Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of free speech in universities
Political correctness and freedom of speech
Chapter6 the right to freedom of speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of free speech in universities
In Camille Paglia’s essay “Free Speech and the Modern Campus”, Paglia discusses her views on free speech on college campuses and how she believes that the idea of free speech has changed over time. The essay was published back in May of 2016 on the website SmartSet. Paglia talks about the current controversies regarding free speech on campus and how it is the second wave that erupted while she has been teaching college. Along with her many details that she lays out in her essay, she also gives many examples of the violation of free speech rights. She gives her reasoning for why the problem of free speech has returned and who there is to blame for the outbreak. In her essay, Paglia goes into deep detail on how bad the current situation is and how she believes it can be fixed. …show more content…
She gives an example comparing political correctness and past revolutions by stating, “This is the phrase of political correctness...the rebels begin to fight…[and] the victorious survivor then rules like the tyrants who were toppled in the first place.” (Paglia 1). She also gives another example of free speech violation by telling the story of a Italian student named Mario Savio, who she met while attending the University of California at Berkeley. He was the leader of the Berkeley protests, and he was protesting because he was physically attacked for trying to raise money for the Civil rights movement. She then said that Mario conducted a very fiery speech on the steps of Sproul Hall, where he blamed the University's administration. Many of the protesters were arrested as a result of the speeches
This source supplies my paper with more evidence of how freedom of speech is in a dangerous place. American has always stood by freedom of speech, and to see how social media platforms try to manipulate and take off as the choose to increase slight bias is unpleasant. The article establishes a worry to the fellow readers that hold freedom of speech so high and that it is at risk. The article manages to explain why freedom of speech is in danger, and why there should be no limits to free speech.
From the opening sentence of the essay, “We are free to be you, me, stupid, and dead”, Roger Rosenblatt hones in on a very potent and controversial topic. He notes the fundamental truth that although humans will regularly shield themselves with the omnipresent First Amendment, seldom do we enjoy having the privilege we so readily abuse be used against us. Freedom of speech has been a controversial issue throughout the world. Our ability to say whatever we want is very important to us as individuals and communities. Although freedom of speech and expression may sometimes be offensive to other people, it is still everyone’s right to express his/her opinion under the American constitution which states that “congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press”.
Rhetorical situations make part of this speech to influence the audience. Repetition will make it possible for everyone to remember an important fact like the repetitive words “It is a violation”, the reason of why she uses negative words is to make people realize there is a problem that needs to be fixed. The audience already know the good things, what they want to know is the bad things that need a solution. What can be done to improve the world?
In the world today, Freedom of Speech is taken to a different level than what one may imply verbally. With social media, political debates, and the outpour of sexual orientation the First Amendment is exercised in its full capacity. Protecting Freedom of Expression on the campus is an article written by Derek Bok expressing his concerns regarding the display of a confederate flag hung from a window on the campus of Harvard University. The Confederate flag to some is a symbol of slavery and to others it is a symbol of war, or perhaps known as the “Battle Flag”. In this paper one will review Bok’s opinion of the First Amendment, clarity of free speech in private versus public institutions and the actions behind the importance of ignoring or prohibiting such communications according to the First Amendment.
"Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus” by Derek Bok, published in Boston Globe in 1991, is an essay about what we should do when we are faced with expressions that are offensive to some people. The author discusses that although the First Amendment may protect our speech, but that does not mean it protects our speech if we use it immorally and inappropriately. The author claims that when people do things such as hanging the Confederate flag, “they would upset many fellow students and ignore the decent regard for the feelings of others” (70). The author discusses how this issue has approached Supreme Court and how the Supreme Court backs up the First Amendment and if it offends any groups, it does not affect the fact that everyone has his or her own freedom of speech. The author discusses how censorship may not be the way to go, because it might bring unwanted attention that would only make more devastating situations. The author believes the best solutions to these kind of situations would be to
...rustrating and a painful one and leaves scars that very few teachers can understand. The problems then combine when the black students have to read this story aloud in class. This experience can really scar a black student and they can never recover. Other students are not asked to go through such embarrassment and humiliation. Even joking or tongue in cheek remarks about the history of their people are extremely poorly received by many black students. “Where rights conflict, one must sometimes supersede the other. Freedom of speech does not, for example, allow words to be deliberately used in a way that would cause someone to suffer a heart attack. By the same token, the use of words in ways that cause psychological and emotional damage is an unacceptable exercise of free speech” (Gilliam 119). She is saying this because she is protecting the rights of students.
Hall, K. (2002, September 13). Free speech on public college campuses overview. Retrieved from http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/free-speech-on-public-college-campuses
In his article, “Feigning Free Speech on Campus,” attorney, Greg Lukianoff wrongly claims that colleges are depriving students of their constitutional right to free speech by enforcing speech codes. By focusing on constitutional rights, Lukianoff overlooks the danger of intolerance.
No matter how controversial an idea, people still have the right to express their opinions. In the end, students should be able to express their ideas no matter how foul it is, and it is the students’ responsibility to express their opinions
If only using one word to represent the United States, “freedom” will be the best answer ever. Due to the protection of the First Amendment, free speech has long been an indispensable part of American people's daily lives. However, there have been lots of arguments when free speech come into campuses. For example, the First Amendment protects all kinds of speech, so students have their right to express themselves even if they are doing hate speeches; nevertheless, if hate speeches do injury some other students, it becomes a very serious problem to not keep the institution peaceful anymore. Just like most people say “school is a miniature of society”, reasonably dealing with the issue of hate speech on campus will be more effective in nurturing
Freedom of speech cannot be considered an absolute freedom, and even society and the legal system recognize the boundaries or general situations where the speech should not be protected. Along with rights comes civil responsib...
The Constitution basically provides freedom of speech. Humans long for this right to express themselves freely. Just this past year, numerous incidents occurred at universities, where, based on the current events of that time, some student-led protests turned ugly. Violence and hate flowed out of the demonstrators, and colleges acted by responding with punitive measures against students. As a result, controversies arose among a variety of groups with people defending free speech, and others attacking it.
Supporters of such protests say that speakers should not be invited to campuses to spread ideas they consider to be offensive. But others believe that the exchange of ideas—of all ideas—is an important part of free speech. The debate has many
“Think for yourselves and let others enjoy the privilege to do so, too,” said by Voltaire, a French Enlightenment philosopher. This idea later influenced the First Amendment of the Declaration of Independence, which lists the five freedoms granted to citizens. One of them being freedom of speech is a fundamental component of a living and breathing democracy. With the recent issues regarding free speech, many have called into question whether or not it is a truly beneficial freedom. First and foremost, writers and artists that take advantage of free speech must be ones to consider the consequences from the varying levels of offense that can be evoked in an audience.
Factors that hold relevance to speech on public college campuses include whether the speech takes place on the campus itself, what specifically is being spoken or demonstrated, is the speech directed to someone or a group specifically or is the speech broad, at what point has the speech turned to action, is the speech considered hate speech, violent, disruptive, or threatening to any reasonable individuals’ ideals? These are just a few factors which must be asked when dealing with speech on public college campuses. For instance: suppose an individual is on the University of Arizona’s campus and they are preaching about a contested subject. Many of the factors listed above will be used in determining whether the speech is constitutionally upheld by the First Amendment or if the speech is deemed unconstitutional and in violation of the University’s policy.