Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of women in shakespeare play
The development of the character of Lear
Influence of the modern era Shakespeare
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of women in shakespeare play
The Sonnets and Cymbeline portray different gender relations: dramatically through the narrative, characterisation and theatricality of Cymbeline and through the poetic structure and language of the Sonnets. The relationships between male characters in Cymbeline can be measured against the two female characters in play and considered within the bounds of gender characteristics alongside patriarchal and societal expectations of gender roles. The effects of Innogen’s disguise as Fidele does not introduce romantic confusion or comedic relief to the plot but appears to operate on a psychological level in order to drive the plot to its misogynistic conclusion. The interaction between characters and the resolutions achieved in Cymbeline supports the proposition that the most important relationships are those between men. The early sonnets, which are considered to address a young man and those from Sonnet 127 onwards the dark lady, illustrate relationships directly between the poet’s voice and the character, whilst no name characters or narrative exist across the sonnets. The language of the sonnets illuminate relationships amidst the theme of longevity and procreation in order to present the emotional and physical nature of relationships and does not imply an importance over relationships between men. Therefore, the Sonnets cannot be considered to support the proposition. Sonnet 1, introduces the predominant themes which run through the sequence of sonnets: the phrase ‘we desire increase’ (Sonnet 1, line 1, Norton 2nd eds, pp. 1946) suggests procreation and immediately the theme of immortality arises where we ‘might never die’ (Sonnet 1, line 2, Norton 2nd eds, pp. 1946). The poet is suggesting that the alleged youth, to wh... ... middle of paper ... ...re portrayed with more emotional involvement and positive language than those directed to the dark lady. However, in terms of indicating whether male relationships are more important they are inconclusive; the gender of the poet’s or reader’s voice, place the relationships within different sexual orientation. Cymbeline is a play dominated with male characters and set against familial discord and political issues, address gender stereotypes through the relationships in the play. Cymbeline, in performance can visually explore the relationships between characters and how resolutions and social order can be reinstated, notably with Innogen being placed in a more subservient and compliant role having been reduced in status through her disguise and the natural male heir aligned to the throne, thus endorsing the proposition that male relationships are more important.
In the opening of both the play and the novel we are introduced to the two main female characters which we see throughout both texts. The authors’ styles of writing effectively compare and contrast with one another, which enables the reader to see a distinct difference in characters, showing the constrictions that society has placed upon them.
“Remember we are women, we’re not born to contend with men” (Sophocles, 18). The popular literary works, Antigone and A Doll’s House, written by Sophocles and Ibsen, are two famous tragedies that have been performed and read throughout the decades. Although countless audiences have been entertained by these well written plays, few would care to guess that many lessons and several unfortunate truths can be found with a less than tedious inspection of the characters and the reactions they give to their circumstances. The two main characters in these stories, Antigone and Nora, face adversities and problems that are amplified by their society’s views on the rights and abilities of women. The two main male characters in these plays, Creon and Helmer, cause the greater part of the struggle that the female protagonists face. The difficulties that Helmer and Creon create during the plot of these stories are the cause of three major characteristics of what one would consider typical to a headstrong man in a leadership position. The three features of Creon and Helmer that lead to the eventual downfall of Antigone and Nora, are pride, arrogance, and ignorance.
Many readers feel the tendency to compare Aphra Behn's Oroonoko to William Shakespeare's Othello. Indeed they have many features in common, such as wives executed by husbands, conflicts between white and black characters, deceived heroes, the absolute vulnerability of women, etc. Both works stage male characters at both ends of their conflicts. In Othello, the tragic hero is Othello, and the villain is Iago. In Oroonoko, the hero is Oroonoko, the vice of the first part is the old king, and the second part white men in the colony. In contrast to their husbands, both heroines—Desdemona and Imoinda—seem more like "function characters" who are merely trapped in their husband's fates, occasionally becoming some motivation of their husbands (like Desdemona is Othello's motivation to rage, Imoinda's pregnancy drives Oroonoko restless to escape). While Shakespeare and Behn put much effort in moulding them, to many readers they are merely "perfect wives". This paper aims to argue that, Desdemona and Imoinda's perfect wifehood may be the product of compliance to male-dominated societies, where women are
First, no matter what is represented on stage, the fact that boys are actually playing cross dressing men and women is insistently metaphorical; the literal fact of trans-vestism (that is, the boy actor impersonating either a woman, a woman cross dressed as a man, or a man cross dressed as a woman, not the represented character) is divided between the homoerotic and the blurring of gender. On the other hand, the represented female character who cross dresses functions literally to relieve the boy actor, at least for a time, from impersonating a woman. Represented characters who cross dress may pre-sent a variety of poses, from the misogynist mockery of the feminine to the adroitly and openly homoerotic. In the case of the title character of Jonson's Epicoene, the motif is utilized as disguise intended to effect a surprise ending for Morose and his heterosexual audience, for whom the poet also pr...
Janet Adelman’s work considers Shakespeare’s plays as a progression of maternal presence or absence, where each play can be considered as a repeated cycle of “doing and un doing”, written in response to the play before it. In the case of “The Winter’s Tale” Adelman infers that the drama’s initial focus on the results of distrusting women, as resembled by Leontes’ uncontrollable jealousy is a response to Shakespeare’s previous work Cymbeline, where male authority is recovered by distrusting women. Thus, by refuting the outcome of the previous play, Adelman shows that Shakespeare takes an alternate perspective with the role of the female in The Winter’s Tale.
In a chapter entitled “When Is a Character Not a Character?” Alan Sinfield presents the argument that the female figures in Shakespeare’s plays are not really “characters” at all, since they do not possess continuous and psychologically consistent interior lives. Although such roles as that of Desdemona, Olivia, and Lady Macbeth are written so as to suggest the presence of uninterrupted interior consciousness, this impression collapses under the pressure of the plot’s movement toward closure, which reveals the figures to represent nothing more than a “disjointed sequence of positions that women are conventionally supposed to occupy”(53). In order to preserve a textual organization that sustains a particular gender hierarchy, female characters abruptly shift from one stereotypical version of femininity to another without coherent linkages between them. For instance, despite their volubility throughout the early acts, at the conclusions of the plays, as Sinfield notes, Shakespeare’s women often “fall silent at moments when their speech could only undermine the play’s attempt at ideological coherence” (73). Thus, “the point at which the text falls silent is the point at which its ideological project is disclosed” (74). One of the most prominent of such silences appears at the end of Measure for Measure, where Isabella, “the bold woman silenced most spectacularly when marriage is proposed” (74), fails to react verbally to the Duke’s two offers of wedlock. According to Sinfield, this lack of response occurs because Isabella is suspended between two conventional female roles, and the disjunction between them makes manifest the agenda of the text’...
It seems that only Queen Elizabeth, shrewd and headstrong, could provide a female presence strong enough to counter certain aspects of a male-dominated Renaissance culture. The Elizabethan sonnet provides a paradoxical example of woman's inferior status. Although she has all the idealized virtues--"meekness, constancy, beauty, and, of course, chastity" (155), the sonnet itself functions as a measure of "masculine vitality" (156). It is the male who eme...
Many literary critics have presented theories on the meaning of William Shakespeare's Hamlet, ranging from claims of Oedipal Complexes to insinuations of homosexuality. Though most such interpretations can be considered true at some level, there seems to be some basic theme - some driving force - that underlies all other interpretations. While most criticisms focus on individual characters, a more insightful criticism of the true nature of Hamlet can be drawn simply by analyzing the key relationships in play. These relationships - especially those dealing with women or issues of femininity - allow a level of interpretation that examines not merely the events of the play, but the true underlying significance of gender both to Shakespeare and to the characters he presents. In order to interpret the significance of the feminine within the relationships in the play, one must first understand precisely the nature of feminine.
Much Ado About Nothing is traditionally known as a comedy, but gender is an obvious theme in this play. To me this play challenges the gender inequality of this time period through its main female roles. Beatrice is a challenge to the traditional woman of the Elizabethan era, who is represented by Hero. Beatrice is seen as a sharp, outspoken, independent woman, while Hero is a quiet, polite and obedient woman. The stark differences between these characters shines a light onto the gender inequality of Shakespeare time. This paper will argue that Beatrice and her cousin Hero are used to show the gender inequality of the the Elizabethan era.
These unequal concepts are crucial factors that ultimately lead these characters to alter their standardized gender role, and commit heinous actions that are perceived to be against their morality. Shakespeare implements the notion of gender role’s discrepancy, prevalent in his period of time, through his characters to perpetuate and empower their social status and power.
Traditional Petrarchan sonnets were conservative, standard, and led by a male voice. Wroth incorporated the Petrarchan sonnet in her works; however, she reversed the gender roles of the characters. In the opening sequence of Pamphilia to Amphilanthus, Wroth asked the reader if one will do “what he lists?” She replied with saying, “no I flye” (qtd. in Hagerman). Wroth’s use of “he” and “I” clearly identified herself as a female author. Wroth’s feminism is also present in an imitation of the Petrarchan sonnet “My Ship Passes” in Pamphilia to Amphilanthus. Wroth changed the voice of the speaker from “a ship” to “my paine”. The “ship” referred to an unknown woman while “my paine” clearly established the speaker as a female voice (qtd. in Fienburg). Wroth’s change in the speaker and the point of view in Pamphilia to Amphilanthus altered the traditional male role in the Petrarchan sonnet
In sonnets 1 and 32, EBB demonstrates that the idea of the female perspective can be liberated by undermining the stereotypes relating to poetry. Alternatively, in the Great Gatsby, F. Scott. Fitzgerald provides an alternative view to women's liberty, by creating the illusion of women’s liberty. In Sonnet 1, EBB begins her use of expression using sonnets, representing a large shift in the typical gender of renowned sonneteers. Since Sonnets had typically been stereotyped as a form of male expressionism and perspective, the Sonnets of the Portuguese spoke strongly against this stereotype, by specifically standing for the female point of view.
Angela Carter’s attitude towards her work has always been one with intrinsic feminism at its roots. Carter’s feminist attitude within her novel Wise Children has given the reader a much more realistic and intuitive approach to Shakespeare. Carter conveys ideas of feminism through matriarchy and the power of womanhood, or rather new family structures of an acceptance of an absentee father. In some aspects, her work is an invitation to criticisms towards Shakespeare’s lack of matriarchal concentration and sometimes all together absentation, and realistic approaches towards female characters. However, in other aspects it appears to be more of a praise towards him, meticulously alluding to countless amounts of Shakespeare’s works. Angela Carter uses Wise Children as her invitation for her own feminist criticism as well as paying homage by tempting the reader into comparing herself and Shakespeare, to hold them in the same high regard.
For most of the book the boy feels that he can not achieve his goal of discovering his personal legend. “Sonnet XXIX” reveals a different mood through the use of irony. A portion of the poem depicts a sense of loneliness, although towards the end of the poem the mood changes to a more content and ironic tone. We desire the things that we think may make us content, when there is always something of ours someone else yearns for. The first part of the poem shows the speaker's loneliness and depression.
Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra is aptly named, not just because the play centers around these two characters, but also because it encompasses the play’s fixation on the lovers’ oppositional relationship. On the surface level, Antony embodies the Roman ideals of a good, noble man, while Cleopatra represents the hyper-sexualized, dangerous Eastern woman. However, upon further examination both Antony and Cleopatra display complicated internal conflicts that effectively reverse these polar positions repeatedly throughout the play. In this way, the opposition between Antony and Cleopatra that exists on a simple, interpersonal level is echoed by more complicated, internal conflicts within each of these characters on a deeper, more individual level. The tension between the title characters creates the love that draws them together at the same time as it drives them further apart, thus establishing yet another layer of antagonistic relationships within the play. The importance of these oppositional relationships is underlined most starkly in Act II.2. In particular Enobarbus’ speech describing Cleopatra’s beauty functions as one of the greatest statements of the play’s conflicting themes. This speech reflects the antagonistic nature of the play’s central relationships through the invocation of equivalent antagonistic relationships between the violent descriptors used to depict Cleopatra.