Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Federalists vs republicans
Federalist vs republican views
Federalists vs republicans
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Federalists vs republicans
Short answer questions 1. Discuss the significance of the duel as it related to the young, fledging nation. - The duel was very significant because it showed Aaron burr as a murderer. The death of Hamilton also led the Federalist to go against the republicans which will later create more problems to the infant nation. But even if Hamilton died his ideas were alive. His ideas about check and balances were embraced. Burr in the other hand flew the state but the “joint statement” that was later created showed Burr as innocent. 2. Account for the “sharp differences” dividing the leadership of the revolutionary generation. - The “sharp differences” dividing the leadership of the revolution generation was the problem between federalism and republicanism. …show more content…
The federalist and the republicans both have very different views and they went against everything each other said. Another reason was also the difference between North and the South. The North and the South both had different viewings and they collided with each other’s view. 3. Contrast the arguments of the North and the South on the issue of slavery. - The South and the North had very different views on slavery. The South brought in history, religion, legality, social good and even humanitarianism, to support their arguments. They said that if slavery was ended so suddenly then the economy of the south would suffer. They also said that if the slaves were freed than there would be a problem of unemployment, and problem of settlement. They also argued that the slavery existed throughout the history in many other countries, and it would go against the state of mankind if they get rid of it. But on the other side, the North argued that freeing the slaves would make the American Revolution more successful. They said that having slaves would go against the purpose of the American Revolution that “All men are created equal”. The abolitionists from the North also said that slavery is unjust and unfair. But at the end the agenda of slavery was closed and put off until 1808. 4. Explain what Washington had in mind when he composed the Farewell Address? - When he composed the farewell Address he had in mind many different advices for the infant country. First he wanted the country to stay united because if the country as united then nothing could tear them apart. Next, he wanted the country to stay away from foreign affairs because United States couldn’t sustain another war. He also had in mind that the country would go through his advice. - 5. Ellis indicates that “the truly effective centers of power were located in two political partnerships based on personal trust.” Explain and discuss this statement. - The most effective partnership based on personal trust of John Adams and Thomas Jefferson was very effective. They were very effective because they are from different states and they have different views which make their work collaborative. They works include the views of both the north and the south. When their relation was destroyed then conflicts was raised between the federalist and the republicans which put the national unity in danger 6. Adams and Jefferson had a conflicting vision of the American Revolution. Explain the essentials of this difference. Discuss an analogy in today’s world. - Jefferson view was more romanticized and it focused on the positive aspects of the revolution whereas Adams view was more messy and negative. Adams said that the winning of the war was totally luck. The essential of this difference was that people supported Jefferson version which supported American as more powerful and successful. People regarded Adams version as incorrect. In today’s world people believe in Jefferson’s version whereas Adams version. But Adams version is also used by historians due to the complexity and intelligence he used. Quotations from the book Quotes Significance "What distinguishes the American Revolution from most, if not all, subsequent revolutions worth of the name is that in the battle for supremacy, for the "true meaning" of the Revolution, neither side completely triumphed. Here I do not just mean that the American Revolution did not "devour its children" and lead to blood-soaked scenes at the guillotine or the firing squad wall, though that is true enough. Instead, I mean that the revolutionary generation found a way to contain the explosive energies of the debate in the form of an ongoing argument or dialogue that was eventually institutionalized and rendered safe by the creation of political parties" (Ellis 24). This passage is one of the most memorable passages in the whole book because it sums up the essential argument of the book, regarding how the American Revolution differed from other revolutions. It says how the Revolution was in a form of argument and debate instead of war and violence. This quote is also significant because it shows that neither side in the Revolution completely won or succeeds. “Tell them from ME, at MY request, for God’s sake, to cease these conversations and threatening about a separation of the Union. It must hang together as long as it can be made to” (Ellis 72). This text was from Hamilton right after this declination and the republican’s success. After the decline of the Federalist party the delegates from New England was considering succession, but Hamilton stopped them from doing so. This changed my perspective about Hamilton. It showed me that even thought he was in serious decline; he still cared for the unity of the nation. “Madison agreed to permit the core provision of Hamilton’s fiscal program to pass; and in return Hamilton agreed to use his influence to assure that the permanent residence of the national capital would be on the Potomac River”(Ellis 79). During the Revolution, leaders were making compromises with each other due to different views. This compromise is significant because it allowed the fiscal program to pass and it also led the capital to be near the Potomac river. This text has a big impact because due to this compromise Washington D.C was brought into the choice for the capital. “If slavery’s cancerous growth was to be arrested and the dangerous malignancy removed, it demanded immediate surgery” (Ellis 150). In this quote Ellis has a demanding tone and he shows slavery as a disease that if not removed it can cause danger. This quote is very significant because it portrays how slavery is growing and how it could potentially harm the infant nation. “A relieved George Washington wrote home to a Virginia friend that “the slave business had at last been put to rest and will scarce awake” (Ellis 195). This text is a fact and it has a really big impact on the American Revolution. It shows how George Washington, who is such a great leader, denies the cause of slavery. Washington, instead of solving the problem, puts it aside which shows that he wasn’t considering the biggest threat to the union seriously. Quotes Significance “Washington was the core of gravity that prevented the American Revolution from flying off into random orbits, the stable center around which the revolutionary energies formed” (Ellis 200). This quote shows Washington as the most important person during the Revolution. This sentence by Ellis is biased completely towards Washington. It is biased because Washington wasn’t the only important person during the Revolution. He contributed a lot towards the unity of the nation but other Founding Brothers also contributed to the unity. “They are, from this period, to be considered as Actors on a most conspicuous Theatre, which seems to be peculiarly designed by Providence for the display of human greatness and felicity” (Ellis 220). This quote by George Washington is very significant because it shows that the nation possessed great potentials. He thought that the expansion to the West will bring America greatness and prosperity. This quote also portrays American’s freedom and liberty. The quote is very compelling because it shows America as a successful country with greatness and felicity. “More than any great leader in American history before or since, he was accustomed to getting his way, and equally accustomed to have history prove him right” (Ellis 267). This sentence shows the point of view of the author towards George Washington. Ellis believed that Washington was a great leader who was always accustomed to getting his way and making history prove him right. This quote can be used to show how Washington utilizes his powers and steps down from a post before the power corrupts him. “Men who have been intimate all their lives cross the street to avoid meeting, and turn their heads another way, lest they should be obliged to touch hats”(Ellis 309) The purpose of this sentence was to show the way leaders behave during the Revolution. It is very significant because it shows how the nation could be torn apart due of the relationships between the men. This sentence also shows how the different party system of America made the people think differently. “This was Adams’s apparently impulsive decision, announced on February 18, 1799, to send another peace delegation to France” (Ellis 319). This sentence is biased towards Adams. Its purpose is to show that Adams made a good decision without the consultations with any member of the government. It shows the positive side of the decision and signals that Adams can make right decision on his own rather than with the help of his wife, Abigail. Book Review The thesis of Joseph J.
Ellis’s Founding Brother is that the success of the United States was not always a foregone conclusion as it is today. No one present in the beginning of the Revolution knew how it would turn out at the end. The Founding Brothers had to work hard in order to bring success to United States. The evidence that supported this thesis is that the leaders during that time doubted the success of the infant nation and they believed that the nation might fall apart. The next evidence is that the Founding Brothers had a strong belief that they can be a seen as a legitimate country to other threating country if they stay together as a united nation. The final evidence is that the country didn’t want to deal with anything that could possibly bring on the thoughts of disunion. For example, slavery was avoided due to this danger towards the unity. Ellis is a very biased historian because he has a special affiliation for George Washington and John Adams. The POV of the author is very significant because when the author of the book is biased towards some particular character, then the author would only show the positive side of the character in order to show him greater than the others. This would lead the people to understand the biased version of the story. This book is written from the political perspective because it talks about political effects caused by the revolution. It also has some social perspective. For example, the friendship and the collaboration of John Adams and Thomas Jefferson was a social thing which affected the politics. Overall, this was a very good and interesting book which improved my understanding of U.S History. It helped me learn the timeline and the details of the significant events during the American Revolution. Some question that I had were about slavery. Slavery’s agenda was closed because of the danger it possessed but I wanted to know about when the agenda was reopened and how the agenda of slavery progressed to the
conclusion? In order to answer this question I could read a book specific to slavery and its ending. In general, I enjoyed reading this book and it increased my knowledge about history.
However, the author 's interpretations of Jefferson 's decisions and their connection to modern politics are intriguing, to say the least. In 1774, Jefferson penned A Summary View of the Rights of British America and, later, in 1775, drafted the Declaration of the Causes and Necessity of Taking Up Arms (Ellis 32-44). According to Ellis, the documents act as proof that Jefferson was insensitive to the constitutional complexities a Revolution held as his interpretation of otherwise important matters revolved around his “pattern of juvenile romanticism” (38). Evidently, the American colonies’ desire for independence from the mother country was a momentous decision that affected all thirteen colonies. However, in Ellis’ arguments, Thomas Jefferson’s writing at the time showed either his failure to acknowledge the severity of the situation or his disregard of the same. Accordingly, as written in the American Sphinx, Jefferson’s mannerisms in the first Continental Congress and Virginia evokes the picture of an adolescent instead of the thirty-year-old man he was at the time (Ellis 38). It is no wonder Ellis observes Thomas Jefferson as a founding father who was not only “wildly idealistic” but also possessed “extraordinary naivete” while advocating the notions of a Jeffersonian utopia that unrestrained
The Revolution of 1800 was a turning point for American politics as power peacefully transitioned from the federalist party to the democratic-republican party when Thomas Jefferson, a democratic republican, won the election against John Adams. Adams lost the election because his support decreased after he went against his party’s advice to go to war with France. The French revolution created another divide between federalists and democratic-republicans as the federalists sided with the British and the democratic republicans sided with the French. Along with differences about the French Revolution, the Federalist party had opposing ideas of a strong central government, loose construction of the Constitution, and support of a market economy compared to the democratic republicans who supported strong state
Unfortunately, by choosing to focus on only a few events, Ellis's book fails in that it lacks somewhat of a scope. The book also focuses on some of the founding brothers in much greater detail than others. While I come away with a wealth of knowledge about both Adams and Jefferson, I have less knowledge of Ben Franklin and Aaron Burr, as Ellis's focus is significantly less on them.
When one explains his or her ingenious yet, enterprising interpretation, one views the nature of history from a single standpoint: motivation. In The American Revolution: A History, Gordon Wood, the author, explains the complexities and motivations of the people who partook in the American Revolution, and he shows the significance of numerous themes, that emerge during the American Revolution, such as democracy, discontent, tyranny, and independence. Wood’s interpretation, throughout his literary work, shows that the true nature of the American Revolution leads to the development of United State’s current government: a federal republic. Wood, the author, views the treatment of the American Revolution in the early twentieth century as scholastic yet, innovative and views the American Revolution’s true nature as
Jefferson had abused his executive power and increased the power of the executive branch even though he had original beliefs that the president should not be too strong. Jefferson promising a “Republican Revolution” followed the Federalists path, ending increasing debt as well as the power of the executive branch. Jefferson had made promises to Americans, some of his promises in particular the increase of land for the yeoman farmer and promised not to keep were decreasing National debt and Federal power. Jefferson’s presidency was to a certain extent a “Republican Revolution” but at the same time it had also become a continuation of Federalist policies.
In order for someone to understand what lesson Joseph Ellis was trying to teach, one must first come to an understanding of these five short stories. The first story to review and understand is called the duel. The duel is one of the most historical conflicts in history. The duel actually came to be from years of personal and political resentment, between Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr. These two men really hit high tensions during the New York gubernatorial race. Due to Burr Being a candidate for this race, and due to the duel taking place during the time dueling was becoming outlawed, the duel had a vast political ramification. With the duel going badly and Alexander Hamilton Dying, Burr under New York and New Jersey stature was charged, but all charges were later dismissed, bringing Burrs career to an end. One can conclude that the significance regarding the duel is how violence during the beginning of American statehood, was highly politically based. What really makes the duel uniquely important is the fact or trend after a revolution for revolutionaries to turn on one another in an unavoidable bloodbath. Ellis seems to side more with Hamilton and make him look like a saint.
Many people think that all of the scandals and betrayal in politics have just recently started but little do they know that they have been going on since before people would write things down so we do not have them on record. One of the stories that we do know though is the Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr story. This story is a very interesting story because it shows us the difference of how things were handled back then and how we handled them now. If this story were to happen in our time nothing of the same importance would really happen but since it was handled then it ended up being a duel and resulted in the death of one of those two men.
When the French Revolution grew to its most radical peak the Federalists reacted with horror as citizens overthrew the aristocracy. In launching the New Ship of State Hamilton said, "The cause of France is compared with that of America during its late Revolution. I own I do not like the comparison...well informed men must equally unite in the doubt whether this [free and good government] be likely to take place." Thomas Jefferson's response was "I still hope the Revolution will issue happily...The livery of the whole earth was depending on the issue of the contest, and was ever such a prize won with so little innocent blood?" Many Republicans even imitated French Jacobins in dress and in speaking. The difference between the Federalist and Republican social philosophies is most easily seen among their different reactions to the French Revolution.
The duel between Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr is one of, if not the most famous duel in American History. Dueling, at its creation, was meant solely as a way of retaining one's honor or reputation from the slander or activities of another. Rarely did a duel ever come to a gunfight, but it there was an impasse and no way to truly gain one’s honor back, then a duel was the way to do it. Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr clashed many times throughout their lives and it ultimately ended the life of one, and the political life of the other.
One of the positive aspects is that Larson’s book provides numerous details about the process of how our presidential candidates become elected, why they wanted to be president, and the time and procedures by which this occurs. His book gives a little bit of background about the American Revolution, which is a benefit that he includes this because it helps the reader to see the candidates differentiated view of the Revolution. This is one of the reasons that led Thomas Jefferson and John Adams to run against each other so that they could define and justify their different views about the Revolution and why the revolution was significant. Thomas Jefferson said the Revolution was about the triumph for individual liberty and John Adams said the American Revolution was because the strong central government wanted to fight for and ensure individual freedom. In Larson’s book he writes with great detail about Jefferson’s and Adam’s personal lives before the election, which gives the reader an inside look on the candidate’s opinions, character and their friendship prior to the election; that of which is not really seen when learning about the election of 1800 in school textbooks or in movies which define mostly the facts and
This book may be aimed towards the audience of adults, but I hope that soon teenagers will soon become interested in History. I have alway been a huge fan of American History, but I do not like to read. This book though I do want to read, because of the amazing explanations of “The Duel.” Ever since this broadway show Hamilton by Lin Manuel Miranda I have wanted to learn more about the life of Alexander Hamilton,. Whenever I find a book that describes Hamilton’s life I want to read it, and i'm glad I read Founding Brothers. Within this book Ellis uses many quotes from Hamilton and Burr which is personally one of my favorite parts. The quotes of Hamilton is one of my favorite parts of the book because of Hamilton's amazing skills with a paper and pen. Another element of the book I enjoyed is the still problematic conclusion of Hamilton's death. In “The Duel” there were two shots fired, one by Hamilton and one by Burr. There are two hypothesis’ shared in the book on who shot first. This is important to me because the author was not biased and did not only include one option, I feel like in doing this they gave the reader a choice of which conclusion they want. Joseph J. Ellis did not only stay unbiased he also included some fun and interesting little tidbits throughout the story. When I say this I mean when he described the connection between the weapons used in “The Duel.”
Many sections of the book were unnecessary and useless for my certain task. Most of the book was also written in a story format and was not cold hard facts. However Chapter 5 gave an in-depth description of the Boston Tea Party and also the effects it had on the colonist. It also stated what the colonies did about this and how they went about rectifying it.
Jefferson’s beliefs in local self government created differences between himself and Alexander Hamilton which created the Federalists (Hamilton followers) and the Democrat Republican’s (Jefferson followers).
Each episode played some of the biggest roles when it came to shaping the Early Republic and affected the America today. The two biggest themes that “evolved” are collaboration and slavery. Collaboration between the founding fathers can definitely be seen throughout the world. In each World War countries teamed up with or against each other, fighting for their own sides, eventually phasing out into the United Nations which is an intergovernmental group to promote cooperation internationally. Slavery has definitely made a change in America where slavery was abolished in 1865. In conclusion, Ellis shows the readers the lives of the founding fathers to teach the readers their lives and how it shaped America to be the strong nation it is
...oncerns over which groups would provide leadership for the masses, and how those masses were to be represented. Men like Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin, who had provided great leadership for this fledgling nation, were leaving the fate of America in new hands. The pessimists voiced their opinions, but there was a great feeling off optimism as the Industrial Revolution began to harbor its effects throughout the United States and the world.