Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Genocide is a term that most people in the world have heard of in one way or another. People may have heard it through any film viewings, books, or any other media outlet, the point is, many people have heard of genocide in one way or another. Though genocide may be generally known by most people, a fraction of those people may only have an in-depth understanding of what genocide exactly is. With all of that said, for the research memo, the topic of genocide is going to the subject of the research memo. The beginning part of the paper will focus on the history and origins of genocide. Following the origins of genocide, theories will be discussed to explain why people participate in genocide and why genocide happens for that matter. After the …show more content…
theories of genocide are completed, the paper will then examine the Rwandan genocide. The origins of the Rwandan genocide, such as the history leading up to the genocide, the events that took place in Rwanda, and the aftermath will be discussed in a great ideal. Lastly, the paper will wrap up with a conclusion summarizing all of the topics of genocide and explain the importance of the subject matter. In order to understand genocide in the modern day, it is essential to learn the origins of genocide. For the purposes of this paper, the first case of the twentieth century will be examined. This is primarily due to the origins of genocide prior to the twentieth century being a little bit foggy. Meaning that the first case is not clear cut, thus not being adequate to put into the paper. The first documented case of genocide in the twentieth century took place in South Africa. The Herero and Nama people of South Africa were massacred by the Germans between the years of 1904-1907 (sahistory.org). South Africa was declared a German colonial territory in 1884. Because of this acquisition, this encouraged the Germans to take more land away from the local Africans and implemented and enforced laws on the local population causing oppression on the locals. By 1904, the tensions had begun to rise and the fighting between the two groups started then and ended around the year 1907. The total amount of people lost in the Herero group tallied up to be around 65,000-80,000 people and in the Nama group around 10,000 people were killed in the genocide (sahistory.org). Still to this day, the groups are still reminding people of what they endured in the early portion of the twentieth century to remind people of the atrocious events they had to go through. As said before, it is important to talk about the first documented case of genocide in the twentieth century, because it serves as the foundation for having a basic knowledge for the rest of the paper. Now that the first documented genocide case of the twentieth century has been discussed, it is now time to talk about when genocide officially became a term.
Back some couple centuries ago, genocide committed by states was seen as heroic, as they were allowed to commit such an atrocity in pursuit of building a larger empire (Lecture 9/18). Keep in mind, that the term “genocide” had not been officially defined by that time, thus not containing the same meaning as it does today. Instead of being seen as evil, states that committed genocide were seen as heroic. In-fact, William Blackstone once said “the king can do no wrong is a necessary and fundamental principal of the English constitution (Lecture 9/18). It wasn’t until 1948, that the term “genocide” had been officially labeled as an official term and international crime. This was declared by the United Nations. One of the first trials to occur due to this was the Nuremberg Trials. In the Nuremberg Trials, twenty-four Nazi leaders and six Nazi organizations were convicted on four counts (Lecture 9/18). Of those twenty-four convicted, twelve of those people were sentenced to the death penalty for the crimes they had committed. Fast-forwarding to the 90’s, 120 countries had signed an international treaty that established the International Court. The International Court was established in 1998 as a result of the treaty and it gave the ICC the jurisdiction to prosecute any related Genocide crimes (History.com). Before I move on …show more content…
to the theoretical aspects of genocide, a proper definition of genocide will be listed now that the history and origins of genocide has been established. The term “genocide” is defined as the deliberate killing of members of groups for no particular reason other than the specific group being different than the perpetrator, which can include race, ethnicity, gender, and religion (Lecture 9/18). The origins of genocide have been discussed along with the definition listed as well. Now that all of that has been discussed, the paper will now shift gears in examining why genocide happens and why people decide to take part in such a gruesome event. The first reason why genocide happens is due to social control (Campbell 155). According to Campbell, genocide is committed by groups for more morally reasons than predatory reasons. Specifically, they come up with moral grievances and use those grievances as reasons for committing the horrendous acts they commit. Campbell gave a perfect example of how the grievance reason was used in a real life example. For example, right before the holocaust happened, the Nazi’s had claimed the Jews were foolish, distant, dishonest, and were hungry for power (Campbell 155). As a result of those acquisitions, the Jewish people were blamed for the defeat of Germany in World War 1, and thus was the beginning of the Nazi hatred for the Jewish people. There were also accusations of Jewish doctors molesting and murdering children and harmed anybody who was not Jewish (Campbell 155). Because of all of those accusations and nasty words called by the Nazi’s, the Jewish people were seen as being wicked and bad for the culture and well-being of Germany. This is a perfect way to show how one of the reasons for genocide unfolds. It is almost like a certain amount of brainwashing takes place to a degree. This is said because the people did not have negative opinions of the Jewish people until the Nazi’s came up with a substantial amount of lies about the Jewish people. Another reason why genocide occurs is due to the geometry of genocide.
This has to do with a number of things. First, genocide is more likely to happen in areas where there is immobility, cultural distance, and inequality (Campbell 160). Greater immobility’s are linked to genocide occurring, while less immobility is linked to less genocide occurring. In addition, genocide is more likely to happen in an area that is considered to be a “downward direction”. This means it would happen to groups that are a lower socially ethnic groups rather than a higher up group. In other words, genocide is less likely to happen in an upward or lateral direction (Campbell 160). In relational distance, genocide is more likely to take place as well. Relational distance refers to the extent to which participate in each other’s lives (Campbell 162). For example, ethnic groups who do not communicate as much with other groups would be deemed as and seen as being in the category of relational distance. In addition, this term can apply to refugees or migrates who flee violence to go to “safer” countries, at least in their opinion. For example, shortly before the holocaust, Eastern European Jews immigrated to cities in Germany in large amount of numbers making them highly visible to being rationally distant. Because of this, the Jews are more vulnerable to being victimized by the Nazis because of their status. As far as functional independence goes, it has been known that genocide is more likely to
take place. For example, ethnic groups that are deemed as functionally independent are less likely to be victims of a genocide attack (Campbell 164). Whereas, groups who are instead, functionally dependent on others are more likely to be victims of a genocide attack.
"Eight Stages of Genocides." Genocides and Conflicts. William Mitchell College of Law, 2012. Web. 15 Apr. 2014. .
The physical and mental intent to destroy another being often unveils the darkest side of human nature. In the memoir, “An Ordinary Man: An Autobiography” dedicated to the Rwandan genocide, war hero Paul Rusesabagina states: “A sad truth of human nature is that it is hard to care for people when they are abstractions, hard to care when it is not you or somebody close to you. Unless the world community can stop finding ways to dither in the face of this monstrous threat to humanity those words never again will persist in being one of the most abused phrases in the English language and one of the greatest lies of our time.” The United Nations promised never again would they allow genocide to occur after the Second World War. Unfortunately, less
To start off with, what is genocide? Genocide is the killing of a massive number of people of in a group. Genocide has not only been practices in the present day, but it has been practiced for m...
When comparing the Holocaust and the atrocities in the Belgian Congo I was able to further understand the differences between crimes against humanity and genocides. Further more the impact they have on society, especially how easily it was for the Belgian government to wash out the permanent footprint they caused on the Congo. As previously stated, the main differences we could find were the monetary priorities established in the Belgian Congo and the motivations behind the ethnic extermination, which led to the Holocaust.
Stanton, Gregory H. "Genocides and Conflicts." World Without Genocide. World Without Genocide, 7 May 2013. Web. 14 Apr. 2014. .
The first reason the holocaust should be considered an example of genocide is based on the UN’s definition of genocide. In the treaty by the UN titled “ Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide”, they explain the punishment of genocide, stating that genocide is illegal. According to the
The word genocide was derived from the Greek root genos (people) and the Latin root cide (killing), and did not exist in the English language until 1944, which was the end of World War II (Power). According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, genocide is “the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group.” Such violence occurred during the Holocaust and during the separation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The problems of ethnic cleansing and repression have become so prevalent in the last century that they have contributed to two world wars, over fourteen million deaths, and a new word. United Nations Secretary-General, Ban Ki-moon, said, “Far from being consigned to history, genocide and its ilk remain a serious threat. Not just vigilance but a willingness to act are as important today as ever.”
Greenfield, Daniel M. "Crime of Complicity in Genocide: How the International Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda and Yugoslavia Got It Wrong, and Why It Matters." The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 98.3 (2008): 921-24. HeinOnline. Web. 18 Apr. 2011.
SAINATI, TATIANA E. "Toward A Comparative Approach To The Crime Of Genocide." Duke Law Journal 62.1 (2012): 161-202. Academic Search Premier -. Web.
Both of these cases share similar characteristics, but because the genocides differed in motivations and certain key mechanisms, it can be concluded that each case holds its own uniqueness, therefore the differences outweigh the
Springer, Jane. Genocide: A Groundwork Guide. Toronto, Ontario: Groundwood Books / House of Anansi Press, 2006. (Accessed March 7, 2014).
The Rwandan Genocide was a terrible event in history caused by a constantly weakening relationship between two groups of people. The country of Rwanda is located in Africa and consists of multiple groups of people. Majority of Rwanda is Hutu, while a smaller amount of people are Tutsis. The genocide started due to multiple events that really stretched the relationship between the two groups to its end. One of the starting factors was at the end of World War 1. Rwanda was a German colony but then was given to Belgium “who favored the minority Tutsis over the Hutus, exacerbated[exacerbating] the tendency of the few to oppress the many”(History.com). This created a feeling of anger towards the Tutsis, because they had much more power then Hutus.
When the Rwandan Hutu majority betrayed the Tutsi minority, a destructive mass murdering broke out where neighbor turned on neighbor and teachers killed their students; this was the start of a genocide. In this paper I will tell you about the horrors the people of Rwanda had to face while genocide destroyed their homes, and I will also tell you about the mental trauma they still face today.
When 1937 arrived, Japanese soldiers raided China’s capital of Nanking and began to mass murder citizens. A sole leader of the Japanese Imperial Army was non-existent. There were many of people in power such as generals who allowed these behaviors to occur. Baron Koki Hirota, Foreign minister at the time, proceeded to do nothing while being well aware of the Japanese’s persecution of the Chinese. These unsympathetic murders of those who were thought to be Chinese soldiers as well as woman, children and elderly. This massacre lasted between the 1937 and 1938. Within this time 300,000 Chinese citizens were viciously killed. This genocide is called Rape of Nanking because of raping the woman before killing them. Most likely this group was selected because the second world war happened in Asia. This was significant because a country was able to kill half the population of another. I believe the reason of this Genocide was for Japan to take advantage of China while expand Japan. Most likely the Japanese wished to exterminate China’s entire population.
Print. The. Hymowitz, Sarah, and Amelia Parker. " Lessons - The Genocide Teaching Project - Center for Human Rights & Humanitarian Law." American University, Washington College of Law. American UniversityWashington College of Law Center for Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, 2011.