Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Family systems theory summary
Family systems theory summary
Family systems theory summary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Family systems theory summary
An adage goes by “show me your friends and I will tell you who you are” but in family system theory, it more like show me/tell me about a family member, and I will tell and interpret the family as a whole. Family system theory work hand in hand with the definition of family because, based on how the family defines itself, you can tell more about the family in terms of their communication and coexistence in general. Based on my understanding of Turner & West, (2013) definition of system theory, it implies that a family is a system and in order for that system to function, there are part components of that system that helps the system survive and those components are wholeness, Interdependence, Hierarchy, boundaries, calibration/feedback and Equifinality. Each of these components has specific significant that it brings to understanding and functionality of the family system. …show more content…
When it comes to the basic premise of system theory, family system theory is rooted in positivistic-empirical intellectual tradition.
When I was first introduced to family system theory, I did not know what Positivistic- Empirical approach was by with the aid of the lecture and Turner &West, (2013) page 59, it implied that we can understand and gain more knowledge about how a family functions and its laws and everything by the interactions that occurs within the family. Since most of the basic knowledge and the way we view the world is first developed at home, by studying an individual from a family or the family in general, we can learn and discover the functions of the
family. The components described by Turner & West (2013) in page 68 are wholeness, interdependence, Hierarchy, Boundaries/openness, Calibration/feedback and Equifinality are ways which family communication are interpreted but also understood. Wholeness and Interdependence are somewhat similar in the sense that wholeness talks about how family isn’t just a make up of the individuals or everyone but also the personalities and experiences of the whole family in general while Interdependence talks about how family are all tied together so what affects an individual in the family, affects the whole family. Hierarchy and boundaries are some what also the same in the sense that hierarchy is more of a rank and respect while boundaries/openness somewhat includes boundaries because sometimes boundaries are created out of respect or fear of the reaction from hierarchy in the family also is openness. Calibration/feedback and Equifinality is more on the communication and goal aspect of the family in the sense that calibration/feedback talks about feedback and rules derived from the family while Equifinality is the different way by which family achieve a goal but the achievement and development of the family depends on what kind of feedback the get. In conclusion, system theory is the theory that helps with understanding a family better. We might all have different definition of family but the system isn’t based on any theory but rather on the communication of the family. Just like new york times online (2011) talked about how a family tree and the definition is like a tangled forest, well, system theory helps us understand the kind of plants and animals in the tangled forest and also gives up the knowledge about what kind of tools to use to tame and also main the huge forest.
Family systems have been studied since psychologists began studying people and their behaviors. The family is a dynamic system—a self-organizing system that adapts itself to changes in its members and to changes in its environment (as cited in Sigelman & Rider, 2009). Allowing the focus of a family system to grow beyond the mother and child relationship did not happen overnight. For many years, there was no connection made between other members of the family and the developmental issues of the children involved.
Olson, John DeFrain, and Linda Skogrand,2014, p.74). Family systems theory states the whole is greater than the sum of parts meaning that the family is much more a collection of individuals who live together and are related to each other. It represents an integration of parts that individual members can be understood only within the context of the whole (Suzanne R. Smith and Raeann R Hamon, 2012, p.146). When looking at the family through a family systems theory lens, we can see that the husband and wife have similar backgrounds. They both are Indian and their families have ties to one another because their parents have been friends for nearly seventeen years. The family is the greatest source of influence on a child and that the child’s personality also effects the parents (Suzanne R. Smith and Raeann R Hamon, 2012,
In understanding others, one must first understand our own family background and how it affects our understanding of the world. Conversely, family systems draw on the view of the family as an emotional unit. Under system thinking, one evaluates the parts of the systems in relation to the whole meaning behavior becomes informed by and inseparable from the functioning of one’s family of origin. These ideas show that individuals have a hard time separating from the family and the network of relationships. With a deeper comprehension of the family of origin helps with the challenges and awareness of normalized human behaviors. When interviewing and analyzing the family of origin, allow one to look at their own family of origin
Becvar, D. S., & Becvar, R. J. (1999). Systems theory and family systems (2 ed.). Lanham, NY: University Press of America.
According to Richard Charles (2001) “the effectiveness of family systems theory rests not much on empirical research but on clinical reports of positive treatment outcomes, the personal benefits experienced by the families that underwent this kind of treatment, and the elegance of Bowen’s theory” (p. 279). Bowen’s family systems theory views the family as an emotional unit and is a theory of human behavior. Systems thinking is used to describe the complex interactions in the unit. However, the client’s ability to differentiate himself/herself from the family of origin is the basis for Bowen’s family systems theory. In addition, the primary focus for growth within the emotional system is differentiation of self.
Murray Bowen’s family emotional systems theory (BFST) is an outgrowth of Freud’s psychoanalysis of the individual (Kerr, 1981). Bowen was an analyst by training and applied the “unconscious mental processes” to the study of family systems (Walsh, 2010, p.91). Bowen’s theory exists as a branch under the umbrella of the more general systems theory. System theory posits that a whole system is more tha...
First, we must understand what each theory encompasses and then examine the varying benefits and incompetencies each reveals. In the realm of family-systems theory, we find that,
Families make us who we are. From our families we learn communication skills, emotions and how to form relationships. Murray Bowen developed the Bowen family systems theory. The Bowen family systems theory provides the opportunity to learn about complex family relationships and emotional relationships. The Bowen family systems theory can be integrated with religion and spirituality. Everyone can relate the Bowen family systems theory. I can integrate my personal experiences with concepts from the Bowen family systems theory.
When defining family, the U.S. Census Bureau defines it as "a family is a group of two or more people related by birth, marriage, or adoption, and residing together". Essentially, this definition pulls a broad pool of people together. In Jack's case, he considers his mother, father, two siblings, both of his grandfathers, his aunt, his wife, and almost newborn baby to be in his family. A household, on the other hand, is anyone that lives together in a particular space (U.S. Census Bureau, 2014). Jack explained that his household consists of himself and his wife. Soon, it was also consist of his newborn child.
The whole (group) is greater than the sum of its parts. A couple is more than two individuals. A family is more than two parents and a child. These are not merely cliches but a recognition that we are influenced and influence the people that matter most to us in sometimes subtle yet profound ways. A couple is a unit; there has never been the combination and alchemy that is two people coming together to create a new entity. Families exist in a web of relationships - carrying their parents and even grandparents in their DNA and their habitual subconscious patterns. Systems theories honor the inter-connectedness that defines us.
These four perspectives of assessment involve: communication, family structure, life cycle adjustments, and the impact of the social environment on the family. Family theorist have also further expended on the interaction of family and the social environment. Throughout this paper, I will apply the four perspectives of assessment to asses my family of origin; as well as, use various family systems theories to assess my experiences with family of origin in order to develop an awareness of how my experiences affected me, and to prevent them from interfering with my ability to provide my future clients with the best possible
The television sitcom Modern Family produced by Steven Levitan and Christopher Lloyd shows the many different types of a modern American family. According to Andrew Hampp, “The show is among the most-viewed scripted programs in prime time in its second season, averaging 11 million viewers during original airings and often ranked as the most DVRed program most weeks” (2). The television show is a frequently watched show and is liked by many viewers. Modern Family's storyline helps the families of viewers by being an influential and relatable show to different types of families. The show is about the lives of three different families that are all related. In the show there are Jay and Gloria, an intergenerational couple with two sons-- Manny (from Gloria’s previous relationship) and Joe, their new baby. Jay’s adult son Cameron is married to his gay partner Mitchell, and they adopted Lily from Vietnam. Finally, Jay’s daughter Claire is married to her heterosexual partner named Phil and they have three children. The show is influential to our culture today because it shows these different types of families and addresses controversial themes such as gay adoption, the different family connections and communications, intergenerational coupling, and acceptance of diversity within an extended family. The family is easy to relate to while watching because it is based off of real family situations.
Each family unit exhibits concepts and themes found within Bowen’s Family System Theory. In my family unit, I see the following concepts and themes from a family system theory perspective exhibited through my genogram; boundaries, levels of differentiation, family projection process, and emotional cutoff. Each of these will be expanded on further below:
Family structure can greatly impact the day-to-day activities of a family. A family with one parent may have a very different dynamic than one with two parents, or possibly even more parents. It is no surprise that these differences exist and families and that one’s family impacts their way of life. However, does it make a significant difference? Or is it simply a difference in how people react to their situations. That is what I wanted to learn from this assignment.
Everyone is born into some form of family, with the family taking the responsibility of nurturing, teaching the norms or accepted behaviors within the family structure and within society. There are many types of families, which can be described as a set of relationships including parents and children and can include anyone related by blood or adoption. Family is the most important, “for it is within the family that the child is first socialized to serve the needs of the society and not only its own needs” (Goode, 1982).