Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Problems of immigration in the mid 1800s
Racism in the usa history
Problems of immigration in the mid 1800s
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Problems of immigration in the mid 1800s
In Matthew Frye Jacobson's article called "Free White Persons in the Republic, 1790-1840", concepts of "probational whiteness" and "fitness for self-government" are scrutinized. This article is mainly related with racism, so this word is defined by Meriam-Webster Dictionary as "a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race or racial prejudice or discrimination." According to this definition racial differences have created problems among mankind for centuries. Jacobson draws a portrayal of perception of race and tells about the different phase of racism, especially after 1790 in America.
In the "latter half of the 19th century a second regime of racial understanding emerged" This new understanding was in response to the immigration. Many peasants and labourers were immigrated from different parts of Europe. After the immigration of Hebrews, Caucassians, Slavs, Teutons, Celts, Mediterraneans, etc. the known fact of racism, which was between blacks and whites, started to change its dimension. Thus, there emerged "white Others."
With the naturalization law of 1790 "the eighteenth centuries free white persons became the nineteenth centuries Celts, Slavs, Hebrews, Iberics, Latins, and Anglo-Saxons, who in turn became the twentieth centuries Caucassians, as popular recognition of consanguinity of racial difference fluctuated in response to national, regional and local circumstances." According to the naturalization law;
"that all free white persons who, have, or shall migrate into the United States, and shall give satisfactory proof, before a magistrate, by oath, that they intend to reside therein, and shall take an oath of allegiance, and shall have resided in the United States for one whole year, shall be entitled to the rights of citizenship."
Therefore, with this law the question of the limitation of naturalized citizenship
to "white persons" was raised. For the newcomers, namely for the immigrants, there occurred many limitations, for instance; on the right to hold political office, land-holding, inheritance and etc. From this point of view, Matthew Frye Jacobson has named this phase of racism as "probational whiteness."
Moreover, in the earliest dictionaries of American English, the definition of self-government was not political...it was the "government of one's self." This remained true as late as 1959 when the Merriam-Webster dictionary defined self-government as "Self-control; self-command," and self-control meant simply, "control of one's self." Jacobson defines fitness for "self-government" as "The very `inferiority' that suits a given group to a particular niche in economy.
Prior to the case of United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind, the United States implemented a naturalization law known as the Naturalization Act of 1790, in which citizenship would only be granted to “any alien, being a free white person.” And so the prerequisite cases was born, in which any immigrants who wanted to be granted citizenship would have to prove in the court of law that they were indeed “white”. The court would either use scientific evidence or common knowledge to determine if someone was white or not. But not both, due to the In Re Najour case of 1909, in which In Re Najour a dark skin syrian, was granted citizenship after proving that he was indeed “white” in which he won due to scientific evidence. But would of never been granted
Since 1790, the United States started to granted limited naturalization to immigrants of free white persons through the Naturalization Act of 1790 and established racial qualification to national citizenships. Immigrants regardless of who they were need to prove that they were of white race. This lead to the moment when defining who was white was through either scientific method or common knowledge. Into the early 19th and late 20th century, there were numerous of terms to include whiteness and non-racial qualification for immigration to the United States. As immigrants try to show how they were white, there were court cases, Takao Ozawa v. United States, 260 U.S. 178 (1922) and United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind, 261 U.S. 204 (1923), which
In “From Notes on the State of Virginia,” Thomas Jefferson includes some proposed alterations to the Virginia Laws and discusses some differences between blacks and whites. First, he describes one of the proposed revisions regarding slavery: All slaves born after the enactment of the alteration will be freed; they will live with their parents till a certain age, then be nurtured at public disbursement and sent out of state to form their own colonies such that intermarrying and conflicts can be avoided between blacks and whites. Next, Jefferson indicates some physical differences between blacks and whites, including skin color, hair, amount of exudates secreted by kidneys and glands, level of transpiration, structure in the pulmonary organ, amount of sleep, and calmness when facing dangers. As he notes, these differences point out that blacks are inferior to whites in terms of their bodies. In addition, Jefferson also asserts that the blacks’ reasoning and imagination are much inferior to the whites’ after he observes some of the art work and writings from the blacks. As a result, based on his observation, he draws a conclusion that whites are superior to blacks in terms of both body and mind. However, Jefferson’s use of hasty generalization, begging the question, and insulting language in his analysis is a huge flaw which ruins the credibility of his argument and offenses his readers.
Have you ever wondered if there was a middle ground between being free and being a slave? The arrival of the first Black Americans to the USA in 1619 triggered a dark period of slavery that lasted until the end of the Civil War. The nation began to divide itself into two groups; free states and slave states. Though the black people who lived in the free states weren't slaves, they were denied certain rights. Free blacks in the North had many restrictions in their life, but they were given few freedoms in the areas of political, social, and economic rights.
The Naturalization Act of 1790 was the first piece of United States federal legislation regarding immigration and it provided a national and uniformed rule for the process of naturalization. Under provisions of Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution, it granted citizenship to “all free white persons” after two years residence and provided that the children of citizens born outside the borders of the United States would be “considered as natural born citizens” (Naturalization Acts, United States, 1790-1795). This was an important piece of legislation that encouraged immigration necessary for the continued growth and prosperity of the republic. The individuals that it was intended to attract and protect were European whites, specifically men who would bring skills and participate in the emerging manufacturing and mining labor
The Strange Career of Jim Crow, by C. Van Woodward, traces the history of race relations in the United States from the mid and late nineteenth century through the twentieth century. In doing so Woodward brings to light significant aspects of Reconstruction that remain unknown to many today. He argues that the races were not as separate many people believe until the Jim Crow laws. To set up such an argument, Woodward first outlines the relationship between Southern and Northern whites, and African Americans during the nineteenth century. He then breaks down the details of the injustice brought about by the Jim Crow laws, and outlines the transformation in American society from discrimination to Civil Rights. Woodward’s argument is very persuasive because he uses specific evidence to support his opinions and to connect his ideas. Considering the time period in which the book and its editions were written, it should be praised for its insight into and analysis of the most important social issue in American history.
In the early 1920's, many generational Americans had moderately racist views on the "new immigrants," those being predominantly from Southern and Eastern Europe. Americans showed hatred for different races, incompatibility with religion, fear of race mixing, and fear of a revolution from other races. At the time, people believed the Nordic race was supreme.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."
I. Thesis 8: The Racial Contract tracts the moral/political consciousness of (most) white moral agents (Most controversial chapter)
Today, in most cases, people don’t spend very much time thinking about why the society we live in presently, is the way it is. Most people would actually be surprised about all that has happened throughout America’s history. Many factors have influenced America and it’s society today, but one of the most profound ways was the way the “Old Immigrants” and “New Immigrants” came to America in the early to mid 1800s. The “Old Immigrants were categorized as the ones who came before 1860 and the “New Immigrants” being the ones who came between 1865 and 1920. The immigrants came to the United States, not only seeking freedom, but also education. Many immigrants also wanted to practice their religion without hindrance. What happened after the immigrants
All so called "Native Americans," were once immigrants. There were two waves of immigration between the early 1800’s through the early 1900’s. The first wave of immigrants called the "old immigrants" came to America between 1890-1897. They were primarily from Northern Europe: Great Britain, Germany, and Scandinavia. The second wave of immigrants called the "new immigrants" came to America from 1897-1924. The "new immigrants" primarily came from Southern and Eastern Europe countries such as Poland, Russia, and Italy. Nativist parties, like the Know-Nothings and the Order of the Star Spangled Banner verbalized their distaste and disapproval of immigrants. Actions and regulations against immigration did not begin until near the end of the "old immigration" and the beginning of the "new immigration." Nativists had many fears and concerns regarding immigrants. These concerns included being socially ill-suited to live with the older stock Americans, stealing jobs from the native work force, and bringing new, radical ideas to the country. These fears and concerns caused nativists to come up with schemes to keep immigrants out of the country. These strategies had a great impact on immigration in our country.
The philosophy of race is the discipline that studies economical, political and social aspects between different races all over the world. Though there are key areas where the study of philosophy of race has been focused, it is evident through different philosophers that the study of race is widespread across all societies in the world. There has been different argument regarding racism and discrimination with critics claiming that racism and discrimination only affect African America and Asians. Well, to some extent, their argument is valid. If we look at the history of racism and discrimination, many African Americans have experienced it more than natives. Few natives have experienced racism. This paper is a discussion of realism about race by looking at Kant, Blumenbach, DuBois, and Locke argument about realism of race.
That included whites that were from European countries. The Third Wave of Immigrants, from 1890s to 1920s, brought over white Europeans from Northern and Southeast Europe. Of course at the time, the term white was only applied to whites in the United States. Also race was, and still is, a social and political construction seeing as it was created to classify people into groups to create a hierarchy where the people at the top prospered, while those at the bottom worked to maintain the top’s prosperity. Newly arrived European immigrants were initially othered because they were different from American whites; however through federal and state funded programs they assimilated. Why were they allowed to assimilate? Well, they were not too different. In other words they were still white. Blacks and other people of color were at the bottom of the Unites States’s social hierarchy, so in order to maintain the system, only people who shared the same skin color as American whites were allowed to prosper. If European immigrants did not adhere to the rules than they would be at the same level as people of color. In other words assimilation was, “...a weapon of the majority for putting minorities at a disadvantage by forcing them to live by cultural standards that are not their own” (Remaking the American Mainstream, Alba). Immigrants of European descent were gradually Americanized and through generations, they lost touch with their cultures.It was essentially the birth of whiteness in America, and the start of learned
Will and in this essay the author challenges the citizenship status of children born to illegal immigrants. Will argues that the 14th Amendment, which grants citizenship to any person born in the United States, is being misinterpreted. He explains how this misinterpretation leads to the actual act of illegal immigration. For example, by essentially rewarding the children of illegal immigrants with an American citizenship Will demonstrates how this provides an incentive for illegal immigration. The author makes clear the idea that when the 14th Amendment was written in 1866 it could not have included illegal immigrants since that concept did not exist at that time. He continues by using Indians as an example of people not included in the 14th Amendment since Indians and their children owed allegiance to their tribes. Finally, the author uses a decision by the Supreme Court in 1884 that declared both person and country must consent to the citizenship; therefore, if the source is illegal then the child should not be considered a
After being established in 1948, racism was now legalized. Laws separated everything, from buildings to even marriage. Marriage between two separate races was outlawed. Even jobs were discriminatory. Africans were then assigned to homelands, categorized by racial tribes. These homelands were small living quarte...