Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The problem of regulation on the internet
The problem of regulation on the internet
First amendment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The problem of regulation on the internet
"You can no more leave your children to explore the internet
than you can leave them alone in Times Square in New York," states Lee
Munsil, the executive director of the National Family Legal Foundation
("Internet Regulation"). This analogy between the Internet and Times Square
is indeed quite accurate. The Internet has a
plethora of information and resources, however for children especially it can
be quite dangerous if not monitored properly. Most parents would opt not to
leave their children alone in New York City so how could they leave them
alone on the Internet? The government should take a more active role in
controlling and regulating illicit material on the Internet in public
libraries by mandating the use of filtering software, the so-called "Internet
Nannies."
Being relatively new, the Internet standards of regulation have not been
completely set. Many forms of legislation have been made in regards to
regulation, and many are still being developed and decided in courts right
now. In particular, the First Amendment protection as it relates to Internet
content has not yet been determined ("Internet Filtering Software"). Most of
the legislative attempts to control the content on the Internet so far have
not been too successful. They have been declared unconstitutional upon
judicial review. Because it changes so often, the author of "Internet
Filtering Software," suggests that will be difficult for the government to
control the content placed on the Internet anytime soon. There is, however,
great potential for filtering devices to be implemented in various
institutions involving children. ...
... middle of paper ...
...p its process in
setting the standards before more children see the horrific content on the
Internet.
Works Cited
Burt, David. "Libraries Should Regulate Internet Access." Mass Media. San Diego: Greenhaven, 1999. 142-146.
"Congress Begins Taking Action to Stop Child Pornography." The American Center for Law and Justice E-Newsletter. 22 May 2014 .
http://www.aclj.or/news/pornography/020522_congress_begins_taking.asp
"Internet Filtering Software." Issues & Controversies. 26 April 2014 Online.
www. Facts.com 21 May 2014 .
"Internet Regulation." Issues & Controversies 14 Sept. 1914 : Online.
www.facts.com 21 May 2014 .
Tevis, Cheryl. "Internet Security: Here's What You Need to Know About Products That Block or Monitor Internet Sites." Successful Parenting. Jan 2014 : 25. Online. Infotrac. 21 May 2014 .
FACTS= On September 24, 1987, Keith Jacobson was indicted on charges of violating a provision of the Child Protection Act of 1984, which criminalizes the knowing receipt through mail of a “visual depiction [that] involves the use of minors engaging in sexually explicit conduct.” On Feb 1984 Jacobson ordered two magazines in the mail of young boys. The magazines entitled Bare Boys 1 and Bare Boys 2, contained material of nude young boys from preteen to teens. Jacobson claimed that he want to order material of 18 year olds and up. However Jacobson’s receipt of the magazines was legal under both federal and Nebraska laws. Laws were constructed three months after the order was filled that banned all sexual depictions of children. Soon after the Gov. started setting up Jacobson by sending him applications to phony organizations that were illegally based.
Teachers suspended, radio and television personalities fired, authors disinvited to speaking events, all because their words, opinions or shows did not agree with what a handful of people consider appropriate. One would think these types of situations regarding censorship happened decades ago, not in a time now, where people pride themselves on having an open-mind and the ability of forward thinking. However, censorship still prevails in America today, and not only censorship of pornography or violence on television, but it seeps into our textbooks and classrooms too, all in the name of protecting the children.
...ment: A Historical Timeline Of Children And Their Access To Pornography And Violence." Pace Law Review 33.1 (2013): 462-489. OmniFile Full Text Mega (H.W. Wilson). Web. 18 Nov. 2013.
as high as possible during the 20 minutes it will be timed for. And so
Tears begin to fall down a child’s face. Her body goes into shock out of fear. Her mother warned her about watching inappropriate content, and there it was, right on her computer screen. This could not have happened though. All she was doing was casually browsing the internet before a pop-up appeared. Although it may seem hard to believe, the major cause of events such as this is the lack of censorship on the internet. Internet censorship relates to the removal of offensive, inappropriate, or controversial content published online. The current problem with the internet is that there are few restrictions on what can be published or viewed. Several sites on the internet only offer a warning about inappropriate content that can easily be bypassed by agreeing to the terms. Other websites provide access to private or military information. More dreadfully, however, are websites that use their explicit content as a promotion. These factors bring the conclusion that anybody of any given age can view and publish inappropriate or dangerous content. The current problems with the internet serve for clarification as to why the United States should create a nonpartisan assembly to censor the internet in order to protect its citizens from the mental, emotional, and physical harms the internet creates.
cloudy, to test this; I will place a piece of paper with a cross on
Takes Down Child Porn Users.” CBS Miami. 2012. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 09 May 2014.
It seems unlikely that there is a school librarian out there who has not encountered a problem with--or railed against--the presence of CIPA-mandated filters on school computers. My own career so far has allowed me to experience a full range of experiences with school computers, from a filterless library to an overfiltering situation so egregious that my journey to have it resolved culminated in suing the school district that employs me—Knox County, Tennessee. I just discovered, in fact, that a Google search for “internet filtering in schools” lists the ACLU litigation for which I was a plaintiff, Franks v. Metropolitan Board of Public Education, as its second hit.
The Internet has become such a vast and quickly growing technology that law makers have had difficulty keeping up with the technological advances within the internet grid and the sick minds of individuals. One specific area of concern is internet safety regarding minors, especially in the area of pornography. There is a controversy that surrounds the policing of the Internet for illicit activities such as pornography that has been going on since the early 1990’s between the U.S. government and the American Civil Liberties group that claims policing the Internet would take away personal freedoms from Americans in the form of freedom of speech. This issue has even gone to the highest court in our country, the United States Supreme Court. “Leaving the Internet alone” has been the nations Internet policy since the Internet was first commercialized in the mid-1990’s. The primary government imperative then was just to get out of the way to encourage its growth (Strickland, 2012). In 1998 President Clinton signed COPA (Child Online Protection Act) into law, but it was never enforced (Information Week, Nov. 2006). The rate of pornography viewed in the United States has grown, and continues to grow in viewership to this day with few arrests being made for those distributing the sites or for those who are viewing them where minors are concerned.
...pornography with such ease, parents are going to have to figure out a way to keep their children off these sites. The only other option is coming home and finding them looking at something they shouldn't. Because some children, given the opportunity, are going to seek out these sites, even if you ask them not to. After all, children will be children.
Censorship is Necessary to Protect Children from the Internet Do you want our future generations being exposed to violence, hate, sexuality, illegal substances, and false information, and then one day think it would be cool or alright to try these things? The internet is filled with dangerous information, that children should never have the freedom to access. Children learn from example, and if they search, watch, or read something on the web that could be potentially dangerous, they could be influenced or curious and think that it would be alright to imitate one day. If our children now are viewing these things, it could mean that future generations could grow to be more violent and our world could become more dangerous than it already is today. Censorship is necessary if we plan on having our kids grow up in the safest environment possible.
The invention of the internet has been one of the major advances of the modern world. It has allowed people from all over the globe to communicate with each other and ideas to be shared. In addition to this it is a free platform. Unlike television and radio it doesn’t cost anything to put your idea on the internet, making it a base of personal expression. This freedom coupled with the global access attracts around a billion users worldwide. Unfortunately, just as easily as the information is produced it is abused. The internet, although mostly used appropriately does harbour all manner of illegal activities. These range from phishing scams, trying to steal someone’s personal details, viruses, malicious code that attacks a person’s computer and websites that are morally questionable or illegal under Australian law. To combat this, the Rudd government has started action to impose an internet service provider level internet filter. An internet service provider is any company that provides internet services to its customers. Most notable of these is Telstra which is one of the top internet service providers in Australia. This filter will prevent a list of websites, the blacklist, from being accessed in Australia. In theory this is an excellent plan, but in reality, once implemented it will have little effect on preventing the illegal activity which occurs on the internet. The major arguments against the proposed filter are, cost of the filter, the ineffectiveness of the filter to stop illegal activity and the possibility of the blacklist expanding to block anti-government websites.
we know this because a gas is given of too show a change, this is why
Many resources are used in schools today, including something we use every day: the Internet. To fully utilize the Internet, we need to be able to get into all parts of it, no matter the content. This is where censorship in schools comes into play. Many schools have placed some type of filter on their Internet browsers to protect young students who are going through grade school. However, school officials do not see what negative feedback is coming from these filters being placed on students’ computers, or even the schools computers, due to the possible knowledge that could be gained by the blocked content. While some schools think that installing filters on their computers is beneficial to students, these filters should not be used so that the educational advantages that the Internet possess can be fully accessed and used by students and faculty alike.
...nt and Civil Liberties groups, no one seems to be making much headway in determining where the line should be drawn when it comes to pornography. The positive is that child pornography is being acknowledged as a real problem, but law enforcement officials are still having a great deal of difficulty fighting it. The United States is taking steps toward implementing a multi-layered approach to governance, which will allow adults their freedom and protect children at the same time, but as of right now we are a long way from a solution.