Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Consumerism as an environmental concern
Animal abuse by making fast food
Impacts of industrialization on human health
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Consumerism as an environmental concern
In the modern world, customers and consumers intake a variety of foods; but primarily, foods from the fast food production industry. Under the images of farmers, ranchers, and animals on certain food products, there’re actually assembly lines in factories supervising the distribution of the food we eat today. The film Food Inc. directed by Robert Kenner takes its audience to the examination and inspection of the industrial production of meat in the United States, and revealed its hidden truth, emphasizing on the harm it has on the environment, animals, and the human population, which is crucially important and vital to the development of our nation. Back then in the 20th century, Upton Sinclair wrote about the errors and flaws in the meat packing …show more content…
industry, and it still happens today. Food Inc. first took its viewer to the introduction of the fast-food industry.
“But what I would like is a burger. My favorite meal today remains a hamburger and a French fries. I had no idea that a handful of companies had changed how we eat and how we make our food. I’ve been eating all these foods all my life without knowing where it comes from,” stated by an interviewee in the film (Kenner, Food Inc.). The statement mentioned previously demonstrate the paucity of knowledge many consumers have. The interviewee, in particular, described that he doesn’t know where and how his favorite meal, which consists of a hamburger and fries, was created and distributed. Furthermore, the documentary-film also presents its audiences another interviewee, with similar aspects of the previous one mentioned above. However, this interviewee gave the viewers another aspect of the …show more content…
fast-food story. According to the movie, he unfortunately has Type II diabetes, in addition to poverty. “My husband is diabetic. One of my main concern is he can lose his sight…I’m afraid he’s not going to be able to drive, cause that’s what he does for a profession. We’re really tight for paying for his medicine to be healthy or buying vegetables to be healthy,” the interviewee’s spouse described (Kenner, Food Inc.). This shows the idea that poverty can heavily and crucially influence eating habits of certain individuals. The family often rely on the dollar menu at a fast-food restaurant, primarily because of poverty, employment hours, and unfortunately, medical issues. Therefore, not only people who likes to eat fast food eat them, but also those with low-incomes that have no choice. Regrettably, the consumption of meats may ultimately lead to the loss of lives among the American people. The film presented Barbara Kowalcyk and Patricia Buck, in which both of them are food safety advocates. Mrs. Kowalcyk described her son’s death, which was caused by his digestion of food, which later inspired her and her mother, Mrs. Buck, to become food safety advocates, aforesaid. “We ended up eating three hamburgers before he got sick. We started to see blood in Kevin [Kowalcyk’s son]’s diarrhea. We took him to the emergency room….He has E. coli. They [medical team] informed us that Kevin’s kidney was starting to fail. Kevin received his first dialysis treatment, and he was not allowed to drink water,” mentioned Barbara Kowalcyk (Kenner, Food Inc.). The story of Kowalcyk’s son momentously emphasizes the dangers caused by the meat industry. According to the film, meats occasionally contains E Coli. as they were commonly found in the factories. When one animal is infected, the bacteria can easily be transmitted to other animals in the same ranch. This bacteria can cause bloody diarrhea, severe stomachache, and vomiting. Unfortunately, if the infection does not get resolved in a certain amount of time, there’s a high risk of getting kidney failure, which can eventually lead to death; similar to what happened in Kevin’s case. Based on available evidence, it seems fair to undoubtedly suggest that the food industry, particularly meat, requires critical and intense improvement; thus, other cases like Kevin’s can be prevented in the future. Additionally, the food industry unknowingly put the population’s health on serious jeopardy.
Rosa Soto, whose working for the California Center for Public Health Advocacy, mentioned, “There is something going on, in the way we live our lives, where we are playing, where we buy our foods, and the type of foods we’re able to buy, is causing an epidemic, and it’s not just our community, it’s not just Baldwin Park; it’s everywhere…. It usually the Type II diabetes that only affects adults, and now it’s affecting children,” (Kenner, Food Inc.). The statement presents the idea that the commonly eaten foods are negatively affecting the lives of children, whom are the future of our nation. Unexpectedly, Ms. Soto stated how Type II diabetes are developing in children, primarily because their eating habits. It is vital to note the fact that mass production of food, often leads to the lack of safety and quality of foods produced; therefore, are unhealthy for
children. In conclusion, there is evidently a paucity of safety in the industrial production of meat in the United States; thus, many examination and investigation conducted in the film Food Inc. is extremely significant and vital to take note of, mainly because it gave the American people another aspect of the food they eat. Nowadays, students from Bard High School Early College Queens often rely on fast food restaurants, which include McDonalds, Wendy’s, Popeye’s Louisiana Kitchen, and many more, without realizing the danger behind the consumption of those meals. This film opens the opportunities to see the revealing aspects of the industry, which may inspire BHSEC students to change their lifestyles, and become healthier.
Food Inc. addresses many political issues during the film to draw in the audience. Issues such as: the environment, education, workers’ rights, health care, climate change, energy control, to name a few. Director Robert Kenner exposes secrets about the foods society eats, where the food has come from and the processes the food went through. It is these issues that are used as politics of affect in both an extreme visual representation and a strong audio representation that has the biggest impact on the audience and their connection to what they are being told. This paper aims to discuss the film Food Inc. and the propaganda message for positive change, as well as, the differences between seeing food and deciding...
Schlosser, Eric. "Chapter 5: Why the Fries Taste Good." Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal. New York, NY: Harper Perennial, 2005. Print.
In the documentary, Food Inc., we get an inside look at the secrets and horrors of the food industry. The director, Robert Kenner, argues that most Americans have no idea where their food comes from or what happens to it before they put it in their bodies. To him, this is a major issue and a great danger to society as a whole. One of the conclusions of this documentary is that we should not blindly trust the food companies, and we should ultimately be more concerned with what we are eating and feeding to our children. Through his investigations, he hopes to lift the veil from the hidden world of food.
With regulations being set and laws enacted, the United States has seen a change for the better within the food industry and for the consumers overall. As a result, as much as a company is willing to cut on cost, without the consumers, every business in any industry will become bankrupt. The power is in the consumer and as long as consumers are educated properly and willing to speak up, there is a bright future ahead. However, because not everything can be seen, it is important to have books such as The Jungle and authors like Upton Sinclair to let people know what is going on and what not everyone is able to see. In doing so, this will raise awareness, create transparency and demand that companies practice ethically for the betterment of the
Upton Sinclair’s “The Jungle,” gave the most in-depth description of the horrid truths about the way America’s food companies, “the only source of food for people living in the city,” are preparing the food they sell. “The Jungle” describes the terrible
Meatpacking pertains to the raising, slaughtering, packaging and processing of livestock such as pigs, cows, and chickens. Prior to slaughter, animals are grown and fed. Food borne illness and pathogens still plague the meatpacking industry since the creation of meatpacking. The government plays a huge role in providing legislation and ensuring the safety of meat products and business. Although the government is meant to inspect and guarantee safety, many unlawful practices appear overlooked pertaining to the safety of meat for consumers. Meatpacking commenced thousands of years ago, and the safety of the meatpacking industry has been evaluated greatly since the industrial revolution in America. The history of the meatpacking industry in America, the impact of literature such as the novel of the jungle written by Upton Sinclair, the rendering and irradiation of meat, and current worker issues contribute to the horrible safety precautions as well as the awful environment involving the meatpacking industry.
At the turn of the twentieth century “Muckraking” had become a very popular practice. This was where “muckrakers” would bring major problems to the publics attention. One of the most powerful pieces done by a muckraker was the book “The Jungle”, by Upton Sinclair. The book was written to show the horrible working and living conditions in the packing towns of Chicago, but what caused a major controversy was the filth that was going into Americas meat. As Sinclair later said in an interview about the book “I aimed at the publics heart and by accident hit them in the stomach.”# The meat packing industry took no responsibility for producing safe and sanitary meat.
“I wished to frighten the country by a picture of what its industrial masters were doing to their victims; entirely by chance I stumbled on another discovery--what they were doing to the meat-supply of the civilized world. In other words, I aimed at the public’s heart, and by accident hit it in the stomach” (Bloom). With the publication of a single book, Upton Sinclair found himself as a worldwide phenomenon overnight. He received worldwide response to his novel and invitations to lectures all over the world including one to the White House by President Roosevelt. In late 1904, the editor of the Appeal to Reason, a socialist magazine sent Sinclair to Chicago to tell the story of the poor common workingmen and women unfairly enslaved by the vast monopolistic enterprises. He found that he could go anywhere in the stockyards provided that he “[wore] old clothes… and [carried] a workman’s dinner pail”. Sinclair spent seven weeks in Chicago living among and interviewing the Chicago workers; studying conditions in the packing plants. Along with collecting more information for his novel, Sinclair came upon another discovery--the filth of improper sanitation and the processing of spoiled meat. With the publishing of his novel, Sinclair received international response to its graphic descriptions of the packinghouses. The book is said to have decreased America’s meat consumption for decades and President Roosevelt, himself, reportedly threw his breakfast sausages out his window after reading The Jungle. However, Sinclair classified the novel as a failure and blamed himself for the public’s misunderstanding. Sinclair’s main purpose for writing the book was to improve the working conditions for the Chicago stockyard workers. Sinclair found it...
Our current system of corporate-dominated, industrial-style farming might not resemble the old-fashioned farms of yore, but the modern method of raising food has been a surprisingly long time in the making. That's one of the astonishing revelations found in Christopher D. Cook's "Diet for a Dead Planet: Big Business and the Coming Food Crisis" (2004, 2006, The New Press), which explores in great detail the often unappealing, yet largely unseen, underbelly of today's food production and processing machine. While some of the material will be familiar to those who've read Michael Pollan's "The Omnivore's Dilemma" or Eric Schlosser's "Fast-Food Nation," Cook's work provides many new insights for anyone who's concerned about how and what we eat,
Zinczenko argues that fast-food companies ultimately hold responsibility for the growing problem of obesity and type 2 diabetes among the country. Due to the inexpensive prices, indefinite locations, and the deprivation of nutritional labeling. In Zinczenko’s view, “Before 1994, diabetes in children was generally caused by a genetic disorder- only about 5 percent of childhood cases were obesity-related, or type 2, diabetes. Today, according to the National Institute of Health, type 2 diabetes accounts for at least 30 percent of
In a society that is facing numerous problems, such as economic devastation, one major problem is often disregarded, growing obesity. As the American society keeps growing, so does growth of the fast food industry and the epidemic of obesity. In order to further investigate the main cause of obesity, Morgan Spurlock, the film director and main character, decides to criticize the fast food industry for its connection with obesity in America. In his documentary Spurlock performs a radical experiment that drives him to eat only from McDonald's and order a super-sized meal whenever he is asked. By including visual and textual techniques, rhetorical appeals, and argumentative evidences, Morgan Spurlock was able to help viewers know the risks of fast food and how it has caused America to be the world's “fattest country”.
"Ironically and to Sinclair 's keen disappointment, as he wrote, 'I aimed at the public 's heart and by accident I hit it in the stomach. ' The Socialist vote in America did not increase, nor did the social revolution appear to be any closer." [...] "...both the Pure-Food and Drug Act and Beef Inspection Act were passed in modified form and became laws of the land - less than six months from the appearance in book form of The Jungle." (Sinclair 348-349) The description of diseased animals and rodents that were packed into food that other richer classes consumed were a result of capitalist decisions. Inevitably, consumers only concerned themselves with what they were eating rather than the original reason as to why tainted meat was permitted to be sold in the first place.
“If you live in a free market and a free society, shouldn’t you have the right to know what you’re buying? It’s shocking that we don’t and it’s shocking how much is kept from us” (Kenner). For years, the American public has been in the dark about the conditions under which the meat on their plate was produced. The movie, Food Inc. uncovers the harsh truths about the food industry. This shows that muckraking is still an effective means of creating change as shown by Robert Kenner’s movie, Food Inc. and the reforms to the food industry that followed its release.
Zinczenko uses information from the National Institutes of Health stating that “Before 1994, diabetes in children was generally caused by a genetic disorder”. While reading this statement one must ask, what significance does 1994 have on the increase in Type 2 diabetes? As well as how does this date support Zinczenko’s theory that fast food influences Type 2 diabetes when McDonald’s and other fast food restaurants have been around since well before 1994. In addition, Zinczenko uses another statistic to support his claim that “Type 2 diabetes accounts for at least 30 percent of all new childhood cases of diabetes in this country” (242). One reason Zinczenko’s argument is invalid is because he neglects to take into consideration the varying reasons that Type 2 diabetes rates could go up. For example, children may not be getting enough exercise or eating poor meals at home. In addition, only 30 percent of new childhood cases of diabetes in America are Type 2, which means that 70 percent of these childhood cases are genetically related. Although these statistics are unsettling, we cannot solely blame the fast food industry for the rise in Type 2 diabetes. In the final analysis, Zinczenko is ineffective in arguing fast food’s cause of childhood illness by using an argument with a missing claim and a cause and effect
Food, Inc. is Robert Kenner, the director, and his teams answer to Pollan’s question “what is the omnivore’s dilemma?” This movie addresses the industrial production of meat (i.e. treatment of animals, how meat is slaughtered and processed, dominance of meat companies), environmental repercussions of agribusiness; use of soybeans and corn in our foods, use of petroleum, fertilizers, and pesticides; food label regulations; the economics and politics of farming; health issues stemming from malnutrition which is related to large consumptions of processed foods, and more. Kenner brings attention to the fact that many of Americas issues begin with the large production of meat due to fast food restaurants popularity due to price and taste. This led to high demand for meat which led to the industrialization of meat, corn, soybeans, and the use of pesticides and fertilizers. He further notes that many governmental officials have strong ties with many large agribusinesses which allow for certain issues to be overlooked or issues such as USDA