Freedom Of Speech Should Be Taught In Schools Essay

Students and people attending the speeches of activasts can result in a catastrophic outcome. The question, how is an institute supposed to control the reactions of the audience, and should these public speakers be allowed to enter a campus or any public area? These are all questions addressing the extent of freedom from the 1st Amendment. I believe that public speaking is a wonderful privilege, but we must learn to not abuse it. When lives are put in danger and dangerous organizations arise, should we not then put an end the the absurdity we call freedom of speech? American citizens have the right to freedom of speech and protest, but where can one break even? Perhaps the best answer is found within the person themselves. Consider the spokesman and his history with people. Does he tend to present offensive material? In that case, you probably should not allow this speaker to speak at your institute, and give them alternative venus that may let them speak. An association has the right to decide who may and may not speak on their property, and they must consider the consequences that may follow. If they allow an abhorrent spokesman the privilege to speak on their property, the institute is blamed, and not the addressee.

If an establishment knows that the potential crowd will become upset over the speakers beliefs, than the obvious answer should be to not allow the spokesman to speak in that venue. However, a company cannot always control a crowd's reaction, therefore, security measures should be implemented to ensure the safety of the speaker, the crowd, and the establishments appellation. It is common that the listening congregation may become offended, resulting in a tumultuous uproar. Large crowds can become unrestless, and can present dilemmas that the foundation will have to rectify. If somebody gets hurt, the institution will be to blame, not to mention the companies name will be