Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Morality in Frankenstein
Morality in Frankenstein
Frankenstein morality essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Morality in Frankenstein
Agyarko
AP English
Mr. Quartermus
January 30, 2015
Corruption of Innocence
In Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein innocence is fragile. Time and time again it was proved to be easily shattered by knowledge. The book served to prove that Humans are fundamentally flawed creatures; their ambition, prejudice, and vanity often lead to corruption. Victor Frankenstein did not create a monster. What was created was an innocent being that was tainted and corrupted along with its creator. In the conflict between the creation and the creator many lives were ruined. But who was really at fault? By Jean Jacques Rousseau’s standards, the true monster in Frankenstein is society
What led to the creation of the monster in the first place was Victor’s desire to be
…show more content…
revered by society. He wanted to be a great scientist, he desired world renown. As a result he became lost in his ambition. Victor’s thirst for knowledge blinded him. After he created his “Adam” he realized what he had actually done, “For this I had deprived myself of rest and health. I had desired it with an ardour that far exceeded moderation; but now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart.” (18). He was obsessed with creation but he forgot several important details. After creation should come nurturing. When he had successfully given the creature life he was unable to see an innocent being. Instead he saw a monstrosity. Rather than take responsibility for his creation he spurned it. “All men hate the wretched; how then, must I be hated, who am miserable beyond all living things! Yet you, my creator, detest and spurn me, thy creature, to whom thou art bound by ties only dissoluble by the annihilation of one of us.” (36). He successfully became god and as God did, Victor created the devil. Originally a blank slate, Victor’s creation learned from the evils of society. Victor deprived his creation not only of the natural human desires of love and acceptance but also of a teacher. He was forced to provide for himself with no knowledge about the world. When he describes his first night he says, "I was a poor, helpless, miserable wretch; I knew, and could distinguish, nothing; but, feeling pain invade me on all sides, I sat down and wept" (68). Eventually he began his own quest for knowledge. What he found was that his only desire was companionship. When his desires were satisfied by neither society nor his creator he turned to vengeance. “I am alone and miserable: man will not associate with me; but one as deformed and horrible as myself would not deny herself to me. My companion must be of the same species and have the same defects. This being you must create.” (53) Of course, when Victor destroyed the companion the creature desired he fell further and further into the depths of evil. Society denied the monster access to the happiness he longed for. Vengeance had become all the monster had left. “You can blast my other passions, but revenge remains—revenge, henceforth dearer than light of food! I may die, but first you, my tyrant and tormentor, shall curse the sun that gazes on your misery.” (57). Victor caused his innocent creation to become an evil monster. The monster was originally benevolent, when he speaks to Victor he says, “Remember that I am thy creature; I ought to be thy Adam, but I am rather the fallen angel, whom thou drivest from joy for no misdeed. Everywhere I see bliss, from which I alone am irrevocably excluded” (56). Though the monster’s deeds were evil, they were not purely his fault. He was like a child that was raised by abuse and as a result only knew how to abuse. In Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein society is ignorant.
Dr. Frankenstein’s monster is mistreated because of his outward appearance. He was attacked, shunned, and scorned. His only “crime” being his existence. This made him understandably bitter and angry. “Was there no injustice in this? Am I to be thought the only criminal, when all human kind sinned against me?” (55). His treatment by society was not justified by anything except his demeanor. Justine’s fate was similar to that of the monster. This was an ironic act of vengeance. The monster was accused of being a monster based on assumptions rather than proof. All the same Justine was treated as if she were guilty without the chance to prove her innocence. The priest as well as her associates treated Justine as if she were guilty. Justine, being a devote Catholic that she confessed to the crime in order to prevent herself from going to hell. “I leave a sad and bitter world; and if you remember me and think of me as of one unjustly condemned, I am resigned to the fate awaiting me. (31). In the end her faith in humanity was lost. Elizabeth’s innocence was also lost at the trial of Justine. Elizabeth lost her innocence because her trust had been betrayed. "How shall I ever again believe in human goodness? Justine, whom I loved and esteemed as my sister, how could she put on those smiles of innocence only to betray? (30). She had believed that Justine was innocent, when Justine confessed her faith in humanity was lost. The weak …show more content…
nature of man was shown during the trial. “Several witnesses were called who had known her for many years, and that had spoken well of her; but fear and hatred of the crime of which they supposed her guilty rendered them timorous and unwilling to come forward.” (29) Those around her that knew her good character were afraid to speak up on her behalf. Society had failed Justine as it had failed the monster. When Victor goes back on his promise to give the monster a female companion the monster lost all of his preexisting morals.
In his rage he vowed to ruin Victor’s life. “If I cannot inspire love, I will cause fear, and chiefly towards you my archenemy, because my creator, do I swear inextinguishable hatred. Have a care; I will work at your destruction, nor finish until I desolate your hear, so that you shall curse the hour of your birth.” (60) The monster no longer has a trace of purity within him. He was forced to watch everyone experience happiness around him while he himself was shunned. “Now that virtue has become to me a shadow, and that happiness and affection are turned into bitter and loathing despair, in what should I seek for sympathy?"(203) Isolation had left the monster bitter and angry at the world, but most importantly his
creator. The point the Monster began to lose his innocence was when he left the forest. When he started his pursuit of knowledge he saw the evil in society. When the pains of knowledge first manifested in the monster he exclaimed "I cannot describe to you the agony that these reflections inflicted upon me; I tried to dispel them, but sorrow only increased with knowledge. Oh, that I had forever remained in my native wood, nor known or felt beyond the sensations of hunger, thirst, and heat" (81). What the monster desired was to go back to an earlier time in his existence; before he was subject to the hatred of society. Because the monster could not go back to reclaim his innocence he proceeded down the only path that was left to him. Rejected by his creator and society he embraced his new evil nature. When he confronts Dr. Frankenstein after the doctor destroys what would have been the monster's mate, he says "Beware; for I am fearless, and therefore powerful" (116). Prior to this the monster was still similar to a child having a temper tantrum than evil. He had evolved from the ignorant and fearful creature that stuck his hand in the fire. He had learned from the society that hated him and rather than be afraid he became bold. The monster chose to become the tormentor rather than the tormented. Despite what the monster had been through his actions; though understandable, were inexcusable. The monster murdered Frankenstein’s brother, William implicated an innocent women. As if not enough, the monster also vented its anger against Dr. Frankenstein on his fiancé and Elizabeth murdered her. The monster was a blank slate that was tainted by society’s influence. Prior to his interaction with the world outside of the forest he was harmless, as Jean Jacques Rousseau believes, society has a corrupting influence on everyone. Works Cited Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. USA: Tom Doherty Associates, Inc, 1988
The result of society’s resentment, Shelly’s cynical text unmasks the fact that Frankenstein’s creation was not produced as innately monstrous but instead learned to become a monster over time. Once again utilizing the literary element of irony, the monster’s exclamation “Nay, these are virtuous and immaculate being!”, demonstrates the monster’s resentment towards not only humans but also himself. Realizing biological inferiority to be the cause of his misfortune, the monster’s frustrations underline the novel’s central paradox of the natural versus the artificial. That is, because human beings exist within the natural order of society and therefore control the law, characters such as Victor, Felix, and even Walton’s carelessness remain protected. Meanwhile, Frankenstein’s creation, an artificial production, exists as mankind’s ostracized enemy regardless of the being’s emotional or intellectual superiority. Beyond envy, the monster’s monologue additionally reflects a sense of desperation. Utilizing the repetition of the word “injustice,” Shelly’s literary choice solidifies the perpetual denial of societies crimes against Frankenstein’s monster. Concluding his speech with the word “injustice”, Frankenstein’s monster testimony signifies the unavoidable truth the being’s presence never caused
As a romantic, archetype and gothic novel, Victor is responsible for the monsters actions because Victor abandons his creation meaning the creature is dejected and ends up hideous and fiendish. It is unfair to create someone into this world and then just abandon it and not teach it how to survive. The quote from the creature “Why did you make such a hideous creature like me just to leave me in disgust” demonstrates how much agony the creature is in. He is neglected because of his creator. The monster says “The hateful day when I received life! I accurse my creator. Why did you form a monster so hideous that even you turned from me in disgust?” Victor is wholly at fault for his actions, image and evil.
To begin, the monster longed for human connection so badly, he even begged Victor to create his wife: “You must create a female for me with whom I can live in the interchange of those sympathies necessary for my being. This you alone can do, and I demand it of you as my right which you must not refuse to concede,” (174). In this quote, the monster asks Victor to make him a companion, which Victor blatantly denies. This eventually leads to
Victor’s lack of compassion and sympathy towards the monster causes him to become angry instead of guilty. His cruelness to his creation made the monster kill and hurt the people he did but “when [he] reflected on [the monster’s] crimes and malice, [Victor’s] hatred and revenge burst all bounds of moderation,”(Shelley 325). Without compassion Victor thinks that the only way to stop the monster is to get revenge on him, instead of just giving him the empathy and kindness that monster craved. Victor realizes that "if he were vanquished, [he] should be a free man...balanced by those horrors of remorse and guilt which would pursue [him] until death. ”(Shelley 731).
As a tragic hero, Victor’s tragedies begin with his overly obsessive thirst for knowledge. Throughout his life, Victor has always been looking for new things to learn in the areas of science and philosophy. He goes so far with his knowledge that he ends up creating a living creature. Victor has extremely high expectations for his creation but is highly disappointed with the outcome. He says, “I had desired it with an ardour that far exceeded moderation; but now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart” (Shelley 35). Frankenstein neglects the creature because of his horrifying looks, which spark the beginning of numerous conflicts and tragedies. At this point, the creature becomes a monster because of Victor’s neglect and irresponsibility. The monster is forced to learn to survive on his own, without anyone or anything to guide him along the way. Plus, the monster’s ugly looks cause society to turn against him, ad...
If Victor had stayed around and showed the monster the real world, he might have not have went on to perform violent actions. This portrays Victor as a selfish character and gives more of an insight on his personal life. As a child, Victor is only interested in furthering his own knowledge and not worried about anyone else. He spent much of his time “drawing the picture of [his] early days... when [he] would account to [himself] for the birth of that passion which afterwards ruled [his] destiny” (Shelley 34), or otherwise a magnificent creation that would change his future. When constructing the Monster, he put all of his relatives in the back of his mind, and only focused on his own success and victory. This further explains the theme of being selfless and only doing certain things that will benefit
The fact that Frankenstein’s creation turns on him and murders innocent people is never overlooked; it has been the subject of virtually every popularization of the novel. What is not often acknowledged is the fact that Frankenstein himself embodies some of the worst traits of humankind. He is self-centered, with little real love for those who care about him; he is prejudiced, inflexible and cannot forgive, even in death. While some of these traits could be forgivable, to own and flaunt them all should be enough to remind a careful reader that there are two "monsters" in Frankenstein.
Since the fall of Adam, humanity has always been keenly aware of the existence of good and evil, right and wrong, justice and injustice. Any person who has been betrayed or abused has felt the weight of injustice. Anyone who has been mistreated has experienced the desire for vengeance. However, opinions begin to differ when defining the boundaries of justified revenge. Varying perceptions prevents humans from viewing and validating the motives of others. In Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein, the two main characters were driven to madness by their desire for revenge against each other. In the book, Victor Frankenstein and his creature both relayed the same story; however their individual perspectives drastically shift the roles of the perpetrator and the victim. Mary Shelly’s brilliant juxtaposition between the Creature and his Creator demonstrated the relativity of justified revenge.
“Revenge alone endowed [him] with strength and composure; it modeled [his] feelings, and allowed [him] to be calculating and calm” (145). Victor gained new purpose and even on his deathbed holds to the principle that he is justified in desiring the death of his enemy. Moment before his death he turns to Captain Robert Walton and says, “I feel myself justified in desiring the death of my adversary. During these last days I have been occupied in examining my past conduct; nor do I find it blamable” (156). He even begins to lose the small amount of compassion he had for the creature’s struggle. When visiting his family’s graves he cries that, “they were dead, and I lived; their murder also lived” (145). Previously in the novel he blamed himself for the deaths of Mathew, Justine, and Henry, claiming to be their murderer and lamenting on the evil he had set forth into the world. Victor now places the weight of these deaths solely on the monster’s shoulders and believes it is his god given burden to cleanse the world of this evil. He had been “assured that the shades of [his] murdered friends heard and approved [his] devotion… rage choked [him]”(146). The death of the monster would not even weigh on his conscience since it is god’s
“.he declares 'everlasting war against the species, and, more than all, against him who had formed me, and sent me forth to this insupportable misery” (Bond). The monster is angry with Victor. He wants Victor to build him a companion, or he will kill everyone that Victor loves. After Victor rejects the idea, the monster wants Victor to feel the loneliness and isolation that the monster has felt all his life. “.if I cannot inspire love, I will cause fear; and chiefly towards you, my arch-enemy, because my creator, do I swear inextinguishable hatred” (Shelley, 204).
Throughout Frankenstein, one assumes that Frankenstein’s creation is the true monster. While the creation’s actions are indeed monstrous, one must also realize that his creator, Victor Frankenstein, is also a villain. His inconsiderate and selfish acts as well as his passion for science result in the death of his friend and family members and ultimately in his own demise. Throughout the novel, Shelley investigates the idea of monstrosity. She makes the point that a monster does not have to be genuinely evil in order to be considered monstrous.
In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein, the protagonist, produces a monster and instead of teaching his monster the mannerisms and norms of society, he abandons him. Victor expects his monster to make it in the harsh, critical society without being taught correct demeanors because he believes that having correct mannerisms is intuitive. A common viewpoint of the book is that Frankenstein’s monster should receive the blame, because he should have had proper nature, but in reality, society nurtured him to act out. Victor isolated the monster, and other members of society followed in Victor’s example and also treated him as so; which made the creature’s actions monstrous. Frankenstein played God, causing society to view his creature as a monster and as a risk to the public, but Frankenstein did not intend to create the monster as dangerous in nature; society nurtured him to act as a beast.
Many people know that Mary Shelley, the author of Frankenstein, was part of a family of famed Romantic era writers. Her mother, Mary Wollstonecraft, was one of the first leaders of the feminist movement, her father, William Godwin, was a famous social philosopher, and her husband, Percy Shelley, was one of the leading Romantic poets of the time ("Frankenstein: Mary Shelley Biography."). What most people do not know, however, is that Mary Shelley dealt with issues of abandonment her whole life and fear of giving birth (Duncan, Greg. "Frankenstein: The Historical Context."). When she wrote Frankenstein, she revealed her hidden fears and desires through the story of Victor Frankenstein’s creation, putting him symbolically in her place (Murfin, Ross. "Psychoanalytic Criticism and Frankenstein.”). Her purpose, though possibly unconsciously, in writing the novel was to resolve both her feelings of abandonment by her parents, and fears of her own childbirth.
Victor has a lack of respect for the natural world that leads him on the path to becoming a monster. In creating the monster Victor is trying to change the natural world. He is trying to play the role of god by creating life.
Mary Shelley in her book Frankenstein addresses numerous themes relevant to the current trends in society during that period. However, the novel has received criticism from numerous authors. This paper discusses Walter Scott’s critical analysis of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein in his Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine Review of Frankenstein (1818).