Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Mexican history essay
Mexican history essay
Chicano culture history
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Mexican history essay
The Lemon Grove Incident #2
1. What arguments were made for segregating Mexican children? What were the real reasons why they were segregated?
a.) I watched this movie a couple years ago, and I remember one of the arguments made was to make sure all the children were learning. One of the younger teachers had explained that the Mexican children needed more attention to catch up on their studies.
b.) After watching this movie a second time, there were many arguments made by the school board that were used to segregate the children. The younger teacher said there was a safety issue regarding Mexican children crossing railroad tracks on their way to school. Then, the toilets were backed up, and the Mexican children had sanitation issues. Lastly,
…show more content…
she said the Mexican kids learned at a slower rate, and were embarrassed of it, so they needed more special attention. The real reason that the Mexican children were segregated was because of white racist people. They felt like their kids should be learning away from the Mexicans. 2. What legal arguments were used by the judge to enforce that the Mexican students be let back in the school? a) The judge had told them that there was no legal segregation of white children, and Mexican “half-breeds” were considered white on legal documents.
b) Since Mexicans were from the Caucasian race they could not be legally segregated. The other reason he used was that the Mexican children were being denied the daily presence of the Anglo children, which was a vital part of their learning and assimilating.
3. Is the response that the Mexican community had expected by the Lemon Grove school board? Explain.
a) They did not expect them to do anything about their situation, in fact, they were most likely expected to sit down and obey. They were so accustomed to Mexicans following orders.
b) The school board didn’t think that the Mexicans would seek help, and stand up for their children’s educational rights. One of the school board members even said, “This is not like our Mexicans here.” He said their Mexicans wouldn’t start anything because they were quiet, obedient, and immigrants who wouldn’t try anything in fear of deportation. The school board did not expect a law suit, especially to lose.
4. What would you have done in the situation if you were a parent whose child was segregated to the Olive Street School, aka Mexican
School? a.) I think that if my daughter was segregated I would stand up for her educational rights. I would personally go to the school board and try to speak some sense into these people. I would let them know that I am prepared to go to higher authority. After speaking to higher authority I would let my child know that she will be sitting in class against their wishes. If she got forced out, then I would do the same as Mrs. Ruiz and not send my daughter to school at all. b.) I agree with many of the steps that were taken to ensure their rights were being protected. The best idea they had was to speak with the Mexican consul, and agreeing to be represented by Mr. Noon, who would look out for their best interest. The only sad truth is that many Mexicans are scared; therefore do not stand up for their rights.
At the end of article they describe the pain Joaquín Murieta endured for being a honest and innocent man: “His soul swelled beyond its former boundaries, and the barriers of honor, rocked into atoms by the strong passion which shook his heart like an earthquake, crumbled and fell” (1). At the current time it didn 't matter if you were honest or not with law. If you weren 't white in 1850, you were considered an outsider. Since Joaquín Murieta was Mexican, he was not persecuted because of his transgression but because he was Mexican. The writer wanted to give you an idea of what it felt to be a Mexican and the mistreatment they got from the white
A student should never be denied the right to learn and become successful because of a different skin color, or because they speak a different language. “No saco nada de la escuela” by Luis Valdez is a play that discusses the racism in schools. The play starts with students going to elementary school and then ascending to middle school and college. At the beginning the students were not aware of what racism really was because of their innocence. However, the teacher that they had was very racist and bullied the students of color. That experience made the other kids realize that not everyone was the same and because of color or language they should be treated differently. There are five different students who take part of this play, two of those students were white, and there were two Chicanos and one black. That is great diversity of cultures. The teacher that the students have in elementary school was an example of the other professors they were going to have throughout their school years. Very arrogant and not understanding of the minority students. Their teachers were not really interested in teaching the minorities and always showed her discontent of having students of color. Their teachers didn’t believe that students who were part of a minority should be placed in the same classroom as the white students. Maybe that was because they didn’t know the potential a minority student could have. One Chicano student named Francisco never denied his roots and became very successful. He had many obstacles in his learning environment, but at the end he becomes a great example of perseverance. Francisco is the student who I think showed the greatest development in the play. He had to deal with racism all the time, but that didn't stop ...
From the early days of pioneers and settlers, thousands of Americans began to move into what would become Texas. The Mexican government was wanting to populate the Texas area to increase the economy. For a long period of time the Mexican government had placed many laws on the territory, but none that were deeply inforced. Finally when a new dictatorship came into power, they began to enforce the laws. Slavery among other issues
The particular issue was whether a black girl, Linda Brown could attend a local, all-white school. Linda had to walk over twenty blocks to get to her school in Topeka even though there was a local school just down the road. Linda's class at her school in Topekawas big, the classrooms were shabby and their were not enough books for each child. The all-white school down her road was much better off, better education with a lot better teaching materials. The poor quality education and environment at Linda's school was because the Topeka Board of Education spent much more money on the white school than on Linda's school for blacks.
Immigration played a large part in public education. With so many children immigrating to America for an education, schools were being packed with students. However, many of these students were not going to school and instead were working in
This movie is based on changing the lives of Mexican Americans by making a stand and challenging the authority. Even when the cops were against them the whole time and even with the brutal beatings they received within one of the walk out, they held on. They stuck to their guns and they proved their point. The main character was threatened by the school administrators, she was told if she went through with the walkout she would be expelled. While they wanted everyone who was going to graduate to simply look the other way, the students risked it all and gave it their all to make their voices
Imagine seeing 10,000 of your classmates walking out of your school because they wanted a better education - a better way of life. In the 1960s’ Chicano students were being “pushed out”(Esparza) of school or being pushed towards vocational programs. East L.A was home to schools were “one out of every four Chicano’s completed high school”(Esparza). Instructors and the school board alike did not have an interest in helping Chicanos finish school to become someone other than a laborer and was expected of them to keep being a laborer. In “Taking Back the Schools”, Sal Castro a high school counselor claims, “I think the bottom line is the lack of concern of the teachers towards the kids and whether the kids were really getting an education or not...the reality set in that the teachers weren’t really concern for the kids.”(Esparza).
While watching the Uniondale School Board of Education meeting this was something very interesting. The people that attended this meeting where the school board members, the superintendent, the student member, business affairs and people from the local community. The people the present was the student member, two school board members and a couple people from the community. There were a couple things that the board talked about and the members of the community. Something that was very interesting at this board meeting was that the members of the board had a student member by the name of Campbell present during the meeting. Campbell raised a concern about the segregation that is happening in Long Island. She mentioned how she and other people
This source really focused on all the different types of struggles the Chicano people went through for their education. Such as being excluded from enrolling in public school institutions and special school programs. The source uses pathos by describing that at some schools they would only speak English, something the Chicano people didn't know, and sharing their struggles with going to school not knowing the language, the author really grabs the audience attention with this because it makes you think about the Chicano's people's emotions about going to schools not being able to understand anything when they are there to get an education and shows the suppression of Spanish in the schools by being
Specifically, one of those was the insecurity felt by the children as they traveled through Mexico. At one point in the film, the boys talked about how they were robbed and abused by Mexican authorities. One of them spoke briefly about how it took several Mexican officials to take his watch off his arm, because he refused to hand it over. This issue leads back to one that was described earlier in this paper, the influence organized crime has on the Mexican government. The major issue that was cited in this documentary however, is the growing number of unaccompanied children traveling to the United States. This issue has two sides to it, the social side and the political side. The first side of this issue starts at the home country of each of these children. Their government is not able or not willing to help them, and as a result they live in poverty and without access the basic human needs; water, food, shelter. This leads the children to want better for themselves and ultimately to take the decision to travel to the U.S. On the political side, the unaccompanied children are causing Mexico and the United States to spend more money on Immigration. This because they have to create more detention centers for minors, they have to house and feed them until they are deported to their country of origin. Throughout the film these issues are put into the perspective of the children. The reason the directors did this, was to show the challenges the children face as they made their journey. The reason they used that perspective is because it is a unique one. It is not every day that you hear about a 12 year old who traveled across Mexico and into the United States
Through the agreement, the US promised that all Mexicans who occupied the newly acquired US territory were going to be incorporated into the Union of the United States. They were to enjoy all the rights of the US citizens. To be classified as citizens of the US, something had to be done since the US did not accept people of color as
The English immigrants are given a brief introduction as the first ethnic group to settle in America. The group has defined the culture and society throughout centuries of American history. The African Americans are viewed as a minority group that were introduced into the country as slaves. The author depicts the struggle endured by African Americans with special emphasis on the Civil War and the Civil Rights movement. The entry of Asian Americans evoked suspicion from other ethnic groups that started with the settlement of the Chinese. The Asian community faced several challenges such as the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, and the mistreatment of Americans of Japanese origin during World War II. The Chicanos were the largest group of Hispanic peoples to settle in the United States. They were perceived as a minority group. Initially they were inhabitants of Mexico, but after the Westward expansion found themselves being foreigners in their native land (...
The emotional letter that Juan left for his mother might be one of the most emotional scenes in the documentary. The pure emotions that the letter was written by Juan to her mother leaves the audience with the bonds and emotions felt between the kids and families. Juan Carlos’s father abandoned the family years ago and left to New York, consequently Juan believe it is his responsibility to provide for his family. He also wants to find his father in New York and confronts him about why he has forgotten about them. The story of Juan is not just about migration of children, but also the issue of family separation. The documentary does not dehumanize but rather bring the humane and sensitive lens to the story of Juan where the human drama that these young immigrants and their families live. Juan Carlos is not the first of Esmeralda’s sons to leave for the United states, his nine-year-old brother Francisco was smuggled into California one month earlier. Francisco now lives with Gloria, his grandmother, who paid a smuggler $3,500 to bring him to Los Angeles, California. Once Juan Carlos is in the shelter for child migrants his mother eagerly awaits him outside. After she sees him she signs a paper that says if Juan Carlos tries to travel again, he will be sent to a foster home.
...against them and it seems that the Hispanics are taking over white Anglo-American society according to racists. Two of the movies presented in class which had Latin American theme were «Spanglish» and “A better life”. Though “Spanglish” was not about racism instead it was about letting go of fear, cultural differences and language, next to “A better life” which had couple scenes of prejudices and stereotypes. For example when the police officer was sure the young boy had tattoos that indicated him being a part of a street gang, and wanted him to take off his shirt for evidence.
In this lesson, we learn about Mexico and Texas. In 1820, a new territory was born. It was Texas, they was opened to American settle, but was property of a new nation called Mexico (page 79). In 1822, Mexico was created. The people of Mexico fought in the revolution to gain there independence from Spain. The Mexican government realize they needed a populate that vast in the northern territories and overspread it with civilization (page 79). They allowed the American people to move to a free land. However, there were four condition: 1, learn to speak Spanish and speak it as a primary language,: 2, convert to Catholicism,: 3, became a naturalized citizen of Mexico and 4,don’t bring slaves in Mexico territory. Moses Austin came up with these condition