Feudal Lords Pros And Cons

feudal lords were powerful leaders who had dominated in the area of political, military, economic and religious aspects (Smith, Cynthia 2) Lords could have opened manors, or large estates which was huge to their power and name. Since landownership was the only reliable measure wealth because it was a permanent value they wanted a ton of it and made oaths to capitalize in that way (Smith, Cynthia 2). Agreements tended to favor the lord, and that is how it always went. Vassals and all others in the feudal system obeyed their orders because if they did go against their lord, he could then bring charges against him in court (Smith, Andrew 5). Hands down, feudalism revolved around different agreements from one man to another that sustained the

Serfs were bound to their land because it was very difficult to leave while maintaining their benefits. For example, to leave the land it would be very difficult to find food and water for survival (Smith, Andrew 25). Why would a serf leave if there was a possibility for death? Too add, serfs would lose the one thing they needed and couldn't farm, protection. They would lose their lord’s military and legal protection (Smith, Andrew 25). Going out in the fighting world without the security of their manor meant they could be attacked at any moment, and potentially lose their few belongings. Secondly, to leave meant they are putting next generations at risk. When agreements are meda with a serf’s overlord, they are set to work agriculture or another form of labor for life (Smith, Andrew 25). Even so, most serfs stay on the same land for generations and generations to come (Smith, Andrew 25). To leave this would be forcing the next generation to go outside the only manor their family has even known. Assuredly, serfs were really bound to their land through contracts and reasons where they just did not want to leave for cultural and life threatening