Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
In the past 5 years how has fraud and abuse affected the U.S. healthcare system
Health care fraud and abuse paper introduction
Health care fraud and abuse paper introduction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
False Claims Act and Pharmaceuticals
Health care fraud cases continue to be problematic for health care systems and providers across the United States. According to Pozgar (2012), these cases not only pose financial burdens on the accused, but may also lead to unnecessary risks to patients. A violation against the Federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-33, is one example of health care fraud that often enters into a settlement agreement. It is important to mention violations against the Federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-33, often allude to physician kickbacks as well (a violation against the Anti-Kickback Statute).
The following paper discusses the Federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-33 in more detail. While such violations may involve various types of health care providers, focus is placed on the applicability of the law within the pharmaceutical sector of health care. The roles and responsibilities of a health care administrator within the pharmaceutical sector are also discussed considering the impact this entity may play in preventing such violations (e.g., knowledge of law, how it impacts daily operations, consulting with legal entities, regulatory compliance, etc.).
False Claims Act and Requirements (Summary)
To gain a better understanding of the Federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-33, one must first consider when and how the law was established. According to the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) (n.d.), this law was first “enacted in 1863 by a Congress concerned that suppliers of goods to the Union Army during the Civil War were defrauding the Army” (p. 1). Since its original presentation, the law has been amended – significant changes were made in 1986, followed by three more ame...
... middle of paper ...
...cesses to report the offense to relevant authorities in appropriate circumstances. (p. 7-9)
The OIG (2003) indicates the above elements should not be considered a comprehensive compliance program, but rather guidelines for the pharmaceutical sector of health care.
Conclusion
The evidence presented suggests violation of the Federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C §§ 3729-33 not only imposes financial burdens on pharmaceutical companies and manufacturers, but may also jeopardize the reputation and operation of such entities. Hence, as an administrator within the pharmaceutical sector of health care, one must remain cognizant of the law and implications for violation. Efforts placed in ensuring regulatory compliance through development of a corporate compliance program, as well as adhering to the standards set forth by the PhRMA may help reduce cases of health care fraud.
Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits anyone knowingly or willfully offering, paying or soliciting or receiving remuneration, directly or indirectly; in cash or kind; in exchange for; patient referrals or furnishing or arranging a good or service for a Federal healthcare program including Medicare or Medicaid. Stark would also apply to Hanlester as well but Stark was not enacted until after the Hanlester case. Stark is strict liability, does not require the knowingly/willfully element, and is not prosecuted criminally.
Medical malpractice cases are difficult for the families who have lost their loved one or have suffered from severe injuries. No one truly wins in complicated court hearings that consist of a team of litigation attorneys for both the defendant and plaintiff(s). During the trial, evidence supporting malpractice allegations have to be presented so that the court can make a decision if the physician was negligent resulting in malpractice, or if the injury was unavoidable due to the circumstances. In these types of tort cases, the physician is usually a defendant on trial trying to prove that he or she is innocent of the medical error, delay of treatment or procedure that caused the injury. The perfect example of being at fault for medical malpractice as a result of delaying a procedure is the case of Waverly family versus John Hopkins Health System Corporation. The victims were not compensated enough for the loss of their child’s normal life. Pozgar (2012) explained….
In some instances, the pharmaceutical industry in the United States misleads both the public and medical professionals by participating in acts of both deceptive marketing practices and bribery, and therefore does not act within the best interests of the consumers. In America today, many people are in need of medical help. In fact,the Federal Trade Commission estimates that 75% of the population complain of physical problems (Federal Trade Commission 9). They complain, for example, of fatigue, colds, headaches, and countless other "ailments." When these symptoms strike, 65% purchase over-the-counter, or OTC, drugs.
Lahman, Larry D. 2005. Bad mule: A primer on the Federal False Claims Act. The Oklahoma
Medical error occurs more than most people realize and when a doctor is found negligent the patient has the right to sue for compensation of their losses. Debates and issues arise when malpractice lawsuits are claimed. If a patient is filing for a medical malpractice case, the l...
Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Program. (2003). Annual Report For FY 2002. Office of the Inspector General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services website. Retrieved May 26, 2011, from http://oig.hhs.gov/publications/docs/hcfac/HCFAC%20Annual%20Report%20FY%202002.htm.
Making false or misleading statements with the purpose of securing goods or services under the Workers' Compensation Act;
The children had incurred numerous needles and painful hospital admissions, investigations, and procedures because of a false story and factitious signs...the falsification was not by the patient themselves but by another person "acting on their behalf" which is a proxy (502).
While the intent of this legislation is to prevent fatal medical errors, threatening the loss of licensure for misreading prescription orders will do nothing to prevent the errors. In fact, it may even worsen the extent of the errors as it will likely lead to a decrease in the reporting of such errors due to fear of the consequences. This law also uses the word “gross negligence” to describe misreading an order, which is human error. Misreading an order is unintended
Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. Code of ethics for pharmacists and pharmacy technicians, August 2007.
Collectively, the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Justice work to reduce healthcare fraud and investigate dishonest providers and suppliers. The Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team recouped almost 3 billion in fraud, this year alone. Also, aggressive strategies exist to eliminate Medicare prescription fraud. Patients abusing or selling painkillers received by visiting several doctors and obtaining multiple prescriptions costs Medicare millions annually. Fraud affects everyone, preventing it requires government officials and citizens diligently working together.
Healthcare services have been on the rise for over 10 years now. According to a 2012 consumer alert, the industry provided $2.26 trillion in payments for more than four billion health insurance benefit claims in the year 2011(Fraud in Health Care). The bulk of the claims and the mainstream of fraud and abuse stem from the Medicare system professionals, who are knowledgeable about the process and persuade new clients into handing over their pertinent information in hopes of deception and illegitimate claims. Multiple and double billing, fraudulent prescriptions, are some of the major flaws in this organization that has made the healthcare services industry curdle. (AGHAEGBUNA, 2011) This is a non-violet crime and is often committed by very educated people including business people, hospital, doctors, and administrators.
Phatak, A. (1998 йил 01-01). The pharmaceutical industry and the medical profession. Retrieved 2012 йил 19-01 from Indian Journal of Medical Ethics: http://www.ijme.in/064cr131.html
...le enough concept. However, in the light of competition and stress it is often hard to stay truthful to the truth. The human condition is such that we give in to temptations and shortcomings of our beings. If there is an easier route we as humans are more likely to take it. However, because of the gift of self-governance when it comes to the medical profession we have to be our own biggest critics. It is of paramount importance for the medical community to police itself in a manner that doesn’t encourage dishonesty, fraud and misrepresentation of fact. Dishonesty is a cancer that has a stranglehold on the medical community and just like any other cancer it has to be treated aggressively and has to be fought again from within. But, just like cancer, if dishonesty keeps reemerging even after aggressive treatment, it can lead to the downfall of a proud profession.
Dispensing errors can be defined as content errors and/or labeling errors1. These errors generally involve pharmacists dispensing the wrong product to the patient or displaying wrong information on the dispensing label1. Error of medicinal content could mean supplying patient with a different product, strength, form or quantity from the prescription. Displaying the wrong information on the dispensing label could mean different patient’s name, different description of the medication or different dose. These errors can happen at any stage of the dispensing process. However, it is the duty of pharmacists to intercept these errors before it reaches the patient that potentially cause harm or even death. In this essay, I will discuss whether it is fair for pharmacists to face legal action for dispensing errors.