False Confessions In The Interrogation Room

845 Words2 Pages

Over the years, false confessions in the interrogation room has sparked a lot of interest from researchers and other individuals. As a result, there have been several studies conducted to investigate what goes on in an interrogation room. The researchers who performed this study wanted to see the degree to which people could identify the difference in real and fake repudiations in an interrogation setting. They also hypothesized that training participants on how to identify cues would increase their ability to make accurate decisions regarding whether a person was or was not actually guilty of the crime.
The first part consisted of the creation the interrogation tapes that would be shown to participants in the second part of the study. Researchers randomly assigned subjects to one of four groups each having a different crime that subjects were assigned to either commit or not commit. Each crime had two subjects commit the crime and two subjects that were innocent resulting in four videos per crime and sixteen videos in all. During recording, subjects were given instructions on what to do and were apprehended at the scene of crime and taken to an interrogation room. An interrogator would interrogate them for the crime and afterwards, subjects were given a questionnaire where their reactions were assessed. In all, two tapes each with eight videos, …show more content…

There are also limitations to this study that researchers could further researcher or analyze such as other interrogation techniques and the amount of experience that professionals have gained. Nevertheless, the results found in this study will allow one to make the general assumption that false judgements can be made by real detectives and others who make decision in their

Open Document