Free Trade, Globalization and International Conflict Burak Sezer Coskun In today’s increasingly smaller world, free trade and globalization have become inevitable parts of our lives. The growing importance of free trade and globalization have undoubtedly impacted the existence and extent of conflicts between nations. Free trade is defined by Mankiw (2015) as “the unrestricted purchase and sale of goods and services between countries without the imposition of constraints such as tariffs, duties and quotas.” The economic argument for free trade is that nations that engage in it will be able to produce and consume more due to the principles of absolute and comparative advantage. More recently, arguments in favor of free trade have emerged not …show more content…
In today’s global economy, free trade and globalization are deeply intertwined. Globalization makes free trade possible and vice versa. It is beyond doubt that as time goes by the speed at which international integration is increasing and reduction of barriers to free trade are decreasing have gone up. While there is some resistance against the forces of globalization and free trade (McMaken, 2016), most nations have come to accept it as a reality of the modern era. This large scale acceptance is generally regarded as progress towards a world with less conflict. Arguments in favor of free trade and globalization stem from a variety of interdisciplinary sources. This paper goes into the details of some arguments for free trade and globalization, and explains why Globalization and free trade reduce the prevalence of conflicts in the international arena, and promote peace, cooperation and disarmament …show more content…
Pillars of Peace, an annual report published by the Institute for Economics and Peace, consistently indicates that nations with high levels of development, democracy and economic prosperity are unlikely to engage in interstate conflicts. This provides the framework for yet another crucial argument in favor of free trade and globalization. In his article, The Capitalist Peace, Eric Gartzke (2007) does a rigorous statistical analysis into how free trade effects a variety of sociological metrics such as development, democracy, prosperity and peace. Gartzke found a high correlation between each of these factors. Most notably, he found a mutually causal relationship between free trade and each sociological metric. That is, free trade causes development, democracy and peace and vice versa. Acemoğlu and Robinson (2011) give insight into the mechanisms of this mutually causal relationship. They claim that elements of the global economy and by extension, affluence, will make their way into any country that recognizes property rights and has some form of democracy. Thus, one can say that the policy of governments have an effect on their likeliness to engage in international conflicts. This point is illustrated by Thomas Freedman(1999 ) who came up with the “Golden Arches Theory of Peace.” Freedman discovered that no two countries in which
My thesis is that the four authors examined actually agreed with one another on the connection between free trade and peace, despite the discordant resonance of their arguments. Due to the nature of trade in Hamilton and Smith's time, their assertions that trade had ambiguous, if not adverse effects on state behavior is equivalent to Hull's statement that trade under the auspices of international organizations ensured peace. Almost all trade, up until the foundation of post-W.W.II international economic bodies, was practiced in an opaque, unfair, and mercantilist manner. Both Keynes and Hull, who argue that trade is pacific, lived in a rapidly liberalizing environment where international organizations were gaining legitimacy and influence. Thus, the conclusion of all four authors can be modified to state that trade is pacific only when it is conducted in an open, fre...
Besides that free trade encourages strengthen the development of a country’s institutions, in order to protect the country’s eco...
Topic: Analyze the validity of the objections to free trade and critically discuss the role of international organizations in regulating trade between counties. Does how the control of trades has impacted positively or negativity on a company of your choice.
The commercial activity has been, over the centuries, linked to human activity, due to the need to obtain satisfactory. The evolution of trade throughout history presents issues of immense importance to understand the current configuration of trade, However, for the purposes of this research we will be observing what is free trade so we can understand and interpret every point that we will be talking about in this investigation. Free Trade is an economic concept, referring to the sale of products between countries, duty-free and any form of trade barriers. Free trade involves the elimination of artificial barriers (government regulations) to trade between individuals and companies from different countries.
What is free trade? Many American’s have a broad and sometimes-false idea of what free trade actually is. Free trade “refers to the economic philosophy and practice of reducing barriers such as tariffs, taxes, subsidies and quotas so that raw materials, goods and services can move unhampered across national borders.” (68) Various options have arisen about whether or not free trade benefits developing counties or not. I believe that free trade is not favorable or helpful towards developing counties. Free trade benefits few but not the masses, is in favor of rich companies with large corporations, means a loss of power and political control on a national, regional and local levels of government, as well as allows for child labor and there for loses out economically. Many people here in the United States are not well informed about Free Trade or its drawbacks. By giving people the information and steering them toward a better form of trade such as Fair Trade we could possible help those other counties that are dealing with the effects of free trade.
In the article, "Seven Moral Arguments for Free Trade," Daniel Griswold provides just what the title suggests, seven arguments on why free trade is a good thing to have in a country. Griswold is co-director of the Program on the American Economy and Globalization at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, which builds his credibility on the topic. His article was published in the CATO policy report, in which Griswold explains thoroughly why free trade is beneficial to all. The article explains how free trade benefits the individual in many ways, but also how it has a global impact as well.
Farmer, Brian. “Free Trade in Theory and Practice.” The New American. Web. 2 Nov. 2013
While it's economic benefits are discussed constantly, free trade has been known to produce large amounts and consistent amounts of peace. In the 19th century, Europe experienced a remarkably long period of peace. Key to this “golden age” was the decision of the British Parliament to repeal virtually all tariffs and other restrictions on trade with foreign nations. After that, most of Europe joined England in this free trading, lasting for more than half a century.
The global economy needs free trade. Countries need free trade. Trade with other countries occurs at some level in every country globally. There may be some indigenous tribes within some countries that can lay the claim that they are self-sufficient, however, there is not a single country that can say the same. Proponents of an open trading system contend that international trade results in higher levels of consumption and investment, lower prices of commodities, and a wider range of product choices for consumers (Carbaugh, 2009, p26). Free trade is necessary. How do countries decide what to import and what to export?
The issue of trade has been a factor in the interrelations between nations since their conception. Throughout history there have been many different structures that encompass these trade relations. In essence, the state of trade between counties coincided with, and depended upon, their economies, social structure, willingness to trade, and their available resources (tradable products and services). Today's trade system is still formulated by these factors. However, there are many more concerns and actors which must be weighed. The current international trade system is, to say the least, much more complex. In its complexity, the trade system has also inherited a very controversial nature.
I’m writing my second paper on how “free trade” (not just trade) can lead to world peace. This is a pretty hefty goal to put on free trade’s shoulders but it is only an ideal. It’s what freer trade tends toward. I will break the paper down as follows:
In analyzing free trade versus other systems that promote trade in dissimilar ways, one must take into account a 360 degree view of all supporting and derogatory factors of each style. There is no such thing as perfect competition or constant returns; these are both factors that can never truly be in place because of the nature of an economy. The fact is that “economists do not have reliable models” (Krugman, 1987, p139) to truly reflect economic behavior. But for the sake of building theory, assumptions like these must be made to prove points and provide new ideas on age old questions. For this analysis we will be comparing free trade against strategic trade policy and a system of external economics. All three have there place, depending on how one would like to shape an economy and what compliments an economy in the most proficient way.
A decline of tariffs, liberalization of trade, elimination of quotas and restrictions on capital flows was an essential portion of a series of economic transformations put in order after World War II. Trade liberalization has been famous in a few years. Moreover, there is huge diversity of writings on the concept of international trade and its gains and benefits, whereas, a lesser amount is written about the costs and pressures of free trade. Free trade policies generated economic benefits and threats, then again, there is no agreement amongst the economists if the benefits of free trade offset the threats and intimidation.
The Capitalist Peace has been analyzed by several popular figures such as Montesquieu, Adam Smith, Richard Cobden, Norman Angell, and Richard Rosecrance. Each of these individuals discussed that the power of the free markets hold potential for states to avoid the cycle of recurring warfare. The spirit of Capitalism supports the partnership with other states which invents rules that appeal in making war unwanted. The ability of trade and free market fulfill the human need for international competition without the need for physical force. Economic freedom produced the rising importance of commerce which has led to a profound change in the international sphere (Gartzke). Capitalist economies can produce the element of peace within at least three
Although economic globalization and economic integration cannot solve every conflict and dispute that occurs between states, it does however effectively reduce the amount conflict and war that could possibly occur by bringing states together in trade relationships that create bonds of interdependency and trust through trade in the market. The market acts as an alternative means for conflicts to be solved and bonds to be built between nations.