Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gentrification in urban areas
Essays on gentrification
Essays on gentrification
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Every neighborhood is subject to change. These changes occur due to many reasons and factors like modernization, technological advancement, social forces etc. Due to these changes new cultures and way of living will be explored while some may be ignored. Gentrification is the process of increasing the rent and housing of a certain neighborhood which leads to displacement of the poor/low income families. Changes take place as people with similar interest and status form a community of higher social status. In this paper, I will discuss gentrification from a point of view that will allow us to see the advantages of it. Gentrification allows a community to be economically successful by expanding the local tax base. Because when property value …show more content…
increases in a gentrifying neighborhood landlords have to pay higher property taxes and investors are attracted into investing on big businesses like condos, fine dine restaurants, high end stores which eventually leads to stronger tax base of that neighborhood. Thus, the stronger and more diverse the economy, the stronger the community becomes. Although some might argue that gentrification leads to displacement and is unfair to the part of the citizens, gentrification is actually a way to improve the living quality of a neighborhood. Gentrification and property value Properties are like prized possessions that are valuable to the owners but having to pay property taxes might be the least favorite responsibilities. But property taxes are crucial for funding schools, community parks, public libraries, roads, fire departments, police departments and other public services. In my opinion it is very important to understand the factors that can drive the property tax rates up and the importance of taxes in a neighborhood. “First wave gentrifiers thus push for restrictions on development and because they’re more politically influential than the poor incumbents who came before them, they tend to succeed in their efforts.
Now that the amenity value of the neighborhood has improved in a durable way, restrictions on supply lead to big increases in housing prices” (Salam, 2014, p. 35). When a neighborhood under goes gentrification, the home prices skyrockets so then the owners have to pay high taxes which leads them to increase their rent. The good news is that the neighborhood will directly benefit from the expanded tax base as it is used in building better schools, parks, libraries, more convenient public transportations, which allows people to live a more luxurious life. Thus, by increasing land values, gentrification can financially benefit residents who own their homes. Not only does it benefit high status families, it also brings an opportunity in moving upward to low income people who manage to stay in gentrifying areas. “Lower-income children benefit significantly from living in more mixed-income neighborhoods; they tend to experience less violence and crime, attend better schools, and have better role models” (Litman, 2017, p. 2).
One of the common misconception about expanding the tax base is that we often confuse ourselves into thinking it as raising taxes. When a tax base expands, the businesses and members within the community share in the costs associated with running the community. “The larger the
…show more content…
tax base grows as a result of increased sales, the smaller the individual’s share of the tax burden becomes. This leaves more money in the pockets of community residents and business owners” (Nelson, 2016). Due to the expanded tax base, community gest a firm and consistent growth rate. Gentrification and business The strategy of gentrifying a community is associated with the renewal of homes of a neighborhood in order to attract audiences of similar interest and status.
Gentrification itself is a big business. With the money that the investors give in to the gentrifying neighborhood, they are able to build and bring in various chain stores and big companies. People in the neighborhood will then have a lot more choices. Besides the options that those companies provide, they also provide a better and more secure environment for the surrounding residents. The renewal of the city will allow residents to have a better living environment. The investors try their best to renovate the area and switch old buildings into condominiums or luxury housing for purchase, which means that people need to have certain amount of money in order to buy or rent those houses. First, the increase in chain stores provides middle and upper class people to have more choices among daily needs. Even though the chain stores will take away some of the culture experiences that only the local popshops can provide, the chain stores are still definitely better due to its convenience and the size of the company. One of the reasons that people choose big chain stores and not small shops is that people feel more comfortable and familiar with shopping in chain stores. Furthermore, not only the shops are replaced, but public utilities are also
improved. Improved infrastructure I agree with the belief that when neighborhoods change, some families do get pushed out and that the longtime residents of low-income neighborhoods don’t support gentrification exactly, but they do want the things it often brings like the grocery stores and other retail within walking distance, better transit connections, reduced crime and priority from the city/local government. Although some might argue that gentrification leads to displacement and is unfair to the part of the citizens, gentrification is actually a way to improve the living quality of a neighborhood. It also gives small creative opportunity like street art and graffiti. Author Romero (2018) explains in the article “Gentrification, for Better and Worse” how small street artists get opportunities for paid work. The growth of city space extends street artists’ creative playground, which advances the artists’ opportunities for paid work and exposure (Romero, 2018). In many economically depressed or low-income areas, old buildings often progressively become worse because of low tax base and lack of funding. Gentrification brings people to the community with a wide range of interests and skills. Therefore, some might argue that gentrification leads to displacement and is unfair to the part of the citizens, gentrification is actually a way to improve the living quality of a neighborhood. Gentrification is a rising controversial topic that people have been debating about. It has many definitions and people tend to favor the one that suites their status or works in their favor. Some economists view this as a process of growth and betterment while others claim gentrification compels poor families to move out of the neighborhood. Rather than debating about what gentrification is, it is more crucial to learn the advantages of gentrification and make it work for both high status and low status families. I believe concentrated poverty is worse and harmful than the mixing of incomes in a neighborhood. The term “gentrification” has become a scary word when in reality the benefits are much more than its cost. As considered that gentrification is not going to end anytime soon or is an inevitable process, it will be wise to benefit and take advantages from these change rather than refusing to agree.
“Gentrification is a general term for the arrival of wealthier people in an existing urban district, a related increase in rents and property values, and changes in the district's character and culture.” (Grant) In layman’s terms, gentrification is when white people move to a black neighborhood for the sake of cheaper living, and in turn, raise up property values and force black neighbors to leave because of a higher price of living. Commonly, the government supports gentrification with the demolition of public housing in areas that are developing with more white neighbors. This is causing a decreasing amount of African Americans to be able to afford to live in the neighborhood as their homes are taken away from them, forcing them to relocate. Whilst gentrification normally has negative connotations, there are several people who believe gentrification brings about “an upward trend in property values in previously neglected neighborhoods.” (Jerzyk) On the other hand, this new trend in property value and business causes those...
Another noteworthy urban sociologist that’s invested significant research and time into gentrification is Saskia Sassen, among other topical analysis including globalization. “Gentrification was initially understood as the rehabilitation of decaying and low-income housing by middle-class outsiders in central cities. In the late 1970s a broader conceptualization of the process began to emerge, and by the early 1980s new scholarship had developed a far broader meaning of gentrification, linking it with processes of spatial, economic and social restructuring.” (Sassen 1991: 255). This account is an extract from an influential book that extended beyond the field of gentrification and summarizes its basis proficiently. In more recent and localized media, the release the documentary-film ‘In Jackson Heights’ portrayed the devastation that gentrification is causing as it plagues through Jackson Heights, Queens. One of the local businessmen interviewed is shop owner Don Tobon, stating "We live in a
There are many examples of cities reforming itself over time, one significant example is Vancouver's Downtown Eastside. More than a hundred years after the discovery of gold that drew thousands of migrants to Vancouver, the city has changed a lot, and so does one of its oldest community: Downtown Eastside. Began as a small town for workers that migrants frequently, after these workers moved away with all the money they have made, Downtown Eastside faced many hardships and changes. As a city, Vancouver gave much support to improve the area’s living quality and economics, known as a process called gentrification. But is this process really benefiting everyone living in Downtown Eastside? The answer is no. Gentrification towards DTES(Downtown Eastside) did not benefit the all the inhabitants of the area. Reasons are the new rent price of the area is much higher than before the gentrification, new businesses are not community-minded, and the old culture and lifestyle of the DTES is getting erased by the new residents.
Older gentrification is issued onto poor black communities to increase white supremacy in the area and improve living conditions in the so called “hood.” After Older proposed his thoughts on Gentrification being an issue in colored low-income neighborhoods, he then turns to criticizing another writer with a different point of view on the issue. The author of “Is Gentrification All Bad?” in an article in the New York Times explains his views on gentrification. Older places emphasis on one of Davidson’s claim on “sweet spots” in the community saying “Davidson talks of a “sweet spot”: some mythical moment of racial, economic harmony where the neighborhood stays perfectly diverse and balanced.” (Older 358) The author does not support this claim as to being logical in his sense. Older’s views represents an opposite approach on the same issue of gentrification. In another quote “The gears are all already in place, the mechanisms of white supremacy and capitalism poised to make their moves.” (Older 358) the author speaks on how white people are over taking the poor colored communities to improve their lives, but not thinking about the consequences of the affected
Furthermore, both articles “Gentrification: A Positive Good For Communities” and. “The Deeper Problems We Miss When We Attack ‘Gentrification’” exhibit their opinion on the positives of gentrification and the potential of “revitalization” in low-income urban communities. Badger argues that gentrification brings nothing more than further opportunities for urban communities while integrating citizens of different social classes. Furthermore, she continues to question if gentrification is in fact the monster that brings the prior expressions against gentrification where she says “If poor neighborhoods have historically suffered from dire disinvestment, how can the remedy to that evil — outside money finally flowing in — be the problem, too?”(Badger) Stating that the funds generated from sources external that are brought into these communities can’t be problematic.
Sikhulu Shange owned a shop called Record Shake but lost his lease in 2007 due to price increases in property in New York neighborhoods (69). Interviewing people who have been affected by the gentrification of neighborhoods in New York helps support Zukin’s thesis. I believe that by going into the city and talking to the locals and the people who use to live there, Zukin helps illustrate the affects of gentrification from two points of view. It is clear that she uses several primary sources such as blog posts, newspaper articles, city planning documents, and observations to help support her theories. At certain times I do feel like Zukin’s main point gets lost because she focusing too much to detail. She spends a good portion of the book critiquing Jane Jacobs book The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Although I think it’s important that Zukin provided a different view on the crisis of authenticity, I felt she focused a little too much on trying to argue against Jane Jacobs. In her conclusion she critiques Jacobs work, saying that Jacobs views are bias (227). Zukin could have made her thesis sound by incorporating visuals to show the roles of changes in demography. Seeing statistics that show the cultural change in New York cities over the past couple of years would definitely make her arguments clearer. She is still able to expose the
With the rapid development of the city and tremendous progress of technology in America, gentrification becomes a universal phenomenon in every city, especially in Englewood―the south side of Chicago. As capital begins to flow into the Englewood community, many aspects of daily life are changed for better. The tremendous change brings not only the renovated facilities but arrives with the new retail and service business. Plenty of citizens who live in the Englewood community were benefiting from the gentrification. They also said that gentrification is a commendable change in Englewood to renew and develop. Thus, gentrification is beneficial to local residents because it arrives with the new retail and service business, increases employment opportunities and transform a more beautiful community.
Gentrification is described as the renovation of certain neighborhoods in order to accommodate to young workers and the middle-class. For an area to be considered gentrified, a neighborhood must meet a certain median home value and hold a percentage of adults earning Bachelor’s degree. Philadelphia’s gentrification rate is among the top in the nation; different neighborhoods have pushed for gentrification and have seen immense changes as a result. However, deciding on whether or not gentrification is a beneficial process can become complicated. Various groups of people believe that cities should implementing policy on advancing gentrification, and others believe that this process shouldn’t executed. Both sides are impacted by the decision to progress gentrification; it is unclear of the true implications of completely renovating impoverished urban areas; gentrification surely doesn’t solve all of a community’s issues. I personally believe that gentrification is not necessarily a good or bad process; gentrification should occur as a natural progression of innovative economies and novel lifestyles collide within certain areas. Policy involving gentrification should not support the removal of people out of their neighborhood for the sake of advancement.
There are people in the neighborhoods that can enjoy the neighborhood enhancements because they know they can survive the inflation of their rent. There are people that are oblivious to the fact that their rent will increase a significant amount, because they are excited that there will be shiny new locations arriving around their area. Once their landlord explains to them that their rent will increase – in New York it could be up to fifty percent – they will be struck with the sad reality of gentrification. Gentrification is similar to other social issues, primarily in the fact that one does not think about the issue until it affects them. To me, it is crucial to approach with Immanuel Kant’s theory in mind. It is important to view the overall morality of an issue. “Is it necessary?” is a question I ask myself when addressing this issue. Kant believes one should not use another for self-benefit, and with gentrification one group of men or women are using a group of families for their own
Of the many problems affecting urban communities, both locally and abroad, there is one issue in particular, that has been victimizing the impoverished within urban communities for nearly a century; that would be the problem of gentrification. Gentrification is a word used to describe the process by which urban communities are coerced into adopting improvements respective to housing, businesses, and general presentation. Usually hidden behind less abrasive, or less stigmatized terms such as; “urban renewal” or “community revitalization” what the process of gentrification attempts to do, is remove all undesirable elements from a particular community or neighborhood, in favor of commercial and residential enhancements designed to improve both the function and aesthetic appeal of that particular community. The purpose of this paper is to make the reader aware about the significance of process of gentrification and its underlying impact over the community and the community participation.
Lance Freeman tackles the issue of gentrification from the perspectives of residents in the gentrified neighborhood. He criticizes the literature for overlooking the experiences of the victims of gentrification. The author argues that people’s conceptions on the issue are somewhat misinformed in that most people consider it as completely deplorable, whereas in reality, it benefits the community by promoting businesses, different types of stores, and cleaner streets. These benefits are even acknowledged by many residents in the gentrified neighborhood. However, the author admits that gentrification indeed does harm. Although gentrification does not equate to displacement per se, it serves to benefit primarily homeowners and harm the poor. Additionally,
Gentrification is the keystone for the progression of the basic standards of living in urban environments. A prerequisite for the advancement of urban areas is an improvement of housing, dining, and general social services. One of the most revered and illustrious examples of gentrification in an urban setting is New York City. New York City’s gentrification projects are seen as a model for gentrification for not only America, but also the rest of the world. Gentrification in an urban setting is much more complex and has deeper ramifications than seen at face value. With changes in housing, modifications to the quality of life in the surrounding area must be considered as well. Constant lifestyle changes in a community can push out life-time
With the rapid development of the city and tremendous progress of technology in America, gentrification becomes a universal phenomenon in every city, especially in Englewood―the south side of Chicago. As capital begins to flow into the Englewood community, many aspects of daily life are drastically changed for better. The tremendous change brings not only the renovated facilities and building but arrives with the new retail and service business. Plenty of citizens who live in the Englewood community were benefiting from the gentrification by live happily. They also said that gentrification is a commendable change in Englewood to renew and develop. Thus, gentrification is beneficial to local residents (Ferro).
Notwithstanding, there are various positive characteristics of outer ring suburbs, such as cheaper housing, bigger housing, lower taxes, ample parking, and it is a lot more safer, but even then, I would choose to live in an inner ring suburb. Moreover, another reason to why I would choose to live in a neighborhood in an inner ring suburb, has to do with the prevention of the negative aspects of gentrification. Although gentrification has promoted the overturn of poor neighborhood, increasing property values, the middle class returning, and preventing urban sprawl, the negative effects it has on individuals that have lived there for many years is devastating. Unfortunately, inner city residents have to endure the prices of their property taxes going up, causing them to feel uncomfortable, specifically financially. In addition, the old residents are forced out by the young, middle class, graduate students that are looking for cheap housing. Gentrification also includes the deterioration of old businesses that are overtaken by new businesses, such as
Gentrification is not about race, yet it is dressed up to be. Gentrification at its core is about new companies coming and old local stores being replaced. A more complex analysis would be that; gentrification has a significant effect and shifts on people of low-income residencies with a diverse population being replaced by primarily wealthy white residents. This causes a rift towards small and local business, culture and aesthetic of neighborhoods with the changes of new coming residents raising housing cost and ultramodern companies.(Leonard 2013) Despite the main cause of gentrification being new companies moving into low-income diverse neighborhoods. It is not portrayed in such fashion, but rather portrayed as the displacement of minorities.