Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Relation between The United States and Mexico
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Relation between The United States and Mexico
I was desperate to find a way to bring my family or at least my daughter here to the US. I am not sure how I came about consulting with a lawyer to find out whether a separation of a mother from her child can be considered a “humanitarian reason” --- Notes: “United States will not reissue visas, nor will they issue new visas, except for compelling and proven humanitarian reasons or where the national interest of our own country requires”. I found an immigration lawyer in Saint Louis and made an appointment. St. Louis was about hundred miles from Rolla, I asked my friend if she could take me to the lawyer office in St. Louis since I didn’t have a car. She accepted and we went to see the lawyer. Unfortunately, the lawyer didn’t think I has …show more content…
a case. I came away disappointed, but not yet convinced that my case is not a humanitarian case. I thought about going to the United State Department in Washington D.C. and talk to someone about my case. How naïve I was! I knew a friend who lived in Washington DC, I called and told her about my situation. She was more than happy to let me stay with her. As soon as the semester ended, I bought a Greyhound bus ticket going to Washington D.C. from Rolla. It was over 900 miles from Rolla to Washington D.C., and it took more than thirty-five hours to get there. Seeing and spending time with my friend was very nice, but the goal was XXXX on my mind. I managed to go to the State Department and asked the security guards that I wanted to speak to someone who can help me to bring my daughter to the US. I don’t remember what else I told guard, that he finally went and brought someone to the front door. With my broken English, I told the new guy about my daughter and I wanted to bring her in the US. Unfortunately, nothing mattered, the response was no, how naïve I was thinking that I would be able to find a solution. It was so frustrating and I felt miserable! I left the Washington the next day. The year1980 was tough year for me, the hostage crisis continued throughout the year.
In the fall of 1980, neighbor to the south, Iraq, ruled by brutal dictator Saddam Hussein lunched an attack against Iran, hoping to capture territory in midst of hostage crisis, and ongoing feud with the US. Half a million Iraqi and Iranian soldiers, with an equivalent number of civilians, are believed to have died, with many more injured; however, the war brought neither reparations nor changes in borders. Extensive use of chemical weapon used by Iraq on civilian during this atrocity. My brother, twenty-five years old, volunteered and joined the army to go fight the war, this brought additional distraught in my …show more content…
life. Another major event in 1980 was, the presidential election between the President Jimmy Carter (Democrat) and the California Governor Ronald Reagan (Republican) was held on November 4th, 1980.
President Carter lost the election mainly because the Iran-US hostage crisis. Minutes after Ronald Reagan’s inauguration, on January 20, 1981, the 52 U.S. hostages held at the U.S. embassy in Teheran, were released, ending the 444-day Iran Hostage Crisis. This was the best thing happened after a long and painful time. The Iranian travel ban was lifted sometime later, in 1981, but my husband and daughter still could not leave Iran because of the Iran-Iraq war. The Iranian government would not allow ing people to leave the country during the
war.
For decades, U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East had depended on a friendly government in Iran. The newly appointed leader, the shah of Iran, began Westernizing the country and taking away power from the Ayatollah, powerful religious leaders. The United States poured millions of dollars into Iran’s economy and the shah’s armed forces, overlooking the rampant corruption in government and well-organized opposition. By early 1979, the Ayatollah had murdered the Shah and taken back power of the government. A group of students who took the American embassy hostage on November 4th, 1979, turned the embassy over to the religious leaders. Carter knew he must take action in order to regain the American embassy and the hostages, but with all of the military cutbacks, the rescue attempt was a complete failure and embarrassment. It took the United States 444 days to rescue the hostages. This was the final straw for many Americans, and enough to push them to the “right” side of the political spectrum, Republican.
Commentators whipped both Carter's arrangements to give up control of the Panama Canal and his reaction to Soviet animosity in Afghanistan by hauling out of the Olympics and completion the offer of wheat to the Russians. His acknowledgment of socialist China, which developed Nixon's China approach, and his arrangement of new arms control concurrences with the Soviets, were both condemned by moderates in the Republican Party. Yet, the most genuine emergency of Carter's administration included Iran. At the point when the Ayatollah Khomeini seized power there, the U.S. offered haven to the sickly Shah, irritated the new Iranian government, which then urged understudy aggressors to storm the American consulate and assume control fifty Americans prisoner. Carter's inadequate treatment of the tremendously broadcast prisoner emergency, and the shocking fizzled endeavor to protect them in 1980, destined his administration, despite the fact that he arranged their discharge instantly before leaving office.
In September 1980, a very destructive war with Iran was started by Saddam Hussein. This was a result of an invasion in Iran. This invasion spurred an eight year war. Saddam used c...
...w the United States’ close ally Shah. Countless modernizers were persecuted, arrested and executed. In November 52 United States diplomats were held hostage by student revolutionaries who’d seized the American embassy in Tehran. America took immediate action and seized all Iranian assets. The United States attempted to negotiate. The negotiation, to the dismay of the American people dragged on for 444 days. There was a large push for President Carter to use military forces as means of negotiations; he however opted for peaceful means, which proved to be unsuccessful. Finally in April 1980 the President sanctioned a rescue mission. The attempt failed due to technical difficulties, eight men died; as a result the nation became extremely unnerved. Carter's dialogue with Iran continued throughout 1980. This was yet another failure on Carter’s part to rectify an issue.
“Out of intense complexities, intense simplicities emerge” a quote from Sir Winston Churchill (1923, p.623) he used to describe the geopolitics of the First World War is found an apt characterization of Publicis Singapore’s WAR (see appx). Created for Crisis Relief Singapore’s “Liking isn’t helping” ad campaign as an argument against self-gratifying passive acknowledgment and a call for substantive action marketed to a global audeance. WAR successfully illustrates this intent with an easily understandable yet deeply powerful nearly universal effect. To better understand the simple strength in Publicis Singapore’s argument requires dissection
There were many problems in which Carter had been blamed for, especially the Iran hostage crisis which proved to be very humiliating. He failed to deal with any of these situations. Either as hesitant or ineffective is how many Americans viewed Carter. He also had attacked Reagan as a dangerous radical after he defeated Tom Kennedy for the nomination. For his part Reagan, the charismatic ex-Governor of California, repeatedly made fun of Carter's powerlessness , and won a landside victory that carried the United States Senate for the first time in 28 years. Reagan's victory marked the beginning of the "Reagan Revolution."
The just war theory is described by Thomas Massaro in his book Living Justice as the “principle that warfare might be justified under certain conditions” (108). The complexities involved with international relations makes determining a just war very difficult. Even though historically pacifism hasn’t gained much traction within Catholic circles, it currently is gaining popularity with many mainstream Catholics. With so many differing views on military action, one might ask, “What determines a just war? How can we balance the need for peace with self-defense?” An examination of criteria for a just war and critiques written on this topic might shed light on these two questions.
O’Brien begins the chapter by explaining about Bob (Rat) Kiley. O’Brien says that Kiley is his close friend in Vietnam, and explains how Kiley’s friend Curt Lemon was killed in the war, and Kiley starts to write a letter to the Lemon’s sister about what happened. Kiley starts talking about all the positive stuff about his friend to O’Brien, and Kiley is in tears when he talks about the things that make them close friends. Rat finally mails the letter, but his friend’s sister never mails him back. O’Brien explains that almost all war stories are immoral. He explains that war stories are never positive, and mostly told by a negative light. O’Brien explains that if someone wanted to hear a true war story, they should talk to Rat Kiley. Later on, O’Brien explains that the guy name is Curt Lemon. The smoke grenades caused Lemon’s death. He explains that some of the soldiers were playing with the grenades and they were not careful with it. This led to his death, and O’Brien explains that Lemon’s death was almost beautiful with Lemon’s handsome face when the sunlight reflecting on him. O’Brien explains that the author has a difficult explaining what is the reality and what they “think” happened in their books. He
It caused the Energy Crisis which in turn caused the Recession of 1979. The Iran Hostage Crisis also had political consequences for President Carter. It was a major factor that contributed to him losing the election of 1980 to Ronald Reagan. Additionally, this crisis led to many instances of racial discrimination toward Iranian-Americans and Iranian immigrants. Even after the Hostage Crisis was resolved, the bad blood between the two countries continued; the United States helped Iraq in the war against Iran, and the Iranians backed a second hostage situation in Lebanon.
After World War I and the Bolshevik Russian Revolution, Communists, people who supports or believes in the principles of communism, which is a political theory derived from Karl Marx, supporting class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person is paid according to their abilities and needs, overpowered Russia in 1917. The Americans feared the Communist ideas. The fear increased when millions of American workers went on strike in 1919. The Red Scare began in April 1919 after postal workers found bombs in packages addressed to famous Americans. Officials never found the sender of but suspected members of the Communists Party.
In the words of Bertrand Russell, “Fear is the main source of superstition, and one of the main sources of cruelty. To conquer fear is the beginning of wisdom” (Russell). Fear causes many problems in our lives. Fear influences many of a person’s actions and decisions. However, people usually regret the decisions or actions they made out of fear. Also, these actions and decisions can cause problems for those people in their future. Fear is a harmful emotion, for it clouds people’s judgement, disables them from taking action, and causes them to make decisions that they will regret later.
Society portrays heroes as doing good, as defending against a clear evil. Our society has Superheroes whom we idolize, but is that a true hero? Is it someone who dies with a clear conscience, or is it someone who has had to make some of the most difficult decisions to allow them to serve, protect, and survive. “Hero of War,” a song by Rise Against, and American Sniper by Chris Kyle show that the definition of hero is not as cut and dry as we might think. A soldier is a hero until someone hears what happened over seas, when they hear of the horrific things that happened in another country; but those exact experiences are what make them a true hero.
In Praise of War is a poem written by Bertran De Born and is to no surprise from its title, about his love for war due to the pleasure it brings him during battle. Born was the Lord of Altaforte at the time and was involved in several wars, most notably against Henry II, the King of England. The Prince is a political treatise written by the notorious Niccolò Machiavelli of Florentine and it includes an analysis on how to acquire and maintain political power. In both works of literature, betrayal and loyalty is a shared common theme in warfare. Machiavelli discusses these two themes while Born contradicts as well as supports them and actually demonstrated them in reality. One specific aspect that both Born and Machiavelli could both agree on,
A war crime is an unjust act of violence in which a military personnel violates the laws and acceptable behaviors of a war. Despite all the violence in a war, a soldier shooting another is not considered a war crime because it is not a violation to the laws and practices of a war, and it is considered just. A war crime is defined as a “violations [violation] of the laws and customs of war” (“War Crimes”), and are attacks “against civilian populations, prisoners of war, or in some cases enemy soldiers in the field” (Friedman). War crimes are typically committed with weapons or by uncommon, cruel, devastating military methods and are “…Committed primarily by military personnel” (Friedman). There are many different types of war crimes one can commit, including “murder, ill treatment…murder or ill treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages or devastation not justified by military necessity” (Friedman). Originally constructed as international law by the London Charter on August 8th, 1945 and further developed by the Hague Conventions of 1899, 1907 and the Nuremberg trials, war crimes are aggressive, unacceptable and unjust actions performed by military workforce that occur during a war.
War has been around for centuries. From the time modern civilizations began, war has played an integral part in human history. It shaped the world into the modern world we live in. War has been said to be a great motivator, for example, the Great Wall of China was built to fend off the attackers from the north. However, the negative aspects of war far outweighs any positive effects it might have. The destruction of civilizations, cities and countries, mass killings of men, woman and children alike, the disastrous effect it has on economy and the after effects of war can last for centuries.