GMO Foods

966 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Negative effects of gm food

Immune disorders, aging faster, infertility and much much more! That is what you are paying for when you purchase GMO foods. GMO stands for genetically modified organisms. GMO products are products that have undergone modifications that cannot happen in nature. GMOs are advertised as a better, more enhanced version. Scientists have altered the genes of GMO products so that it can grow in different environments, in severe weather conditions, and to generate more food. The truth of the matter is that because of these modifications, GMO foods propose major problems for our health, our environment, and our well-being. The manufactures of these foods will tell you that they are no different then food that has not been genetically modified, but if that is the case why modify foods at all? These manufactures will try to tell you that the food is safe, even better for you. I am going to tell you the truth. I am going to tell you the real reasons why genetically modified organisms are bad for our country.
It’s hard to know for certain when GMOs were introduced to the US. GMO foods are such a natural part of our life now, but it’s quite easy to remember when food was simple. If you have ever listened to your grandparents talk about stories from back in the day, they will tell you all about when they had to grow there own food. They would plant the seeds, tend to the crop, and have a nice harvest at the end of the summer. According to Mail Online “The first commercially grown genetically modified food crop was a tomato created by California Company in the early 1990s.”This is when every thing began to go south for us.
Now companies can have patents for certain foods and seeds. This is extremely bad news for farmers. Econimists say “ that...

... middle of paper ...

...thority states “Why so sneaky? The European Union has banned GMOs, as have Australia, Japan, the UK and two dozen other countries that recognize that a lack of long term studies and testing may be hiding disastrous health defects.” This begs the question why not label?
Could it be that putting “GMO” on the package could cost more money? Or is it that less people will purchase these items if they knew what was going into their bodies. There are bills pending on Beacon Hill to pass labeling laws for genetically modified foods. “The laws would mandate that there would be a small sentence or a phrase on a package saying food in this product has been genetically modified or genetically engineered. It is not a large warning label. It’s the same size as the other ingredients.” I believe that these companies do not want to decrease there sales by puting GMO on the package.

Show More
Related

  • Critical Analysis Of Monsanto's Harvest Of Fear?

    731 Words  | 2 Pages

    Monsanto scrutinizes neighboring farms, practicing their right to enforce their patent and contract. What they take into account and chose to ignore is that their genetic product is natural and cannot be controlled completely. Monsanto’s patent allows them to prosecute neighboring farms for any concentration of their patented genetic code in their crops, regardless of whether a farmer knowingly involved themselves in infringement or was the victim of natural pollination. Barlett and Steele cite the increasing number of legal cases and settlements as means of pressuring contracted farmers to follow procedure and of allegedly pressuring uncontracted farmers to sign with Monsanto to avoid

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of GMO

    1119 Words  | 3 Pages

    To begin, In the U.S.A, Americans have been using genetically modified food since the early 1990’s according to “GMOS” 101 by Alisa Blackwood. The reason for

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Gmo Labeling

    1016 Words  | 3 Pages

    A very valid point brought up by Clause (Say ‘no’), Hemphill, and Banerjee (both G.M.O. and the U.S.), is that consumers already have an easy and effective option to steer clear from GMOs: buying organic products. Through Hemphill’s and Banerjee’s article, we are informed that United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) “presently offers an organic certification for crops and processed food products, which by definition prohibits the use of GMO ingredients” (Page 455-466). This is certainly a label that has the ability to help concerned customers know exactly what they are eating. The co-authors call this solution the “Voluntary Labeling Strategy.” There is, however, one issue with this: not all products that don't contain GMOs qualify as organic. The resolution lies in an upcoming proposal from the U.S. Food and Drug administration (FDA). It's called “Voluntary Guidelines” and it allows, but doesn't force, GMO-free products to display a label of their own. I believe that this is a much smarter option than labeling every item containing GMOs because it is not binding by law, which would provide consumers with all of the benefits they need to choose the right foods for their preferences, while saving on all of the unnecessary extra costs discussed

    Read More

  • GMO Labeling Essay

    1763 Words  | 4 Pages

    A non-GMO label doesn’t necessarily mean “healthy”. White sugar, flour, and processed ingredients if not genetically modified are considered non GMO. Recently Cheerios made their ingredients GMO free. This label made Cheerios seems as a “healthy conscience choice” when in fact they are not healthy at all. The truth is that this breakfast cereal is highly processed and is best to be avoided despite the “healthy halo” of being approved by the National Heart Association and GMO free. The truth appears on the nutrition label and the ingredients (Wartman). “If you can’t pronounce it, don’t buy it” The voluntary labeling places a burden on the consumer. The average Americans are forced to navigate confusing and cluttered food landscape” (Wartman). A mandatory labeling law is vital to give clear and concise information to citizens.

    Read More

  • The Impact Of Monsanto

    1091 Words  | 3 Pages

    Everyone has likely already heard the name Monsanto, the largest seed distributor in the world. Nearly fifty percent of all seeds in the world are owned by only three corporations. These companies account for trillions in fertilizer, pesticide, seed patents and herbicide sales annually. These companies have been building a seed empire within the food industry for over thirty years now and they have plans to patent every seed with biotechnology. Thoreau wrote in his book, “The condition of the operatives is becoming every day more like that of the English; and it cannot be wondered at, since, as far as I have heard or observed, the principal object is, not that mankind may be well and honestly clad, but, unquestionably, that the corporations

    Read More

  • Gmo Pros And Cons

    780 Words  | 2 Pages

    You might have heard GMO thrown around by scientists or news stations before. It stands for genetically modified organism. This is a relatively new technology that has sparked a huge debate. Organisms are genetically modified by taking genes from one being and transferring them to another being in order to change the qualities of the resulting species. Now this seems like a very good thing, and in some ways it is, but it has some very serious consequences. When humans start to tamper with nature, trouble is never far away. The same is true for genetically modified foods and organisms.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Food Labeling

    1248 Words  | 3 Pages

    Bronner’s raised in 1.15 million dollars to support food labeling. Unfortunately, supporters of the cause are greatly outnumbered by their opponents. Monsanto raised four million dollars in opposition to mandate labeling. In spite of the supporters passionate efforts, GMO labeling most likely would not be the solution that activists and consumers are looking for. “Approximately ⅔ of the foods and beverages we buy and consume would be exempt. Meat and dairy products would be exempt even if they come from animals raised on GMO feed and grain. All alcoholic beverages, food for immediate consumption served in restaurants and other institutions would also be exempt, even if they contain GMO ingredients” (Review Of Proposition). With laws like these, information on GMOs that affect the majority of the people that care about taking these precautions will not be available. The facts that the labeling laws will mandate will be so vague that they will not provide anymore information than companies that label their product with non-GMO or organic. Any label mandated product under Proposition 105 would not have to inform the consumer of what percentage of the product was genetically modified and what ingredients in the food were genetically modified (Review of

    Read More

  • The Genetically Modified Foods Controversy

    1350 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the U.S., GM foods have received little public opposition; this is largely due to the fact that food manufacturers are not required to label their products as containing genetically modified ingredients for fear of confusing consumers. Due to the lack of evidence that genetically altered foods are harmful, the Food and Drug Administration considers GM foods to be “generally regarded as safe” (known as GRAS) and no special labeling is required (Falkner 103). In the U.S., genetically modified crops are monitored by t...

    Read More

  • Essay On Gmo Food Pros And Cons

    1107 Words  | 3 Pages

    With all of the controversy surrounding GMO foods: health versus biodiversity; benefits versus dangers; pros versus cons, a topic that always arises is the subject of labeling. Labeling has been a matter of discussion for years and

    Read More

  • Examination of the Causes of the Food Crisis in The Politics of Hunger: How Illusion and Greed Fan the Food Crisis by Paul Collier

    519 Words  | 2 Pages

    The second “giant” that needs to be laid to rest is the fear of agricultural technology and GM crops. Europe has banned the im...

    Read More

  • Genetically Modified Organisms

    859 Words  | 2 Pages

    Scientists have been changing genomes of plants and animals by integrating new genes from a different species through genetic engineering, creating a genetically modified organism (GMO). Consumers in America have been eating GMOs since 1996, when they went on the market. There are benefits to genetically modifying crop plants, as it improves the crop quality and increases yield, affecting the economy and developing countries. But there are also negative effects from GMOs. Consumption of GMOs has various health effects on both body systems of animals and humans. GMOs also affect the environment, ecosystems and other animal species. The cons outweigh the pros in the case of GMOs.

    Read More

  • Negative Effects of GMOs

    846 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...M crops will escalate the cost of farming, causing many small farmers to potentially loose their businesses. As GMOs continue to affect human life and the environment, it should be mandatory for products to be labeled if they are genetically modified, thus giving consumers the right to make their own decision. With the list of health risks and environmental issues rising, the use of GMOs should be banned as a method to increase food supply and continue a natural approach to eliminate all risks.

    Read More

  • The Benefits and Risks of Genetically Modified Foods

    862 Words  | 2 Pages

    The labeling of food made with genetically modified plants and produced from animals fed with genially modified food is completely voluntary. So basically the American consumer has no way to make informed choices. If by any chance any of these products cause adverse side effects in the future Americans are completely at the mercy of the retailers. The public has no way to make informed decisions of whether they want to eat genetically modified food or not. Upon further research I found out that there are over 40 plants varieties that have completed the federal requirement for commercialization. These approvals include foods with drugs in them, fish, fruits and nuts that mature faster, and plants that produce plastics. (NERC 2005)

    Read More

  • Genetically Modified Food are Pandora´s Box to Humans and the Environment

    536 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Genetically modified foods are a "Pandora's box" of known and unknown risks to humans and the environment. They have been forced onto the American public by multinational biotech and agribusiness corporations without adequate oversight and regulation by the United States government (Driscoll, SallyMorley, David C).”Genetically Modified Food is food which has been chemically altered by scientists during the production process to give the food more nutrients, better appearance, and a longer shelf-life (Rich, Alex K.Warhol, Tom). The importance of this issue is that these GMO’s can actually have a negative effect in our society in general. It could mutate in a negative way and cause cancer or other diseases. Genetically modified food should be strictly controlled due to its various detrimental effects on the environment, human health, and potentially insect/animal effects.

    Read More

  • Growing Demand for Non-GMO Foods: Risks and Benefits

    820 Words  | 2 Pages

    The demand for non-GMO foods is on a great rise all around the world. "Non-GMO products accounted for $550 billion of the 5 trillion global food And beverage retail market in 2014". Many people, in today's time, are being offset by negative perceptions of GMO products. Numerous consumers have pre-disposition and attitudes when it comes to their intentions of purchasing GMO foods. General consumers believes that "scientifically altered crops could be unethical and unsafe". The U.S. food and drug administration defines the term genetically modified organisms as "used by scientists to denote a living organism, that have been genetically modified, By inserting a gene from an unrelated species". In other words, they describe GMO's as an organism

    Read More

More about GMO Foods

Open Document