Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Racial inequality introduction
Reflections on the usa frontier essay
Racial inequality introduction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Frederick Jackson Turner’s thesis in his work, Significance of the Frontier is “The existence of an area of free land, its continuous recession, and the advance of American settlement westward, explain American development” (p 31). The expansion of people into the new frontier is his way of explaining American development. The problem with this thesis is although he makes good points, which are the way in which people moved out bringing families and brining a new way of living. The frontier not the most important part of history, slavery is far more impactful to shaping American history than Turner’s idea of the frontier. Slavery brought in the dehumanization of African people in America, furthermore, it caused one of the bloodiest wars in …show more content…
the United States Turner’s inability to give credit to the other more important aspects of shaping American history is a large glaring problem in his history.
First, slavery lead to one of the bloodiest wars in United States history. The Civil War started over slavery and the southern states rights to maintain their right. Within the document, South Carolina Ordinance of Secession (1860), “Those states have assumed the right of deciding upon the propriety of our domestic institutions, and have denied the rights of property established in fifteen of the States and recognized by the constitution; they have denounced as sinful the institution of Slavery;” (p 280). This is part of the succession documents illustrates the reason why South Carolina left the Union. They are calling slaves their property and the government attempting to take away their property is a direct threat against the state. The authors point is to showcase that the foundation of the civil …show more content…
war is slavery. Furthermore, the north was fighting to end slavery as well. In the section of Slavery Must be Cleaned Out, a message wrote to home had this in a part, “I have no heart in this war if the slaves cannot go free” (p 117). This is under the context that this was not every Union soldier and maybe not the majority, however, the author points out that the Union soldiers understood the context behind what they were fighting for. Some may claim that the war was about state’s rights, however, slavery was the foundation for the civil war, one of the bloodiest wars that shaped the future of America and is a large stepping stone into the future that America is now. The idea that Turner claimed that the most American and impactful thing is the frontier, lacks real basis. Six-hundred-thousand people laid down their life, on both sides, to fight for or against the existence of slavery in the south. The second aspect of slavery is the ever-present racial separation that has been bred into American society.
People continue to die and fight for these rights. Slavery is a distinct type of servitude that has a master and a servant, however, different from the old English Lord and peasant’s relationship, the servants in slavery have no rights, and they are property. An interesting idea that comes about while describing American slavery is in, George Alsop on the Benefits of Servitude, he makes a few claims, one being that servitude is necessary and he also claims that no country can be stable without it, furthermore, people would not be able to live without it (p. 96). This statement makes the claim that without any servitude there is no way for a government to form. However, he views the servitude of learning a trade or something like that of slavery. That is the dangerous connection that he makes here. Of course, there must be servitude, bosses hold power over the employees, however, complete dehumanization and the lack of rights given to people is not the same. So, these slave owners saw their slaves as their workers, however, they didn’t pay them, did not care about their health, or stop themselves from killing them. This view is part of the problem that lead to great wealth in the south. They had people working without any legal repercussions to pay them or make sure they are okay. Evidence of the old south and the complete dehumanization of Africans, is a story coming
from Josiah Henson in, Uncle Tom’s Story of His Life: An Autobiography of the Rev. Josiah Henson, the story explains a man attempting to rape his mother, his father struck the white man attempting to rape his wife (although not legally because of the lack of rights). The authorities punish the father, which includes a string of punishments ending up in execution. The real problem here is that near the ending of the story, other black people said the father deserved what he got. That they should never raise a hand to a white man. (p. 341) This example speaks for itself. The slaves accepted their punishment and thought they deserved what they got. They had lost themselves in the punishment. This treatment of slaves during the times concluding in the war is one of the largest and currently on-going. Although Turner wrote his piece in 1893, over one-hundred years ago his story of the importance of the American frontier falls flat on the ideas of a true America. It does not explain the fact that there were similar experiences in South America, meaning that this experience was not solely American. America fought a war to help end slavery in the south, although all soldiers may not have been solely attempting to end slavery they knew that part of their task was to end slavery. The civil war is the bloodiest American war and is polarizing in the 21st century. The dehumanization of slaves resonates through all parts of American society. The Civil War was fought over whether slaves were property. Furthermore, there were laws during and after Turner’s piece that allowed for discrimination of Africans and it is not until the 1960’s that there were put away. Slavery has affected American culture and American history for more than 200 years. Slavery is one of the largest atrocities committed by the United States and their affect is far and wide and much deeper than the frontier that Turner theorized.
In Apostles of Disunion, Dew presents compelling documentation that the issue of slavery was indeed the ultimate cause for the Civil War. This book provided a great deal of insight as to why the South feared the abolition of slavery as they did. In reading the letters and speeches of the secession commissioners, it was clear that each of them were making passionate pleas to all of the slave states in an effort to put a stop to the North’s, and specifically Lincoln’s, push for the abolishment of slavery. There should be no question that slavery had everything to do with being the cause for the Civil War. In the words of Dew, “To put it quite simply, slavery and race were absolutely critical elements in the coming of the war” (81). This was an excellent book, easy to read, and very enlightening.
However, it is relevant that we understand the ripple effect that Turner’s thesis had on the world. Soon to be President had already written three of the fourteen four volumes of Winning the West, prior to reading the pamphlet. The concern I see that effects our society is that Turner was able through a speech able to not on influence but encourage Roosevelt to continue to write more in regards to Winning the Race in the West. The impact of Turner’s ideas and Roosevelt’s rise to presidency are a great indication of how significant the thesis was through the “frontiers” which included the Chinese Boxer Rebellion and the Philippine-American War. During both of these engagements, American soldiers were accused and found guilty of brutally beating, killing and even raping women and men in both regions. The tolerance of “manifest destiny” was still alive and well as Roosevelt then Governor of the Philippines would soon take over as President of the United States in 1904. Although this was a negative impact, this is still significant to our history even
Frederick Douglass, the author of the book “Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass”, said “I saw more clearly than ever the brutalizing effects of slavery upon both slave and slaveholder” (Douglass, p.71). Modern people can fairly and easily understand the negative effects of slavery upon slave. People have the idea of slaves that they are not allow to learn which makes them unable to read and write and also they don’t have enough time to take a rest and recover their injuries. However, the negative effects upon slaveholder are less obvious to modern people. People usually think about the positive effects of slavery upon slaveholder, such as getting inexpensive labor. In the book “Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass”, Douglass also shows modern readers some brutalizing impact upon the owner of the slaves. He talks about Thomas Auld and Edward Covey who are his masters and also talks about Sophia Auld who is his mistress. We will talk about those three characters in the book which will help us to find out if there were the negative influences upon the owner of the slaves or not. Also, we will talk about the power that the slaveholders got from controlling their slaves and the fear that the slaveholders maybe had to understand how they were changed.
Until today, many people still discuss about the main reason of the Civil War. It is definitely the war is about slavery. The more they discuss the more they see how horrible people can be to each others. Slavery was the reason to start the war. Hopefully, people learn from this and will never make the same mistakes from the past
Today, it is often debated whether the Civil War was truly caused by slavery. I would suggest that the people who dismiss slavery as a cause have either not realized that the other potential causes all trace back to slavery, or are reluctant to believe that southern citizens would go to war over such a cause. When even the highly-supported secession documents clearly outline how important slavery was to the southern states, it is hard to deny its fault in the war. The argument that the Confederacy was fighting for states’ rights is the most-often suggested alternative, however all one needs to do is dig deeper and calculate what these
The existence of slavery was the central element of the conflict of the north and south. Other problems existed that led to this succession but none were as big as the slavery issue. The only way to avoid the war was to abolish slavery, but this was not able to be done because slavery is what kept the south running. When the south seceded it was said by Abraham Lincoln that “ a house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free.” Because slavery formed two opposing societies and slavery could never be abolished, the civil war was inevitable. These were all the reasons why the south seceded from the union, this succession was eminent and there was no plausible way to avoid it.
Yes, slavery was the cause of the Civil War, half of the country thought it was wrong, and the other half just could not let it go or continue. The war was fought overall in different places, and the monetary and property loss cannot be calculated. Arguments about the causes and consequences of the Civil War, as well as the reasons for Northern victory, will continue as long as there are historians to wield the pen ? which is, perhaps even for this bloody conflict, mightier than the sword (Oates 388). The Civil War was a great waste in terms of human life and possible accomplishment and should be considered shameful. Before its first centennial, tragedy struck a new country and altered it for an eternity. It will never be forgotten, but adversity builds strength and the United States of America is now a much stronger nation (Oates 388).
Near the end of the Antebellum Era, tensions and sectionalism increased as the states argued over what was constitutional. The South had later seceded from the United States and had become the Confederacy of America while the North had remained as the Union. The South had fully supported states’ rights while the north had strongly disapproved it. However, westward expansion, southern anger with the abolitionists, and the secession of the South that had destroyed the feeling of unity in the country because of the disagreement over slavery had been the main factors to the cause of the Civil War. Therefore, since slavery was the primary reason for the discontent in the country, it had been the primary cause of the Civil War.
The Union is to blame for the civil war, particularly the northern states because the federal union’s goal was to not promote conformity, but to permit diversity within the orderly confines of any socialized community (Niven 311). The union could easily be considered a haven for all types of people, not just slaves. From 1830 until 1860, relatively few immigrants settled in the South (Meyers). The Northern states had a different vision of what they wanted America to be and strongly opposed how the South ran things. The southern states thrived off slavery and is mainly how people made a living in that region. Slavery is the cornerstone of a social order that protected individual liberty and equality for the white population in the south (Niven 311). Meaning that the North had way more resources, workers, and support in comparison to the South, so slavery was a way for the Southern states to at least stay relevant in the United States of America. The North’s feelings about how slavery was tearing the country and the union apart was the spark for the Civil War.
Throughout the years, many people have been taught that the reason the Civil War happened, was to abolish slavery all through the United States. Although that is true, there were more reasons why the Civil War occurred.Referencing will be done on different articles and writers to support the findings of the authors. The article “Slavery, the Constitutional, and the Origins of the Civil War” by Paul Finkelman, discusses about the North (union) and the South (confederacy) and the disagreement of the territories following the constitutional laws regarding slavery, the article explores both sides of the territories and their beliefs of how the situation of slavery should have been dealt with. The article “The Economic Origins of the Civil War” by Marc Egnal, discusses the North’s (union) and the South’s (confederacy) economic situation that could have pushed the two territories to engage in war with one another. Finally, the last article “Politics, Ideology, and the Origins of the American Civil War” by Eric Foner, focuses on the Norths (union) and Souths (confederacy) views on politics and ideas of how each territory is ran and how they have affected the North and the South. These historians supplied specific and different explanations that explained what exactly caused the United States to enter into a Civil War. With the information provided by the authors, the evidence will lead us to the answer of what caused the Civil War.
The majority of speculations regarding the causes of the American Civil War are in some relation to slavery. While slavery was a factor in the disagreements that led to the Civil War, it was not the solitary or primary cause. There were three other, larger causes that contributed more directly to the beginning of the secession of the southern states and, eventually, the start of the war. Those three causes included economic and social divergence amongst the North and South, state versus national rights, and the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Dred Scott case. Each of these causes involved slavery in some way, but were not exclusively based upon slavery.
Because the American slave system was based on this principle of human chattlehood, slaves were confined in many ways that handicapped them from even being able to act or live as a human being. The very idea of human chattelhood gave the master unlimited control over his defenseless slave. Chattels are not permitted to get married, acquire or hold property. Chattels cannot have rights and hence the slave has no rights. Chattels can be bought and sold and so justifies the existence of the slave trade. Chattels do not have any claim to legal protection, therefore the slave has none and must tolerate the cruelties of slavery. Chattels are not to be educated or instructed in religion. And lastly, chattels do not possess the freedom of speech and of the press.
Slavery was the core of the North and South’s conflict. Slavery has existed in the New World since the seventeenth century prior to it being exclusive to race. During those times there were few social and political concerns about slavery. Initially, slaves were considered indentured servants who will eventually be set free after paying their debt(s) to the owner. In some cases, the owners were African with white servants. However, over time the slavery became exclusive to Africans and was no limited to a specific timeframe, but life. In addition, the treatment of slaves worsens from the Atlantic Slave trade to th...
After thoroughly assessing past readings and additional research on the Civil War between the North and South, it was quite apparent that the war was inevitable. Opposed views on this would have probably argued that slavery was the only reason for the Civil War. Therefore suggesting it could have been avoided if a resolution was reached on the issue of slavery. Although there is accuracy in stating slavery led to the war, it wasn’t the only factor. Along with slavery, political issues with territorial expansion, there were also economic and social differences between North and South. These differences, being more than just one or two, gradually led to a war that was bound to happened one way or another.
Slavery has been a part of human practices for centuries and dates back to the world’s ancient civilizations. In order for us to recognize modern day slavery we must take a look and understand slavery in the American south before the 1860’s, also known as antebellum slavery. Bouvier’s Law Dictionary defines a slave as, “a man who is by law deprived of his liberty for life, and becomes the property of another” (B.J.R, pg. 479). In the period of antebellum slavery, African Americans were enslaved on small farms, large plantations, in cities and towns, homes, out on fields, industries and transportation. By law, slaves were the perso...