Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A eassy about pharaohs
Summary of genesis chapter 12 :25
A eassy about pharaohs
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A eassy about pharaohs
Sharon Ra
CB 39 Essay #1
“She’s not my wife, she’s my sister.” There are many interpretations of the different stories in the Bible that often do not agree with each other. From ancient interpreters who believe that the Bible is written from the account of one person to modern scholars who believe that the Bible is written from various accounts, the Bible can be viewed in multiple ways. One of the stories that are placed under scrutiny is the “She’s not my wife, she’s my sister” narrative. The passages that fall under this narrative are Genesis 12:10-20, Genesis 20:1-18, and Genesis 26:1-11. When analyzed, these passages appear to be parallels to each other (Jewish Study Bible 42). While some may argue that these passages are variations on
…show more content…
In Genesis 12, the names Abram, Sarai, and Pharaoh are used; while in Genesis 20, the names Abraham, Sarah, and King Abimelech are used. The fact that different versions of the name Abraham and Sarah are used strongly supports the argument that these passages are all three different events that occurred in the Bible. The names Abram and Sarai signify that the particular event occurred prior to the establishment of the covenant between God and Abraham. It is in Genesis 17 that God solidifies His covenant with Abram; therefore, changing Abram’s name to Abraham and Sarai’s to Sarah. The usage of the names Abraham and Sarah in Genesis 20 reveals that that specific event occurred after Abraham knows God, thus, making Genesis 12 and 20 two different and separate events. In Genesis 26, it is instead Abraham’s son, Isaac, his wife, and Abimelech of the Phillistines who are the main characters. Isaac was born to Abraham and Sarah, so Genesis 26 must have occurred after Genesis 12 and …show more content…
Genesis 12 names this culprit as the Pharaoh while Genesis 20 refers to him as King Abimelech (who is the king of Gerar). It is also important to note that in one story, the marriage was consummated while in the other it was not. In Genesis 12, it is presumed that Sarai and the Pharaoh did have sexual relations because it states in Genesis 12, “But the Lord afflicted Pharaoh and his household with mighty plagues on account of Sarai, the wife of Abram” (Jewish Study Bible 31). The Lord already punished the Pharaoh and his household, and it’s assumed that this is due to the fact that sexual relations did exist. There is no mention of these “mighty plagues” of being taken away or relieved, so the crime must have already been committed. On the other hand, in Genesis 20, King Abimelech did not touch Sarah at all. This is made clear within the passage when the Bible states, “‘I knew that you did this with a blameless heart, and so I kept you from sinning against Me. That was why I did not let you touch her’” (Jewish Study Bible 43). God had punished Abimelech’s family by closing all of the women’s and slaves’ wombs, but this punishment was taken away when Abraham prayed for the
In the book of Genesis, two characters – Sarah (Sarai) and Hagar – support different, yet significant roles. There is an interesting connection between Sarah and Hagar and their lives are interconnected as evident in Genesis 16.
With the appearance of Abraham we enter into datable history. Abraham (known as “the father of the Jews”) is also significant because the nation of Israel are his descendants.
In Genesis both Lot’s wife and Noah’s wife are women that are overshadowed by their husbands, so much so that they aren’t even given a name. Robinson uses allusions of both of these women to demonstrate female subjectivity to further the feminist theme, but also reframes the original biblical stories seen in the book of Genesis by giving the women characteristics which create sympathy for them, but also perverts the original stories.
For instance; God made a covenant with Abraham as evident in the book of Genesis, Chapter 15 verse 18, where God had promised that he would give Abraham and his descendant the land from the river of Egypt unto the great river Euphrates. I also believe Sarai was a significant beneficiary of the blessings of God's covenant with Abraham. However, I believe Sarai and Abram broke the marriage vows established in Genesis Chapter 2 Verse 24, which clearly states the reason why a man should leave his father and mother to form a unity with his wife. Because of the human nature and how we perceive situations, I believe Sarai could not exercise any more patience for God's appointed time, nor could she imagine to have a child in her old age. I also believe the reason she gave up on God's appointed time was that she had already experienced her
One of the biblical allusions that continue to surface is the connection to Abraham and Sarah in Old Testament Genesis. Abraham and Sarah were nearly 100 years old when they attempted to bore a child together, however, it was unfeasible
Regularly characterized as monsters, women were ridiculed for being sexually unappeasable, lustful, and shrewish, and they were regarded with condescension by the church authorities. Similarly, people in the medieval era regarded multiple marriages as highly questionable, and it is for this reason that the Wife of Bath carefully examines the words of God as revealed in scripture (revealing her to be more than a simple-minded woman: a knowledge of religious texts proves she is definitely educated and well-read). She confesses that nowhere can she find a stricture against her having more than one marriage, and her five husbands are therefore her choice and hers only. “He seith to be wedded is no synne:/ Bet is to be wedded than to brynne”, she remarks humorously, drawing on the fact that by God’s permission, finding a partner through marriage is a pastime with little consequences, for it is better than engaging in sin and burning for it (50-53. 301). This begins her analysis of the bible and the often “sinful” breakdown of a sexual relationship between man and woman, and introduces her repetitive idea of the
The rape narrative of Genesis 19 begins with Lot, a resident of Sodom, inviting two angels, in the form of men, to stay at his house. During the night, the townspeople come to Lot and demand him to bring out the men so that the townspeople can rape them. In response, Lot disturbingly offers up his daughters as a substitute for the
The book of Genesis focuses on six persons and their families: Adam, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Joseph. God blessed man and all of his creations. For a moment, God’s creation was as He intended: paradise. Man sinned and God became unhappy, but he still provided for his people. God wants man to repent.
The first connection is probably the most easily seen by the common reader which is the use of language in both texts. In Genesis 12:1 according to Fox's translation it says, "YHWH said to Avram: Go-you-forth from your land " and similarly in Genesis 22:2 G-d says, " and go-you-forth to the land of Moriyya/Seeing." In both cases when G-d is speaking to Avram, who is later renamed Avraham, G-d uses the term "go-you-forth" If these two sections of the bible had actually been written by different sources at different times then how come the same words are used? The answer is that they were not written by different sources but the reason the same language is used for both is because it is one source. Had it been written by two different sources there would most likely be different words used for, go-you-forth, like travel, journey or move. The fact that the source of the Old Testament chose to use the word "go-you-forth" for both of these passages meant that there was supposed to be a link between the two especially because it is G-d speaking these words in both situations.
Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were called the patriarchs, or the founders of Judaism. Moses, being one of the great religious leaders in history, God. revealed his name, Yahweh. Yahweh means “to be” in Hebrew. The events recorded in Exodus indicate that through Moses a new and deeper understanding of God was revealed.
In the Bible, he escapes from the wife who wanted to force herself on him, leaving behind his garment. Potiphar’s wife screams and informs the servants that Joseph attempted to defile her. She also waits upon the husband who returns later on and tells him the same story. The husband believes her and sends Joseph to prison. Similarly, in the Quran, the two characters, Joseph and the master’s wife struggle. But unlike the Bible, both Joseph and the king’s wife run out towards the door where they meet the husband. Like the in Bible, the wife accuses Joseph of seducing her and attempting to force himself on her. Similarly, Joseph throws back the blame at her. In this case, however, Joseph is tried and a witness who is the wife’s relation testifies based on Joseph’s torn garment. Joseph is found innocent and the wife guilty. The king believes in his innocence and asks the wife to repent and ask Joseph for forgiveness. Instead, new characters-the women of the city are introduced. These characters are unique to the Quran and are not mentioned in the
One day God spoke to Abraham with an intention of making a covenant with man whom he chose as his partner. Abraham was told by God to leave his home to a different land since the people of Ur worshipped idols of wood and stone. The covenant made between them had a lot of promises. Abraham left with his wife Sarai, Lot his nephew,
Repetition is also the concept that the Hebrew Creator-God uses throughout the story of Genesis to educate Abram about God's purpose and His nature. God is aware of the doubtful and cynical nature of Abram. Over time, God uses Abram's own repeated mistakes to build a conceptual understanding of Himself for Abram. This model provides Abram with a relevance for God in Abram's own life. Though the classic view depicts the patriarch Abraham as blindly, obedient, there is significant evidence within the story of Abraham to show that he was not so naturally submissive. The text often depicts Abram as doubtful, indignant, and sarcastic to a fault. Taking this side of the text in context illustrates Abraham as the antagonist in a battle against God. In this struggle with God, Abraham achieves excellence by learning, through repetition of his own errors and the reinstatement of God's promise, that it is in his best interest not to fight against his own personal idea of God, but to recognize, respect, and accept the true will of God.
In Addition, archaeology is critical for the history and learning of old Near Eastern writing and dialects to comprehend the Bible authors ' expectations and the importance of their endeavors to influence. This level shows how the disgrace and exposure are deciphered from the biblical passage, from its unique dialect, into English. For instance, there is a part that would merit attention in the term of nakedness written in the Collegeville Bible Commentary, which is, "The man and woman are naked and yet feel no shame is more than a mere observation of their being undressed" (p: 43). The term “Nakedness” in Genesis 2: 25, refers to the intact relationship between the man, the woman, and God in a symbolic way; thus, it cannot be or cause shame. However, later in Genesis 3: 7, the nakedness becomes as an embarrassment due to the disobedience of Eve and Adam. The serpent is characterized as being "cunning", (arum) in Hebrew." Cunning forms a wordplay with the word "naked" (‘arummim) in Hebrew. "This wordplay underscores the fact that man and woman become aware of their nakedness because of the cunning of the serpent" (Collegeville Bible Commentary, on Genesis, p:
He shapes and molds you into the vessel that he needs you to be in order to fulfill his WILL. Abram was shaped by the changing of his identity. God gave Abram instructions to change his name to Abraham and for Sarah’s to change her name to Sarah. God chose Abraham to ancestor a multitude of nations. This everlasting covenant with Abraham covers his offspring, and their generations.