Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of interest groups in politics
Effect of interest groups in politics
The role of interest groups in politics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of interest groups in politics
The modern French government is a unique political entity like no other in history. In my research paper I aim to show that while France's system of government appears democratic it is in actuality not. I plan to demonstrate it is more of an oligarchy than a polyarchy, polyarchy being fundamentally necessary for democracy. Drawing on research from conflict theorists I plan to show that France is not truly democratic. I plan to first draw a parallel between research on France as a pluralist state and Robert Dahl's New Haven study by showing that France like New Haven appears to be a pluralist democracy. I then plan to show just as G. William Domhoff did with Dahl's original study, that the same inequality in power exists in France as in New Haven. This power inequality leaves a certain elite with a greater control over the states political system.
To me true democracy must include all adult citizenry. According to Robert Dahl in a democracy “all members are to be treated as if they were qualified to participate in the process of making decisions about policies”. He goes on to further sate no group should in a democracy have control of an agenda. When you have a group of people who as a result of their class and status in society can participate more fully and influence what issues are addressed by policy makers as well as control the policy making themselves you do not have a democracy.
Frank L. Wilson in his article French Interest Group Politics: Pluralist or Neocorporatist? makes the case that interest groups that are most affective in changing policy are the ones which employ informal and formal contact between their groups and leaders and subleaders within the political stratum of France. The French people are reluctant t...
... middle of paper ...
...n study, it seems the interest of an elite class is underlying a democratic facade in France.
Bibliography
Bell, David S. 2002. French politics today. Oxford Rd Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Richard Nice. 1984. Distinction. Cambridge Ma: Harvard University Press.
Dahl, Robert A. [1998] 2000. On Democracy. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Dahl, Robert A. [1961] 2005. Who Governs?: Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Domhoff, G. William. 2005. “Who Really Ruled in Dahl’s New Haven?”
http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/local/new_haven.html?print.
Elgie, Robert, and Steven Griggs. 2000. French politics. New York NY: Routledge.
Putnam, Robert. 1995. “Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital,” Journal of Democracy 6: 65-78.
In today’s society, American citizens tend to believe that America has been, “American” since the day that Christopher Columbus set foot in the Bahamas. This is a myth that has been in our society for a multitude of years now. In A New England Town by Kenneth A. Lockridge, he proves that America was not always democratic. Additionally, he proves that America has not always been “American”, by presenting the town of Dedham in 1635. Lockridge presents this town through the course of over one hundred years, in that time many changes happened as it made its way to a type of democracy.
Doyle, W. (2005, September 7). The French revolution of 1848European history summary France. Retrieved October 14,
Beginning in mid-1789, and lasting until late-1799, the French Revolution vastly changed the nation of France throughout its ten years. From the storming of the Bastille, the ousting of the royal family, the Reign of Terror, and all the way to the Napoleonic period, France changed vastly during this time. But, for the better part of the last 200 years, the effects that the French Revolution had on the nation, have been vigorously debated by historian and other experts. Aspects of debate have focused around how much change the revolution really caused, and the type of change, as well as whether the changes that it brought about should be looked at as positive or negative. Furthermore, many debate whether the Revolutions excesses and shortcomings can be justified by the gains that the revolution brought throughout the country. Over time, historians’ views on these questions have changed continually, leading many to question the different interpretations and theories behind the Revolutions effectiveness at shaping France and the rest of the world.
The French Revolution was a major transformation of the society and political system of France, lasting from 1789 to 1799. The social structure caused major segregation between each echelon, or Estate. There were many grievances among the Third Estate on the coming of the French Revolution. The Third Estate was made up by the merchants, peasants, laborers, and the bourgeoisie. The bourgeoisie was the prominent class that were able to address the Third Estate grievances. The Third Estate’s grievances were unequal taxation, financial problems, and food scarcity.
When Alexis de Tocqueville traveled to America, he hoped to acquire a better understanding of the principles of democracy that the young country was exhibiting. Tocqueville had noticed his native country France slowly but surely moving towards those democratic standards He saw that over the past 700 years events seemingly beyond anyone’s control had been driving the nation towards that specific form of government. He believed that eventually the rest of France and the rest of the Western World would follow at least the principles of equality shown in the New World. However, he also noted that there were certain impediments slowing down the change to democracy. Tocqueville did not think that democracy was the right form of government for every
In Democracy in America, Alexis De Tocqueville argues that the women and families in Aristocratic and Democratic societies have substantial distinctive characteristics in terms of livelihood. According to Tocqueville, the state of government affiliated with Americans also defined its people. He issued a negative view of Americans, created by their party affiliation. After examining the influence of a democratic society on the American people, he concluded that “ equality of conditions modifies the relations of citizens among themselves” (558). In understanding the background of a democratic society, it is necessary to emphasize the impact “equality of conditions” has created amongst Americans. However, in terms of an aristocratic society,
Landy, Marc and Sidney M. Milkis. American Government: Balancing Democracy and Rights. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2004.
Each social class in France has its own reasons for wanting a change in government. The aristocracy was upset by the king’s power, while the Bourgeoisie was upset by the privileges of the aristocracy. The peasants and urban workers were upset by their burdensome existence. The rigid, unjust social structure meant that citizens were looking for change because “all social classes.had become uncomfortable and unhappy with the status quo.” (Nardo, 13)
O’Connor, Karen, Larry J. Sabato, Alexandra B Yanus. American Government: Roots and Reform. Indianapolis, indianna: Pearson, 2011.Print.
This investigation plans to explore the multiple political parties that existed during the French Revolution and how their doctrines reflected that of the citizens of the French Empire, from 1789 to 1799. This paper will focus upon the ideas of egalitarianism, or the belief in equality.
Herbert, Sydney. The Fall of Feudalism in France. New York: Barnes & Noble, 1969. Print.
Domhoff, G. W. (1990). The power elite and the state: How policy Is made in America. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Kevin B. Smith, Alan Greenblatt, and John Buntin, Governing states and localities: First Edition (Washington, D.C.: CQ Press), 2005, 95.
... middle of paper ... ... “France was a republic, but one now in the hands of an assembly dominated by conservatives, many of whom were monarchists”7.
We interviewed King Louis XVI about the political system of France and this is what he said. “The system should one hundred percent be maintained because peasants were born low in the social order and should stay there. Just like I was born the king and should stay high in the social order.” “It should also be maintained because of the social contract which is a good system to pay your upper social classes for benefits in return.” later he says that the punishment system should stay intact, “the punishment system works perfectly. If they do not behave up to their standards then they lose some of their rights until they prove themselves trustworthy.” He later goes on to say “Finally I will say that the tax system is working well because the