Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Douglass frederick speech 36
Frederick Douglass 4th of July speech
Essay about frederick douglass' speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Notes of comparison: Jefferson and Douglass “Ten Thousand Recollections” In Query XIV from the “Notes on the State of Virginia”, which was part of our reading from an earlier lecture, Thomas Jefferson engages the question of “Why not retain and incorporate the blacks into the state” once they are freed. Put another way, the question becomes” why ex-slaves once freed must be colonized (e.g. kicked out of the country). The first reason he gives is: “Deep rooted prejudices entertained by the whites;” in other words, plain old racism. A second answer is more relevant to our reading of Frederick Douglass. Jefferson writes ominously about the “ten thousand recollections, by the blacks, of the injuries they have sustained.” The unstated suggestion is that “the blacks” once freed will exact a heavy (one might add, just) revenge …show more content…
if they remain on the North American continent in proximity to whites. Earning One’s Stripes The “Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave” serves not just as a telling of his own escape to freedom but as a compendium of the “recollections” that Jefferson feared and the injuries that blacks sustain.
The sanguinary and horrifying whipping with the “cowskin” particularly -- are so commonplace that the phrase “earning one’s stripes” takes on a bloody and rueful meaning in slave culture. Incidentally, the use by Jefferson of the indefinite article when discussing “the” blacks is an instance of linguistic racism and alienation that persists to this day. “My father was a white man” versus “Real distinctions which nature has made” In Notes, Jefferson’s ever-observing and pseudo-scientific eye is fond of making unfavorable comparison between Blacks and the Whites (unfavorable to Blacks, of course). Yet the fact that children were often born the product of a black women and a white man (primarily through rape) belies the notion that Jefferson’s “real distinctions” were valid. That Jefferson’s household was literarily “littered” with mixed-race children in his own image makes this fact particularly
poignant The Narrative and Eco-criticism (Misc Notes) 1) PLANT-ation I like Cheryll Glotfelty's simple definition of “ecocriticism” as quoted on the Purdue OWL site – that ecocriticism is “the study of the relationship between literature and the physical environment”. Using this rubric, events in the Narrative offers some interesting illuminations. First most of the narrative concerns a Plant-tation, the root of which we typically forget: the object of the plantation (as a center of profit) is to grow plants and animals (and humans) then exploit and eventually discard them. 2) Forbidden Fruit and Tar Baby Douglass recounts that “Scarcely a day passed, during the summer, but that some slave had to take the lash for stealing fruit from Colonel Lloyd’s “large and finely cultivated garden”. To keep the “swarms of hungry boys” away, tar was applied to the fence surrounding the garden. “This plan worked well; the slaves became as fearful of tar as of the lash. They seemed to realize the impossibility of touching tar without being defiled.” Perhaps, this is one of the origins of Tar-Baby? 3) “Indelicate Inspection” and LIVE-stock Part of the degradation of slavery was to be treated as property, no better (and sometimes) less than livestock. In Chapter VIII of the narrative discuss, when his master dies, Douglass recounts that, as property, slaves were subjected to “indelicate inspections” where “Men and women, old and young, married and single, were ranked with horses, sheep, and swine.” In terms of eco-criticism, this stands out as an instance of human degradation of course but also as an example of what one might call animal-racism: degrading the natural world to prove a political point. In sum, as Douglass narrative makes clear, the worse horror of slavery was it “dehumanizing character” and “soul-killing effects”. As Douglass lays bare this was accomplished through the destruction of the family unit -- one of the basic aspects of the human nature and society; also, the destruction of the human spirit through psychological terror and the perpetuation of ignorance and despair.
In 1791 Benjamin Banneker, the son of former slaves, astronomer, and almanac author, wrote a letter to Thomas Jefferson, in a courteous but forceful manner, challenging the framer of the Declaration of Independence and secretary of state on the topics of race and freedom. He touches on the topics of the way blacks were treated and seen by the common white American citizen and how it is an injustice. In his letter, Banneker uses ethos, logos, pathos, repetition, syntax, and juxtaposition to sympathize with Jefferson about former hardships to perhaps reach common ground.
In Myne Owne Ground, the authors argue that it was not inevitable that black men and women were made subordinate to white colonists in colonial Virginia because in the early days there was more about wealth, economic standing, and religion than the color of one’s skin. For example, when a white man, Richard Ackworth, ask John Johnson to give testimony in a suit which Ackworth had filed against another Whiteman (Myne Owne Ground, 16). They were unwilling to allow a black man to testify in legal proceedings involving whites at first, but when they learned that John had been baptized and understood the meaning of an oat, they accepted his statement.
In Thomas Jefferson's Notes on the State Virginia, Query 14 & 18 Jefferson uses the literary technique of compare and contrast as well as rhetorical questions to describe how white people are far more superior to slaves. However, by minimizing the validity of the African peoples beauty and way of life he only shows himself to be ignorant and insecure.As a result, Thomas Jefferson's Query 14 & 18 showcases the psychological disabilities that comes with “whiteness”.
Many people were afraid of what would happen to society after the emancipation of the slaves and wondered if that emancipation was worth losing the lives of so many soldiers. Frederick Douglas gave what he believed to be a simple and obvious answer to the question of what should be done with the emancipated slaves once the war had ended in his article, “What Shall Be Done with the Slaves If Emancipated?” After emancipation, people were at a loss when it came to what to do with the black population, believing that “they would not work; they would become a burden upon the State, and a blot upon society” (Douglas 55). Douglas counters these fears by emphasizing the fact that black men will work for a living since work has been all they have known for their entire lives. Freed slaves were arguably the hardest working people of the time since they had no other choice than to do whatever work was thrown in front of their face, or else be severely punished. This is shown in this image as they work hard to do one of the most heart wrenching tasks possible: burying their fallen brothers. Douglas’ stance was clear- the freed black men and women were to be left alone to do what they felt they needed to do, without the interference of the white society. He argues that white people’s “doing with them [was] their great misfortune” and that “they have been undone by [their] doings” (Douglas 57). Douglas advocated that the answer to the question was obvious since the South needed black men to function. He states that the “black man as a freeman is a useful member of society. To drive him away, and thus deprive the South of his labor, would be… absurd and monstrous” (Douglas 59). This argument is shown through the picture- even though the men are free, they are still performing the hard work
Jefferson feared the immigrants could explode into “unbounded licentiousness” doing so would bring down the curtains of the new republic. He also feared that unless men obeyed their moral sense and exercised self-control they would “live at random” and destroy the republican order. In Jefferson’s view, slavery was not only a violation of black’s rights to liberty, it also undermined the self-c...
As I read through the excerpt Richard Pratt states that we as Americans “have not yet learned our lesson.” After many years of oppressing the black man, mistreating them, beating them, seeing the black race as something less of a human being, was highly hypocritical coming from Americans whom wrote in the doctrine of our Declaration that “ all men are created free and equal” and of the clause in our Constitution that forbade “any abridgment on the right of citizens on account of race, color, or previous condition.” African Americans were not offered schooling programs; they were separated from their family, sold to work as a slave for the
1.) Fredrick Douglass’s purpose in this speech was to explain the wrongfulness of slavery in America. Fredrick Douglass states in his speech “Are the great principles of natural justice, embodied in that Declaration of Independence, extended to us?” and “The rich inheritance of justice, liberty, prosperity, and independence, bequeathed by your fathers is shared by you, not by me.” These prove that the freedom and independence Americans have aren’t shared with the Africans when it should be that Africans have those rights as well. Frederick Douglass then talked about how badly whites treat blacks and how wrong it is. “There are 72 crimes in Virginia which, if committed by a black man, subject him to a punishment of death, while
Walker addresses biases established by Jefferson decades before his time that still significantly shape the way many think about blacks. In doing so, Walker is able to draw attention the problematic logic behind said arguments. Ultimately, in his Appeal to the Coloured Citizens of the World, David Walker addresses the arguments, presented in Thomas Jefferson’ Notes on the State of Virginia, of race superiority, slavery, citizenship, and Jefferson’s own default validation by means of his authority, to further and strengthen his own abolitionist
Once I came to Concord I worked as a farm laborer for seven years and was able to “own a house and two acres of land.” (Gross 186) Never in my dreams would I dream that I would have this, but compared to the white man I do not have anything and live a modest life. I am not complaining because my wife and I are privileged in comparison to other blacks in concord. Within Concord, “A small plot of land, a good house, decent clothes, and a full stomach: this was the best blacks could do in the new republic, and it was not much better than John Jack had done in a land of slavery.” (Gross 186) During John Jack’s time, “slaves were a badge of status,” (Gross 95) but if they worked hard enough they could buy their freedom to become no voting members of society, and still not as respected as whites. “John Jack, after all, had to buy a freedom that was a birthright of every white man in town.” (Gross 96) So I don’t know why these people went to war against you for their freedom, but the don’t view everyone in this land
...ootan are attracted to black women, Jefferson may offense some readers. As a result, using insulting language can anger and offense readers that they may stop reading Jefferson’s work.
In The Narrative of Frederick Douglass by Frederick Douglass, an African American male describes his day as a slave and what he has become from the experience. Douglass writes this story to make readers understand that slavery is brutalizing and dehumanizing, that a slave is able to become a man, and that he still has intellectual ability even though he is a slave. In the story, these messages are shown frequently through the diction of Frederick Douglass.
Frederick Douglass's Narrative, first published in 1845, is an enlightening and incendiary text. Born into slavery, Douglass became the preeminent spokesman for his people during his life; his narrative is an unparalleled account of the inhumane effects of slavery and Douglass's own triumph over it. His use of vivid language depicts violence against slaves, his personal insights into the dynamics between slaves and slaveholders, and his naming of specific persons and places made his book an indictment against a society that continued to accept slavery as a social and economic institution. Like Douglass, Harriet Jacobs was born into slavery, and in 1853 she published Letter from a Fugitive Slave, now recognized as one of the most comprehensive antebellum slave narratives written by an African-American woman. Jacobs's account broke the silence on the exploitation of African American female slaves.
Frederickson’s title “The Black Imagine in the White Mind” leaves little doubt regarding which side of the argument the author takes on this subject. Within his essay, he stresses the point that racism under the doctrine of “white supremacy” had a vast influence on the failure of Reconstruction. This doctrine of white supremacy stated that white men were superior to colored men, although colored men were now freedmen. Frederickson contends that although the Civil War was over, racism within the south did not disappear overnight which lead to strong opposition from southerners to conform to the North’s pursuit of equality among all races. Southerners were extremely bitter with the fact that colored men would have civil rights equal to theirs.
“The history of the American Negro is the history of this strife, – this longing to attain self-consciousness, manhood, to merge his double self into a better and truer self. In this merging he wishes neither of the older selves to be lost. He would not Africanize America, for America has too much to teach the world and Africa. He would not bleach his Negro soul in a flood of white Americanism, for he knows that Negro blood has a message f...
The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave details the progression of a slave to a man, and thus, the formation of his identity. The narrative functions as a persuasive essay, written in the hopes that it would successfully lead to “hastening the glad day of deliverance to the millions of [his] brethren in bonds” (Douglass 331). As an institution, slavery endeavored to reduce the men, women, and children “in bonds” to a state less than human. The slave identity, according to the institution of slavery, was not to be that of a rational, self forming, equal human being, but rather, a human animal whose purpose is to work and obey the whims of their “master.” For these reasons, Douglass articulates a distinction between the terms ‘man’ and ‘slaves’ under the institution of slavery. In his narrative, Douglass describes the situations and conditions that portray the differences between the two terms. Douglass also depicts the progression he makes from internalizing the slaveholder viewpoints about what his identity should be to creating an identity of his own making. Thus, Douglass’ narrative depicts not simply a search for freedom, but also a search for himself through the abandonment of the slave/animal identity forced upon him by the institution of slavery.