Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Frederick Douglass knowledge and freedom
Frederick Douglass knowledge and freedom
The theme of freedom in the narrative of the life of frederick douglass
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Frederick Douglass knowledge and freedom
A slave acquaintance of Douglass. Is highly superstitious and stands in the Narrative as a representative of all uneducated, superstitious slaves. She is kind to Douglass when Douglass runs away from Covey's, but the Narrative also implies that she may have informed William Freeland about Douglass's plans to escape; gives Douglass a root to keep him safe from harm. Douglass doubts the power of this root, but it does encourage his resistance. The root instills the thought of defiance, and persuades Douglass’s attack on Mr. Covey. This shows the courage that slaves have and the determination it took to survive as a slave Mr. Freeland is a decent slaveholder, who is one of the kindest that Douglass has ever had. He serves him after leaving Mr. Covey. It would be an exaggeration to say that Douglass admires him, but Douglass doesn´t feel too much hatred towards him. Freeland doesný force anyone to abide his religon. …show more content…
Douglass tries to escape here again, twice. He fails, both times. Freeland´s mother blames Douglass for instilling his beliefs in other slaves’ minds. These reverends are greatly hated by Douglass and others in the farm.
He claim that he is a huge hypocrite who doesn´t practice what he preaches to any extent. They are known to beat their slaves at any given chance and claims that religon allows him to do so. Everybody is outraged by his behavior. Douglass is a great friend to Henry Harris, and admires him. Harris is a friend of Freeland, who Douglass is also fond of. He believes that he is noble and wise. They try to escape, and Henry is extremely resistant when they are caught. Others members who try to escape with them are John Harris, Henry Bailey, and Charles Roberts. Henry Bailey is related to Douglass, who is his nephew. Charles is also related to Douglass; he is his uncle-in-law. They are friends who have similar beliefs. Gardner is the shipbuilder to whom Douglass is appointed to the first time. The shipyard is stuffy and crowded and busy, and Douglass is unable to actually learn anything from him. They barely have any encounters with each other, but Douglass is already not fond of
him. When Douglass goes to New York, he is one of the first people he meets. He is an abolitionist who Douglass is grateful for. He even offers to help Douglass by helping him move to Massachusetts (New Bedford) to better his career. Anna is his wife. Towards the end of the novel, Douglass informs readers that he writes to “Anna, [his] intended wife...informing her of [his] successful flight, and wishing her to come” (Douglass 94). His brief inclusion of an event as significant as his marriage proves that his purpose is not for writing about himself. Although the story is a narrative, Douglass only utilizes first-hand accounts to further persuade his readers, and expose them to the atrocious system of slavery. By exposing the horrors of slavery, in a first-hand account, he persuades his many readers into supporting the abolitionist movement. He states that there are many stories that he could tell, but he believes that the ones he shares are sufficient. This indicates that his purpose is persuasion, he intends to educate the reader on the evils of slavery and urge them to oppose it. Douglass was previously known as Frederick Johnson, but Nathan Johnson, who he is grateful for, gives him the last name Douglass. He and his wife Anna are abolitionists who are aided by Nathan in going to New Bedford, Massachusetts. Bailey is the mother of Douglass. Although she is shortly separated from him after his birth into slavery, she attempting to mend relations by walking twelve miles to see him at night. She dies early in the life of Douglass. He knows his mother must care about him because in his youth, she would make the long journey at night to come see him and still get back in time to work in the morning. Despite their separation, she still finds a way to be a small part of his childhood, and it has a big effect on his future. This shows the hardships that slaves often had to endure, and the lengths that they would often go to in order to ensure the safety of others. It is meant to seem appalling that Bailey would even have to walk so many miles just to see Douglass’ face. Douglass suspects that Anthony is his father, and he is his first master. He is also the clerk for Colonel Lloyd, and he manages all of his plantations and nearby plantations. He takes pleasure in hurting his slaves, and is hated by all. Since he once was a captain at Chesapeake Bay, he is referred to as a captain. This shows the brutality of slavery, but also the overpowering influence of slavery; even between a father (maybe) and a son, slavery is there to tear apart their relationship and expose the unforgivingness of slaveholders. He is a drunk and a cruel man who carries a whip and cudgel with him and often uses them on slaves. In Chapter 1, Douglass says “he always went armed with a cow skin and a heavy cudgel” in reference to Plummer. A cudgel is a thick stick that is used as a weapon, and therefore demonstrates the horror of slavery. Later, in Chapter 2, he uses the words anguish, pathetic and privation, all of which demonstrate the horrors of slavery through their meanings. Each refers to a different aspect of slavery that is unpleasant and horrific. Throughout the novel, he also uses words that do not show the horror of slavery, like barouche and homage. Douglass's aunt. She is a very beautiful and well-meaning woman with many noble qualities. Her wonder qualities make her superior to most white and black women. However, she suffers countless abuses from Captain Anthony, since he is probably attracted to her, thus becomes angry. Aunt Hester shows the exceptions in the very racist and unacceptable stereotypes that controlled black men and women in this time period, and even today. She is pretty, wise, and generally better than several others in the novel. Here, Douglass breaks the stereotype and shows the magnificence of many black people. Betsey Bailey had been a slave of Captain Anthony for her entire life, and most of her relatives also ended up serving him as well. She was extremely loyal and caring and looked over not only Douglass, but also several of Captain Anthony’s children, for which Anthony shows no appreciation. Even when she is too old to work, she is not allowed to be freed; she is instead abandoned in the woods. His grandmother is a great example of the many harsh realities and endings for even the most dedicated slaves, that may even embody the stereotype of the “content slave”. She served Anthony so well, yet was born and died in slavery, and did not experience slavery once in her life. Thomas Auld is the husband of Mrs. Lucretia, and Douglass is sent to live with him in Baltimore, along with his brother Hugh Auld. Auld is, for the most part, incompetent and unable to look over his plantation or his slaves. He’s mostly scared of everything. He soons “find religion”, but no drastic change is seen in his behavior towards the slaves, and is seen as a hypocrite. Douglass is sent to Thomas’ brother Hugh after he attempts to escape. This shows the appalling nature of slavery, especially when taken into consideration that Douglass was probably 10 times smarter than Thomas Auld, but Auld probably had 10 times more power than Douglass just because he was a white man. He is incompetent but still earns more respect than an intelligent man. He is a lavishly rich landowner who owns upwards of twenty farms in Talbot County. He lives in the Great House Farm, which is one of the main slave farms. Slaves want to serve here more than any other. Lloyd own so many slaves, and is unaware of any of their conditions or names. They barely know him, either. Douglass is often at this house, and does work for Mrs. Lucretia Auld and Master Daniel Lloyd. Similar to all the other slaveholders in the book, the reader comes to hate Lloyd and his way of life. He is rude and rightfully disliked by every slave. The reader will hate everything that he does and has, after seeing how much Douglass hates him. He is an overseer at the Great House Farm, and he does not conduct many affairs there. Douglass barely knows him, and Severe dies shortly. The slaves are overjoyed by his death, and are happy that they don’t have to deal with his moodiness. Severe is yet another example of a horrible white man who really is probably inferior to men like Douglass, if it hadnt been for his skin color. The slaves are justly happy because of his death, so the readers are too. After Severe dies, Hopkins joins the Great House Farm as a replacement. The slaves actually like him, he is fair and doesn’t do anything bad that isn’t necessary. However, Lloyd is disappointed by his lack of severity, and Mr. Gore replaces him. Hopkins is an example of how white slaveholders would purposely be as cruel as possible to their black slaves, often for no reason. He was fired only because he wasn’t being cruel enough, which is outrageous. They are a pair of father and son who are slaves to Lloyd. The are given the prized task of maintaining the stable horses, and they aren’t too awful at their job, but are often beat without any reason. This unfairness is observed by everyone in the house, but no one is able to anything about it. Lloyd likes Gore very much, for all the same reasons that the slaves do not. He is ambitious and extremely strict, and treats the slaves badly. He kills a slave for not listening, and decides that the shooting was completely justified because he think that if slaves are not punished severely, there is no point to slavery. Lloyd agrees with this explanation, and thinks that he is a great overseer who is fit for discipline. Demby is the slave that was shot to death but Mr. Gore when he had a fit of rage when Demby didn’t listen to his commands. There is sympathy among the slaves, but the overseers think nothing of it. No penalty is given. Hugh Auld is the brother of Thomas Auld, whom Douglass is sent to live with after he attempts to escape. However, he is soon sent back because of a fight between Hugh and Thomas. He attempts to escape in St. Michael´s,and is then taught how to read by a kinder slave holder, the wife of thomas. She is then scolded for doing so, and Mr. Auld then trains him in his new job. He is forced to pay his owner weekly even though eh is the one doing the job. Sophia Auld is married to Mr. Hugh Auld, and she treats Douglass with respect and more kindness than everyone else there. She even teaches him how to read and write, which is a huge part of his life. But, her characteristics soon change when Auld scolds her for treating Douglass like a person. She turns cruel like everyone else in the farm. Douglass uses her case to point out that slavery has a menacing effect on both the slaves and the slaveholders. Mr. Hamilton is the father in law of Captain Thomas Auld, and he is semi-respectful to Douglass. When looking over the horses, Douglass purposely allows them to run away so that he can go to Hamilton´s house to have a meal. Mr. Covey is known for breaking the spirits of slaves. His continuous abuse dehumanizes the slaves. Like many others, Douglass is sent to Mr. Covey to have his spirits diminished. Douglass often endures abuse from Mr. Covey, “during [his] first six months, of that year, scarce a week [passes] that [he is not whipped]...[he is] seldom free from a sore back” (Douglass 52). Douglass becomes overworked and at one point he can no longer gain the strength to work, and this enrages Mr. Covey. Covey shows the abuse and hardships that slaves often suffered through, and he helps to strengthen the message in Douglass’ novel that slavery is to be taken seriously, especially in the face of people such as Mr. Covey.
In sum, all of these key arguments exist in “The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass” because of the institution of slavery and its resulting lack of freedom that was used to defend it. This text’s arguments could all be gathered together under the common element of inequality and how it affected the practical, social, and even spiritual lives of the slaves.
One of the amazing things about the story is the level of description and imagery that Douglass uses to describe the suffering around him. The excerpt spans a mere three days, but most of the text focuses on his abuse and battle with Mr. Covey. Douglass skips over the common parts of his life to further his case against slavery. By doing this, the Northerners rea...
The edifying phenomenon that comes across the lives of Douglass and Wright is seemingly a climax imposing new beginnings and a tentative freedom. Consequently, allowing both men to gravely understand the terms and conditions they must face in order to comply with that preceding society. “My reading had created a cast sense of distance between me and the world in which I lived and tried to make a living, and that sense of distance was increasing each day.” (Wright 153) “The moral which
Unlike his peers, his perception of slavery is much more realistic and depressing due to his understanding of his plight situation. For instance, he states, “The more I read, the more I was led to abhor and detest my enslavers […] I loathed them as being the meanest as well as the most wicked of men” (334). He is distressed by the hopeless position he is in and the “everlasting thinking of [his] condition tormented [him]” (334). Douglass talks about his seven-year experience under the Hughs. During those years, he accomplished the skill of reading and writing under his mistress’s care; however the short time of hope came to a very abrupt stop when his master advised her to cease the instructing. Douglass writes, “a kind and tender-hearted woman; and in the simplicity of her soul she commenced, when I first went to live with her, to treat me as she supposed one human being out to treat another […] she was a pious, warm, and tender-hearted woman” (332). He witnesses that that humanity does exist and that there are kind owners just like his; however, the circumstances shape them into the stern owners they
In The Narrative Life of Frederick Douglass, emotional violence takes an aggressive toll not only on Douglass, but also his master Mr. Covey, his family, and fellow slaves. During his time with Covey, Douglass was affected deeply by the strain of slavery, especially in spirit and ways of hope. Mr. Covey was infamous for his reputation as a ‘‘nigger-breaker” and induced fear into slaves, emotionally scarring them (Douglass 53).
In, “The Narrative of the life of Frederick Douglass”, readers get a first person perspective on slavery in the South before the Civil War. The author, Frederick Douglass, taught himself how to read and write, and was able to share his story to show the evils of slavery, not only in regard to the slaves, but with regard to masters, as well. Throughout Douglass’ autobiography, he shares his disgust with how slavery would corrupt people and change their whole entire persona. He uses ethos, logos, and pathos to help establish his credibility, and enlighten his readers about what changes needed to be made.
However, through rhetorical devices, Douglass demonstrates how slavery also had a degrading influence on slaveholders and thus shows its corrupting nature. Specifically, he contrasts the shift in Sophia Auld’s character through antithesis and metaphor after being exposed to slavery. Before Mrs. Auld’s corruption, Douglass described his master by claiming, “Her face was made of heavenly smiles, and her voice of tranquil music” (32). Through metaphor, Douglass makes her sound like an angel with “heavenly smiles.” Angels are commonly associated with pureness and therefore by making this metaphor Douglass associates Mrs. Auld as originally being pure. However, he then juxtaposes this idea when he claims she has received the “fatal poison of irresponsible power”(32) also known to him as being a slave master. He explains her new characteristics by stating, “That cheerful eye, under the influence of slavery, soon became red with rage; that voice, made of all sweet accord, changed to one of harsh and horrid discord; and that angelic face gave place to that of a demon”(32-33). Through metaphor and antithesis, Douglass shows how she shifts from being an angel to a demon. The metaphor associates Mrs. Auld with satan and the antithesis makes her list of changing features appear extensive. Through these rhetorical devices, Douglass is able to emphasize the abruptness of her change in character due to her experience around slavery. By explaining this personal experience in his narrative, Douglass shows to his audience the unexpected negatives of slavery and how it not only dehumanizes slaves, but masters as well. This most likely would have given Northern abolitionists stronger reasons to push for Douglass’s goal of
After reading Frederick Douglass’s narrative of slavery, I couldn’t help but stop and try to gather my thoughts in any way possible. It was not the first time I had read the narrative, but this time around Douglass’s words hit me much harder. Perhaps, it was that I read the narrative in a more critical lens, or possibly it was just that I am older and more mature now from the last time I read it, but whatever the reason, I can confidently say reading the narrative has changed my heart and opened my eyes in many ways. I have always been aware of the injustices that slavery encompassed and of course like many other people, I have been taught about slavery in a historical narrative my entire life. But, Frederick Douglass’s narrative does more than just provide a historical perspective in seeing the injustices in slavery. His narrative asks the reader to look directly into the eyes of actual slaves and realize their very heart beat and existence as humans. Douglass humanizes the people of whom the terrible acts we acted upon that we learn about as early as elementary school. It is because of this that I decided to write this poem. Reading the narrative made me really think about Douglass’s journey and the story he tells on his road to freedom. I felt as if he was really speaking to me and, and in turn I wanted to give Douglass a voice in my own writing.
When first introduced to Douglass and his story, we find him to be a young slave boy filled with information about those around him. Not only does he speak from the view point of an observer, but he speaks of many typical stereotypes in the slave life. At this point in his life, Frederick is inexperienced and knows nothing of the pleasures of things such as reading, writing, or even the rights everyone should be entitled to. Douglass knowing hardly anything of his family, their whereabouts, or his background, seems to be equivalent to the many other slaves at the time. As a child Frederick Douglass sees the injustices around him and observes them, yet as the story continues we begin to see a change.
In this final research analysis, I will be doing a comparison between the “Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass” and the “Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson” to show how both Douglass and Rowlandson use a great deal of person strength and faith in God to endure their life and ultimately gain their freedom.
In paragraph 7 Douglass is starting to hate his life, which makes him eager to hear people talk about slavery. “I often found myself regretting my own existence, and wishing myself dead…” (Douglass, 103) “While in this state of mind, I was eager to hear any one speak of slavery.” (Douglass, 103)
Once in his prime, leading the abolitionist movement Douglas takes the time to detail the many incongruences of the slave owner, particularly ones that was members of the clergy. “They bind heavy burdens, and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men’s shoulders, but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers. All their works they do to be seen by men” A fitting quote of Matthew 23, to describe the hypocrisy of racist slave owners who would with the same mouth curse, condemn and belittle a slave then just as soon preach holiness and purity of heart from the pulpit. Frederick was very well aware of the plaster-saintly nature of the white clergy, and yet it seems, Douglas was satisfied deeming himself the master of himself. This has all the makings of being a form of Stockholm
Fredrick learning to read and write was one way to help him get closer to freedom. While he continues to improve his literary skills, Fredrick has to go and be divided up along with his master’s property; that is what he considered to be. This will put a halt on things. Fredrick now comes to regret not trying to escape from the city because there is a greater chance for success than if you were to try out in the country. His regret fuels the desire for freedom even more because he knows it was just in his grasp only to not be a plausible option anymore. He even goes to the Chesapeake Bay and rants to the ships about slavery; he’s beyond ready to acquire his freedom. Fredrick continues to devise plans to escape and everything along the way reminds him of his longing to be free. He can now realize how they were misled by the overseers about what freedom actually was. For example, the slaves were given whisky/alcohol during the holidays and they would assume that it was freedom. Going back to the fields would be a relief because it was easy to get tired of all the alcohol consumed. Fredrick continues to want and ache for freedom like the white men and freed
Edward Covey is one of the meanest slave holders. In many situations, bad slaves are sent with Mr. Covey in hope of complete change of attitude in the slaves. Mr. Covey often uses manipulation and devious methods to induce fear within the slaves. Frederick has just previously abandoned his Master’s home, Mr.Covey. He aspired to seek refuge with a retired slave but instead was told to return to Mr. Coveys’ plantation. Douglass was told to return back but this time with a piece of the woods in his pocket, a root. This root piece is to always be on the right side of himself (Douglass 30). It was said to offer him protection from any white man and his whip. Mr. Douglass thought this was a silly idea and that it was crazy to think a plant would
Douglass’s narrative relies on religious allusions of Christ that condemn the foundations of slavery. In Douglass’s narration, slaveholding acts as a distortion of Christianity. Over the course of his narration there is paradox between religion and slavery. Douglass creates a distinction between what is true and what is false in the wake of the beliefs of Christianity and shows that Christianity is not a part of a slaveholder’s integrity but it’s merely a hypocritical stroke to their “righteous” brutality. The corrupt and manipulative power that slave owners take pleasure in over their slaves has a damaging effect on the slave owners own health. To strike this distinction there is textual evidence that Douglass illustrates between the charitable,