Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflection paper on forensic psychology
Forensic psychology study comparing
Forensic psychology in criminal investigations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reflection paper on forensic psychology
Forensic psychological evaluation is mainly the study of human behavior within a legal context. In conducting interviews, the psychologist is needed to elicit accurate collection of data which is inclusive of all the information gathered and then do a detailed recollection, while in traditional clinical psychological evaluation which is aimed to evaluate individuals with problems so that they can be used to solve the problems. Here the psychologist ensures a thorough and extensive evaluation and collection of data on the patient’s condition. The main aim is to ensure that data provided is well furnished and provides a solid treatment plan to the patient. Discussion of informed consent This is theconsent by a client to a certain proposed medical or and therapeutically attention. In forensic evaluation psychologists should be determined to provide data which is reliable and at the same time ensuring that they are not biased. This also helps to avoid conflict of interest, while in traditional clinical psychological evaluation; this is achieved through understanding relevant facts, risks, benefits and other alternatives needed. Legal documentation is also very important to ensure that the victims have a right to say what type of treatment …show more content…
For example, the time and the number of interviews the victims have undergone or and the list of clinical interviews conducted. Reports also contain opinions that include diagnosis and psychological evaluation. The evaluator should be able to explain step by step the process through results and conclusions are met, while in traditional clinical psychological evaluation, the purpose of report writing is to communicate the process of a clinical action. The report provided should be true to principles of action research and should be both understandable and have positive impact to different
Therefore, a defendant, the court or the attorney general can order a hearing on motion. Before the date of the hearing of the case, the court may order a psychological or psychiatric evaluation of the defendant. Pursuant to the provisions of section 4247, psychologists or psychiatrists report the findings to the court. The court has the permission to request a deadline for the evaluation so that it can insure the promptness of the examination. The court can also request the experts who carried out the evaluation, to specify observations made of the defendant, the type of examination carried out and the opinion of the experts on the competency
In respect to the fidelity and responsibility guideline, the participants were given a full defriefing after the study. Participants also had their psychological state analyzed (McLeod, 2008). Participants in this study were not protected from harm and were at more than mini...
The Ethical Principles and Code of Conduct, published by the American Psychological Association are the standard guidelines for all Psychologists. Forensic Psychologists are also informed by Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychologist. Psychologists practicing forensic psychology can use these two documents to help clarify ethical questions. This paper will focus on role conflicts specifically in the area of Sex Offender Management and the ethical conflicts that may arise as a result and how to best handle this situation when faced with it. When an individual chooses to practice psychology within the legal system, they must be aware that this can at any point in their career lead to ethical conflicts. Just the possibility alone of ethical dilemmas, are or should be a concern for forensic psychologists.
I have been involved in conducting forensic psychological and neuropsychological evaluations for the Department of Child and Families (formally DYFS) for over four years. I was providing these services through Forensic Psychology and Neuropsychology Services (FPNS), a company based out of Hamilton, NJ. I am on the FPNS contract with DCPP to provide forensic evaluations as a psychologist. I worked in an assistive capacity for the first three years under the supervision of Dr. Jonathan Mack, Psy.D., a licensed psychologist and subsequently worked independently on cases conducting forensic evaluations for DCPP through FPNS. I also have training and experience in conducting other forensic evaluations involving both civil and criminal matters. I have a doctorate in Clinical Psychology from APA credentialed Suffolk University, Boston, MA. During my doctoral training, I completed course work in human development theory including child development; assessment of adults and children; psychopathology; multicultural issues and individual differences; ethics; and empirically
Forensic Psychology is a specialized practice by psychologists in areas of clinical psychology, counseling psychology, school psychology, and neuropsychology. You will be engaged regularly as an expert and primarily proposed to offer professional psychological expertise to the judicial system.
As future school psychologists, it is important to understand the legal and ethical liabilities when dealing with clients. In this case, understanding and applying confidentiality, duty to warn and duty to protect shows the importance of the career field and what is required. Understanding how important confidentiality is in order to maintain a relationship with a client if very important. It is also very important to understand when it is necessary to breach confidentiality without being held legally and ethically responsible. When it comes to safety of others, a psychologist is legally and ethically liable to report the threat and warn anyone that is possibly in danger. This case shows how important it is to warn those in danger and the consequences when duty to warn and protect is neglected as it was in the Tatiana Tarasoff
Overall, though, I believe that Stein is the closest scholar here-mentioned to have accounted for the explanation behind these controversies. The main mistake made by many modern scholars lies in the planning and the research – too much effort is spent on seeking to explain this opposition between the Proculians and the Sabinians in terms of two internally coherent law schools which differ entirely and have held controversies stemming from a specific occurrence. I have personally, as a student of the Roman law, found it difficult in reading the sources and differing theories from scholars to do just this – because, as Scarano Ussani stated, nowhere, in the mass of research that has been done, have any definitive results been reached. As afore-mentioned, I ruled out the political explanation for the purpose of answering this question, and the social explanation does not add a great deal to the debate for me. The theories supporting the social standpoint as addressed in this essay are among the worst for choosing to ignore many of the hard facts in order to make their theory fit better. This leaves only the philosophical and methodological explanations. The philosophical explanation is a reasonably sound one, although as explored above, I do believe that its significance has been largely exaggerated. There is no doubt over the fact that philosophy has played an influential role - even if you only look at Gaius’ ius gentium which contains a certain level of Stoic influence, but as mentioned above there are major differences which have been overlooked slightly in those arguments. The methodological explanation is another seemingly logical one, and the most reliable of all theorems explored in this essay, in my opinion, as it i...
Forensic psychology is such a complex sub-discipline of psychology, and this complexity makes it difficult to define. The simplest way to define forensic psychology would have to be: sub-di...
In order to understand how to compile evidence for criminal cases, we must understand the most effective types of evidence. This topic is interesting because there are ample amounts of cases where defendants have gotten off because of the lack of forensic evidence. If we believe forensic evidence is so important and it affects our decisions, then maybe we need to be educated on the reality of forensic evidence. If we can be educated, then we may have a more successful justice system. If we have a more successful justice system than the public could gain more confidence that justice will be served. In order to do this, we must find what type of evidence is most effective, this can be done by examining different types of evidence.
In an article titled, What is Forensic Psychology, Anyway?, John Brigham attempts to explain the beginnings of psychology and law; Forensics Psychology. Brigham explains that, “forensic psychology involves the interaction of psychology and the legal process” (Brigham 274). Brigham further highlights a historical case and the precedent established by the House of Lords through the induction of the McNaughten Rule, which translates, “To establish a defense on the ground of insanity it must be clearly proved that, at the time of committing the act, the party accused was laboring under such defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know nature and quality of the act he was doing, or he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong” (Finkel, 1988, p21; Brigham p275). Brigham explains that the concept of introducing psychology into the field of law ...
Forensic evidence can provide just outcomes in criminal matters. However, it is not yet an exact science as it can be flawed. It can be misrepresented through the reliability of the evidence, through nonstandard guidelines, and through public perception. Forensic science can be dangerously faulty without focus on the ‘science’ aspect. It can at times be just matching patterns based on an individual’s interpretations. This can lead to a miscarriage of justice and forever alter a person’s life due to a perceived “grey area” (Merritt C, 2010) resulting in a loss of confidence in the reliability of forensic evidence.
The professional role of a forensic psychologist I am interested in is working as a prison psychologist. The reason it interests me is because prison psychologists are a big part in the function of today’s society. The prison psychologist play an important role in the rehabilitation with those who we would call the common criminal as well as working with criminals who are clinically insane. There are many roles that the prison psychologists do in the prison system such as treating all different criminals from murderers, sex offenders, violent offender and even those who have committed white collar crimes. The prison psychologist tend to work in many different types of facilities from maximum prisons, minimum security prisons, and mental health facilities that hold
In order to pursue my dream as a Forensic Psychologists I am aware that I have to put in a lot of effort and determination in to school. There are various aspects to pursuing my career such as getting good grades, volunteering in police departments, networking, and doing an immense amount of research on my field. The career I chose requires a lot of my time not only as a student but as an adult. What I mean by this is that from now on, my time is devoted in to acquiring skills and changing my persona in order to be better qualified for the my job. Throughout this road map I will talk about what is a Forensic Psychologist, what are the requirements, skills necessary, what I could do with this degree, the personality types that are best suited for this job, and what are the prospects of moving up.
Forensic psychologist go through different types of test to become trained in testing the mental stability of criminals. Forensic psychology is important in todays’ Driver 1921. Although this was not the first time that a psychologist was used as a witness it was the first time that psychologist was used to help confirm the mental stability during the crime.(Weiner) In this case the psychologist findings was not used to make a final verdict of the driver. Another important case that came about in the field of forensic psychology was Frye vs. The United states 1923.(Weiner)
According to the American academy of forensic science, the forensic sciences form a vital part if the entire justice and regulatory system. Forensic science is an enticing career having to do with science and criminal justice, a large variety of schooling is needed to start this job Despite the fact that it can be a dangerous environment it can be an exciting profession to pursue. There are many different fields in forensic science that you can study or major in but they all have the same objectives.