Freedom Of Speech Should Be Regulated

College campuses have banned many offensive words and terms directed towards certain groups of people. This include racist slurs, sexist comments and speech that is demeaning or otherwise intended to offend or harm groups or individuals. Many favor these speech code enforcements in schools, while others believe it strongly violates the first amendment. Interpretation of this is left to court judges who have ruled in favor of the opposition, stating that public colleges are required to impose little in the way of speech conduct. The one exception to this is when speech has an immediate and dangerous consequence. Then it can be regulated.
There are those in favor of speech codes which believe that they will aid in the general protection of young people on campuses and those who believe it goes directly against the second amendment. Both

As long as no immediate threat is created, opposers believe that any speech suppression is unconstitutional. There is a distinction between people threatening to kill vs disrespecting a peer for a having different lifestyle or skin color. Conservatives and Libertarians believe that only regulating speech which imposes imminent threat should be lawful and all other forms of expression through speech are allowed. Oliver Wendell Holmes commented in opposition to the regulations stating, "The very aim and end of our institutions is just this: that we may think what we like and say what we think." The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the opposers and decided that all public colleges are not allowed to decide what students can and cannot say unless it is deemed an immediate threat. Students still have the choice to attend schools with strict speech codes if they wish through the private school