Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How does nature and nurture influence human behavior
Are we more impacted by nature or nurture
How does nature and nurture influence human behavior
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How does nature and nurture influence human behavior
In a life like ours where decisions and actions define who we are as a person; can those actions affect other people that are in our life. From gang violence, death of family member, drugs and alcohol, and abuse; these are all examples of conflicts that happen in daily life that affect the person next to you. Gang violence is responsible for approximately sixteen percent of all homicides in the US and twenty-five percent in cities with a population over 100,000.Gun violence has contributed to over 11,000 deaths in just a year. Events like this contribute to kids losing family members and relatives affecting their mental state at a young age and their maturity level. Some of these kids end up in prison where currently over 2 million occupants …show more content…
reside. The reasons that can contribute to these factors are the argument of “Nature vs. Nurture” including what morals and messages they are taught at a young age, their role models or parents adding to the help they can receive and the way they treated in life. One factor that could`ve contributed to two completely different fates of the Wes Moores` is “Nature vs.
Nurture,” the mentality that is built in them. The argument of “Nature vs. Nurture” is whether you were born with a that certain mentality or you were taught to have that certain mentality. This influences the way your life turns out whether you were born with something inside or taught to act a certain a way. “I was taught to remember, but never question, Wes was to taught to forget, and never ask why.”(Moore, 4) This quote shows the different ideas they were taught at a young age and the drastic difference between the two. Scholar Wes Moore was taught more to trust the decisions made, and the imprisoned Wes Moore was taught to just forget about it. “Rule number one: If someone disrespects you, you send a message so fierce that they won't have the chance to do it again. It was Murphy homes law and Wes took it to heart.”(Moore, 33) This ideology was ingrained into Wes`s mind which will lead into the violent actions he performs throughout his life including almost stabbing a kid and shooting a person. The Scholar Wes never had this kind of influence because he didn't have brother or a family member in such a situation that would give him such ideas. This is where Nurture argument starts to become stronger because what they are taught will differ in the way they make out messages and
situations. Another factor that contributes to two completely different fates of the Wes Moores` is their parents, relatives, and role models in life. There are kids in the US with a single parent whether it's because of death or imprisonment. When the man in the family is gone, then the boy now becomes the man and doesn't learn all the aspects through his own father possibly causing confusion one`s life. For this situation, your father being in jail or dead can be two different reactions as shown by the imprisoned Wes Moore. To scholar Wes, “Your father wasn't there because he couldn't be, my father wasn't there because he chose not to be.” The imprisoned Wes is not upset about his father`s absence because he lost a liking for him since his father did not want to be a part of the family. Scholar Wes Moore is upset because his father didn't really have choice of leaving because he died of health complication.
The Nurture vs. Nature has been a long standing debate amongst psychologists. This psychological controversy questions whether or not the environment has more or less to do with the outcome of a child’s psychological development than the genetics involved. The nurture side of the argument is highly illustrated by the memoir The Other Wes Moore, by Wes Moore, due to the fact that both of their lives although starting off similar, ended dramatically different.
The nurture argument is based on how a person was raised and nature is the argument
Over the past 60 years there has been a recent phenomenon in the development and rise of gangs and gang violence. This is exceptionally apparent in South Central Los Angeles where the Bloods and the Crips have taken control of the social structure and created a new type of counter culture. Poverty in this area is an enormous problem caused by a shear lack of jobs; but just because there is a lack of jobs doesn’t mean that there will be a lack of bills to pay, so sometimes selling drugs in order to keep a roof over your head seems like the most logical option. Crime often times flourishes in these regions because the inconvenient truth is; crime pays. Senator Tom Hayden stated “It’s been defined as a crime problem and a gang problem but it’s really an issue of no work and dysfunctional schools.” this statement is in fact true, but with an exception it is a more broad issue than just involving school, and lack of jobs but goes beyond into social structure as a whole and more specifically the judicial system, this can all be supported by three sociologists Chambliss, Anderson, and Durkheim.
The nature versus nurture theory is a way to distinguish whether certain traits or characteristics of individuals are impacted more by biological means or environmental means. What the “nature” part signifies in the the theory is that we are more impacted by heredity and biological effects of our personality and what defines us as a person. What “nurture” signifies is that environmental factors have a more powerful impact on our lives and personality. As we mostly know, most things aren’t black and white, and so it’s hard ro determine which type of factors is more effective. Most people believe that it’s a blend of both nature and nurture that makes us who we are.
Nature verses Nurture is a concept that Childhood Psychologists have been studying since Piaget. This theory goes back and forth between the idea that human begins are born to be a certain way, or that their environment molds them into the person they are( Santrock 14). In The Glass Castle there are four children, all who grow up in the same home environment with the same family. Yet, the Walls children all end up being entirely different people. Their personal successes of all the child varied. Their future relationships were entirely different, and all in all they are extraordinarily opposite to one another. Though we only have some information on their lives it is clear to see that though they
Nature and nurture are no longer a debate; we see the two working together in concert to produce a genuine expression of the individual. The personalities and habits humans acquire in their lives is as much a biological evolution as it is a social or cultural acclimatization. While some people still have the argument that it is nature or it is nurture many people have come to the realization that is has to be both. Both nature and nurture developed who we are and what we become. So the question would remain which one influences us more on if we become a criminal. In that it is meant people that live outside the acceptable social norms of that society that may involve punishment or rehabilitation. The impression that people become criminals due to their inheritable factor has not been a popular idea amongst criminologist and has incited anger amongst a lot of them. There have been amazing findings in the fields of genetics that have encouraged a biological evaluation in other social sciences. This has also steered to the appearance of a criminology sub-field called Biocriminology.
Measures of prevention or intervention that can be taken include creating early prevention programs, collaboration between the school, police, and parents, and policy measures. Programs that focus on increasing positive interactions with peers and encourage self esteem can help deter a child from a lifestyle susceptible to gang recruiting later in life (Simon, Ritter, and Mahendra, 2013). Such programs are vital in the school environment, where a youth spends most of his/her day. Schools must take note of the common signs of a youth with a high risk of becoming a gang member, for instance, poor grades and performance, and social rejection in the form of being bullied or being the bully. Moreover, schools should offer programs that raise awareness
I believe that people are a byproduct of both their inherited and inborn characteristics, as well as their environment. The nature versus nurture debate has long been a hot debate in the psychology world with evidence supporting both sides of the argument. It is hard to determine whether nature or nurture has more of an influence on our behaviors. For instance, you have a child who is a bully in a classroom. The question is then raised, is this child a bully because his genetic makeup created him to be more aggressive and less empathetic? Or is this child a bully because his home life fosters and rewards him for being aggressive? Or is his home life one where the parents are negligent and aggressive towards the child? If all of the above scenarios were true, then it would be relatively easy to state that the child’s bullying behavior is a byproduct of both his nature and his nurturing. Now let’s look at a professional athlete. Some say a person is born with the skill, hence the phrase natural born athlete. Now a child could be born with the innate aptitude to be an all-star athlete, however, no skill can succeed without practice. Therefore, that would bring to reason that a child could not have any skill to begin with, but with practice they become an all-star athlete. Both of these examples (the bully and the athlete) portray the interconnected and complex ideal of nature versus nurture, with neither providing substantial evidence that
= Gang Violence in California The City of Los Angeles is the “gang capital” of the nation. There are more than 450 active gangs in the City of Los Angeles. Many of these gangs have been in existence for over 50 years. These gangs have a combined membership of over 45,000 individuals.
he had nothing to do after school. Both he and G-Ball joined a gang by choice.
One of the hottest debates is and has been nature vs nurture for years, but what is the difference between the two? Nature is what people think of as already having and not being able to change it, in other words, pre-wiring (Sincero). Nurture is the influence of experiences and its environment of external factors (Sincero). Both nature and nurture play important roles in human development. Scientists and researchers are both trying to figure out which is the main cause in development because it is still unknown on which it is. The best position to side with is nature. Nature is also defined as genetic or hormone based behaviors (Agin). Regardless of the involvement in everyday life, or nurture, this argumentation centers around the effect genes have on human personalities. Although it is understandable on reasons to side with nurture, nature is the better stand in this controversy. Reasons to side with nature is because of genes and what genes hold. Genes is what
The true impact of the way people have seen and learned is sometimes genetics or environmental (where we live). The impact of both is huge but the way of thinking is always changing. In Nurture Vs. Nature, nurture is our environment. Our ever changing environment is seen in violent video games where players think that people won’t actually die and will get back up, a possible solutions, and movies which could create copycat killers.
Gang violence is a major problem in our society today. Gang violence could take place in our neighborhoods and corrupt the young children easily influenced by the violent behavior as well. In the two poems, ?Leather-Jackets, Bikes and Birds? by Robert Davies and ?Street Gang? by H. Webster, the two poets write about gang related issues discussing the ill-mannered bikers who cause these problems to other around them. These poems discuss the violence, death and illegal activity in which a number of people participated in, which like reality is the problematic truth. Both poems are similar because their main intention is gang related violence issues in society today and the distinctive character of the darker side in human nature which causes the harmful consequences of a corrupt humanity. The communication strategies used by both poets are able to grasp the reader?s interest due to the fact that both poems have similar methods of word selection which is diction and are able to describe the psychological minds of aggressive behavior. The poem ?Leather-Jackets, Bikes and Birds? has sentences that describe the type of characteristics gang members have and illustrate their overall presence around others. For example when the poet writes, ?pretending they are looking for trouble?? demonstrates that the individuals of a gang gather not to enjoy themselves but to cause excitement among themselves for the wrong reasons. Another quote from the poem that describes the psychological mind of gang members is ?because you?ve got to be hard to be a leather-jacket??
In my view, the fight between nature and nurture plays a major in an individual’s life and can alter a person’s life direction depending on the influence of outside sources such as family and society. I truly believe that my view, best fits a behavioral perspective of human nature. The comparison is that with a behavioral perspective such as social learning theory it is thought that all individuals are affected by the environmental stimuli to which they are exposed to. Within behavioral theory there are developmental patterns that reflect a particular set of environmental stimuli, and the development is the result of continuing exposure to specific factors in the environment.
A common understanding is that nature has to do with genetics, but as for nurture it deals with surroundings and people’s influencing environments. This age-old nature versus nurture debate has existed for thousands of years, and is still debated today. Two articles that explore this dispute are “Nature Vs. Nurture Debate” and “Serial Killer: Nature Vs. Nurture”. Also, in the screenplay East of Eden, by Paul Osborn, Cal Trask wonders if his personality is determined by his genetics or his free will. Despite the common belief that people may be genetically born a certain way and they can not change that, more research indicates that in reality people are not born good or bad because people have the ability to change who they are, and the world