Fahrenheit 451 Title Analysis

633 Words2 Pages

As I was reading Part 1 of Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury, I noticed that it was called The Hearth & the Salamander. I feel that there is a deeper meaning behind the title, I was able to connect some real life definitions to the words of the title. What I mean, is that according to dictionary.com, a hearth is like a fireplace or the floor of a fireplace, the area in front of a fireplace, or used as a symbol of one’s home. If you look at it in the way it is connected to a fireplace, it is also connected to fire, this makes me think perhaps the hearth is where they burn the books, and with it hearth also is a symbol of home, so the books hold history. Thus they burn the history of their home and past at the hearth with blazing fire. Bradbury wants us to …show more content…

Which reminds me a lot like modern firemen. They have the equipment to go into fires and not get burned, however in this case it reminds me of how these firemen are not at all emotionally phased by burning books, or starting fires. They stand their and watch as it all gets engulfed in flames and are not the tiniest emotionally burned by the destruction. They are salamanders they can withstand fire. To conclude I believe the Part 1 of Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury, was named The Hearth & the Salamander, to show how hearth can me two things and to show that they are burning their past and actual home, of what they should care about, and they are like salamanders they can stand for the fire and destruction without being burnt or hurt emotionally. However, I simply don’t understand why Ray Bradbury chose to write about this topic, everyone knows that the most typical type of dystopian is the government prohibiting knowledge, education, & reading. What makes this book different from the others? Why choose this one, why write about his one? I don’t understand why Bradbury prohibits reading, but what about math, calculations?

Open Document