Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The portrayal of women in shakespeare plays
Gender expectations during the time of Shakespeare
Sexism in shakespeares era
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The portrayal of women in shakespeare plays
But what about the years before women began acting? What about Shakespeare's time? Who played Juliet or Desdemona or Rosalind during "the golden age of English history", the Elizabethan era? This was back when theatre was the highest form of entertainment (bear-baiting being a close second, of course) and people of all backgrounds and status would flock to a tour stop or later, one of many permanent theatres around London. Women, as we know, weren't acting then so who would fill these female roles? The obvious answer for playwrights at the time were boy players. Contrary to present-day theatre, women were only seen on stage in the Elizabethan era as portrayed by young men. Elizabethan theatre, categorized by the reign of Queen Elizabeth …show more content…
When the Elizabethan boy player acted as Viola disguised as Cesario, he would literally just look like himself— a boy performing a male role. What made it so special and "tongue in cheek" was that audiences were able to make the distinction and recognize a boy playing a girl acting like a boy. The male dress allowed these women characters to explore their surroundings freely as well as discover more about themselves, in turn demonstrating to the audience the layers women had; "Disguise makes a woman not a man but a more developed woman (Dusinberre, "Shakespeare and the Nature of Women")". These boys were playing complex women, meaning that women at the time were complex beings and Shakespeare validates that by making his female characters just as strong-willed and intelligent as any of his male heroes. Women were, and still are, interesting people— the only difference is that now we've come such a long way from all-male theatre companies. Now women are actors, directors, writers, stage managers, as they should be! It's just that during Shakespeare's time it wasn't considered proper for them to be on stage. Thankfully, the playwrights (for the most part) were skilled at giving women a voice in the theatre and the Elizabethan boy player, well-trained
William Shakespeare’s writing reflected and at times emphasized the gender oriented stereotypical roles and responsibilities of the English Renaissance. However, many Shakespearean characters including Benedick and Beatrice of Much Ado About Nothing challenged the standard image and characteristics of men and women.
The play Twelfth Night, or What You Will by William Shakespeare is a 1601 comedy that has proven to be the source of experimentation in gender casting in the early twenty-first century due to its portrayal of gender in love and identity. The play centrally revolves around the love triangle between Orsino, Olivia, and Viola. However, Olivia and Orsino both believe Viola is a boy named Cesario. Ironically, only male actors were on the stage in Shakespeare’s time. This means that Olivia, Viola, and other female characters were played by young boys who still had voices at higher pitches than older males.
Richmond, Macrae Hugh. "Women's Roles" Shakespeare's Theatre: A Dictionary Of His Stage Context (2004): 502-504. Literary Reference Center. Web. 31 Mar. 2014.
Throughout Romeo and Juliet, by William Shakespeare, there is an overlaying presence of the typical roles that men and women were supposed to play. During Elizabethan times there was a major difference between the way men and women were supposed to act. Men typically were supposed to be masculine and powerful, and defend the honor. Women, on the other hand, were supposed to be subservient to their men in their lives and do as ever they wished. In Romeo and Juliet the typical gender roles that men and women were supposed to play had an influence on the fate of their lives.
Gender expectations limited personal choice to a great extent during the Elizabethan Era. The Elizabethan Era was the period in which Elizabeth I ruled England from 1558-1603. There was a strong view on women should be the property of men and must obey them. William Shakespeare influenced this time period massively and incorporated the different gender roles and expectations into his plays. Personal is defined as something concerning one's private life, relationships, and emotions rather than one's career or public life. Choice is defined as an act of choosing between two or more possibilities. Therefore personal choice can be seen as how someone chooses to life their personal life; whether that be the relationships formed or lifestyle. Women were greatly disadvantaged as they had little legal rights and had no choice in lifestyle. The main clashing differences between men and women during the Elizabethan Era were: legal status and marriage. These differences between men and women limited women to a great extent which in turn resulted in a lack of personal choice for women; in contrast men could choose how to live their life freely.
The way the men acted and treated the women in the play was an over exaggeration of how things actually were back then, and this contributed to the comedic aspect of the play. In a way, Shakespeare seemed like he was trying to get a point across to the audience, to let them know how absurd sexism really is, and how easy things would be if it were to not
In the play ‘Romeo & Juliet’, Shakespeare uses feminism and masculinity. This is just one way he shows gender roles throughout the play. However, Shakespeare doesn't necessarily follow the Elizabethan life that women followed in Elizabethan England time period. Women in the Elizabethan Time period had to follow certain rules:
names - ""and I'll no longer be a Capulet" - to be together. Giving up
Queen Elizabeth I, also known as the “Iron Queen”, was a remarkable woman of her time, she ruled with great power and longevity. She was one of the greatest feminist of time. Coming to the throne in 1558, she took the place of her father, Henry VIII. She was given one of the most difficult jobs fit for a man or King, ruling England. At the time women were second class citizens, they could not vote nor own properties and such. Surprising England with her intelligence and fierce rulings, she changed herself to make better decisions. She proved through her rulings, to everyone that females were strong and could rule just as well as a king. She refused to marry, giving a feeling of “I don’t need a man for anything.” The Queen was responsible for giving females a voice in literature and it is shown through Shakespeare’s writings.
In the Middle Ages, books, and verbal stories, were typically didactic in some way whether religious or secular. These sources give modern readers and historians’ insight into gender roles and ideals in the Middle Ages. The Book of the City of Ladies and The Poem of El Cid both informed the medieval readers of the preferred behavior for the sexes via references and archetypes. Christine de Pizan instructed women to be pious, good daughters and wives, and to behave like the saints would; while The Poem of El Cid directed men towards being brave conquerors, loyal vassals, but still pious men.
These women are sexualized, audacious, respectful, and flirtatious. Women in the Elizabethan society were considered the weaker sex and in need of always being protected. Women, however, were allowed many freedoms in Shakespeare writings. The thinking from both plays was that women were not above men but more like sex objects and a necessary part of society. Women have evolved into so much more, however, I would like to think this is from the open-mindedness of how Shakespeare saw each woman.
“Gender hardly determines the nature of a character, in the plays of Shakespeare. It is for this very reason, that his plays are read, viewed and enjoyed by both the sexes equally, even after five hundred years of their composition” (Singh). Gender is not something that defines what a character is going to be like in Shakespeare’s plays. This quote illuminates that in Shakespeare’s writings females and males were on equal level playing fields when it came to their traits. Females during the time period were considered inferior to men.
Riverside Shakespeare, 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1997. 366-398. Neely, Carol Thomas. “Shakespeare’s Women: Historical Facts and Dramatic Representations.”
During the times in which Shakespeare lived, women had certain roles which ensured they were a permanent underclass to men. In Women in Shakespeare’s world by Theresa D. Kemp, Kemp states that “The roles of early modern women included daughters and wives, sisters and mothers; they learned and worked and played but for the most part they were not expected to be school girls (whining or otherwise) As women they were expected to be the slightly beautiful beloved and not the balladeer. Women were not seen as fit to play soldier or the judge. And as keepers of the homes and the households, as in our own time, women withdrawn from a “world too wide” ( 29). This quote from Kemp shows how victorian women were seen a just a pretty face to do as told. They were to be obedient and non opinionated. A woman of that time period was very objectified and used, basically women weren't real people.
... Critical Interpretations, ed. Harold Bloom (New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1987) 43. For further discussion on renaissance gender performance and identity politics among Shakespeare's cross-dressed heroines, see Michael Shapiro's Gender in Play on the Shakespearean Stage: Boy Heroines and Female Pages (Ann Arbor: The University of MIchigan Press, 1994).