Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of grammar to morphology
On the need of some grammar wilson follett summary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of grammar to morphology
A Summary of “On the Need of Some Grammar”
1 In the book Modern American Usage: A Guide by Wilson Follett presents the article “On the Need of Some Grammar” that states that there is a permanent need for grammar.
2 Follett states that there is a need for traditional grammar, more specifically syntactical grammar. Syntactical grammar allows an individual to logically analyze sentences.
3 In more recent time, the opposite view point in some grammar guides indicate that instead of syntax and traditional grammar there should be a need for morphology. Morphology is the scientific view of analyzing grammar; the formation of words.
4 The harmful activity is that individuals seek guidance and are deprived of it due to science which is harmful. Also, that speech is place among things that are artificial and unimportant, this may also be harmful.
5 Traditional grammar must
…show more content…
Due to this anything is accepted and there is no argument regarding the standard and what is correct and good grammar. 8 Good grammar is not only helpful with syntax, it is also helpful with the rules that come close to those already in the tradition. Simple frequency can improve many popular errors.
9 Challengers of grammar are rather right to mention that it is an artificial examination made after the fact, and not a statement of natural laws; they are quite wrong to think this convict it from being artificial. Those who argue that grammar is a craft of the arts rather than as an essential part of linguistic naturalists.
10 Traditional grammar is what we recognize as English Grammar was framed by educators as if English was Latin. Latin is further described as a dead language which they are more knowledgeable of than English. The English language is derived from the Romance language and the Germanic language to offer the explanations and differences that cannot be grasped without the knowledge of
In the article by Kyle Wein “I Won’t Hire People Who Use Poor Grammar. Here’s Why.” explains reasons as to why the owner of a business only hires educated, employees. If someone cannot tell the difference between simple words such as there, their, and they’re, the manager will not hire that applicant. That’s not the only thing Wein looks for in an employee. He is looking for smart, educated, employees who use good grammar. “Yes, language is constantly changing, but that doesn’t make grammar unimportant. Good grammar is credibility, especially on the internet.” Grammar is important no matter what the job is. According to the author, without good use of grammar you will not have a job. Without a job you will have no money, no satisfaction, and/or
In the article “I won’t hire people who use poor grammar here’s why.” published in Harvard business review on managing yourself, Kyle Wiens argues that he have a zero approach which does not allow for any grammar mistake because it makes people stupid, and he believes that people who made mistake in grammar do not deserve to have a job. Further, he supports his thesis by stating that people who made an error in their writing will do error in their work and their life. In addition, he claims that language is constantly changing, but that does not ignore the importance of the grammar. Thus, this claim is supported by stating that good grammar is credibility. For example, programmers who
2. Follett explains that the type of grammar we need is traditional. A traditional approach to grammar involves an emphasis on syntax. Syntax deals with how words relate to each other in a sentence. This knowledge of how words work together provides the type of logical analysis necessary to speak and write correctly. An emphasis on syntax demonstrates the conservative view that language is an art of expressing meaning.
The idea of good usage can be explored in many facets. Many writers such as Dowst, Sale, Thomas and Albutt have enlightened me to their own views on what constitutes good or bad usage. The thought never occurred to me that I too am guilty in many ways of improper use of the English language, including grammar, word use, tense, structure, the list could go on. But then again what is termed good use by me may not be good to another. To me, my own personal use of language is acceptable and could probably stand some improvement. However, without learning grammar, syntax, diction, etc., I never would have been able to get to where I am now today.
There are many reasons why good grammar is important at work. First of all, if an applicant has bad grammar, then he or she may not even get hired in the first place. Kyle Weins, CEO of ifixit, said in his “Harvard Business Review article” that he won’t even hire applicants who have bad grammar; his company has an English test that all applicants must take. Many other companies also have English tests in the hiring process. He also said that good grammar skills show how serious someone is about they’re work; someone with lazy grammar looks like a lazy worker. Plus, good grammar makes people look smarter; someone with a wide vocabulary and great grammar would do a better job impressing a client (Weins ). In her Frobes article, Susan Adams listed the reasons why she thinks good grammar at work is important. She says that good grammar show that an employee knows when to use context appropriate language. It also shows respect to the person they’re talking to and finally it shows that they’re organized people. Employers value an organized employee because they more dependable (Adams).
When I was in grade school and high school I was taught grammar everyday no matter what the subject. That is not the case anymore. Grammar is not taught like it used to. Teachers are avoiding the fact that they are not teaching grammar. They want children to write more about what they feel then write about facts.
Bagno asserts that if the grammar books do not account the innovative forms in them, the problem is entirely theirs not the populations. If purists chose to continue speaking in the traditional way, it is their right. Nobody is obliged to adopt innovations. “All we ask is that the other forms are also considerate correct”. (BAGNO, 2009).
In the article, “Current Developments in Research on the Teaching of Grammar” by Hossein Nassaji and Sandra Fotos two main issues had been discussed. The first one is whether grammar teaching make any differences to language learning where the questions raised are whether grammar should be taught or not. The second issue is what kinds of grammar teaching have been suggested to facilitate second language learning. If grammar should be taught, how much and should it be implicit or explicit grammar teaching? Lastly, the article discussed on the current approaches to grammar teaching in which formal instruction can be integrated with communicative activities which are processing instruction, interactional feedback, textual enhancement, task-based
"The principles and rules of grammar are the means by which the forms of language are made to correspond with the universal froms of thought....The structures of every sentence is a lesson in logic."
In the grammar Thrax dealt with what they would call the phonology and morphology of the language. Grammar is the technical knowledge of the language generally employed by poets and writers. It has six parts:
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., Svartvik, J. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, Essex: Longman Ltd.
Freeman, D. E. & Freeman, Y. S. (2004). Essential linguistics: what you need to know to teach reading, ESL, spelling, phonics and grammar. Portsmouth: Heinemann
It is not uncommon to say that grammar instruction plays an important role in language teaching. Regarding the status and importance of grammar teaching, a variety of opinions have been made. Batstone (1994) states that “language without grammar would be chaotic: countless words without the indispensable guidelines for how they can be ordered and modified” (p. 4). More vividly, Wang (2010) makes two similes. She compares grammar to the frame of a house, which is a decisive factor to ensure the solidness of it. Additionally, she regards grammar as a walking stick, whose function is to help and support students to learn English. Thus, the nature of grammar instruction manifests its own significance as it helps students enhance their overall language proficiency by integrating grammar into other aspects of learning, like listening, speaking, reading and writing.
Language proficiency can achieved through grammatically correct and effective use of language structure. Therefore, a sound of knowledge of the fundamental rules of grammar is essential for the acquisition of language competence.
Susan Adams and Kyle Weins have both written articles on the importance of using good grammar in the workplace. Each article gives numerous compelling reasons why this is a good practice. Susan Adams’ article first reason for doing so is in regards to how other people would view someone who uses bad grammar. She brings out that someone’s image can be damaged when they have improper speech habits; consequently their chances of advancing at work could be limited. Second, she shows how using poor grammar could cause a manager to view an employee as unorganized or unable to perform more advanced tasks. Finally, she brings out that someone who has poor speaking habits could be perceived as not having a firm grasp on the subject they are speaking about (Adams). Kyle Weins article also brings out some important points on bad grammar in the workplace. First, he shows that in today’s world people’s intelligence is judged based on what they say or what they type. The second point relates to how a manager could perceive someone with poor grammar. A manager could see an employee who uses poor grammar as someone who struggles to concentrate on tasks and doesn’t show attention to detail. Finally, he shows that peo...