Female Outcasts In Dracula

1015 Words3 Pages

While the female outcasts in the two works met different treatments as discussed above, another contrast lies in the writer’s choice of heroic savior who redeemed these outcasts. In both works, redemption of a fallen woman depended on these heroes, but a female character, Lizzie, became the savior in Rossetti’s poem, while Dracula remained heavily androcentric. Rossetti’s choice of a female savior is particularly interesting considering how male-exclusive Victorian society was. Lizzie is in every way the paragon of Victorian femininity. She embodies the ideal quality of a mother — unconditional compassion and selflessness —, illustrated through her self-sacrificing compassion to save her sister: “Laura, make much of me; /For your sake I have …show more content…

Stoker suggests otherwise in Dracula, however. Stoker could have also established a female savior, and Lucy’s sister figure, Mina, would have been the perfect candidate. Like Lizzie in “The Goblin Market,” Mina is an individual whom Van Helsing praised as “So true, so sweet, so noble, so little an egotist” —a mirror of femininity (Stoker 226). But, in Dracula, it is the masculine force and scientific intelligence which overcame the fallen woman in Lucy. Stoker portrays the group of four men, led by Dr. Van Helsing, as mighty soldiers of modernity and religion. As Van Helsing asserted, “[they] have on [their] side… resources of science,” “a power denied to the vampire kind” (Stoker 276). Dracula is evidently a male-centered world, where redemption of fallen outcast requires bravery, self-reliance, and intelligence — all of which are Victorian ideals of men — and such task is “no part for a woman” (Stoker 274). Therefore, Mina, despite her competence of being both virtuous and accredited for having a “man’s brain,” is excluded from the role of a heroic savior (Stoker …show more content…

Superficially, “The Goblin Market” seem to end in successful resolution, where Laura and Lizzie, as wives and mothers, “Would call the little ones/ And tell them of her early prime,” extolling the bond of the sisters (Rossetti 548-549). But there is a deliberate ominousness present in Rossetti’s poem that is absent from Stoker’s Dracula. The goblin men, who were the cause of Lucy’s fall, evaded any punishment, thus revenge against evil was not undertaken. Through the ambiguous tone in which she concluded “The Goblin Market,” Rossetti questions the fairness of Victorian society, and challenges its long-living patriarchy by introducing a female hero, Lizzie. Meanwhile, Stoker’s Dracula is a novel about the effectiveness of a male-oriented society. Contrary to “The Goblin Market,” the novel indeed resolved in a satisfactory note, as Dracula, who is the villain behind the fall of Lucy is appropriately “sterilize[d]” (Stoker 281). Stoker also concludes his novel with Van Helsing passing down the story to Harker’s son, but his story, unlike Laura’s, is not about power of femininity. Rather, it

Open Document