Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The right to fairness in the criminal justice system
The concept of fairness in a jury trial
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The right to fairness in the criminal justice system
Fairness is always a relative concept,fairness in a criminal trial could be measured only in relation to the gravity of accusation,the time and resources which society can reasonably afford to spend,the quantity of available resources and the prevailing social values.Even though a trial that is conducted justly with procedural regularly by an independent impartial court in which the defendant is able to afford his or her constitutional right can be considered as a fair trial. The major aspects of fair trial rightly provided in Article 10 & 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. These are; * Article 10:- Everyone is entitled in full equality to fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial Tribunal in determination of his The court may expel him when he obstruct the smooth conduct of the trial.However the accused be able to reclaim his right to be present at trial if he express bonafide willingness to conduct himself in such a manner as to allow the court to produced with the trial smoothly in his presence. Whenever any evidence is given in a language not understood by the accused,it shall be interpreted to him or his pleader in open court in a language understood by him. 8.Right of the accused person to have an expeditious trial. The delayed justice is denied Justice, This principle is the basis for the right to speedy trial. If the accused is in detention during the proceedings before Magistrate and the trial is not completed within 60days from the first date fixed for hearing he shall be released on bail. The concept of speedy trial is read in to Art.21 as an essential part of fundamental right to life and liberty guaranteed and preserved under Indian Constitution. The right to speedy trial begins with the actual restrainment imposed by arrest and continues at all stages namely, The stage of investigation, inquiry, trial, appeal and revision. The obligation upon the state is constitutional obligation and the state can not plead financial or administrative inability, which is rightly said by Supreme Court in the case of Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar,in
Defence: Mr John Bell, Mr. A R Castan AM, QC and the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission.
...arately from the length of the delay, the prejudice towards the accused can be inferred from the length of the delay as established in R. v. Morin. Examining the Morin guidelines made the decision and since the guidelines set out an 8 to 10 month institutional delay and in this case the court deemed that the Crown was responsible for 23 months of delay. The court failed to justify the reason for the 23-month delay and since it exceeded the Morin guidelines the court concluded that the delay was unreasonable and the accused’s right under Section 11(b) of the Charter has been violated and the trial within a reasonable time was infringed and negated.
In theory all jury systems (which have existed for almost 800 years) are fair and just.
American citizens accused of crimes have a constitutional right to a speedy public trial by an impartial jury, to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation, to be confronted with witnesses against them, to bring witnesses in their favor, and to have the assistance of legal counsel. On April 27, 1861, Lincoln decided that such constitutional...
Declaration of Human Rights: Dignity and Justice for All of Us. Accessed on October 29,
The principle of bail is basic to our system of justice and its practice as old as English law itself. When the administration of criminal justice was in its infancy, arrest for serious crime meant imprisonment without preliminary hearing and long periods of time could occur between apprehension and the arrival of the King's Justices to hold court. It was therefore a matter of utmost importance to a person under arrest to be able to obtain a provisional release from custody until his case was called. This was also the desideratum of the medieval sheriff, the representative of the Crown in criminal matters,
Due process is a legal obligation that the state should adhere to the legal rights which are normally owned by the individuals who may be facing criminal or civil dealings. In every due process is very essential to one always questions whether the government has denied one party’s life, freedom, or property as they pursue their pleasure. The due process does integrate certain protections which consist of bill of rights such as the right to
The criminal trial process is able to reflect the moral and ethical standards of society to a great extent. For the law to be effective, the criminal trial process must reflect what is accepted by society to be a breach of moral and ethical conduct and the extent to which protections are granted to the victims, the offenders and the community. For these reasons, the criminal trial process is effectively able to achieve this in the areas of the adversary system, the system of appeals, legal aid and the jury system.
The first right I will talk about, is the right for speedy trial. There are two factors to consider: the...
"Universal Declaration of Human Rights." Amnesty International USA - Protect Human Rights. 19 May 2009 .
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (European Convention on Human Rights, as amended) (ECHR), Art 5(1)(e)
...so, the sixth amendment which is the right to a speedy trial derived from clause 40, “To none will we sell, to none deny or delay, right or justice.” This is not a coincidence how these two amendment relate to the clauses of the Magna Carta, since the Magna Carta was such an influential document on the English government we adopted it into our own constitution, which still lasts today.
...e or bring to trial the suspect before 96 hours". This also requires a lawyer be given to the defendant before a maximum of 7 days is reached.
Indubitably, all human beings are equally entitled human rights without discrimination. It is very important as it is inherent to all human beings and it enables effective functioning of the administration and dispensation of justice. If the authority or respect for law is weakened, then the public will diminish their confidence in the administration of justice. If the courts authority is not adhered to in court administration of legal proceedings, then it reduces the chances for a fair trial for the persons involved in the case. Hence, the courts reserves the right to punish those preside or wilfully interfere with its authority.
I could cite several examples where I thought a judge’s or jury’s ruling was not fair, but I won’t because frankly, we’ve all seen those. I actually believe in our legal system, and I believe in justice. I believe in justice as an ideal that we strive for, and that is what it means to me. The legal system, when looked at closer, is not justice but instead judgment. You can be punished when found guilty, in a number of ways, but who knows if they’re “fair” punishments, it’s all a matter of opinion.