Federalism In Hurricane Katrina

606 Words2 Pages

Hurricane Katrina was the 2nd most catastrophic event since September 11th. During the hurricane, there was a failure in preparedness of the federal, state, and local government. The definition of Federalism is in which power is distributed between a central government and subdivisional governments, called states in the United States. The national and the subdivisional governments both exercise direct authority over individuals. In the case of Hurricane Katrina, the role of federalism failed in many ways. The reasons why the government failed was for one a lack of communication, and most importantly they were unprepared for this type of domestic disaster. The government on all levels were blaming each other on who should have done what. In the case of a major problem like Hurricane Katrina, all levels of government should work together. FEMA is brought to the table for the blame. Some things FEMA did wrong in response to Katrina were they didn’t have the resources, poorly led, they lied about how the army requested assistance which they did, and they did not deliver. FEMA responded slowly, and all the areas that were affected by the hurricane got hurt. Not to mention, President Bush did not respond as quick as he should have either. It took him 6 days just to get to New Orleans, not on the ground, but on Air Force One. At that time, nobody knew who was in charge, and who to blame for the lack of preparedness for this catastrophe.
The best way to ensure cooperation …show more content…

They had a lack of communication, lack of supplies, and lack of notice. From the federal government, to the local government did not prepare for the hurricane. Federalism should have been used during Hurricane Katrina. Everyone in all levels of government needs to work together on catastrophes like Hurricane Katrina to get the job done. The levels of government did not work together, and look what happened in the

Open Document