Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths and weaknesses of leadership trait theory
Limitations of leadership trait theory
How leaders play an integral role in achieving organizational goals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strengths and weaknesses of leadership trait theory
What is a key attribute of a strong leader? Would he be strong, bold, courageous, fearless? Magellan, a portuguese captain during the fifteen hundreds crossed the world through the Pacific Ocean, Atlantic Ocean and the Indian Ocean. Ferdinand Magellan did not deserve defense. He would treat his crewmen unfairly, put himself first, and was distracted from his goal. (Document A, B, C, D, E) Magellan treated his crewmen unfairly because he felt that he had total control over them. An employer should be provided benefits, Magellan did not provide living essentials. The crewmen would sleep on the wood floors because beds or at least hammocks were not provided. For the employer that does all the work a true captain should provide for his labor-men. Also, the …show more content…
He treated the workers as unequals by making them work hours then they were sleeping. Even when Magellan’s crewman would warn him about dead-ends and rocky areas, he would rely on the water’s amount of salt. Ferdinand Magellan was so unliked by his fellow sailors that when he went into battle most crew stayed on the ship knowing that their captain was at risk. When a goal is set than you should strive to reach that goal. Magellan had his goal set, which was to reach Spice Island. Ferdinand got distracted around the year 1521 as he was in the Philippines. He was set on reaching Spice Island, but stopped in the Philippines because he thought God had called him to convert people to Catholicism. When a goal is set, it is suppose to be reached no matter what! Over the time that Magellan was there he converted about two-thousand two-hundred people to Catholicism. In conclusion, this portuguese captain was willing to die for his beliefs but for the wrong reason. Maybe Magellan would have one against the Indians if he were to have treated his crewmen better. Loyalty comes with a cost and Magellan was not willing to pay
These were told to me by your majesty as reasons to Columbus’s imprisonment . And i personally agree to all of this as i had went to Christopher after his first voyage to assist him , but instead he humiliated me by saying that the positions were already taken and then wanted to appoint me as a notary. But when i went there myself with permission from the king and queen , i collected lot of complaints against Diego and Cristobal, discovering they had made a bad administration, and serious abuses of authority, which ordered his arrest and transfer to Spain. In addition, it seized all assets of the Columbus brothers. For which i believe in reality I think he didn’t take me just because , i was a judge i would have banished him from the new world the moment I saw all this violation and misconduct he made with the power he possessed as the governor of the indies.
In 1492, Christopher Columbus was a self-made man who worked his way up to being the Captain of a merchant vessel. He gained the support of the Spanish monarchs, Ferdinand and Isabella, for an expedition to the Indies. With the support of the Spanish monarchy, he set off to find a new and faster trade route to the Indies. Upon the arrival of his first voyage, Columbus wrote a letter to Luis de Santangel, a “royal official and an early supporter of his venture,” in February 1493 (35). The epistle, letter, entitled “Letter to Luis de Santangel Regarding the First Voyage” was copied and then distributed in Spain before being translated and spread throughout Europe. The Letter is held in such regard with the people as it is considered the first printed description of the new world. Through his description of the nature of the islands, Columbus decided the future fate of the islands. His description of the vast beauty of the nature around him, declares both the economic and nationalistic motivations for colonizing the new world.
One may wonder exactly what it is that qualities a strong leader possesses. A strong leader is determined, and strong willed. They must be of good judgment, and without bias. They cannot easily be persuaded, and they are firm, yet at the same time, a good lead must also empathize with his subordinates, and have the best interest at heart for said subordinates, at all times. However, with that being said, a good leader cannot be afraid to discipline his subordinates when necessary. Unmistakably, being a leader is a very difficult feat – one which not everyone can accomplish. A leader must be an authority, a friend and a counsellor, all at once. They must be responsible, and always take into account the disadvantages of a situation. Not everyone is suitable to be a leader, whereas, just about anybody can be a good role model.
This voyage and all that Columbus wrote seems to have been done in greed. Columbus flattered the King and Queen repeatedly to win them over for his desired future endeavors. The first letter written to the King and Queen of Spain began immediately with overly exaggerated praise. In this matter, he could have directly addressed them with one endearing term rather than “Most Christian, High, Excellent, and Powerful Princes, King and Queen of Spain” (Halsall). He then describes his intent to “perform the embassy…discharge the orders… [and] keep an account…Sovereign Princes” as he prepares to write his journal. With this in mind, the demand of writing a journal and keeping track of his journey will keep him from sleeping and cause “many trials” all for “Your Highness.” When land was found, Columbus was the one who “bore the royal standard” when he went to shore and “took possession…for the King and Queen.
In 1492 Columbus sailed the ocean blue. And, when he reached his destination he killed, raped and enslaved innocent natives. Was Columbus a villain? The answer to that question, in my opinion, would be yes. Christopher Columbus was a cruel, self-centered, delusional man who does not deserve to be praised for the discovery of America.
...icas. “{There} can be no doubt that when Christopher Columbus made landfall in the West Indian islands in 1492, he set in motion some of the most pivotal developments in human history” (Foner 1). He braved the inconceivable task of sailing across the Atlantic for an undetermined length of time without certainty that he would ever return. In today’s age, getting on a plane and venturing to a foreign country is brave. Joining the military and fighting for your country is brave. Was Christopher Columbus brave or just a mad man? I believe he was both. Sometimes you need to be a little crazy to do “great things”.
After reading the two letters written by Christopher Columbus in the midst of his many voyages, I have found many similarities and differences between the two. The first letter was written to Luis de Santangel on February 15, 1493 at sea. Ten years later, the second letter was written to Ferdinand and Isabella. This letter, regarding his fourth voyage, was written on July 7, 1503. The tone in this letter compared to the first letter was abysmal. Some did not believe it was written by the same person. This makes what happened in that ten year gap become very important. It is what happened during that time that will lead one to discover the changes in attitude made by Columbus between the two letters he wrote.
The Captain of the HMS Bounty was William Bligh. He was very strict in his actions and in his punishment. He followed the “Articles of War” like the Pope of the Roman Catholic Church followed the Bible. When they were in port the Captain was very courteous and polite to everyone on the ship. He treated everyone equally and didn’t abuse his rank. That soon changed as the ship set out for the open seas and Tahiti. The crew started to challenge the Captain and he punished each person that defied him. Many of his actions were unjustifiable and should in turn be pu...
I believe Christopher Columbus was not not a terrific sailor and explore. He explored but he didn't really know what he was exploring. He thought he was in India but he was really in the Dominican Republic.
Magellan eventually was killed in the Philippines on April 27, 1521 due to native politics. One reason for his death was that he attempted to convert almost every indigenous person he met on his voyage to Christianity. It’s known that he baptized people, even king Humabon in the Philippines. One king refused to convert, and this led to a battle in the Matcan islands, where Magellan was killed (Koestler-Grack 84). After his death, his crew was left to finish the journey by sailing back without him (Meltzer 68).
“Even with that amount, I had underestimated the size of the ocean and we barely had enough supplies for the distance we were about to sail,” explained Ferdinand. Then there was a giant setback. First, the crew started by sailing to Brazil and then down the coast of South America Patagonia. Once the fleet arrived there, an attempted mutiny took place. One of the ships was damaged. The problem was settled and the crew continued on with the four remaining ships. The next difficulty the crew ran into was on October 1520. The group entered a place, which is now called the Strait of Magellan. One of the ship’s master gave in and sailed back home. This meant that the crew now only had three vessels
In his book, Martin Dugard uses dramatic detail and imagery to attract the readers attention. At times it feels as though the book is even fiction, but the selected bibliography in the end, defend with certainty this books authenticity. If there were no speculations on the character of Columbus by the lector, then the book will leave the lasting impression that like us, Columbus was human as well. He was not a saint, and had his fallouts. His life was not a complete joy ride, but the ending of the book gives the reader the sense that Columbus was a man of exuberant character: “live a bold life rather than settle for mediocrity.”(p.268)
People are not all seeing. That is just a fact. No one can look at someone and judge them objectively. When anyone has an impression of anyone else, it is biased, imperfect, judgemental, and overall inaccurate. For that reason, people, especially leaders, must present themselves as best as possible to avoid leaving a bad impression. No matter how talented or “good” one is, their impression is the only thing that matters to a casual observer. For example, the story of Magellan. Magellan was the captain of an expedition to the spice islands. To get past America, he would go south then west across the Atlantic, find a strait to Asia, gather spices, then continue to Spain. Yes, he was attempting to sail across the world. He was an excellent navigator,
Cook was the first ship's captain to stop the disease scurvy. Scurvy is cause by the lack of vitamin C and his crew was provided with fresh fruits. This encouraged other sailors to provide fruits to prevent scurvy.
Another aspect of leadership includes leadership traits such as being influential and inspirational. There also different contexts of leadership, e.g, leading oneself, leading other individuals, leading groups, leading organizations. Some traits that are often associated with being an effective leader include a measure of intelligence, high energy, self confidence, dominance, and a need for achievement. An effective, charismatic leader must lead by example. That leader must be able to know what is going on, the job or task that is being accomplished, and be able to lead the group into performing the task at hand successfully.