Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Moral dilemmas in frankenstein
Theme of morality in frankenstein
Moral dilemmas in frankenstein
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
True justice can only be awarded to those who have been treated with injustice.When it comes to the act of justice and injustice in Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, there is one major character who suffers from injustice and yearns to be justified throughout the entire novel. This character is Victor Frankenstein’s creation, the Creature. The Creature suffers injustice from everyone he ever meets and it is how he learns what justice is or should be. These experiences with injustice are what urge and drive him through the entire novel, from birth to death, and what shape him into the figure of a monster. Throughout the novel, however, the readers will begin to question if the monsters are in fact inside of man. The Creature was never instructed …show more content…
what was revenge and what was justice and thus he lives his life in pursual of a justice that paints him as the monster. The Creature attains his understanding of justice through the people he encounters and observes. The first person he witnesses justice from, or lack thereof, is Victor Frankenstein.
Victor rebukes the Creature immediately and says, “it became a thing such as even Dante could not have conceived,”(Shelley 44). The Creature has the knowledge that Victor wants to hurt him, too. It is later when the Creature confronts Victor that he says, “You would tear me to pieces, and triumph; remember that, and tell me why should I pity man more than he pities me,” (Shelley 173). If it’s own creator wants nothing more than to hurt the Creature, why should the Creature not wish to hurt his creator? He was never taught any different and only learned what he observed so it goes to say that the Creature grasped an understanding of equal justice from Victor Frankenstein. The Creature also accumulates a greater understanding of justice from the family he observes and grows to love. For months he watched their lives, he learned from them, and he helped them. The Creature would bring them wood for their fires simply because he wanted to help. In his mind, he believed that it might be possible for him to one day become a part of this caring family. He loves them and cares for them, so why would they not do the same? Of course, the family reacts in a horrific way. The father, DeLacey, is blind and does …show more content…
not hesitate to converse with the Creature, but his family condemns him. The Creature recounts the interaction to Victor and says, “Agatha fainted; and Safie...rushed out of the cottage. Felix...dashed me to the ground and struck me violently with a stick,” (Shelley 122). The Creature thought if he was kind, he would be justified in receiving kindness back. However, he is taught through this family that his kindness does not warrant equal kindness in the presence of the fear he creates. It is no fault of his, but it is the simple truth that a thing that is different will be met in a harsh manner no matter how kind that thing is. It is through this experience that the Creature learns to repay harsh actions with rash actions of his own, and so he burns down the cottage of this family he once loved. He viewed it as justification, however, for his poor treatment. The final group of people that the Creature learns more about justice from is a little girl and a man. The Creature had just saved a young girl from drowning when a man shot him in return. Where a natural man would have been met with gratitude and exaltation, the Creature was met with a bullet. He says, “This was then the reward for my benevolence! I had saved a human being from destruction, and, as a recompense, I now writhes under miserable pain of a wound,” (Shelley 129). He had only wanted to help the girl so she might live, but was still treated like a monster. It was then that the Creature gave into a hatred of mankind. It is then that the Creature decided he was justified in inflicting pain and fear on any human, for they had inflicted pain onto him even when he had helped. He had suffered injustice all his life, and now it had finally resonated within him. The creature takes these moments where he learns what he believes to be examples of justice and proceeds to live out his life in pursual of justice from man. The Creatures pursual of injustice is successful in the way that he beats Victor, but unsuccessful in the way that he loses all the hope he once held in receiving justice.
The Creature successfully wins justice over Victor by outliving him. Victor tells the reader, “I dare not die and leave my adversary in being,” (Shelley 189). It is his last wish to kill the Creature, but the creature is granted this instance of justice when he is the one to live while Victor is the one to die. Victor is truly the only one the Creature ever wanted to hurt. Now that Victor has died, the Creature feels like that desire of his is justified. The Creature says, “The completion of my demonical design became an insatiable passion. And now it is ended; there is my last victim,” (Shelley 207). The Creature’s desire to hurt has been received justice. This transitions into an area in which the Creature is partially successful in receiving justice and partially unsuccessful. This occurs when the Creature hurts others. At first he does not intend to hurt people, but he soon realizes the power that he holds in his ability to hurt people. The Creature says, “I too can create desolation; my enemy is not vulnerable; this death will carry despair to him, and a thousand other miseries shall torment and destroy him,” (Shelley 131). He knows that by hurting people close to Victor, he might also hurt Victor himself. It is justified to him as he is simply hurting someone who has hurt him since the moment he
was brought to life. It is justified. It is justice. The Creature is unsuccessful in achieving justice for himself when he loses hope of ever having someone with whom he would spend his entire life with. The only hope the Creature had to obtain a companion depended on Victor. He was the one who had to create the companion to be exactly like the Creature, only female, but when he died he took that hope with him. It is said by the Creature, “For while I destroyed his hopes, I did not satisfy my own desires...I still desired love and fellowship,” (Shelley 208). The Creature successfully destroyed Victor, but in doing so he also destroyed himself. Victor was meant to create a female monster, but he previously destroyed it and his death means there is no hope of a new female creature being created (Brooks) . The destruction of the female monster negates any hope that the Monster might gain access to a "chain of existence and events" that would offer him relation and the possibility -- even the phantasmatic possibility -- of satisfaction for his desire. He gained justice, and committed himself to never being justified with a companion. The monster’s vengeful acts of murder suggest that so long as revenge motivates justice, the result, conversely, will likely be more injustice (wordpress). The creature seeks justice, but is equally successful and unsuccessful. The significance in the Creature’s search for justice throughout the novel is that it allows the reader to decide who is truly the monster in this story. Justice is something given to someone who has been wronged and that is all the Creature has ever experienced. So then can he truly be called a monster if he was simply seeking justice for all he had been through? He was never given justice, always hate. The Creature said, “If I cannot inspire love, I will cause fear,” (Shelley 173). The Creature was also never taught right from wrong. He was never taught good ways to seek out justice and bad ways to do it. He learned from experiences. The creature learned to stay away from people because he would be met with injustice. “Some attacked me, until, grievously bruised by stones and many other kinds of missile weapons, I escaped to the open country, and fearfully took refuge in a low hovel,” (Shelley 94). He simply did what he observed and learned how to do. He was beaten when people saw him, so he stayed away. He was beaten when he saved a girl's life, so he stayed away. He learned that the justice for his good deeds were always injustice and unfortunately that caused in his mission for justice to look like an attack from a monster. Shelley suggests forgiveness and repentance as the only viable, just response to injustice; the only response that doesn’t lead to more injustice(wordpress). Finally, the Creature’s suffering of injustice highlights the faults of mankind. He says to Victor, “you had endowed me with perceptions and passions, and then cast me abroad an object for the scorn and horror of mankind,” (Shelley 127). He categorizes mankind as a terrible and judgemental group of people because that is all he has felt even though he is kind and simply wants to help. The Creature is claiming it is in mankind’s nature to judge and to refuse justice, no matter what. His search for justice is significant in that it gives the reader insight to decide who is truly the monster of this story. The Creature’s understanding of justice was aught to him through the continuous injustice he suffered from. He wanted nothing more than to fit in and experience life, but he has never given the opportunity. The only moments of normalcy occur when people do not look at him. It is only rational that he seeks justice for his fowl treatment. He is equally successful and unsuccessful in his search for justice, which causes the reader to take a moment and think if he truly is a monster. He may look like a monster, but he is like any other human, if not smarter. This hideous and deformed creature, far from expressing himself in grunts and gestures, speaks and reasons with the highest elegance, logic, and persuasiveness (Brooks). He is smart, human like, and seeks justice the same as any natural-born man did in this story. So if the monsters’ search for justice is the same as man’s, who is to say that man is not the monster?
After abandoning the Creature, it vows “eternal hatred and vengeance to all mankind” which ends up being in direct correlation with Victor’s life (Shelley 143). The Creature is able to carry out this deed by not directly attacking his creator and abandoner, but the one’s of his creator’s affections. The Creature not only makes Victor feel pain through the killings, but also through the guilt that Victor experiences since he knows that he (Victor) is the reason that all the people are now dead. After all the killings had happened, “yet one duty” remained for Victor, to silence the Creature and all feelings of sorrow rooted from death (Shelley 176). This was Victor’s act of revenge in which only one of the two could live while the other was dead. Victor was so influenced by all the death he had experienced, that his revenge took him to his deathbed. The ending years of Victor’s life had been spent focusing and caring for the matters concerning the Creature and himself, which differs of how Zeus felt about his revenge, as it was only of current importance and had no impact on his
The Creature, Victor Frankenstein’s creation, is shaped into a monster through its experiences, instead of the nature of itself, which is more expected. Victor Frankenstein, on the other hand, is shaped into a monster because of his mind’s power-hungry nature. Victor treats his creature poorly and he himself becomes wicked. While the Creature also becomes wicked in the end, its actions are more justified because multiple people treated it poorly, causing the Creature to lash out. Even though Victor Frankenstein and the Creature both turn into wicked monsters, to some extent, only one of
Victor’s lack of compassion and sympathy towards the monster causes him to become angry instead of guilty. His cruelness to his creation made the monster kill and hurt the people he did but “when [he] reflected on [the monster’s] crimes and malice, [Victor’s] hatred and revenge burst all bounds of moderation,”(Shelley 325). Without compassion Victor thinks that the only way to stop the monster is to get revenge on him, instead of just giving him the empathy and kindness that monster craved. Victor realizes that "if he were vanquished, [he] should be a free man...balanced by those horrors of remorse and guilt which would pursue [him] until death. ”(Shelley 731).
Critic Northrop Frye says, “Tragic heroes tower as the highest points in their human landscape that they seem the inevitable conductors of the power about them, the great trees more likely to be struck by lightning than a clump of grass. Conductors may of course be instruments as well as victims of the divine lightning”. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein greatly exhibits the theme of the consequence of knowledge and irresponsibility among others through its tragic hero, Victor Frankenstein. Northrop Frye’s quote is certainly true when looking at Frankenstein’s situation. Victor is a victim of his divine lightning, and ultimately causes much trouble for himself; however, Victor also serves as the tragic hero in the lives of the monster, his family, and his friends.
The creature displays his hatred toward Frankenstein for leaving him immediately and not providing guidance and protection in this harsh, new world by murdering his family and friends. While seeking his creator, the creature first murders Victor Frankenstein’s youngest brother William and exclaims, “I too can create desolation; my enemy is not invulnerable; this death will carry despair to him, and a thousand other miseries shall torment and destroy him” (Shelley 144). The creature wishes for Victor Frankenstein to suffer taking his own companions away, forcing him to be miserable as well by destroying his personal relationships with others by murdering loved ones. Through the rejection of the creature because of his physical appearance, he learns what is accepted as well as how you can treat another being as he succumbs to his anger and proceeds with his crimes. The creature tells Frankenstein, “your hours will pass in dread and misery, and soon the bolt will fall which must ravish your happiness forever.
...e all the evil things they have done. When he goes to Victor's coffin, the creature does the opposite of what a evil being would do. He grieves over Victor despite all the horrible things the creature has done to Victor. The creature even feels guilt over the innocent people he has killed and the torment he put his creator through. Despite Victor's actions leading the creature to commit evil deeds, the creature finds in himself to feel regret in the end.
Victor Frankenstein, a character in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, decided that he wanted to bring life into this world; a life that would eventually go on to killing the creator himself. The Creature can be seen as either innocent or guilty. The popular opinion of the Creature seems to be that he is guilty considering how he has burned down a house, set up Justine for murder and murdered three others. However, after taking a close look at the text, it can be seen that Frankenstein’s creature is not guilty. He was brought into this world with a child-like innocence, never progressed past the emotional state of a child and was rejected throughout his whole life causing him to do the things he did.
By the time of their death, both Victor and the creature has committed repugnant acts: Victor created a being out of corpses and then abandoned it and let it wreak havoc on the people he loved, the creature directly killed three people. But Victor tells Walton that, “During these last days I have been occupied in examining my past conduct; nor do I find it blamable […] nor do I know where this thirst for vengeance may end” (269). Victor is not able to see past the metaphorical clouds that seem to shroud his mind from seeing the truth. Furthermore, Victor is not able to let go of his hate for the creature. In contrast, the creature admits, “But it is true that I am a wretch. I have murdered the lovely and the helpless” (275). The creature is able to recognize that he has made mistakes and as a result he loathes himself. He tells Walton that, “You hate me, but your abhorrence cannot equal that with which I regard myself” (275). Although no amount of regret or sorrow can bring back the people that he has killed, the creature does acknowledge the evil of his actions, which in turn allow him to make come to peace. He is able to reconcile his vengeful feelings towards his creator and praises Victor by calling him, “worthy of love and admiration among men” (275). Both Victor and the creature have done committed actions against each
In Frankenstein, Victor’s monster suffers much loneliness and pain at the hands of every human he meets, as he tries to be human like them. First, he is abandoned by his creator, the one person that should have accepted, helped, and guided him through the confusing world he found himself in. Next, he is shunned wherever he goes, often attacked and injured. Still, throughout these trials, the creature remains hopeful that he can eventually be accepted, and entertains virtuous and moral thoughts. However, when the creature takes another crushing blow, as a family he had thought to be very noble and honorable abandons him as well, his hopes are dashed. The monster then takes revenge on Victor, killing many of his loved ones, and on the humans who have hurt him. While exacting his revenge, the monster often feels guilty for his actions and tries to be better, but is then angered and provoked into committing more wrongdoings, feeling self-pity all the while. Finally, after Victor’s death, the monster returns to mourn the death of his creator, a death he directly caused, and speaks about his misery and shame. During his soliloquy, the monster shows that he has become a human being because he suffers from an inner conflict, in his case, between guilt and a need for sympathy and pity, as all humans do.
“Frankenstein” by Mary Shelly explores the concept of the body, life, ‘the self’ and most of importantly humanity, which is repeatedly questioned throughout the novel. The definition of humanity is the quality of being humane or in other words someone that can feel or possess compassion. Despite all the facts against the “monster” in “Frankenstein” he is indeed what one would consider being human. Humanity isn’t just about ones physical appearance but also includes intellect and emotion. Some people argue that the “monster” is not a human for he was not a creature that was born from “God” or from a human body. That being said, the “monster” is not only able to speak different languages, he can also show empathy - one of many distinct traits that set humans apart from the animals. Both the “monster” and his creator, Victor, hold anger and feel a sense of suffering throughout the novel. Victor is a good person with good intentions just like most individuals, but makes the mistake of getting swept up into his passion of science and without thinking of the consequences he creates a “monster”. After completing his science project, he attempts to move forward with his life, however his past – i.e., the “monster” continues to follow and someone haunt him. While one shouldn’t fault or place blame on Frankenstein for his mistakes, you also can’t help but feel somewhat sympathetic for the creature. Frankenstein just wants to feel accepted and loved, he can’t help the way he treats people for he’s only mimicking how people have treated him, which in most cases solely based on his appearance. Unlike most of the monsters we are exposed to in films past and present, the character of the “monster” ...
“Revenge alone endowed [him] with strength and composure; it modeled [his] feelings, and allowed [him] to be calculating and calm” (145). Victor gained new purpose and even on his deathbed holds to the principle that he is justified in desiring the death of his enemy. Moment before his death he turns to Captain Robert Walton and says, “I feel myself justified in desiring the death of my adversary. During these last days I have been occupied in examining my past conduct; nor do I find it blamable” (156). He even begins to lose the small amount of compassion he had for the creature’s struggle. When visiting his family’s graves he cries that, “they were dead, and I lived; their murder also lived” (145). Previously in the novel he blamed himself for the deaths of Mathew, Justine, and Henry, claiming to be their murderer and lamenting on the evil he had set forth into the world. Victor now places the weight of these deaths solely on the monster’s shoulders and believes it is his god given burden to cleanse the world of this evil. He had been “assured that the shades of [his] murdered friends heard and approved [his] devotion… rage choked [him]”(146). The death of the monster would not even weigh on his conscience since it is god’s
In the novel Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, the main theme revolves around the internal and external consequences of being isolated from others. Being isolated from the world could result in a character losing his/her mental state and eventually causing harm to themselves or others. Because both Victor Frankenstein and the creature are isolated from family and society, they experienced depression, prejudice, and revenge.
In the book, Frankenstein, there are many justice and injustice problems. Justice is the opposite of injustice, the way that injustice is unfairness or undeserved outcomes. I believe that the greatest injustice in the book is the creation of the monster. I believe the human kind should not have the right to even try to create life, they are not God. in someway, victor is taking away a major role in a woman's life, in how women are the only one the can “give life”, in the giving birth to a human being.
Victor plays the role of God and creates his “Adam” but unlike the Adam from the bible, the creature is not designed in a perfect image or guarded by the care of his creator. The creature compares himself to Satan when he says “I considered Satan as the fitter emblem of my condition; …like him, when I viewed the bliss of my protectors, the bitter gall of envy rose within me” (228). The creature was forsaken his first days of living and learned about the society of humans through observation and reading. God introduced Adam to the world with everything provided and guided him his early days of life. He saw Adams loneliness and granted him a mate. The creature asks Frankenstein for a companion as a last chance to become happy and good hearted. Victor destroys his hope and brings more tragedy among him by doing so. God creates all things good, Victor took his Job as a creator and his creation became malignant because unlike God he was ashamed of his creation. From that point on the creatures’ heart becomes cold and makes sure to destroy his creator. When Victor dies the creature repents for the damage that he has done and would live with continuing pain till his death. “…My agony was still superior to thine; for the bitter sting of remorse will not cease to rankle in my wounds until death shall close them forever” (380).
Mary Shelley in her book Frankenstein addresses numerous themes relevant to the current trends in society during that period. However, the novel has received criticism from numerous authors. This paper discusses Walter Scott’s critical analysis of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein in his Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine Review of Frankenstein (1818).