Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The portrayal of women in Shakespeare's plays
Female gender roles and their effects
The portrayal of women in Shakespeare's plays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The portrayal of women in Shakespeare's plays
Society in the16th century was highly structured. Women of the upper class were expected to be trophies for their husbands. The men were required to hunt, lead, and go into battle. If one chose not to follow these dictates, the rest of society would question, look down on, or even punish the deviant. The prominent author, William Shakespeare, placed this subject into comedy and tragedy plays with dramatically different outcomes. In Macbeth and Much Ado About Nothing, William Shakespeare makes fun of stereotypical gender roles by establishing Beatrice and Lady Macbeth as the dominant characters over Benedick and Macbeth through imagery, dialogue, and character personalities. Men held the dominant positions during this time; however, Beatrice, in Much Ado About Nothing, takes on these traditionally male characteristics by being both aggressive and dominant. For example, her uncle, Leanoto states that she will “never run mad” over a romance, and she even affirms this herself by saying she has “cold blood” (“Much Ado” 3-4) (Lewalski 242). Many comments such as these including her conversation with Claudio at the beginning of Act 4 lead critics to brand her as a “protofeminist” (Cook 190). Carol Cook reiterates this by writing, “Beatrice is aggressive and as guarded as the men in the play” (191). Lady Macbeth, in Macbeth, also demonstrates dominant traits. This is introduced at the beginning of the play as she starts to plan Duncan’s demise after reading Macbeth’s letter of the prophecy (Liston 235). She evokes this again in Act I Scene V by saying: Unsex me here, And fill me, from the crown to the toe, top-full Of direst cruelty! Make thick my blood, Stop up the access and passage to remorse… Come to my woman’s breas... ... middle of paper ... ...w.jstor.org/stable/462403>. Dennis, Carl. "Wit and Wisdom in Much Ado about Nothing." Studies in English Literature 13.2 (1973): 223-237. Web. 25 February 2010. . Lewalski, B. K. "Love, Appearance and Reality: Much Ado about Something." 8.2 (1968): 235- 251. Web. 25 February 2010. . Liston, William. "Male and Female Created He Them: Sex and Gender in "Macbeth"." College Literature 16.3 (1989): 232-239. Web. 18 February 2010. . Scheff, Thomas. "Gender Wars: Emotions in "Much Ado about Nothing"." 36.2 (1993): 149-166. Web. 18 February 2010. Shakespeare, William. Macbeth. New York, NY: Dover Publications, 1993. Print. Shakespeare, William. Much Ado About Nothing. New York, NY: Dover Publications, 1994. Print.
William Shakespeare’s writing reflected and at times emphasized the gender oriented stereotypical roles and responsibilities of the English Renaissance. However, many Shakespearean characters including Benedick and Beatrice of Much Ado About Nothing challenged the standard image and characteristics of men and women.
In Act 1 Scene 7 of “Macbeth”, Lady Macbeth uses persuasive language to bring Macbeth from a man full of trepidation, to a hardened killer, ready to commit regicide. She does this in a variety of ways. The play was extremely controversial at the time; this was because it effectively reversed the gender roles of society. These roles were imprinted into the very fabric of medieval community; women were seen as inferior to males, and were brutally oppressed by the largely patriarchal society. As a result, shakespearean audiences would be shocked by the role reversal portrayed in Macbeth.
Throughout Romeo and Juliet, by William Shakespeare, there is an overlaying presence of the typical roles that men and women were supposed to play. During Elizabethan times there was a major difference between the way men and women were supposed to act. Men typically were supposed to be masculine and powerful, and defend the honor. Women, on the other hand, were supposed to be subservient to their men in their lives and do as ever they wished. In Romeo and Juliet the typical gender roles that men and women were supposed to play had an influence on the fate of their lives.
The Elizabethan era was a time that had very strict expectations of what it means to be a man or a woman. However, these expectations are not followed in Macbeth. In Macbeth, Shakespeare investigates and challenges the common gender roles of the time. Through defying the natural gender roles, he shows how people can accomplish their goals. He challenges the stereotypical Elizabethan woman through Lady Macbeth and the Weïrd Sisters, and he investigates how the stereotypes for men are used for manipulation.
The Way of life during the Elizabethan age must be examined in order explain the agency within the concept of masculinity in Macbeth. William Shakespeare uses Macbeth to show the agency that is created for women when men are pushed into proving their own masculinity. In order to fully understand Shakespeare’s portrayal of masculinity in Macbeth we must first examine the stereotypes of the Elizabethan era that effected Shakespeare’s writing. “Defining what a female was supposed to be and do was an act of Renaissance culture, as it has been for other times. For Shakespeare, as well as for most of Renaissance society, women as the feminine represented the following virtues which, importantly, have their meaning in relationship to the male; obedience, silence, sexual chastity, piety, humility, constancy, and patience. However, gender characteristics were socially constructed and there was an easy
Romeo and Juliet has different roles for different genders. During the Shakespearean period, when Shakespeare writes, most women had to marry when they were teen, when they were in adolescence or even before. However, the men who they were marrying were in their early to late twenties. In the household that the women lived in, the men basically owned them. The women always followed men’s word, which says that the male was the dominant gender of the society. Romeo and Juliet reflects this in a number of ways. Juliet was forced to marry Paris, by the word of her father, who said that if she did not marry Paris, she would go to the streets(Shakespeare, 3.5.154-62). Women were thought to be weaker and less important than men in Romeo and Juliet because men are trying to be the strongest out of everyone, women have a lower social status, and men think they owned women in Romeo and Juliet.
The Elizabethan era gender roles were much different than they are today. Women were regarded as the weaker sex, and men were always dominant. These “rules” are shown prominently throughout Romeo and Juliet, and paved way for obstacles they went through in their relationship. The gender conventions for women and men were prodigiously stereotypical and unreasonable, as they made men out to be the superior gender. Women should not have been perceived as inferior to men, and these unwritten rules for masculinity and femininity were shown throughout the play. Romeo acted very feminine which contradicted his gender conventions while Juliet did not abide by rules and disobeyed her parents. Romeo and Juliet had many ways in which they followed and
Shakespeare is debatably the greatest poet and writer of all time. However, that does not mean that these plays adapt to the changing times. In Shakespeare’s, Othello, gender plays a large role in understanding the culture of the time and makes the play out of date, if not used properly. Understanding the gender roles and how they are defined in Shakespeare’s culture, looking at each individual women in the play, and the way Shakespeare should be taught today in order to adapt to the times allows readers a deeper appreciation of Shakespeare’s work. Shakespeare is a wonderful artist and writer. Used properly, students today can learn thousands of lessons and insightful ways to insult one another from the great play writer. “Students have trouble
In Shakespeare's Othello, as in most writings of his time, women are viewed as trophies or objects to capture the attention of men. I do not doubt that these men do love their wives, but the love, respect and admiration for their women is much different that of our time. It seems modern women are much more capable of having what could be known as an "equal opportunity" marriage. In the days of sacred virginity, and honesty of one's word, well off women such as Desdemona were not given responsibility. Women in her position sat back and left the work up to their men and their servants. In due time they were given respect and admiration, and were seen as angels to be loved and cared for, but what does this really matter when one is unable to care for themselves, or have the power to accomplish without being told that someone supposedly more powerful will take care of it for them? I feel that this misogyny and sexism is eternal and even now, our world suffers from it. Many say this has to do with the "times" and the period in which Shakespeare was writing. But still, in these times as many others, there were people even then, that knew that misogyny and sexism were wrong, and must be changed. Unfortunately, it was not a general consensus.
Macbeth rejects conformation to traditional gender roles in its portrayal of Lady Macbeth’s relationship with her husband, her morals and their effect on her actions, and her hunger for power. Her regard for Macbeth is one of low respect and beratement, an uncommon and most likely socially unacceptable attitude for a wife to have towards her spouse at the time. She often ignores morality and acts for the benefit of her husband, and subsequently herself. She is also very power-hungry and lets nothing stand in the way of her success. Lady Macbeth was a character which challenged expectations of women and feminism when it was written in the seventeenth century.
In Hamlet, gender plays a huge role in the assumed capability of people. Queen Gertrude had to remarry instead of rule the kingdom by herself. If she wouldn’t have gotten remarried, it would have been likely that her kingdom would have been usurped by a chauvinist male ruler; who felt that women couldn’t rule a kingdom.
Shakespeare’s tragedies have been assiduously studied by scholars and drama enthusiasts for centuries. A fundamental aspect that adds to the high level of praise that has been bestowed upon his plays is the role of women. Although the primary protagonists in Shakespeare’s plays were men, female characters held dominant supporting roles. For Shakespeare the roles of women served to generally control the actions of the play while the male protagonists were left to be subjected by their wild emotional swings and grandiose displays of love. These dramatic and sometimes conniving exhibits of emotion were often spoken through long soliloquys that further added to the depth of the female character. The roles of women in Shakespeare’s tragedies still prove to be enigmatic even to the most adept scholar; there motives and actions provide necessary rising actions and prove to be essential to the plot. Shakespeare’s shrewd use of assigning the ability to conjure powerful emotions in their male counterparts truly testifies to the high level of complexity and female prowess that characterize the women of Shakespeare’s tragedies.
During the time of Shakespeare, women were regarded as the weaker sex. They were thought not to be as smart or equal to men. Lady Macbeth serves as the main influence in Macbeth’s life (123helpme.com). In the play, Macbeth, Lady Macbeth is a very significant character. She is shown as a very strong and independent woman. Lady Macbeth changes her character dramatically. She changes from a manipulative, deceitful, ambitious woman to a woman who starts to despair and ends up dying because of the guilt she had after murdering King Duncan. Her behaviour leads to the breakdown of Scotland and the death of her and her husband.
Shakespeare makes his audience question traditional gender roles in Macbeth by Lady Macbeth’s character taking on the more dominate manly role in the marriage while Macbeth’s character is portrayed as submissive, therefore portraying the womanly role. Hence, even from the beginning of the play, the Macbeths’ characters reflected the inverse of the societal constructions of gender roles. As the play proceeds, however, in order to keep the balance that Shakespeare strived for in his work, the roles of these characters reversed.
Traditionally, men have been the superior partner in a relationship. Throughout time men have always been the one who is outspoken and dominant in marriages. Shakespeare tends to move away from these traditional gender roles and write woman who are strong and independent. In his play, Macbeth, Shakespeare has Lady Macbeth take on a more dominant, cruel and “manly” role in the marriage while Macbeth submits to his wife’s demands thus giving him a more “womanly” role. Both of these characters go through many role reversals between the two of them and subsequently their greed for power leads them to their downfall.