satire, through which he powerfully illustrates the political and social issues of the twentieth century.
Orwell was the kind of person that did not have a very high self-esteem. He did not have his ducks in a row, so to speak. I don’t think that Orwell was one to function under pressure. He would give in to what he thought the people of Burma wanted, not to what he wanted. But secretly inside he hated the environment in which he lived, he hated the imperialistic government in which resided in Burma. He hated the residents of Burma. He stated that he would love to stick his bayonette into the stomach of a Buddhist priest. He felt all of this hatred for the people around him, but yet he felt as if he had to go along with everything and everyone else just to live in harmony.
Orwell’s writing showed he practiced what he preached. His use of metaphors created a picture in the reader’s mind. His essay stated clearly and concisely what is wrong with English writers and what is needed to be done to repair it.
George Orwell is a man with a hard past. He had to face many difficulties in life and had to overcome many social and health problems. His texts were inspired from personal experiences and he strongly focused on those living in poor conditions going through hardships. His essays “A Hanging” and “Marrakech” are both texts that describe similar themes such as the dangers and inhumanity of colonialism, the realities of class separation and the discrimination of native races. He even uses the landscape and nature as a whole depicting it as brittle, harsh and lifeless.
Based on the two essays, George Orwell is a vivid writer who uses a unique point of view and strong themes of pride and role playing to convey his messages. His writings are easy to pick out because of the strengths of these messages. Just like politicians in government, people with power turn corrupt to stay in power and keep their reputations. Anyone who takes on power must be prepared to live with the consequences of his actions. Orwell knows this challenge well and conveys this principle in his writing. After all, his narration is based on real life experiences and not fictional fantasies.