Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Aristocracy vs. peasantry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Aristocracy vs. peasantry
George R. R. Martin’s epic fantasy saga Game of Thrones transcends the traditional boundaries of the fantasy genre, representing the harsh reality of class exploitation in feudalism and its dichotomous social structure: high birth (nobility) and low birth (peasant). Throughout the series, the interpersonal strife of the noble houses dictates the lives of the peasants. Family is the principle institution through which power is acquired, sustained, and imposed on others. The conflict and subterfuge that occurs in the interest of political gain between houses in this feudalistic society sows the seeds of its own destruction; as a result of war, thousands die in battle, countless villages are pillaged and raided, and the aristocracy falls into …show more content…
The means of production in Game of Thrones most clearly resembles a feudal society. As opposed to operating on the market principles of capitalism, where the means of production are privately owned, investment is privately controlled, and labor is bought and sold as a commodity, the feudal society in Game of Thrones operates according to tradition and custom. The nobles gain their primary means of wealth, or surplus, from the peasants, who, as the main producers, are expected to surrender a majority of their labor to their lord. In the coming seasons of Game of Thrones, the feudal system that defines the show will crumple in the face of immense debt incurred by the aristocracy, widespread peasant revolts, and an uprising of the capitalistic bourgeoisie …show more content…
Westeros has existed for thousands of years, enduring constant civil wars, massacres, and dynastic shifts in a ceaseless battle for the Iron Throne. The noble houses of Westeros are at constant odds, forming alliances and conspiring against one another over a wide array of dynastic disputes. Following the death of King Robert Baratheon, the manipulative, dishonorable, and extremely wealthy House Lannister gains control of the Iron Throne, leaving four other houses that believe they possess legitimate claims to the Iron Throne—Stark, Greyjoy, Baratheon (Stannis side), and Baratheon (Renly side). Referred to as the War of the Five Kings, this ongoing fight for the Iron Throne that animates the series only intensifies as civil war rages on, consisting of violent battles, the deaths of thousands, and the complete destruction of entire noble families. Throughout the series, characters evolve and battles ensue as families compete, form alliances, and conspire for control of the Iron Throne. The mysterious political advisors Littlefinger and Varys—individuals who, without the name of a noble family, were able to climb the political ranks through manipulation and guile—often surround the holder of the Iron Throne and are responsible for much of the chaos throughout the
Davis gives various examples of the social norms that peasants lived under during the sixteenth century. When Sanxi, Guerre’s father, and his family decided to leave their village, Davis states that the majority of men who leave their village do so because they “were usually not heir to their family’s property, as was Sanxi Daguerre, but younger brothers who could not or would not remain in the ancestral household” (Davis 6). This highlights the idea that being the heir to the family’s inheritance is a great indicator of how one’s life as a peasant would carry on. It is very likely that if one is the heir, then the individual shall stay at their property and assume the role as head of the household once the “s...
First power, amongst the royal family the mother, Eleanor is the Queen; the father is King Henry, the youngest son John, middle son Geoffrey, and oldest son Richard. In the play not one, but all of these characters have power in some kind of way. King Henry spent his life conquering many regions and wants to continue to conquer by passing king down to one of his three sons. A quote from the play that shows the greed that having power can create Henry asked, “Isn’t being chancellor power enough?” Geoffrey replies, “It’s not the power I feel deprived of. It’s the mention I miss.” Geoffrey does not think he will receive enough respect if he is just the chancellor and his younger brother John is king. When he comes to Richard, the oldest brother he thinks he should be king because of his army he has behind him, but this is where futility comes into play. It is not always about war and killing people to prove your powerful, but in Richards’s ways that is the only way. Richard says, “I am a constant soldier, a sometime poet, and I will be king.” This quote describes the type of person Richard wants to be, he wants to have all the power to rein over the castle and do it through war. Each of the family members is jealous of one another especially the children of the king and queen, it is pretty much a sibling rivalry between them. Having power can be a good thing or bad thing, in this situation the king and queens children have a different view on having power and what they would do if crowned
Maintaining feudal conditions through violence and intimidation, the army holds the populace in a constant state of fear. Guaranteeing that the peasants stay ill and in need furthers the necessity that they work to stay alive, but prevents them from doing so. This is the paradox of the poor worker, but one the army does not see. The army blindly kills anyone who tries to help the peasants, murdering all the doctors and priests that enter the villages. They do so to keep the peasants in need and in ignorance, to prevent them from learning another way of life. Lacking knowledge of the outside world ensures that the peasants will remain in the plantations, because fear of the unknown is stronger than fear of the known. Acting as feudal knights, the army forces people into the feudal plantation relationship using fear and intimidation.
Between the advancements in farming and the guild system, people across western Europe were highly effected by some part of the economy or another. Early on in the Middle Ages, around the year 1000, farmers had heavier plows and had greatly improved when it came to harnessing horses (Palmer et al. 27). These two aspects made it considerably easier to farm because the plows had a much easier time getting through the soil, while having horses readily available and attached to the plow in the right way made the entire process faster, and overall a better experience. Advancements in farming made it much more productive, which eventually led to the feudal system. Because farming was becoming more and more productive by the day at this time, surpluses were starting to be created, ultimately leading to job specialization and guilds. During the Middle Ages, towns and cities were often home to a guild that specialized in one specific product (LeVan). Masters worked with journeymen and apprentices to perfect whatever craft their guild specialized in (McKay et al. 346). Because there were highly trained masters in charge of everything, from training apprentices to creating goods, it could be ensured that quality was up to par. The masters passed on their knowledge to apprentices, which meant that the products would still be of good quality after the original master ended their career. For the most part, guilds had monopolies on whatever product they specialized in (555). With one guild producing all of a certain good, consumers had no choice but to buy from them, meaning that if necessary, a guild that created a product that almost everyone needed could significantly raise the price, and people would have no choice but to buy from them. People working in the guilds typically made very good wages because of this idea. Economically, the Middle Ages progressed tremendously,
In the novel Player Piano by Kurt Vonnegut, communist ideals are exhibited throughout the novel. Communism came about from Karl Marx ideas of having a classless society, as written in the Communist Manifesto. A main idea in this essay is that society is splitting into the bourgeoisie (capitalist) and the Proletariat (workers). The bourgeois in the novel could be the engineers or the machines while the Proletariat is the homestead. The Communist Manifesto can also be shown in the novel Animal Farm by George Orwell, with the animals being the proletariat and the humans classified as the bourgeois. Orwell and Vonnegut have similar ideas when it comes to the communist ideas written by Karl Marx.
Karl Marx 's writing of ‘The Communist Manifesto’ in 1848 has been documented by a vast number of academics as one of the most influential pieces of political texts written in the modern era. Its ideologically driven ideas formed the solid foundation of the Communist movement throughout the 20th century, offering a greater alternative for those who were rapidly becoming disillusioned and frustrated with the growing wealth and social divisions created by capitalism. A feeling not just felt in by a couple of individuals in one society, but a feeling that was spreading throughout various societies worldwide. As Toma highlights in his work, Marx felt that ‘capitalism would produce a crisis-ridden, polarized society destined to be taken over by
The book Game of Thrones has many different narrators. Each one telling the story from different points of view, giving the reader an i Telling the story from so many different points of view gives the reader an in depth look into all the characters but it can also confuse the reader or prevent them from getting close to the characters. Do you think the novel benefits from having several narrators or would it have been better to only have one narrator? Why do you think the author choose the characters he did for the narration?
Representations of war in Henry IV Part 2 demonstrate the chaos of rebellion and the fickle nature of kingship. While there are many discussions of warfare in this play, the action is not presented in the text. War is vital to displaying the power and vulnerability of the person who wears the crown and is used as a way to display masculinity as an important virtue. Through the deterioration of King Henry IV and the slow rise of Prince Hal, we witness a borderline stagnant country in turmoil. The question of legitimacy over a weakened king creates entropy throughout the land.
Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World demonstrates key principles of Marxist literary theory by creating a world where mass happiness is the tool used by positions of power known as the Alphas to control the masses known as the Epsilons at the cost of the people's freedom to choose. The social castes of Brave New World, Alphas, Betas, Gammas, Deltas, and Epsilons, draw parallels to the castes applied in Marxist literary theory, the Aristocracy, the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat.
“Even if the boy does live, he’ll be a cripple. Worse than a cripple. A grotesque. Give me a good clean death.” The “instead” that follows Jaime’s statement in the first book of the A Song of Ice and Fire series is silent, but strongly implied. His younger brother Tyrion, the dwarf, disagrees: “Speaking for the grotesques [...] I beg to differ. Death is so terribly final, while life is full of possibilities.” Within these two lines, multiple issues arise, most importantly as far as this text is concerned, the links between the construction of masculine identity and the idea of bodily wholeness. From the very start of the series, Martin calls upon a fairly traditional binary of embodied masculine identities. On the one side, the strong and
Shakespeare has written many plays, such as Hamlet and Macbeth, which are famously known worldwide. In his plays, Shakespeare regularly writes with a strong influence of Marxism. Many works can be read and applied to Marxism. One of these works is Hamlet, one of the plays written by Shakespeare. In the play, there are acts of subterfuge, manipulation, and revolution to overcome power and the realization of the ideological faults of the political structure.
Throughout the three books which compose the series it is easy to see examples of class struggle, ruling class ideologies, and revolution. I intend to focus on these
The modern bourgeoisie society is a result of the failed feudal society. This new society established new classes, new conditions of oppression, and new forms of struggle in the place of
A free-market gives way to power and control to a certain group of individuals at the top of economic system, which results in inequality. The inequality sets the working class at a disadvantage because there is minimal to no intervention in protecting the workers. Karl Marx claimed that capitalism exploited the working class, which would eventually alienate the individual in a work setting, from himself, and humanity. In order to deter further alienation and exploitation of workers, Marx figured that the working class had to think alike in ordinance to the problem of a capitalist system to agree that social change was necessary.
Different states go through different types of political and economical systems through a life time. In this case, most of the agricultural society was largely supported by the feudal system social hierarchy. Karl Marx defined feudalism as the power of the ruling class based on the control of “arable land”, this in turn affected class society based on the exploitation of the peasants who farm these lands (Beitscher and Hunt, 2014). In the feudal system, most of the rights and privileges were given to the upper classes. In this hierarchical structure, the kings occupied the highest position, followed by barons, bishops, knights and peasants (History-world.org, 2014).Feudalism is considered to be the “medieval” form of government (Beitscher and Hunt, 2014). Before capitalism came around as an economic model most states were a feudalistic country. These systems had an affect on society due to the fact it impacts citizens by “controlling” how they live and interact. The peasants were required to work for the nobles in return for land. This hierarchy was fuelled by the religious assumptions of the time that stated kings, dukes and other nobles served by the will of God over everyone else lower down the social order (Beitscher and Hunt, 2014). As industrialism provided a much more technical understanding of the world, it challenged these religious assumptions for the social