Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why is artificial intelligence dangerous
Environmental effects of global warming
Effects from global warming
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why is artificial intelligence dangerous
While the thought of being able to inhabit Earth forever is nice, the probability of that actually happening is low. As time goes on, the possibility of another mass-extinction only increases. It is only a matter of time before an event like the one that wiped out the dinosaurs repeats itself. There are multiple threats facing humanity, some which stem here on Earth, and some that come from other parts of the Universe. This means that humans need to put more effort and thought into the possibility of inhabiting another planet. This will be necessary in order to make sure the human race survives. There are many threats to the existence of humankind right here on Earth. There are many people and professionals in the scientific community who acknowledge this and urge for humans to find a new home before these threats become too imminent. “Hawking believes humans will eventually be doomed if they remain on Earth” (Article 1). There are issues that affect the Earth as a whole, such as global warming, which could kill off humans and a lot more other species. Hawking also warns about other potential threats, which people do not think about as much. For example, there is the possibility of artificial intelligence. While it may seem far fetched, it is a real threat, and Hawking points …show more content…
They have a point that the chances of anything happening are low at the moment. Even if something were to happen, humans may be advanced enough to be able to overcome it without leaving Earth. These claims are valid, and they make a good point, but there are simply too many threats to believe humans will inhabit Earth forever. The chances of something devastating occurring only increases over time, and there are probably many threats humans haven’t even thought about yet. It is easy to see why many people believe humans will live on Earth forever, but while it may not be soon, a disaster is bound to happen
Earth will outlive us all and when the human species eventually dies out, Earth will still be here fixing itself from the damage we have caused, yet continuing with the natural disasters. I do admit, we are polluting the planet, but there will always be some sort of life on Earth even if humans are not. People should not be too worried about destroying the planet because it will heal itself. If people begin to pollute it too much, Earth will kill us off. Roderick Nash, along with many other people, underestimates the power of the Earth. It can take care of itself just like how it has been for over a billion years.
A synthesis essay should be organized so that others can understand the sources and evaluate your comprehension of them and their presentation of specific data, themes, etc.
In Democracy and Education, John Dewey, described as the father of experience-derived education, gave his opinion of how democracy and education should interact in order to create a sound democratic society. He wrote of how a democracy cannot flourish if education is tuned for the masses or if only a select few can get higher education. He also discussed how the “three R’s” (reading, writing, and arithmetic) are faulty, and how the curriculum must help students develop the ability to tackle social issues in the “real world.” However, high schools today are not preparing citizens to achieve Dewey’s vision; rather, they are moving farther away from it.
Earth has served as a good home for humans for many years, and will most likely
Despite the world being full of diverse people with varying accomplishments and skill sets, people oftentimes assume the qualities and traits of an individual based purely on the stereotypes set forth by society. Although these stereotypes are unavoidable, an individual can be liberated, empowered and ultimately overcome these stereotypes by obtaining an advanced education.
The main purpose of a synthesis essay is to make insightful connections. Those connections can show the relationship(s) between parts of a work or even between two or more works. It is your job to explain why those relationships are important. In order to write a successful synthesis essay, you must gather research on your chosen topic, discover meaningful connections throughout your research, and develop a unique and interesting argument or perspective.
Television has affected every aspect of life in society, radically changing the way individuals live and interact with the world. However, change is not always for the better, especially the influence of television on political campaigns towards presidency. Since the 1960s, presidential elections in the United States were greatly impacted by television, yet the impact has not been positive. Television allowed the public to have more access to information and gained reassurance to which candidate they chose to vote for. However, the media failed to recognize the importance of elections. Candidates became image based rather than issue based using a “celebrity system” to concern the public with subjects regarding debates (Hart and Trice). Due to “hyperfamiliarity” television turned numerous people away from being interested in debates between candidates (Hart and Trice). Although television had the ability to reach a greater number of people than it did before the Nixon/Kennedy debate, it shortened the attention span of the public, which made the overall process of elections unfair, due to the emphasis on image rather than issue.
First of all, it is a good back-up plan. Why? Well, the famed British cosmologist, Stephen Hawking, said that humanity would most likely not survive for the next 1000 years “without escaping our fragile planet¨. Quote found in http://www.space.com/20657-stephen-hawking-humanity-survival-space.html. In a site, http://futurism.com/space-habitats-and-the-oneill-cylinder/, Hawking said that we need to colonize and build habitats on other planets, or the moon, to survive in the next 200 years. In the first site, he said there are risks in living in a single planet. For example, wars, accidents, asteroids, and natural hazards. Also, Mars has some similarities to Earth. For example, in
Sending humans to Mars screws with our genetic makeup, it’s simply not worth it. Although we are natural explorers, we will have to find a way to control that for a while and stick to what we have. Mars is not the next frontier. With all that Earth still has to offer, a trip to Mars should not be mankind’s top priority at this time.
Not only that, but our population has been growing at an extremely alarming rate. At our current rate, our species may not be able to survive for much longer. This is where space exploration comes in. With the recent discovery of water on Mars, and the finding of Kepler-78b, it is possible that mankind can prolong our existence. The possibility of interstellar travel seems to be an option, or even a necessity, if we wish to continue living.
In addition to this, NASA knows that Mars had conditions suitable for life in its past, and with global warming and pollution on the rise, Earth may not remain suitable for life forever. Therefore, Mars might need to replace the Earth as our home one day and for
“Experience is not what happens to you; it is what you do with what happens to you”(Aldous Huxley). Aldous is true that nature has a powerful effects on us. Our uses of nature provides an strong proof that the Earth isn’t suitable to live for different living beings. As we all know we cannot survive in an unfriendly environment that is created by us. In other hand it is same to all other living creature whether they are small organisms or big.
People of all walks of Earth yearn for one thing: to explore the unknown. Human’s need to explore can be seen throughout history, such as when people took to seas to explore the rest of the Americas, or when Lewis and Clark went west of the Mississippi to explore the Midwest and west coast. After Earth had been explored humans again felt the need to explore. This need took humanity to space where they first orbited the earth and later landed on the moon. Now that the moon has been explored, the next place humanity should visit and colonize is Mars.
We can go explore the ocean and stay on Earth longer. In our lifetime we won´t need another planet to
Can this be true? I do not consider the above idea to be true. Samuel Scheffler did not provide enough information to determine if we think more about the unknown future individuals than those close to us. Also, we should value our lives while we are still alive instead of keeping it for future reference. However, individuals should care about the future which gives meaning to life. This would encourage us to put more effort into the things we do. Moreover, with respect to the inevitable demise of the world, this is questionable given contemplations of other world and the likelihood of effective propelled insight deciding the destiny of the world. More information is required for the inevitable demise of the universe to help know what, how, and when to plan if need