Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Lab report about a case study of patient food poisoning
Food Poisoning Research Paper
Lab report about a case study of patient food poisoning
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
AD: Hi I am Anderson Cooper. We have two guests on the show tonight. The first is Bill Marler. Marler is the most prominent foodborne illness lawyer here in the United States of America; he began focusing on foodborne illnesses IN 1993 when he represented Brianne Kiner against Jack in the Box due to an E. coli 0157:H7 causing Kiner to be seriously injured (“William Marler”). Our other guest today is Randal Meyer of the CATO Institute. CATO believes that there should be a limited government and a free market; they view too much government intervention will cause a less free society (“About CATO”). These two are going to discus an important topic on food safety, whether the executives of a Food company should be held liable for adulterations …show more content…
When they fail to do this by violating regulations they comment a crime. Thus they must be held legally liable. So, the Justice Department should pursue jail time for those who produce unsafe food to show the importance of food safety and the executives’ role in maintaining food safety.
AD: Thank you, Mr. Marler. Mr. Mayer, how do you respond to Mr. Marler’s comments?
RM: I believe that food safety is important but the executives shouldn’t be held criminally liable for lacking food safety. I do believe that food safety is very important, but it is the role of the market to promote safer foods not the governments. Executives should want to make safer foods in order for their company to grow not because the Justice Department will put them in jail. That is why I think the Justice Department should not pursue jail time.
AD: Mr. Marler, how do you respond to Mr. Mayer’s opinion?
BM: It is the governments role to protect it citizens by promoting safer food. Therefor, the government should create regulations and hold executives, like the DeCosters, legally liable for the damages done by unsafe
…show more content…
Mayer, how do you respond to Mr. Marler’s comments?
RM: I agree that food safety is important. However, as I have stated before it is the market that should promote food safety not government regulations and legal liabilities. This will promote a free society and economy. The free market will ultimately protect the consumer’s interest out of the companies’ interest to sell their goods to a wider verity of people. According to McFadden and Stefanou (2016), there are several examples where the free market is working in favor of higher quality foods.
AD: Thank you, both, Bill Marler and Randal Meyer for your opinions on this serious matter of food safety and the government’s role, whether it limited allowing for a free market to promote food safety or a stronger government to promote the same thing. I am sure everyone listening learned a lot. When it comes to violating regulations, there are many opinions on how it dealt with. Some, like Bill Marler, believe the executives should be held liable and that they should receive prison sentences. Others, such as Randal Meyer, think that the executives should not be held liable thus not receive jail time because they had no knowledge of the contamination. That is all for tonight’s debate, thank you all for
McCoy, J. J. How Safe Is Our Food Supply? New York: F. Watts, 1990. Print.
Regulating what the government should control and what they should not was one of the main arguments our founding fathers had to deal with when creating our nation, and to this day this regulation is one of the biggest issues in society. Yet, I doubt our founding fathers thought about the idea that the food industry could one day somewhat control our government, which is what we are now facing. Marion Nestles’ arguments in the book Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health deal with how large food companies and government intertwine with one another. She uses many logical appeals and credible sources to make the audience understand the problem with this intermingling. In The Politics of Food author Geoffrey Cannon further discusses this fault but with more emotional appeals, by use of personal narratives. Together these writers make it dramatically understandable why this combination of the food industry and politics is such a lethal ordeal. However, in The Food Lobbyists, Harold D. Guither makes a different viewpoint on the food industry/government argument. In his text Guither speaks from a median unbiased standpoint, which allows the reader to determine his or her own opinions of the food industries impact on government, and vise versa.
Almost every angle of the food industry can be considered dangerous. It is dangerous to make the food, as a meatpacking job is one that is viewed as having abnormally high risks; however when the food is handed over a counter on a tray or prepared in a family of four’s kitchen, it poses a huge risk to humankind. Foodborne illnesses are all too common and almost everybody has the possiblity of contracting a foodborne illness. These are life threatening diseases that need to be monitored and regulated; therefore the enforcement of government regulations in the fast food industry could potentially save many lives that are lost annually due to the numerous factors that need regulation.
In 2014, Chipotle Mexican Grill became a prominent force in the food industry. They were bolstered by the fact that they were using high quality ingredients and healthy foods in their products. Forbes Magazine even praised Chipotle for their yearly revenue growth comparing their 18% to McDonald’s 2%. So how did they suddenly drop out of the spotlight? For any company, a food safety incident can be catastrophic especially if your company is built around this perception. This is where the ethical issue begins for Chipotle. Beginning on October 25, 2015 a number of people began feeling sick. Within weeks the Centers of Disease & Prevention declared an outbreak of E.coli. Interviews were then conducted for the reported ill patients from the states
Every day in the United States, 200, 000 people are sickened by a food-borne disease. Schlosser’s urge for the consumer to assume responsibility for the travesties waged against American society by the fast-food industry is not a new idea.
“There are … responsibilities more important than making sure the food our families eat is safe” (Joe Biden). The vice president of the United States does not consider food safety important. The government food agencies such as The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), do not do enough to ensure our safety from food. Our standards of ensuring food safety have dramatically dropped due to government food agencies not doing enough to protect us and making new rules and regulations to hard for food producers.
...does now to ensure our food safety. Thirty years from now I bet we will not have to worry about food borne illnesses and contamination of imported products because our government agencies will be so sophisticated and high tech that all of those worries will be long forgotten. I think President Obama has done our country some good by passing The Food Safety Modernization Act back in January of 2011. As I mentioned in this paper, some disagree with this law and I see both sides of the argument. Small farm owners at home and overseas could potentially be put out of business by this law, but then again do we as consumers really want to be eating food that is not safe? This shows me that he is concerned about our Nation’s health and reducing the number of foodborne illnesses every year. I am hoping that we will continue to build on this law and improve with every year.
McDonalds is one of the most well known fast food restaurants in the world. It is so popular that it sells seventy-five hamburgers every second and is shockingly also the worlds largest toy distributor (Lubin, and Badkar.) The powerful company is an overwhelming influence not only in the worlds economy, but also the worlds holistic lifestyle and health; therefore, McDonalds must be carefully monitored-carefully monitored meaning every move, every change, every single action the company makes needs to be a healthy one. Since the McDonalds business is unbelievably large, it has to manufacture a lot of food, and in a fast food business more in numbers means lower quality. But the food served isn’t lower quality. The food is not even food. It is poison! The chain restaurants food that is sold to the world population contains over 70 cancer-promoting ingredients (Roberts), not to mention it also contains preservatives that are butane-based, bleached flour, and the main ingredient found in silly putty (Breyer). It is clear that McDonalds does not sell food that anyone should be eating; yet, it poisons 68 million people a day, or in other words one percent of the population (Lubin, and Badkar.) 68 million people poisoned every single day. This atrocity absolutely without doubt needs to be stopped.
The way that our society has been able to produce food has changed in the last fifty years that the several thousand years beforehand. Robert Kenner addresses problems of our society’s food system and how there is only a handful of large corporations that have basically taken over the food system in the United States in the film Food, Inc. Large businesses have been able to significantly produce vast amounts of food and set low prices for consumers, usually because of government subsidies, which results in enormous profit and greater control of the food supply sources. This leads to negative health, safety, and economic consequences. This documentary examines the exercises of the few large food corporations from the start of production
The 1995 federal program review that thought to reduce federal deficits in the upcoming operational budget triggered the creation of a newly NPM administered body though the process of de-bureaucratization of that regulatory body in question (Aucoin, 1998). While the review was economic in its essence, the proposed framework that thought to rectify the problems was methodological change through the implementation of a new administrative system. In this case, it was in fact the NPM system that would combat the high financial and administrative costs associated with food inspection and enforcement activities. Federalism stood in the way of effectively improving coordination between federal and provincial government’s regulatory bodies. The Government of Canada established and enforces food safety standards in the country as a whole, whereas the individual provinces are responsible for administration at establishments within that provinces border.
Standard Operating Procedure Handling a Food Recall Food and Nutrition Services Policy manual: Food Recall; Food Safety FDA 2013 food codes 3 Food, subparts 3-301; 3-302 Purpose: Proper steps to prevent a food borne illness in the event of food recall. Scope: Food and Nutrition Services Manager & Supervisors; Food and Nutrition Service employees. Procedures: Food and Nutrition Services manager/supervisor will notify staff if there is an event of food recall; and perform corrective action.
Food safety is an increasingly important public health issue. Governments all over the world are intensifying their efforts to improve food safety. Food borne illnesses are diseases, usually either infectious or toxic in nature, caused by agents that enter the body through the ingestion of food. “In industrialized countries, the percentage of people suffering from food borne diseases each year has been reported to be up to 30%. In the United States of America, for example, around 76 million cases of food borne diseases, resulting in 325,000 hospitalizations and 5,000 deaths, are estimated to occur each year.” (Geneva 2)
First off, The government of the United States of America is ultimately responsible for keeping our foods safe. Many of the Presidents of the major food companies also obtain government jobs. When a problem occurs with food and a food has to be recalled a change has to be made. Someone comes up with a law to make sure that the problem does not occur again. The government evaluates the law and either passes or denies it. The type of foods that we buy from the grocery store were pre evaluated by the government. I think the reason why most foods are unsafe and are still being obtained by local residents is because the major food companies work and make deals with government so
The third weakness is the fact that food tests, inspections, and the detection of contaminants are taken seriously only after an outbreak of some food-borne diseases, food poisoning, or deaths. The increase in the number of food establishments or outlets such as cold stores, hypermarkets, and supermarkets reported by the Public Health Director has also made inspection and control mo...
Food safety culture society can be considered of comparable significance (3)to administrative consistence and client benefit . On the off chance that any of these three perspectives fizzle , the business itself could come up short (Ungku Zainal Abidin et al , 2013 ) . Numerous businesses additionally lift security to the same or even a larger amount of significance than these as no business can exist without representatives . Food safety highlights in the work environment is another great case of the significance of value affirmation in the public eye today (Taylor , 2011 ) . Regardless of whether it is the honesty of a security bridle for working at statures or the water testing for the city , quality estimations , preparing and framework arrangement can all straightforwardly influence workers and even open (4)wellbeing (Griffith , 2012 ) . Food safety is a logical idea portraying and dealing with , readiness , and capacity of foods in ways that anticipate foodborne disease . This incorporates various schedules that ought to be taken after to stay away from conceivably extreme (5)wellbeing perils (Roberts et al , 2012 )