Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In our exploration of Oh What A Lovely War, devised by Theatre Workshop and directed by Joan Littlewood. I, as well as my group, came across many challenges and opportunities throughout the extract. It was produced in 1963 and is an anti-war piece which was based on World War I. We wanted to remain true to the political message/gest of the play by mocking the senior command, represented by Haig. We wanted to show their incompetence when they needlessly sacrificed the soldiers’ lives. The genre is political theatre with elements of documentary and musical theatre; however, it doesn’t have a particular style so therefor utilises a mixture of styles including musical elements, Brechtian techniques such as the MC breaking the fourth wall, naturalistic …show more content…
He overlooks the general and doesn't show any signs of sympathy towards the men on the front line. I want the audience to dislike Haig due to his lack of compassion and egotism, especially when he says, ‘Capture the German line without delay' which I will do by having an emotionless tone with a low pitch when I spoke and a forceful delivery of speech. I stood up with a straight back and my hands clasped behind my back with my chin in the air and one foot slightly in front to show authority. I was overlooking everyone and not sustaining eye contact with anyone. I showed this through my face by having a stern facial expression and slightly squinting my eyes so I didn’t look bothered. There is a huge contrast between the British General and Haig which is especially evident in the first extract when the general says, 'We are rather short of men sir' because it shows the contrast between their power and view about the war; the General empathises with the men on the front line whereas Haig has no care for them and is an emotionless, heartless stern field marshal. The proxemics between them were large to show Haig’s social status and power. Furthermore, on page 68 Haig says, ‘I am the predestined instrument of providence for the achievement of victory for the British army’. I said this with a deep, elderly upper-class tone with received pronunciation and portrayed utter arrogance with my head up and a straight posture with a proud facial
The three narratives “Home Soil” by Irene Zabytko, “Song of Napalm” by Bruce Weigl, and “Dulce et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen all have the same feelings of war and memory, although not everyone experiences the same war. Zabytko, Weigl, and Owen used shifting beats, dramatic descriptions, and intense, painful images, to convince us that the horror of war far outweighs the devoted awareness of those who fantasize war and the memories that support it.
O’Brien, Tim. “How To Tell a True War Story.” The Compact Bedford Introduction to Literature. Ed. Michael Meyer. Boston: Bedford St. Martins, 2003. p. 420-429.
Fellers, Carla A. "What A Wonderful World": The Rhetoric Of The Official And The Unofficial In Good Morning, Vietnam." War, Literature & The Arts: An International Journal Of The Humanities 17.1/2 (2005): 232-241. Academic Search Premier. Web. 26 Mar. 2014.
arguing the case that Haig was a fool who cost the lives of too many
Hicks, Patrick. "War, Literature and the Arts." War, Literature and the Arts. An International Journal of the Humanitie, n.d. Web. 6 Dec. 2013. .
The Elusiveness of War and the Tenuousness of Morality in Tim O’Brien’s “The Things They Carried,” “How to Tell a True War Story,” and “Style”
In this essay you will notice the differences and similarities between ‘The Charge of the Light Brigade’ and ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’. ‘The Charge of the Light Brigade’ was written in nineteenth century by Alfred Lord Tennyson. In contrast, ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’ was written in the twentieth century by Wilfred Owen. The main similarity we have observed is that they both capture war time experiences. However, the poets’ present these events using their own style, and the effect is two completely different observations of war.
O’Brien, Tim. How to Tell a True War Story. Literature and Ourselves. Sixth Edition. Eds.
World War One was a massive event. It affected millions of people from all walks of life, and inspired countless written pieces. Nevertheless, without being there, it is impossible to truly be able to tell what the war is like. Therefore the use of setting is very important in giving the reader an idea of the circumstance. This is not to say that everyone is in agreement over how the war should be displayed. Quite one the contrary, the two Poems “In Flanders Fields” and “Dulce et Decorum Est” use their settings to create two very contrasting images of human conflict.
Jones, Peter G, War and the Novelist: Appraising the American war Novel. University of Missouri Press, 1976. 5-6. Rpt. in Literary Themes for Students, War and Peace. Ed. Anne Marie Hacht. Vol. 2. Detroit: Gale, 2006. 449-450. Print.
The difficult association between the occurrence of war and storytelling is told through the eyes of Tim O’Brien; he explains that a true war story has a supreme adherence to offensiveness that provides a sense of pride and courage commonly found in storytelling. “The thing about a story is that you dream it as you tell it, hoping that others might then dream along with you, and in this way memory and im...
Throughout history, war has been depicted as heroic and romantic for a soldier to be involved in. But though all the war propaganda, is it really a glorious and lovely event. One novel explains the true reality of war. In the American Protest literature text, there is a section of Norman Mailer’s novel, “ Why are we in Vietnam”. The section contains several chapters of his novel that explains the situations soldiers had to experience during the Vietnam War. In the section, we see how credited Norman Mailer is, and examples of his descriptions that are very vivid that gives the reader the realization of war.
William Dean Howells was an advocate of realism in writing; he believed that literary art should reflect the reality of the common man and demonstrate the truth of everyday current issues. He believed in truthful writing and he accepted very little at face value. He practiced this belief in his own writing, and his story called “Editha” is a good example of this. In this ironic tragedy, W.D. Howells shows the truth and nature of war. He uses a combination of metaphoric characters, irony, and the pathos appeal to create an almost grotesque parody of the reality of war. In final analysis, Howells is successful in highlighting the consequences of war and inspiring the audience to question the wisdom of those who advocate armed conflict.
Charlie Wilson was an American man working in congress, that was passionate about the Afghan war against the Soviet Union in the 1980s. The film shows Wilson as a relaxed guy earlier in his days. In his congress early days Wilson lived a wild party life highlighted by hotels, strippers, and hot tubs. Even though Wilson looks like a party guy, and “good time charlie” as he is called, deep down he cares about politics, and he is also patriotic. Wilson was passionate about helping the Afghans after he saw the U.S policies as weak on Afghan. He felt strongly about helping the Afghans since they were the underdogs in the war.
The movie I chose to analyze for historical accuracy was War Horse. This movie was set in the First World War, starting in Britain but the story also explored France and Germany during this time period as well. Three scenes will be analyzed: the trench warfare scene between the British and the Germans, the scene where the British soldiers were gassed, and the scene where the British were getting patched up and nursed. War Horse does well to stick to the historical accuracy of what happened during the First World War due to the fact that the three scenes that I have chosen to analyze are not embellished and are close to what really happened.