Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Parent child relationships in literature poetry
The effects of absent fathers essay
Parent child relationships in literature poetry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Parent child relationships in literature poetry
The novel ‘After the First Death’ written by Robert Cormier utilise character construction to explore the issue of relationship dilemma and betrayal. The issue of relationship dilemma is presented through the detached and estrange father and son relationship between a teenager, Ben and his reticent father, General Mark Marchland. The issue is also displayed through Artkin, the impassive terrorist leader and his apprentice, Miro, where their relationship lacks mutual trust. Cormier explores the issue of betrayal through General Mark’s betrayal to Ben and Miro who betrayed Artkin by failing to save him. Through the use of characters, the author conveys the message that an impractical relationship with the absence of mutual trust can be the central …show more content…
General Marchand is constructed as a secretive father who has no true connection to his teenage son, Ben. The general is a powerful man who works for a secret military organisation. Thus, Marchand scarcely reveals anything about himself or his work to Ben, hence causing him to become a stranger to his own son, where Marchand perceives Ben as a ‘member of staff’. General Mark considers he knows Ben ‘better than anyone’ and knew whether his son was ‘doomed to failure or not’ as he observes Ben through monitoring without actually involving himself in Ben’s life. General Mark is depicted by his son as ‘the phantom… the actor’, therefore; enable readers to comprehend that Ben feels incoherent to his own father. Ben also defines himself as ‘an accident of birth’, therefore, demonstrates the negligence he endures and is convinced he is a shame to his father. However, despite his father’s action, Ben would risk his life to ‘honour’ his father. Through the character of General Mark Marchand, Cormier enables the readers to explore the issue of relationship dilemma, where a father conceals himself from his son, which displays absence of confidence that caused the …show more content…
General Mark Marchand and Miro are both constructed to have a relationship dilemma with the person they betrays, thus present the idea that betrayal is the consequence of a relationship without trust. General Marchand betrays his own son, Ben, as he has scepticism on Ben’s competences to succeed in honouring him and serve his country. Miro believes he betrayed Artkin by reaching for the bus driver instead of warning Artkin about the attack and consequently results Artkin’s death. General Marchand assigns an important task to Ben; however, Marchand gave Ben false information with the knowledge that Ben would be a failure. General Marchand describes Ben as ‘a scapegoat’ who is used to ‘absorb the blame’. This shows that Marchand deceived Ben with a sense of trust by revealing his secret and betrayed Ben by expecting him ‘on being a coward’. Thus, Marchand betrays Ben as he did not have high expectations of his son’s capabilities and loyalty. Miro believes that he was ‘responsible for Artkin’s death’ because he felt he had yet again disappointed Artkin. Miro then feels guilt over his betrayal to Artkin, whereas General Marchand stills defends himself after Ben’s death because he never trust Ben. Both General Marchand and Miro betray a person whom they did not share equivalent amount of trust. Cormier uses these characters to present the idea that betrayal is often the consequence
about the war and his lack of place in his old society. The war becomes
There is a major change in the men in this novel. At first, they are excited to join the army in order to help their country. After they see the truth about war, they learn very important assets of life such as death, destruction, and suffering. These emotions are learned in places like training camp, battles, and hospitals. All the men, dead or alive, obtained knowledge on how to deal with death, which is very important to one’s life.
Examples of loyalty can be found in many pieces of classic literature such as _Don Quixote_, _The Odyssey_, and _Sir Gawain and the Green Knight_. Many characters in the stories profess their loyalty to other characters. Some of them fail in their loyalty tests while others prevail. I found loyalty to be an underlying theme in all three pieces of literature covered in this paper. The examples provided should prove the theme of loyalty.
In the beginning of the short story, the young boy is already imprinted with the ideas of war from his father. His father was a former soldier who “had fought against naked savages and followed the flag of his country..” (Bierce 41). The image of war that is imprinted on the young boy from his father is that of nobility and righteous that comes from war.
The violent nature that the soldiers acquired during their tour in Vietnam is one of O'Brien's predominant themes in his novel. By consciously selecting very descriptive details that reveal the drastic change in manner within the men, O'Brien creates within the reader an understanding of the effects of war on its participants. One of the soldiers, "Norman Bowler, otherwise a very gentle person, carried a Thumb. . .The Thumb was dark brown, rubbery to touch. . . It had been cut from a VC corpse, a boy of fifteen or sixteen"(O'Brien 13). Bowler had been a very good-natured person in civilian life, yet war makes him into a very hard-mannered, emotionally devoid soldier, carrying about a severed finger as a trophy, proud of his kill. The transformation shown through Bowler is an excellent indicator of the psychological and emotional change that most of the soldiers undergo. To bring an innocent young man from sensitive to apathetic, from caring to hateful, requires a great force; the war provides this force. However, frequently are the changes more drastic. A soldier named "Ted Lavender adopted an orphaned puppy. . .Azar strapped it to a Claymore antipersonnel mine and squeezed the firing device"(O'Brien 39). Azar has become demented; to kill a puppy that someone else has adopted is horrible. However, the infliction of violence has become the norm of behavior for these men; the fleeting moment of compassion shown by one man is instantly erased by another, setting order back within the group. O'Brien here shows a hint of sensitivity among the men to set up a startling contrast between the past and the present for these men. The effect produced on the reader by this contrast is one of horror; therefore fulfilling O'Brien's purpose, to convince the reader of war's severely negative effects.
As the boys witness death and mutilation all around them, any preconceived notion about the indoctrination, "the enemy" and the "rights and wrongs" of the conflict disappear, leaving them angry and perplexed. The story is not about heroism but about toil and futility and the divide between the idea of war and the real life and its values. The selected passages are full of violence and death and loss and a kind of perpetual suffering and terror that most of us have never and hopefully will never experience. Both authors ability to place the reader right there on the front line with the main character so vividly, not just in terms of what he physically experienced and witnessed All the complicated, intense and often completely numbed emotions that came along...
When this story is viewed through Sigmund Freud’s “psychoanalytic lens” the novel reveals itself as much more than just another gory war novel. According to Sigmund Freud psychology there are three parts of the mind that control a person’s actions which are the id, ego, and superego. Psychoanalysis states that there are three parts of the human mind, both conscious and subconscious, that control a person’s actions. The Id, ego, and
All Quiet on the Western Front is the story of Paul Baumer’s service as a soldier in the German army during World War I. Paul and his classmates enlist together, share experiences together, grow together, share disillusionment over the loss of their youth, and the friends even experience the horrors of death-- together. Though the book is a novel, it gives the reader insights into the realities of war. In this genre, the author is free to develop the characters in a way that brings the reader into the life of Paul Baumer and his comrades. The novel frees the author from recounting only cold, sterile facts. This approach allows the reader to experience what might have been only irrelevant facts if presented in a textbook.
...s, demonstrated through the author's talent, are denouncing the authority figures who were supposed to guide his generation into adulthood but instead turned the youth against each other in the pursuit of superficial ideals. The soldiers were simply the victims of a meaningless war.
The son's rite of passage to manhood, his acceptance as the role of host and peacemaker and unifier, is a shocking one to both speaker and reader. To unite his comrades, he comments "We could easily kill a two-year-old" and the tone of the poem changes finally to one of heartlessness at the blunt brutality of the statement. The mother realizes then that the young boys, the future "Generals" who will soon live as men do "playing war", are far from innocent. Her rite of passage is a complete and sad transition from the mother of a child that she has some control over to the parent of a independent man, who will make his own choices and fight his own battles.
O’Brien has many characters in his book, some change throughout the book and others +are introduced briefly and change dramatically during their time in war and the transition to back home after the war. The way the characters change emphasises the effect of war on the body and the mind. The things the boys have to do in the act of war and “the things men did or felt they had to do” 24 conflict with their morals burning the meaning of their morals with the duties they to carry out blindly. The war tears away the young’s innocence, “where a boy in a man 's body is forced to become an adult” before he is ready; with abrupt definiteness that no one could even comprehend and to fully recover from that is impossible.
When the Charleston Assembly votes to join the rebellion, a friend from Benjamin's past, Col. Burwell, tries to recruit him to join the Continental Army. After all, Burwell says, everyone still remembers Benjamin's exploits at Fort Wilderness during that war. But Benjamin wants nothing to do with the looming hostilities. "I have seven children," he says. "My wife is dead. Who's to care for them if I go to war?" But his eldest son, Gabriel, has no such qualms; he defies his father's will and joins the army. You know it's only a matter of time before Benjamin, too, is drawn into the fightingin this case, courtesy of the cruel British cavalry leader, Col. Tavington.
Tony Palmer, the author of “Break of Day”, tells a story that takes place in and out of war. The story follows a man named Murray Barrett who lives in the times of ww2. He ends up finding himself in the middle of it, down at Port Moresby. During the midst of war, Murray ends up coming across an injured Sid Archer, a childhood enemy and the man who stole Will’s (Murray’s older brother) childhood lover. Murray helps Sid instead of abandoning him, despite their childhood drama. In this book, Palmer really focuses on the themes of family, death, and bravery. He presents to us how complicated families can get, how people deal with death differently from others, and how there are many forms of bravery.
William Golding illustrates World War II through young boys in this novel. Technology is one of the major destructors of a civilization. Jealousy is another destructor that ruins the good nature between men and brings out the beast from within. The author has chosen to show the evil in man though young boys to allow the world to understand how unethical the war was. The symbols, character, and setting are shown to correlate with the outside world. The novel just reinforces the idea of the savage within each and every human being.
“The story employs a dramatic point of view that emphasizes the fragility of human relationships. It shows understanding and agreemen...