Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Discuss the central theme death of ivan ilyich
Literary analysis of the death of ivan ilyich
The death of ivan ilyich analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Discuss the central theme death of ivan ilyich
Falseness vs. honesty
The Death of Ivan Ilyich by Leo Tolstoy is a novella about a man by the name of Ivan Ilyich. He lives an empty and artificial life. When he is about to die, he has to come to terms with the fact that he lived his life based on superficiality and what was socially expected. Throughout the novella, one can see how certain characters share the same view as Ivan by being materialistic and selfish while others act with respect, honesty, and compassion. Ivan’s relationship with his wife, Praskovya Fedorovna Golovina is based on materialism and selfishness. The way the doctors interact with Ivan show that they do not have any respect for him. They
…show more content…
are also very dis-honest and refuse to answer the dying man’s questions.
Unlike Praskovya and the doctors, Gerasim is one character who respects Ivan and who is honest and compassionate towards him. Gerasim understands life and death and he is the only one who is able to comfort Ivan when he is ill.
Ivan marries Praskovya because it is socially expected. All is well until Praskovya becomes pregnant. She becomes an annoyance to her husband so as a result, Ivan prioritizes work over his family. It was “to the degree that his wife became more irritable and demanding, Ivan Ilyich increasingly made work the center of gravity in his life” (50). Ivan has no compassion for his wife. She is going through a hard time with pregnancy and instead of being there for his wife; he makes work his main focus. Ivan disregards the truth. He is unable to comprehend the fact that his life is not perfect. He does not talk to his wife, or try to figure out a way to rekindle their relationship because he cannot face his imperfections. He much rather lie to himself and everyone around him by immersing himself in his work. In order for Ivan to live his life by the social standards, he only necessitates “dinners at home, a
…show more content…
well-run household, a partner in bed, and, above all, a veneer of respectability which public opinion required” (50). Ivan and Praskovya’s marriage is all a façade. Ivan lives an empty life because he has no depth, love, and honesty. Ivan cannot appreciate all the good he has in his life because he does anything he can to heighten his standards to result in social acceptation. Praskovya is similar to Ivan because she is very materialistic, selfish, and fake. While Ivan is sick, she shows no sympathy towards him. She tells Ivan that it is his fault that he is sick. Praskovya continuously reminds her husband that he is a burden on her, “she began to wish he would die, yet she could not really wish that, for there would be no income” (64). Praskovya’s only reason she does not want Ivan to die is the fact that there will be no income. Both Ivan and Praskovya are shallow and selfish. Together they live a life without meaning. Their relationship is founded on a lie just like Ivan’s doctors; who do not share the veracity about his illness with him. Ivan becomes very ill and he is in a lot of pain.
He goes to many doctors to try to get some clarity on his sickness, instead of comforting their patient; the doctors only lie to him. The doctors do not show Ivan the care and security that he needs. Ivan says that “from the doctors summery, I concluded that things were bad, but that to the doctor it was of no consequence even though for him it was bad” (65). “It aroused in him a feeling of great self-pity and equally great resentment toward the doctor for being so indifferent to a matter of such importance” (65). Ivan’s illness is a very important matter, yet the doctors act as if it is insignificant. Ivan has to face his fears alone because he lacks support; not only from his family but from the doctors also. Even “when he consulted doctors, he felt he was not only deteriorating, but at a very rapid rate” (68). When one visits the doctor, the doctor usually instills hope and encouragement in the patient. In this novella, the doctors make Ivan feel even worse about his sickness. They leave out details and they avoid his questions. Ivan has no one around him to act with honesty and respect towards him, until Gerasim the pantry boy comes to help Ivan in his last days of his life. Gerasim shows Ivan deep compassion and comfort, unlike the
doctors. Gerasim creates a great bond with Ivan by treating him like a person who mattered. Ivan’s whole life is based on a lie because unlike Gerasim, he lives his life based on social expectations. Gerasim does everything in a happy and willing manner. Ivan is drawn to him “because no one even cared to understand his situation. Gerasim was the only one who understood and pitied him. And for that reason Ivan Ilyich felt comfortable only with Gerasim” (87). Ivan’s family and friends never truly cared about him so Gerasim helps Ivan get a glimpse of what being loved and cared for feels like. Unlike the other characters, the wellbeing of others is a true priority to Gerasim. He is the only character who is able to accept reality. When Pytor Ivanovich is leaving Ivan’s funeral, Gerasim tells him “It’s Gods will, sir. We all have to die someday” (41). The other characters are blinded by how perfect his or her life has to be; instead of perceiving reality. Gerasim does not live that way so he is able to confront and accept the difficult parts of life. He understands that life is not forever and one needs to do what he can to put meaning in his life until it is too late. Tolstoy teaches his readers important lessons from the relationships between Ivan and some of the characters. Praskovya and Ivan exemplify a bad marriage. They do not respect each other. Instead of trying to mend their relationship, Ivan surrounds himself in his job to avoid reality. The desire to work hard is what makes a marriage work. They both do not want to admit that an aspect of their life is not perfect so they hide it, instead of trying to make it work out. Their marriage is lacking depth and love because they are both just using each other to find favor in the public eye. Ivan Ilyich’s doctors hide the truth from the dying man. Ivan lives his entire life dishonestly, until he is dying and is searching for some truth to comfort him yet, Ivan has to face his fears alone because he lacks support from his family and his doctors as well. One should learn to be there for others when he or she is needed. Sometimes honesty is the best way to go. Grasim is happy in his social position, therefore giving him the ability to live a life of meaning. Gerasim gives Ivan I glimpse of this life right before he dies. Some of the many lessons one can learn from Gerasim is his willingness and love to help others, his security in who he is, and his honesty towards those around him as well as himself.
The Death of Ivan Ilyich by Leo Tolstoy tells the story of Ivan Ilyich, a man who deals with a mysterious illness through introspection. Until his illness, he lived the life he thought he was supposed to live. Like Candide, he was living in blind optimism. He assumed that what he was doing was the right thing because he was told as much. He had a respectable job and a family. Happiness, if it did occur to him, was fulfilling his duties as a husband and father. It was his sudden illness that allowed him to reflect on his choices, concluding that those choices did not make him happy. “Maybe I have lived not as I should have… But how so when I did everything in the proper way” (Tolstoy 1474)? Ilyich had been in a bubble for his entire life, the bubble only popping when he realizes his own mortality. This puts his marriage, his career, and his life choices into perspective. Realizing that he does not get to redo these choices, he distances himself from his old life: his wife, his children, and his career. All that is left is to reflect. This reflection is his personal enlightenment. He had been living in the dark, blind to his true feelings for his entire life. Mortality creates a space in which he can question himself as to why he made the choices he made, and how those choices created the unsatisfactory life he finds himself in
What exactly is dysfunctional? Who wrote the rules to proper family or societal behavior? How does one know exactly what the proper reaction is? Every family has its crazy members and every city it’s insane citizens, but many do a great job of covering it up. Especially when it comes to high in social standing. Many are very careful not to air their dirty laundry in public. There are times when it can get out of hand and the unthinkable may happen. Is it right for one person to automatically appoint themselves as head of the household such as, Orgon in Tartuffe? What about Ivan Ilyich? Would he have been considered the head of the house, because he allowed his wife’s attitude to predict the family’s social standing? These two stories are classic of situational irony not only from families, but in human nature. To analyze Tartuffe and The Death of Ivan Ilyich and then compare them, one must have an open mind to all sorts of behavior and believe that these situations are indeed a reality.
Both monarchs had a royal background and were put in power with high expectations to continue the stability that the country possessed. Citizens aspire for all government officials to keep the peoples best interest in mind. But sadly, due to Ivan’s brutal childhood, he grew up observing and learning from the mannerisms of the corrupt elite. Ivan predominately gained power through fear and with this tactic was the first to exercise a despotism in Russia. One example of this is the story of the peasants who disturbed Ivan during one of his retreats. They came to him to complain of their governor who they believed was unjust but Ivan was so upset that they had troubled him with such a petty matter that he punished them. The men had their hands tied behind their backs, boiling hot alcohol poured on their heads and then their beards lit on fire with a candle. Apprehension and terror were Ivan’s main tools for keeping his people under control. Despite his totalitarian state of mind, Ivan believed that his decisions were still best for the country and the only way to keep it safe was by leaving it in constant fear. Although not always the most rational, the czar still made the suitable choices to keep the kingdom together. Similar to Ivan, Charles was not always under the influence of his mental disability. During his 42
Tolstoy provided us with two perspectives to view Ivan’s life in “The death of Ivan Illyich”: an omniscient narrator and Ivan himself. What I plan to do is give another perspective, not necessarily to view his life, but rather to his experiences after he realized he was dying. This perspective will be an analytical and psychological; the perspective from Kubler-Ross’s Stages of death (or stages of grief, as they are better known for). These stages occur when we are faced with an event that is usually connected with death. The “normal” order in which these five stages occur, though may not go doctrinally in this order, are as such: Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression, and Acceptance.
Though illness stripped both Morrie Schwartz and Ivan Ilych of their hope for survival, their dissimilar lifestyles led each to a much different end. Morrie found himself in an overflow of compassion while surrounded by family, friends and colleagues. Ivan, on the other hand, found only the obligatory company of his wife and the painful awareness that no one really cared. Both characters ended their lives the way they lived them, as Ivan acknowledges: "In them he saw himself" (Ivn, 149). While Morrie poured himself into every moment of life and every relationship he pursued, Ivan skirted the dangers of emotion to live "easily, pleasantly, and decorously" (Ivn, 115). In the spirit of such an opposition, the two stories become somewhat like responses to each other. Morrie Schwatrz, proclaimed...
The short story “The Death of Ivan Ilych” is about a man who realizes he is dying and that no one in his life cares about him. Even more disappointing for Ivan is the realization that besides his success as a high court judge, he has done nothing else to make his life worth saving. The death of Ivan Ilyich, sadly, comes as a release of stress to all. In the end, Ivan is soothed by the release of death, his family and friends are relieved of having responsibility of Ivan taken off their shoulders, and the reader is released from the stressful journey. Tolstoy teaches the audience through the structural elements of the “black sack” metaphor and pathos about the unavoidability of death and the relief of accepting it.
The Death of Ivan Ilyich is a story written by Leo Tolstoy in 1886. Leo Tolstoy was born in 1828 into a Russian society. Tolstoy had a rough childhood growing up. By the age of nine, both of his parents died and he was force to become an orphan. As Tolstoy grew older, he became known for being a womanizer and gambler. He engaged in premarital sex with prostitutes and these women became his downfall. Then he went under an acute conversion. Although Tolstoy converted, he did not adapt the traditional beliefs of a Christian conversion. He rejected the idea of afterlife which plays a role in Death of Ivan Ilyich. This story is about the life of an average man named Ivan Ilyich, who faces the fact that he is eventually going to die. Death is very
The story of In "The Death of Ivan Ilych", was written by Leo Tolstoy around who examines the life of a man, Ivan Ilyich, who would seem to have lived an exemplary life with moderate wealth, high station, and family. By story's end, however, Ivan's life will be shown to be devoid of passion -- a life of duties, responsibilities, respect, work, and cold objectivity to everything and everyone around Ivan. It is not until Ivan is on his death bed in his final moments that he realizes that materialism had brought to his life only envy, possessiveness, and non-generosity and that the personal relationships we forge are more important than who we are or what we own.
They are surprised by his death, but immediately think of how his death will affect their own lives, but more importantly, their careers. “The first thought that occurred to each of the gentlemen in the office, learning of Ivan Ilyich’s death, was what effect it would have on their own transfers and promotions.” (pg 32) As a reader, you have to wonder how Ivan must have had to live in order for people close to him to feel no sadness towards the loss or even pity for his wife. In fact, these gentlemen are exactly like Ivan. The purpose of their lives was to gain as much power as possible, with no regard for the harm that was caused by their selfish endeavor.... ...
Ivan has a strong disconnect with his family and begins feel like he is always suffering, while beginning to question if his life has been a lie. An example of this for prompt number three is when we are giving the quote "Ivan Ilych's life had been most simple and most ordinary and therefore most terrible." Leo Tolstoy implies through the quote that even though he lives an ordinary
Ivan Ilych was a member of the Court of Justice who was "neither as cold and formal as his elder brother nor as wild as the younger, but was a happy mean between them—an intelligent, polished, lively, and agreeable man” (Tolstoy 102). He lived an unexceptionally ordinary life and strived for averageness. As the story progresses, he begins to contemplate his life choices and the reason for his agonizing illness and inevitable death. “Maybe I did not live as I ought to have done, but how could that be, when I did everything properly?” (Tolstoy
Ivan Ilych is living during the industrial revolution, a time of technological advancement, that mainly advances the upper class, which he is apart of. Ivan’s number one priority in life is to be comfortable and to do the correct thing at all times. Every decision he makes, including who he chooses to marry, is with the intent that it does not damage his “easy, agreeable, and always decorous character of his life,” (Tolstoy 213). Ivan is convinced that the best way to have an easy and agreeable life is to be wealthy, marry a woman from his own class, and live in a house full of modern conveniences and luxury. Ironically, it...
The life of Ivan Ilyich, we are told, "had been most simple and most ordinary and therefore most terrible" (Tolstoy, Ch. 2). In analyzing this description of Ivan's life, we see that Ivan has always done what is expected of him in the eyes of others (wife, co-workers, employers, etc.). While Ivan believes his life has run easily, pleasantly, and decorously like it should, we see that in reality it is an unfulfilled life. Ivan's closest associates are more worried about who will be next in line for promotion now that he is gone, and at his funeral they are more concerned over a bridge game than grieving for the loss of a friend, "The more intimate of Ivan Ilyich's acquaintances, his so-called friends, could not help thinking also that they would now have to fulfill the very tiresome demands of propriety by attending the funeral service and paying a visit of condolence to the widow" (Tolstoy Ch. 1).
In his novella, The Death of Ivan Ilyich, Leo Tolstoy satirizes the isolation and materialism of Russian society and suggests that its desensitized existence overlooks the true meaning of life—compassion. Ivan had attained everything that society deemed important in life: a high social position, a powerful job, and money. Marriage developed out of necessity rather than love: “He only required of it those conveniences—dinner at home, housewife, and bed—which it could give him” (17). Later, he purchased a magnificent house, as society dictated, and attempted to fill it with ostentatious antiquities solely available to the wealthy. However, “In reality it was just what is usually seen in the houses of people of moderate means who want to appear rich, and therefore succeed only in resembling others like themselves” (22). Through intense characterizations by the detached and omniscient narrator, Tolstoy reveals the flaws of this deeply superficial society. Although Ivan has flourished under the standards of society, he fails to establish any sort of connection with another human being on this earth. Tragically, only his fatal illness can allow him to confront his own death and reevaluate his life. He finally understands, in his final breath, that “All you have lived for and still live for is falsehood and deception, hiding life and death from you” (69).
This point of the story is indirectly brought out in the very beginning when Ivan's colleagues, and supposedly his friends, learn of his death. The narrator states in paragraph 5: