Test Two – Gawain, the Miller, and the Wife Short answer questions: 1. Nicholas did not actually have a job, his time was spent wooing Alisoun and studying astrology. Since Nicholas did not work, he lived off the charity of friends. John and Alisoun let him live with them. 2. Nicholas’s told John that God was going to cause another flood, however, John, Alisoun and Nicholas would be spared, they just had to spend the night sleeping in separate troughs suspended from the rafters. After John had fallen asleep, Alisoun and Nicholas were able to sneak out of their troughs and spend the night together. 3. “The Wife if Bath’s Tale” is ultimately about power, specifically women wanting to have power over men, especially their husbands. Being the …show more content…
queen, Guinevere is presumably the most powerful woman in the land, yet even she has to beg her husband to allow her to pass judgment on the knight and then thanks him profusely for granting her request. 4. A man that marries an ugly woman would not have to worry about cuckoldry. She will be faithful, humble and please him all his life, where as an attractive woman might have gentlemen callers. 5. The Green Knight had used his wife to test Sir Gawain’s character, loyalty and trustworthiness. He found Gawain to be the most faultless of men, failing only in loyalty. His failure being he loved his own life. The Green Knight blamed him less for that sort of failure. Essay questions: 1.
As a whole, “The Canterbury Tales” could be viewed as Chaucer’s commentary on society. Many of stories focus on the church and on people’s relationships or interactions. At the time, the church was the major focus of the community, the place where most socializing happened, so this focus is only natural. “The Miller’s Tale” uses four types of people to illustrate how society interacts. The first type of character is the miller, John, who represents the wealthy class, but not a nobleman. Right away he is introduced as “a riche gnof that gestes heeld to boorde” (The Miller’s Tale 80). This means he is an irritable old man. Chaucer sees this type of person, possibly the leading edge of the middle class, as a thoroughly unpleasant fellow to be around. He also calls John rich, but then says he takes on boarders in the same line. The appearance is that Chaucer views this character as attached to money. Later, he describes John as being such a control freak, out of fear of his wife cheating on him, that John all but has her locked up in a cage (The Miller’s Tale 116). Chaucer views the wealthy class as being …show more content…
materialistic. When reading the description of John’s wife, Alisoun, one can nearly forgive him for being so concerned with other men wanting her. Her body is delicate and small, immaculately dressed. She takes care in her appearance and has a glow about her (The Miller’s Tale 126). She is also described as having a promiscuous eye and being a doll or wench (The Miller’s Tale 136). Wench could mean a young girl or it could mean a lewd girl. Given the overall context of the story, the latter seems more likely. Between Alisoun’s looks, her affair with Nicholas and her toying with Absolon, Chaucer seems to have the opinion that wives, the second type of person, are not to be trusted. The next leg of this love triangle is Nicholas. As a student and scholar, he represents educated people. Nicholas spends most of his time wooing Alisoun. When not doing that he seems to sing, play music and maybe, on occasion, study. Little time is left for working, so he lives off “his freendes finding and his rente” (The Miller’s Tale 112). In addition to being a seducer of married women, he is also a mooch. Later, when Nicholas tells John the whale’s tale of a flood coming, he reveals another side of himself (The Miller’s Tale 405). Nicholas is an arrogant liar. The lie is obvious, however, the arrogance comes with the audacity of the lie. Even if John did not know the Bible story well enough to know God had promised to never flood the world again, Nicholas is still banking on John not being capable of seeing that a flood had not happened. Chaucer’s opinion of the educated type seems to be the lowest so far. The final type of character is the churchman, portrayed through Absolon. Absolon’s appearance reads very similarly to Alisoun’s, he is exquisitely dressed and impeccably groomed. Chaucer depicts him as being a little up tight, “…he was somdell squaimous / of farting, and of speeche daungerous” (The Miller’s Tale 229). Absolon seems to think he has a literal right to openly pursue whatever he wants, even another man’s wife. This carpenter awook and herde him singe, And spak unto his wif, and saide anoon, “What Alisonm heerestou nought Absolon That chaunteth thus under oure bowres wal?
(The Miller’s Tale 256) This section shows John waking up to Absolon playing music and singing outside their bedroom window in an attempt to seduce Alisoun. How frequently and publicly he tries to impress her shows he has little concern for John discovering his actions. As a churchman, one would expect Absolon to have higher morals, and, perhaps even be committed to a life of celibacy. However, Chaucer shows he thinks the church is full of prideful hypocrites with this portrayal. 2. At the core, “Sir Gawain and the Green Knight” is a story about chivalry. Chivalry could be defined as a moral or social code according to which a medieval knight was supposed to live his life. The entire point of the Green Knight’s challenge was to create a scenario in which to test the legendary chivalry of Arthur’s court. King Arthur’s court was renowned for how chivalrous the knights were. So well known are they, that when Sir Gawain rides into the unfamiliar castle, men are thrilled to meet such a prestigious knight. All the men of the manor were of the same mind, being happy to appear promptly in his presence, this person famed for prowess and
purity, whose noble skills were sung to the skies, and whose life was the stuff of legend and lore. Then knight spoke softly to knight, saying “Watch now, we’ll witness his graceful ways, hear the faultless phrasing of flawless speech . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . We few shall learn a lesson here in tact and manner true… (Sir Gawain and the Green Knight 910-917, 923-925) In this portion, the Gawain author provides an outline of chivalry. Gawain is not only a skilled warrior, but he is also a moral man with grace and courtesy. He is as skilled with his words as he is with his sword. Lesser knights are eager for the chance to learn from him. Chivalry is not just a passing fancy for Gawain. The shield he carries, as well as his shawl, is adorned with a pentangle, which is a symbol that “…is taken to this day as a token of fidelity…” (Sir Gawain and the Green Knight 626). These items are a deliberate choice to wear; Gawain strives to hold himself to the highest of standards. It is with that sort of character in mind that one must consider why Gawain never gave into the advances of the lord’s wife. Beautiful as she may have been, his morality would have abhorred adultery. Loyal as he was, he could not betray his host, who had trusted Gawain to remain the castle in his absence. However, there is another possibility, Gawain and the lord made a pact. “Here’s a wager: what I win in the woods will be yours / and what you gain while I’m gone you will give to me” (Sir Gawain and the Green Knight 1106). Gawain only ever granted the lady a kiss and since he had to pass that winning on to the lord, perhaps his comeliest kiss was the furthest his appetites could go with another man. Given the rest of his character, he deserves the benefit of the doubt on his motivations being loyalty, courtesy and morality, or in short, chivalry.
In Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, Gawain shows qualities of a chivalrous knight. He demonstrates that by showing generosity, courtesy, and loyalty during his travels. A mysterious knight shows up at the king’s castle and calls himself the Green Knight. The Green Knight then challenges one to play a game which he challenges the king to strike him with his axe if he will take a return hit in a year and a day. Sir Gawain steps forward to accept the challenge for his uncle King Arthur when nobody else in the castle would. He took the King’s role in the game to protect him from the Green Knight. He must learn to accept his responsibility as a knight, in accepting his fate.He demonstrates goodness at the hand of the Green Knight. He shows courage by accepting what is to come upon him during his voyage. His journey to find the Green Knight is filled with temptations.In the conversation with him and the “Lady”, Sir Gawain showed a Chivalrous code by keeping his loyalty to the king by not kissing his wife. The lady states “if I should exchange at my cho...
The Merchant's revealed nature, however, combats the very destruction of creation and individual that he tried to attain. As the Merchant tries to subsume the reality of marriage, love, and relationship under his own enviously blind view, Chaucer shows us another individual, significant and important in his own way. Instead of acting as a totalizing discourse, Chaucer uses the Merchant's tale to reveal his depraved envy and to reveal him as no more than a wanton cynic. Thus, Chaucer provides the very perspective that the Merchant tries to steal from his audience.
Dissimilar to King Arthur’s opulent and boyish description, the Green Knight appears earthly, like an overgrown lumberjack in a debutante ball. His very entrance to the narrative aims to shatter Camelot’s superficial relationship with earthly trials. While Arthur seeks pleasure in hearing tales “of some fair feat” (92), the Green Knight undermines all formality known to be chivalrous challenging the king to a life risking game. With a “broad neck to buttocks” (137), (opposed to Arthur’s’ court depicted in the ever regal color red,) the Knight is clothed in green, the color of nature. He appears with no armor other then his faith, merely a utilitarian woodsman’s ax. While Green Knight is described like an animal who is said to have “wagged his beard” (306) yet understands the cyclical nature of life and truth of mans futility, it is only after Sir Gawain proclaims his lack of strength (though he says it at that point as a matter of chivalry) that he is able to ...
Nicholas is credited with devising the plan to fool the carpenter so he and Alisoun can be together; however, what sets off the chain of events in the latter part of the story is Alisoun’s trick on Absolon. When Absolon comes to court Alison, she says she will give him a kiss, but then, “And at the windowe out she putte hir hole, / And Absolon, him fil no bet ne wers, / But with his mouth he kiste hir naked ers, / Ful savourly, er he were war of this” (624). This spectacularly crude action goes beyond all rules of social propriety and demonstrates her desire to not be typecast as a traditional woman. Moreover, it illustrates her ability to reject a suitor. Unlike the Wife of Bath, who accepts multiple suitors, Alisoun has a very clear idea of who she does and does not want to be with. Additionally, her choice between Nicholas and Absolon also demonstrates her ability to break away from traditional social expectations. When the Miller describes Nicholas, he states, “This clek was cleped hende Nicholas. / Of derne love he coude, and of solas, / And thereto he was sly and ful of privee” (91-112). He is a cunning and sly astrology student, while on the other hand, Absolon is a parish clerk and belongs to the institution of the Church. Nicholas’ rebellious and Absolon’s traditional
In Gordon M. Shedd’s “Knight in Tarnished Armour: The Meaning of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight”, he argues that Sir Gawain and the Green Knight is truly about the strength and weaknesses of human nature. One particularly interesting part of his argument asserts that Gawain’s humanity broke medieval romance tradition.
...irony, the corruption he believes can be found in the Church, pointing at its common tendency in this time to take advantage of the people through its power. He also shows through the Pardoner that perhaps immoral people cannot guide people to morality, through subtle lines such as “For though myself be a ful vicious man,/ A moral tale yit I you telle can” (GP 171-172). Through Chaucer’s portrayal of the Pardoner in this tale, the audience is able to see that the Pardoner is a self-absorbed, greedy man that mirrors what the author thinks of the Church, and that the Pardoner is the exact opposite of what he preaches, which also points towards the supposed corruption of the Church. The irony found throughout this work serves the important purpose of bringing attention to the dishonesty and fraud Chaucer believes can be found in the Roman Catholic Church at this time.
The story of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight revolves around the knights and their chivalry as well as their romance through courtly love. The era in which this story takes place is male-dominated, where the men are supposed to be brave and honorable. On the other hand, the knight is also to court a lady and to follow her commands. Sir Gawain comes to conflict when he finds himself needing to balance the two by being honorable to chivalry as well as respectful to courtly love.
In The Canterbury Tales, written by Geoffrey Chaucer, the stereotypes and roles in society are reexamined and made new through the characters in the book. Chaucer discusses different stereotypes and separates his characters from the social norm by giving them highly ironic and/or unusual characteristics. Specifically, in the stories of The Wife of Bath and The Miller’s Tale, Chaucer examines stereotypes of women and men and attempts to define their basic wants and needs.
The structure Geoffrey Chaucer chose for his masterpiece, The Canterbury Tales, of utilizing a melange of narrative voices to tell separate tales allows him to explore and comment on subjects in a multitude of ways. Because of this structure of separate tales, the reader must regard as extremely significant when tales structurally overlap, for while the reader may find it difficult to render an accurate interpretation through one tale, comparing tales enables him to lessen the ambiguity of Chaucer’s meaning. The Clerk’s Tale and The Merchant’s Tale both take on the institution of marriage, but comment on it in entirely different manner, but both contain an indictment of patriarchal narcissism and conceit.
The characters of Chaucer's Canterbury Tales are very memorable. Chaucer's prologue introduces several characters. The Pardoner, Miller, and Wife of Bath stand out from the crowd. These characters are all unique in their own way. Chaucer describes the characters in full detail. The physical description he gives for each character actually foreshadows their attitudes, status, and personalities. The characters of The Canterbury Tales are very memorable because their character types can are universal. People like the disgusting miller or deceptive pardoner are still seen to this day. Having married a total of five times, The Wife of Bath is a perfect example of modern day celebrities. The tales each individual character tells reflects their personal views of their current society. The Wife of Bath voices her full opinions in her tale, while the Miller tells his story in extreme detail.
In this example, Chaucer, by writing this parody, is trying to express the idea that a lot of the ideals of chivalry are a ...
Sir Gawain and the Green Knight fit in with the concept of a romance; it has all the elements that would make one consider the text as so. The tale holds adventure, magic, a quest and an unexpected reality check that even those who are considered “perfect” are also just humans. The author used this story as a way of revealing faults in some of the aspects of knighthood through the use of intertwining chivalric duty with natural human acts; thus showing to be perfectly chivalrous would be inhuman.
Sir Gawain and The Green Knight has prompted scholars to examine and diversely interpret the medieval narrative. One of the underlying questions that has been proposed embodies the analysis of the relationship between Christian and Pagan ideals and how knightly chivalry is influenced by religion during the Arthurian Romance period. It is no mistake that the two varied religious ideals are intertwined throughout the poem due to the nature of classical antiquity. Amidst the overlap between superstitious rituals and Orthodox- Christian beliefs it is clear that Sir Gawain has a sense of personal integrity guided by a moral compass.
In his attempt to surpass the Knight, the Miller sacrifices decorum for the sake of entertainment, reflecting his bawdy nature. When first traveling with the Miller, Chaucer listened to the Miller bellow “his ballads and jokes of harlotries” (1712). Scandalous topics appear throughout the Miller’s tale of a young girl “so graceful and so slim” named Alison who cheats on her husband, John, with his student, Nicholas (1720). When “handy Nicholas” first encounters Alison, he “[catches] her between the legs” and woos her, and they devise a plan to sleep with each other secretly (1721). This lecherous scheme fuels the entire plot of the tale. However, the parish clerk Absolom with his “gray eyes” and “nightingale” nature, typical attributes of lusty men, attempts to win Alison’s heart (1722, 1723). Although Absolom utilizes every method to win Alison’s heart even chewing “licorice and cardamom,” he ends up kissing her “bare bum” whereas Nicholas sleeps with her (1729, 1730). Chaucer’s initial encounter with the drunken Mi...
The Canterbury Tales is a great contemplation of stories, that display humorous and ironic examples of medieval life, which imitate moral and ethical problems in history and even those presented today. Chaucer owed a great deal to the authors who produced these works before his time. Chaucer tweaked their materials, gave them new meanings and revealed unscathed truths, thus providing fresh ideas to his readers. Chaucer's main goal for these tales was to create settings in which people can relate, to portray lessons and the irony of human existence.