Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of tech on society
Effects of tech on society
The negative effect of technology on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of tech on society
In 1609, Galileo put 3 lenses together in just the right way so that when he looked into the night sky, it was magnified by over a factor of thirty. His invention was the modern telescope, and “Cartesian doubt, the most immediate consequence of Galileo’s discovery”, was quickly amplified by the newfound understanding of the universe around us (Hannah). As people began to look out into the night sky, a new realm of technological opportunity was revealed.
Some philosophers have a problem with this expansion- Hannah Arendt cites Galileo’s invention as the beginning of humans looking away from the world, distracting us from our worldly obligations. Conversely, I fine my views more aligned with those of Nick Bostrom- embracing technology and the consequences it entails. For instance, the development of the telescope was the not only a scientific development, but a human one. Over the years, we have been able to develop space technology like the global positioning system (GPS), which has been used
…show more content…
One such was German philosopher and economist, Karl Marx. He believed that the development of technology holds the potential be a monumental improvement to the human condition, but only once freed from the constraints of a capitalistic economy. He argued that as capitalism develops, so follows the “intellectual degeneration artificially produced by transforming immature human beings into mere machines for [the sake of] production” (Philosophy). By his assessment, technology is no more than a cog in the ever expanding atrocity of capitalism, and by association, a detrimental presence in our lives. Martin Heidegger takes this idea a step further, citing technology itself as the reason for various societal downfalls. He places the value of life in personal interactions at the individual level, and finds technology to blame for our inauthentic
The Bible was one of the most important pieces of text during Galileo’s lifetime. If you went against what the Bible stated then you were considered to be a heretic. The Bible indicated that the earth was in the center of the universe and the sun and the other planets revolve around it. a theory known as the geocentric model. Many scientists argued against this theory by stating that actually the sun was in the center of the universe and the earth and the other planets revolved around the sun, this theory was known as the heliocentric model. Nicolas Copernicus was one of the first out of many scientists who publically shared this theory. Later Giordano Bruno also supported this theory and because of this the Church ordered him to be burned
Galileo, Science, and the Church by Jerome J. Langford. Science and the church, two things that you would not ordinarily think would go together until Galileo came along. Galileo, a man that stuck his head out to the world, but especially to the church, when maybe he should have done things a little differently. This particular book shows many accounts of the troubles between Galileo and the church, and with other bystanders. The book goes through the ups and downs of Galileo and the church, the hardships, and friendships that people held, and how hard it was to keep those friendships during the days of Galileo.
In papal Rome in the early 16th century the “Good Book” was the reference book for all scientists. If a theory was supported in its holy pages, or at the very least not contradicted, then the idea had a chance of find acceptance outside the laboratory. Likewise, no theory no matter how well documented could be viewed with anything but disdain if it contradicted with the written word of, or the Church’s official interpretation of scripture. For these reasons the Church suppressed helio-centric thinking to the point of making it a hiss and a byword. However, this did not keep brave men from exploring scientific reason outside the canonical doctrine of the papal throne, sometimes at the risk of losing their own lives. While the Vatican was able to control the universities and even most of the professors, it could not control the mind of one man known to the modern world as Galileo Galilei. Despite a wide array of enemies, Galileo embarked on a quest, it seems almost from the beginning of his academic career, to defend the Copernican idea of a helio-centric universe by challenging the authority of the church in matters of science. Galileo‘s willingness to stand up for what he held to be right in the face of opposition from Bible-driven science advocates set him apart as one of the key players in the movement to separate Church authority from scientific discovery, and consequently paved the way for future scientific achievement.
Galileo Galilei was an Italian scientist, often referred to as “the father of modern physics”. He was one of the inventors of the telescope and a strong proponent of Copernicanism. Galileo used his invention to make astronomical observations which supported Copernicus’ heliocentric model of the universe. These discoveries led to a fierce dispute, because they contradicted the theory which was prevalent at the time – that the universe followed a geocentric model, a theory, which had been accepted by the Catholic Church. To address this dispute, Galileo wrote a letter to Tuscany’s Grand Duchess Christina, in which he presented his position on the relation between science and religion, stating that the Bible does not contradict science.
After reading this letter I feel that Galileo had a very opinionated outlook on life and was heavily involved in a struggle for freedom of inquiry. Galileo was a person who had many strong beliefs and would not let people or a document have a say in what he believes.
The condemnation of Galileo by the Catholic Church is a prime example of the vast dispute between religion and science. It is widely believed that his support of Copernicanism, the theory that the earth rotates on its own axis, led to his condemnation by the Catholic Church. However, modern historians disagree with this belief and as a matter of fact they do not believe that indeed there is warfare between religion and science. Under the content of condemnation of Galileo are subjects such as Copernicanism, Eucharist, Popes Paul 5 and atomism.
university milieu, and in fact his theories were not published until the time of his death.
In the history of the Catholic Church, no episode is so contested by so many viewpoints as the condemnation of Galileo. The Galileo case, for many, proves the Church abhors science, refuses to abandon outdated teachings, and is clearly not infallible. For staunch Catholics the episode is often a source of embarrassment and frustration. Either way it is undeniable that Galileo’s life sparked a definite change in scientific thought all across Europe and symbolised the struggle between science and the Catholic Church.
Galileo is one of the greatest scientists in the world, especially at that moment. At that
In 1610 he was one of the first people to use the telescope to observe
Waking up every day a person is given so many choices of how to complete so many simple task. With technology in their hands people are given the chance to think and use their brains to make those choices instead they are being influenced by whatever technology they have in their grasp at the time. Technology is supposed to provide an extra help and give a reference for people to refer to when they need in other words insist a person with life choices. In so many ways Technology has the potential to make people become lazier and also the possibility to help people become more effective in their daily lives. With technology so overwhelming available everywhere, it has become harder to use it effectively and less. With that being said, Nicholas
Galileo Galilei is a good person who was unjustly put in jail for solid fact and because your church didn’t want to believe him. He studied many subjects, such as astronomy and mathematics. He proved the Copernican theory with solid evidence, and your clergy decides to put him in jail! His discovery would revolutionize the world of science, and you choose to push him away, locked up from society? That’s not good. Galileo should be set free from jail and all charges because a) The Sun, and all of the other planets are also creations of God, therefore, if the Sun was in the center, and all of the planets, including Earth, revolved around it, the Earth wouldn’t be “less special”, or whatever you want to call it. It’s the same now as it would be if the Sun were in the center of the universe. B) Galileo has the freedom to share his ideas with the world. If he, or someone else, decides to translate any of his works into any language, then that’s fine! C) Think about it: did Aristotle have the telescope-thing-a-majigger that Galileo has now? No, he didn’t! Aristotle didn’t have the supplies to back up
The idea that the human spirit grows strong by encountering conflict is an idea that is very open for debate. While it has been witnessed that people are strengthened in response to overcoming a struggle, there are also times in which others are not so fortunate, being destroyed by their experience. Prime examples of these varying situations include war veterans, adrenaline junkies, and even everyday people. An exceptional case that displays both points of view comes from Bertolt Brecht's Life of Galileo, a historical, yet fictional play inspired by the life of Galileo Galilei, in which both the inter and intra personal conflicts are explored, and how each affected Galileo.
Technology has, since the primitive years, always been used to invent tools in order to solve problems. This would, in turn, simplify and make man’s life easier. Through advancements in the field, man has become more efficient on both the macro- and microscopic level. Anything nowadays can be attained with either the flip of a switch or a click of a mouse. One particular technology that came about in this time was the smartphone. Since 2008, the smartphone, a device that combines a normal cell phone with a computer, typically offering Internet access, data storage, e-mail capability, etc. all in your hand was deemed as ground-breaking technology and created one of the largest and most competitive market in terms of technology to date. Their increased popularity continued to grow and today, it is very hard to encounter someone without a smartphone. These devices allow people to disconnect from reality and grant them access to the world as a whole. People use these devices to manage their daily routine, dictating what they should do and when they should do it. The capabilities of this device had been unheard of before their time. However, is there more to this technology than what has been made aware to their owners? We have become overly obsessed with these devices that it has impacted our humanity – our interaction with others and society. Since its upbringing, the invention of the smartphone has come to negatively reinvent the way people go about their daily lives because we have become detached from society, let these smartphones govern our lives, and have become obsessed with these devices.
Mannoia, Jim (1997, May 15). A philosopher looks at the effect of modern technology on our view of human life. At http://www.houghton.edu/offices/acad_dean/Techpap.htm.