Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Benefits or drawbacks of growing and consuming genetically engineered foods
Benefits or drawbacks of growing and consuming genetically engineered foods
Health effects of consuming genetically modified food
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Genetically Modified Plants Would most people eat a hamburger if they knew that the cow that provided the beef possessed genes from a sheep? How about bacon that came from a pig with sheep traits? More likely than not, they would refuse to consume such products, denouncing them as unsafe and irresponsible. Protests over these animals with mixed genetics would probably begin. This genetic tampering has been occurring in plants for years, but the majority of consumers do not think twice about purchasing products derived from these genetically engineered plants. While some may claim that the benefits of these genetically modified plants outweigh the negative effects, it becomes apparent that the crops cause more harm than good. Genetically engineered plants should not be produced because of the harm they cause to farmers, because of the harm they cause to the environment, and because of the harm they cause to people. Contrary to what the companies that produce these altered crops would like people to believe, genetically modified crops fail to help farmers. Rather, they affect farmers adversely when compared to natural crops. Organic farmers face especially high risks because these plants can and will breed with other nearby crops, whether they are genetically modified or not. If fact, one study “demonstrated that more than 50% of the wild strawberries growing within 50 meters of a strawberry field contained marker genes from the cultivated strawberries” (Hanson). Because these modified crops spread so frequently, it proves almost impossible to ensure that the organic crops are natural and are not the offspring of a modified plant. These crops also threaten conventional farmers. Many of these altered plants are resi... ... middle of paper ... ...omois JS, Roullier F, Cellier D, Séralini GE. A Comparison of Effects of Three GM Corn Varieties on Mammalian Health. Int J Biol Sci2009; 5:706-725 “The Establishment of Genetically Engineered Canola Populations in the US.” Space Daily 18 Oct. 2011. General OneFile. Web. 1 Nov. 2011 Hanson, Michael. “Jeopardizing the Future? Genetic Engineering, Food, and the Environment.” Pest Management at the Crossroads. 6 Feb. 1999. Web. 27 Oct. 2011. Ho, Mae-Wan, Li Ching. Lim, and Joe Cummins. The Case for a GM-free Sustainable World. London: Institute of Science in Society, 2003. Print. “More Bt Corn Plagued by Pest.” St. Louis Post-Dispatch [MO] 24 Sept. 2011: A10. Infortac Newsstand. Web. 31 Oct. 2011. “National: Environment; Europe Accused of Hypocrisy Over Opposition to GM Crops.” Observer [London, England] 23 Oct. 2011: 23.Infortrac Newsstand. Web. 31 Oct. 2011
Barbara Kingsolver discusses genetic manipulation through generations of different species in her essay A Fist in the Eye of God. These genetic manipulations occur due to the species acclimating to their environment. Diversity in genes is nature’s survival of the fittest. Only the strongest survive and they pass on their strong traits. With today’s technology, we have the capability of altering genes within a species DNA. This paper examines the detrimental repercussions that GMO 's cause to the environment and insects necessary for the progression of crops.
A debate is ragging over the advancements being made in genetic engineering. Scientist discovered that genes are the map of every aspect of a living organism, this has furthermore led to the prospect of altering this coding. By modifying one’s genes parents will one day be able to pick the color of their unborn child’s eyes and farmers will have the ability to develop plants that will produce bigger and healthier harvest. With the growing anticipation that some feel towards genetically modified crops others question it effects on the surrounding environments. Often pesticides are more heavily relied on for genetically modified crops and some cases have found pollination decreased in areas dominated by GM plants. Since there are so many aspects of genetic modification that have yet to be explored, much more research is required before distributing GM seeds internationally, but from the information already available the sides have begun to divide.
How many of you hear the words “genetically modified food” and immediately think “BAD”? How many of you scorn the idea that genetically modified foods are useful? How many of you have been manipulated by the media to think that all biotechnology is evil? Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are organisms that have been genetically spliced to achieve a certain trait. As the demand for a larger food supply is increasing due to population growth, the benefits that GMO foods provide are being hailed as the only solution to the food crisis. However, many people are making inadequately informed decisions, and are pushing them to the back shelf. I will inform you on why genetically modified organisms may be the only way to a stable, safe future for the less fortunate.
Genetically modified food’s, or GMOs, goal is to feed the world's malnourished and undernourished population. Exploring the positive side to GMOs paints a wondrous picture for our planet’s future, although careful steps must be taken to ensure that destruction of our ecosystems do not occur. When GMOs were first introduced into the consumer market they claimed that they would help eliminate the world’s food crisis by providing plants that produced more and were resistant to elemental impacts like droughts and bacterial contaminants, however, production isn’t the only cause for the world’s food crisis. Which is a cause for concern because the population on the earth is growing and our land and ways of agriculture will not be enough to feed everyone sufficiently. No simple solutions can be found or applied when there are so many lives involved. Those who are hungry and those who are over fed, alike, have to consider the consequences of Genetically Modified Organisms. Food should not be treated like a commodity it is a human necessity on the most basic of levels. When egos, hidden agendas, and personal gains are folded into people's food sources no one wins. As in many things of life, there is no true right way or wrong way to handle either of the arguments and so many factors are involved that a ‘simple’ solution is simply not an option.
Clinton Urged to Protect Consumers From Bio-Corn Contamination. November 25, 2000. 10 November 2000. http://www.consumerunion.org/food/gef2cpi1000.htm.
Many of the pro-GMO nations, such as the United States, were worried that the precautionary principle advocated by the Protocol would become “justification for arbitrary and nonscience-based import-restrictive actions” (Gupta, 2000, p. 29). Anti-GM organizations would counter this belief with the assertion that the US acts in its self-regard to spread the use of GMOs. While the argument that the United States acted in their own self-interests is valid, that does not justify the actions of the European Union or anti-GM nongovernmental organizations. Regardless of public statements of moral reasoning, the intervention of a country does not occur without at least a little bit of self-interest on the part of the intervener. The hidden agenda of
The second “giant” that needs to be laid to rest is the fear of agricultural technology and GM crops. Europe has banned the im...
Scientists have been changing genomes of plants and animals by integrating new genes from a different species through genetic engineering, creating a genetically modified organism (GMO). Consumers in America have been eating GMOs since 1996, when they went on the market. There are benefits to genetically modifying crop plants, as it improves the crop quality and increases yield, affecting the economy and developing countries. But there are also negative effects from GMOs. Consumption of GMOs has various health effects on both body systems of animals and humans. GMOs also affect the environment, ecosystems and other animal species. The cons outweigh the pros in the case of GMOs.
This has created a large amount of debate on local, national, and international levels about the safety of genetically modified foods to human health. There are many angles that have been taken from different groups on this issue. Some believe it is harmful to our health, with one source stating that, “mice eating GMO corn had fewer and smaller babies (Jagelio 2013).” Without testing on humans how are we to know these harmful effects aren’t impacting our health and reproduction. Other groups see GMOs as being both beneficial and having no impact on human health.
“Genetically modified foods are a "Pandora's box" of known and unknown risks to humans and the environment. They have been forced onto the American public by multinational biotech and agribusiness corporations without adequate oversight and regulation by the United States government (Driscoll, SallyMorley, David C).”Genetically Modified Food is food which has been chemically altered by scientists during the production process to give the food more nutrients, better appearance, and a longer shelf-life (Rich, Alex K.Warhol, Tom). The importance of this issue is that these GMO’s can actually have a negative effect in our society in general. It could mutate in a negative way and cause cancer or other diseases. Genetically modified food should be strictly controlled due to its various detrimental effects on the environment, human health, and potentially insect/animal effects.
... There is an expression that the world is round and our actions as developed countries will someday come back to haunt us. Therefore, we have to be responsible if we are to live harmoniously with the rest of the world. Developed countries, like the United States, must face the consequences of presenting GM crops to Third World countries and must offer to amend any problems with honest and just solutions. Developed countries can then truly say that they are responsible leaders of the world.
There have been cases reporting in the development of corn allergy, when working in farms with BT corn. These cases were then dropped because; there was not enough solid evidence to back up the claims. Another case that was filed was that BT was found in human cells, due to the consumption of BT corn. (Tukey, 2012) The toxins that are present in BT corn are only meant to be active only against particular insects and should have no effect on non-targeted organisms and humans at all. However, a recent experiment by the ‘Safe Lawn Organisation’ has shown that they can have effect on human cells. These findings really question if GMO such as BT corn is toxic. (Tukey,
“Adoption of Genetically Engineered Crops in the U.S.” ERS/USDA Data. Web. 12 May 2012. .
Lemaux, P.G. (2006). Introduction to genetic modification. Agricultural Biotechnology in California Series, 8178. Retrieved from http://ucanr.org/freepubs/docs/8178.pdf
Genetically modified organisms, a complex substance, have stirred up a global argument that is as equally complex. With people on both sides of the argument, who are firm believers in their opinion, it is hard to choose which opinion to believe in. It is important for the public to understand that “GM technology adds desirable traits from nature, without introducing anything unnatural or using chemicals, so that food is more plentiful” (“The Facts about GMOs”). The everyday person has a common misconception that genetically modified organisms are bad for humans and the environment because of the bad reputation that the non-scientific world gives them. The World Health Organization is cited saying, “Genetically modified foods are “foods derived