Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on canadian women's rights
Essay on canadian women's rights
Women struggling for equality in Canadian history
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on canadian women's rights
“Feminism is the radical notion that women are people” as infamously quoted by Marie Shear, a writer for feminist magazine New Directions For Women. While feminist ideology is more widely accepted in modern society, the quest for women to be legally recognized as persons wasn't always so attainable. Emily Murphy was a Canadian women's rights activist and the leader in a group of five women who sought out legal action to answer the question of whether women were indeed considered persons in the eyes of the law. When taken to the Supreme Court of Canada, the final vote was to dismiss the motion. After the British Privy Council overturned the Supreme Courts's decision, Murphy and the other women (known as the Famous Five) were victorious in …show more content…
their case and successfully allowed for women to become Senators. Since then, Emily Murphy has become known as a feminist icon and a pioneer for women's rights. Her accomplishments have been recognized and honoured with a statue of the five women, however, controversy has risen about whether Murphy actually deserves the widespread acknowledgment she's given. While admirable as a movement that caused change for white women in Canada, the first wave of feminism ultimately fell short as a force of change for women of all ethnicities. Murphy's blatant propagated racism, maltreatment of Aboriginal peoples and involvement in eugenics shows she is not the Canadian hero many believe her to be. In 1922, Emily Murphy released a series of essays called The Black Candle which pertained to Murphy's sentiments on drug use.
However, while the book starts out as a factual piece to inform the public of the dangers of drug use, Murphy later began using the war on drugs as a platform to spread her racist views. While in parts of the book she writes “The Chinese, as a rule are a friendly people and have a fine sense of humor that puts them on an easy footing with our folk” (Murphy 81-82), she later states “But if you claim that the oriental pedlar, and opium sot are abandoned and irreclaimable--mere black-haired beasts in our human jungle--then, it is quite plain that we should insist on their exclusion from this continent.” (Murphy 47). The Black Candle played a contributory part in the spreading her racial ideology to a larger Canadian audience. Her book was highly influential, which lead to the prohibition of marijuana and more restrictive immigration control. Murphy publicly supported laws to exclude Asian immigrants, and the following year in 1923 the Chinese Immigration Act was created- with strong enforcement on her part (MacDonald and O'Keefe 9-21). Moreover, her “feminist ideology” applied only to white women as she used The Black Candle as a means to actively argue against the rights of women of colour in order to advance her own goals. She believed multiculturalism would taint the purity of the white race and wished for “exclusion of people of colour from the …show more content…
continent” (Atpaka). While Murphy had a large influence in the treatment of Asian immigrants, it was not nearly as influential as the role she played in the mistreatment of Aboriginal people. As a judge, she passed many legislations that came through her bench- including the Indian act of 1923. This law was put in place to assimilate First Nations people and pertained to who could and could not have Indian status. Neither those who had earned a university degree nor women who had married non-Indian men could keep their status and many traditional practices were prohibited. Under her jurisdiction, Murphy also passed the Residential School Act of 1925, a measure taken to further assimilate Aboriginal children into Western society and to abolish all sense of Aboriginal culture and identity. Perhaps some of the most notable and appalling events in Canadian history occurred within the parameters of these institutions. The passing of this Act signified a momentous step in the systematic discrimination of Indigenous people in Canada. Furthermore, Murphy travelled across Canada delivering more than one-hundred speeches in support of forced sterilization of mainly Aboriginal and mentally ill people (Akpata). With her active contributions, the Alberta Sexual Sterilization Act was put in place in 1928. More than 2,882 sterilizations were done to women as young as fourteen to ensure they would never be able to reproduce. A study released by Health Canada shows that while Native and Metis people made up only 2.5% of Alberta's population, they accounted for 25% of Alberta's sterilization procedures. During her life, Emily Murphy was an ardent advocate for eugenics.
Her maternal grandfather Ogle R. Gowan founded a local branch of the Orange Order, a eugenics organization that was closely related to the Ku Klux Klan (Library and Archives Canada). Because of this, Murphy herself was involved in the group and often participated in discussions on law and politics. Later on in her life, she took on a more active role in eugenics through her letters, articles and petitions. She strongly discriminated against mentally ill people and believed they were inferior. In her paper Overpopulation and Birth Control she stated “Some of the opponents to the Sterilization Act had a good deal to say about private liberty, quite forgetful of the fact that social necessity is one of infinitely greater moment. Since I know of no way of driving home a nail other than by hammering it, let me emphasize again that insane people are not entitled to progeny.” In practice of selective breeding, she enforced compulsory sterilization on mentally ill women, sometimes unknowingly. This practice fell under the Alberta Sexual Sterilization Act of 1928. Additionally, in a petition to the Ministry of Agriculture and Health she claimed mentally ill children were “A menace to society and an enormous cost to the state… science is proving that mental defectiveness is a transmittable hereditary condition” (New World Encyclopedia). Her disdain for those she believed to be inferior to her was what drove her to
write these testaments, further proving the many ways she failed to live up to her legacy as a pioneer of feminism. While Emily Murphy is praised for her accomplishments as an influential advocate for feminism and women's rights, the Canadian public's perception of her as a hero is greatly misrepresented. The claim that her beliefs were reflective of the time she lived in is not a sufficient excuse for her actions. She actively used her novel as propaganda to argue against the rights of ethic women as a means to advance her own goals, directly contributed to Canada's systematic discrimination of Aboriginal peoples, was heavily involved in the practice of eugenics, and ultimately, went against her own movement.
died on September 1, 1951, in Victoria, British Columbia. She was part of an important social/political change in Canada because her contributions helped achieve woman suffrage and the advancement of women rights, including the eligibility to become a Senator. She was elected to the Alberta Legislature in 1921 and was the first woman on the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation’s Board of Governors. In addition, she was a delegate to the League of Nations. In 1927, McClung and four other women: Henrietta Muir Edwards, Louis McKinney, Irene Parlby, and Emily Murphy came together to be known as the “Famous Five”. Emily Murphy’s authority to preside as a judge was challenged by a lawyer on the basis that women were not considered to be "persons" under the British North America Act. As a result, they launched the "Persons Case”. They asked the question, “Does the word persons in section 24 of...
Canadian equal right activist, Emily Murphy was writer, journalist, and magistrate, political and legal former born on 14 March 1868 in Cookstown. Emily was the first magistrate of Canada, and is best known for her role in the Persons Case, the effective battle to have ladies proclaimed “persons” in the eyes of British law (Jackel, 2001). She launched the successful campaign for recognizing women as “persons” under the British law in Persons Case. In 1929, under the BNA Act, the women were declared as legal persons and could serve as the member of congress and judges. Some of her achievements also include: being the first female magistrate in the British Empire, author of several books, and president of the Women’s Canadian Club, and was active
Emily Murphy played a vital role in helping women reach a level of true equality during the twentieth century. When visiting a prairie farm, Emily Murphy noticed a stressed woman. The woman was stressed because her husband had sold their land and ran off to the United States, leaving the woman homeless. Becoming very determined, Emily Murphy set out to change the law. In 1911, the Dower Act was finally passed in Alberta, which gave women the right to own one-third of their husband’s property.1 Emily Murphy's important decision to help amend the law in a way that it was beneficial to women showcases her determination to make sure women got their rights. Even though the law was not totally fair, it still shows that Emily Murphy took an initiative and helped women reach a step closer to their goal. Before Murphy took this essential action, many women were left homeless, since they had no right over their husband's property, and if she had not done so, many more women would fall victim. Women being able to own property was a significant matter in those days, and this was only made possible with the ...
The famous five brought the persons case upon the supreme court of Canada in 1927, which was finally determined by Judicial Council of Britain's Privy Council in 1929. The “persons” case involved women not legally being “persons”. After the famous five won the case, women were legally considered “persons” then women began to join important jobs such as members of parliament and the senate. Along with becoming “persons”, women were beginning to get their right to vote in provinces slowly. In 1916, four provinces gave women the right to vote provincially and, finally, in 1940, the last province (Quebec) gave women the right to vote provincially.
Feminism is a word that is stock-full of implications, and has many misconceptions. Full Frontal Feminism by Jessica Valenti attempts to give a broad overview of what feminism is, and how you should feel about it (hint: it’s positively). The book is directed primarily towards the younger generation, and talks about a variety of issues relevant to the feminist movement today and in history. The weaknesses of the book include the casual writing, the assumptions Valenti makes, and the contradictory statements that are consistently made. The strengths include providing an entertaining, broad overview of feminism, and discussing ways to contribute to gender equality. Overall, the book is more likely to be a positive experience for high-schoolers that identify as women then college-aged individuals looking for a critical analysis of issues society faces in regards to gender inequality.
The Famous Five are most well-known for winning the Persons Case. The Persons Case started with Emily Murphy wanting to be Canada’s first women senator. She was supported by the Federated Women’s Institute and National Council of Women. Also, over 500 000 people wrote letters and signed petitions to support Murphy being appointed as a senator (Alberta Online Encyclopedia, 2004). However, Robert Borden, the Prime Minister during that time, refused to appoint Murphy into the Senate as women weren’t “persons”. Two other prime ministers, Meighen and Mackenzie both promised to make changes to the British North American Act to include women as persons, but both failed to do so. Frustrated, Emily Murphy...
The contentious little book titled Women, Power, Politics maintains politics to be devalued, acknowledging the fact that only few people do vote, and women are unable to achieve within the realm of Canadian politics. Sylvia Bashevkin, the author of the book argues that Canadians have a profound unease with women in positions of political authority, what she calls the "women plus power equals discomfort" equation. She evaluates a range of barriers faced by women who enter politics, including the media's biased role of representing the private lives of women in politics, and she wonders why citizens find politics is underrepresented in Canada compared to Belgium. In clear, accessible terms, Bashevkin explains her ideas on how to eliminate “low voters turn-out,” “devaluation of politics,” "gender schemas," and "media framing.” She outlines some compelling solutions to address the stalemate facing women in Canadian politics which are; contesting media portrayals, changing the rule of the game, improving legislative quotas, electoral reform, movement renewals, and so on. This response paper would addresses the reality of a political mainstream, actions which should be taken against the oppressive elements of reality, and the awareness it brings through economic, social, and political environment.
Margaret Fuller was a journalist, critic and women's rights activist associated with the American transcendental movement. She was the first full-time female book reviewer in journalism. Her book Woman in the Nineteenth Century is considered the first major feminist work in the United States. was an early proponent of feminism and especially believed in providing education to women.[113] Once equal educational rights were afforded women, she believed, women could push for equal political rights as well.[114] She advocated that women seek any employment they wish, rather than catering to the stereotypical "feminine" roles of the time, such as teaching. She once said, "If you ask me what office women should fill, I reply—any... let them be sea captains if you will. I do not doubt that there are women well fitted for such an office".[115] She had great confidence in all women but doubted that a woman would produce a lasting work of art or literature in her time[116] and disliked the popular female poets of her time.[117] Fuller also warned women to be careful about marriage and not to become dependent on their husbands. As she wrote, "I wish woman to live, first for God's sake. Then she will not make an imperfect man for her god, and thus sink to idolatry. Then she will not take what is not fit for her from a sense of weakness and poverty"
Charlotte Perkins Gilman uses “The Yellow Wallpaper” to express her thoughts on feminism and individuality. Gilman takes the reader through the mind of a woman who we’re not completely sure of how she became crazy. When does the woman become crazy and why? No one will ever surely know exactly what happened. The way that the woman narrates the story tells a lot of information about who the woman truly is and how she feels inferior to her husband John and the other men throughout the story. This inferiority may have caused the woman’s sickness.
This movement had great leaders who were willing to deal with the ridicule and the disrespect that came along with being a woman. At that time they were fighting for what they thought to be true and realistic. Some of the great women who were willing to deal with those things were Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Mott, Jane Hunt, Mary McClintock, and Martha C. Wright. These women gave this movement, its spark by conduction the first ever women 's right’s convention. This convention was held in a church in Seneca Falls in 1848. At this convection they expressed their problems with how they were treated, as being less than a man. These women offered solutions to the problem by drafting the Declaration of Sentiments and Resolutions. They cleverly based the document after the Declaration of Independence. The opening line of their document was “We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men and women are created equal” (Shi & Mayer 361). In this declaration they discuss the history of how women have been treated and how men have denied them rights, which go against everything they believe in. This convention was the spark that really
Feminism has always a hot topic no matter what time period you may look at. And while it might not have been called feminism at those times, women’s rights seem to have always been up for debate. People seems to have this idea about women and that they are lesser and weaker than men. Throughout history, many people have been trying to change the idea that women are weaker than men. However, one person who might think that that narrative might be hard to change would be Simone de Beauvoir. She wrote the book The Second Sex in order to show how she believed women were looked at to as inferior to men, not because of something biological, but because throughout history women have been referred to as “the Other”. I see her argument as a stepping-stone
Feminism in Like Water for Chocolate by Laura Esquivel. There are many different definitions of feminism. Some people regard feminism as the idea that women deserve the same amount of respect that men deserve. There are the other schools of feminist thought that hold women superior to men.
The Feminist Movement begin in the in 1848 spearheaded by the Seneca Fall Convention (Smith & Hamon, 2012). Feminism is the reaction to many year of oppression by a male dominated society. In the Feminist Movement women like Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Canton Stanton desired rights, opportunities, and the identity that women deserved (Smith & Hamon, 2012). Osmond and Thorne (1993) stated that Feminist respond by expressing their desire to “develop knowledge that will further social change, knowledge that will help confront and end subordination of women as it related to the pattern of subordination based on social class, race, ethnicity, age, and sexual orientation” (p. 592). The “first wave” of the Feminist Movement
Jamaica Kincaid’s “Girl” shows in society how a woman should be placed and what it means to be a woman. A women doesn’t question her partner, instead she is subservient to him. A woman’s duties include staying at home taking care of the children and cooking; while the man works and brings home the money. A feministic approach to Kincaid’s “Girl” points to the idea of the stereotypes that women can only be what they do in the home, they should only be pure and virtuous, and their main focus should be satisfying their husband.
Alice Walker's use of characterization in her novel The Color Purple depicts her main theme of female empowerment and the importance of maintaining an assertive voice. The tyrannical male characters, the victimized female characters, and the development of the protagonist, Celie, express Walker's firm views of female independence in a male dominated society. Her feminist views have been influenced by her experiences with discrimination as an African-American woman as well as her involvement in the Civil Rights Movement. These experiences serve as an inspiration for developing the character Celie, a young black woman discovering her own sense of self while battling a male dependent environment. The progression of civil rights for black women that existed throughout the twentieth century mirrors the development Celie makes from a verbally debilitated girl to an adamant young woman. The expression of racism and sexism that evidenced itself during the postmodern era presented Walker with an opportunity to compose a novel that reveals her strong animosity toward discrimination. Without these outlets, Walker would not have had the ability to create a novel with such in-depth insights into the lifestyle of an immensely oppressed woman.