Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
About fahrenheit 451
Concluding summary of the book fahrenheit 451
How to argumentative short essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Have you ever had an argument with an idea you have presented? In Fahrenheit, 451 people have a grown accustomed that ideas lead to chaos and unhappiness. Fahrenheit 451 takes place in the 24th century where a guy named montag whose job was to start fires to burn banned books being hidden. Montag later knows he is unhappy with his life and books may find the key to his happiness. This in itself destroys society. One may argue that censorship of books prevents any spread of misleading information. In which some cases this is true but we must keep in mind that because all the information is censored information provided by society is believed the ability of any other source of information to create their own ideas. For example, In Fahrenheit 451," 'We stand against the small …show more content…
tide of those who want to make everyone unhappy with conflicting theory and thought' "(pg 59). The people with the censored information may not be able to tell the difference between the truth or lie. Books are trustworthy for information. Censorship will lead to misleading information. For example, In Fahrenheit 451 it states "It's not books you need, it's some of the things that once were in books." (pg 82). Not, only do books help, but it allows forming ideas and information. Books are the future and censorship destroys society. Books played an important role throughout the book. The books were the only things left keeping people “unhappy” from being limited from presenting other ideas. For example, in the book, it states, “If you don't want a man unhappy politically, don't give him two sides to a question to worry him; give him one. Better yet, give him none. Let him forget there is such a thing as war. If the government is inefficient, top-heavy, and tax-mad, better it be all those than that people worry over it. Peace, Montag . Give the people contests they win by remembering the words to more popular songs or the names of state capitals or how much corn Iowa grew last year. Cram them full of noncombustible data, chock check them so damned full of ‘facts’ they feel stuffed, but absolutely ‘brilliant’ with information. Then they'll feel they're thinking, they'll get a sense of motion without moving. And they'll be happy, because of the facts of that sort doesn't change. Don't give them any slippery stuff like philosophy or sociology to tie things up with.”Montag's idea shifted and soon came to the realization that burning books and hurting people in the process was wrong. Along with that, he became curious about why and what they banned books for. A reoccurring event throughout the book is people's ignorance. For example in the “Fahrenheit 451”, the book states “ Colored people don't like Little Black Sambo. Burn it. White people don't like Uncle Tom's cabin. Burn it. Someone's written a book on tobacco and cancer on the lungs? The cigarette people are weeping? Burn the book. Serenity Montag. Peace, Montag. Take your fight outside. Better yet into the incinerator.” People began being used to thinking they were happy because they weren't thinking for themselves. When, they were presented with ideas which can be thought of as unequal because they either feel intimidated or inferior they felt the necessity to rat out the people who were different. They were afraid of change, individuality, and uniqueness. The article “Censorship and Book Banning in America” by Melissa Kelly talks about why books are banned and ways to avoid books from being banned.
The article states,“Is it necessary to ban books? Each person answers these questions differently. This is the core of the problem for educators. Books can be found offensive for many reasons. Men John Steinbeck. Reason: Profanity Go Ask Alice Anonymous, Reason; Drug use, sexual situations, profanity A Day No Pigs Would Die Robert Newton Peck, Reason: Depiction of pigs mating and being slaughtered.” Books are being banned for the inappropriate/explicit use of content in the books and parents are complaining that they don’t want their kids to read these books. "Choose the books you use wisely. Make sure that they fit nicely into your curriculum you should have evidence which you can present that books you are using are necessary for the student". Books are not all bad they can be interpreted in many ways. “Discuss the controversial issues in the book with the students. Explain to them the reasons those parts were necessary for the author’s work.” Books have explicit/inappropriate words to give the text meaning from the author's
perspective. The novel Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury is related to the book burning. An image which is when the Germans burned Jewish books, became they both support the theme of censorship. In the novel Fahrenheit 451, the books are burned because the government wants people to be easily manipulated. The firemen in the novel are the ones who burn the books, and the houses that have books. The theme is censorship because people are not allowed to read books; therefore, they have a lack of knowledge which leads to ignorance and ignorance becomes people that are easier to control. On May 1933 is when the Nazis burned a lot of the Jewish books this is shown on the image where the people stood around a pile of books that is burning while everyone is saluting heil Hitler. This image supports the theme of the censorship because the book burnings represent an element of censorship from the cultural, religious and political opposition. Controlled by the government. In and why he used “ pages to Ashes”. He mentions that truth can be brittle and easily destroyed. The point of this poem is that he maintains that you can’t entirely stamp out the truth by burning books because a “ few charred words.” which shows violent censorship of suppression of the truth. It is a message of ignorance which inflicts the world. He displays this by saying “No one needs to burn it ignorance can dance in the absence of fire’. Pages that contain both truth and lies try to protect themselves from the fire. They appear victimized and the reader is pulled into contrary to the writings, being destroyed. Books are key and essential in the novel throughout the entire way. In the story, Beatty a well-read man explains to Montag that censorship happened because the people allowed it. They wanted to be happy and not disturb their thoughts with things that were controversial. Beatty explains that the censorship did not come from the government, it came from the people. People stopped reading so that things could be done faster and make people happier m. The people chose the censorship, not the government. Faber also admits his role in helping the government enact censorship. It couldn’t have happened without the role of the people. Faber says, “ I saw the way things were going, a long time back. I said nothing. I’m one of the innocents who could have spoken up and out when no one would listen to the guilty.” He was a coward and did not things done faster, they didn’t want ideas challenged, they didn’t want criticism, and they didn’t speak out when they saw censorship happening. In conclusion, censorship leads to curiosity because there is a lack of knowledge in which leads to ignorance and ignorance becomes people that are easier to manipulate. This was shown in the novel when people didn’t know anything about the real world anymore and were only given information by the television which was controlled by the government.
In Federalist 10 James Madison argued that while factions are inevitable, they might have interests adverse to the rights of other citizens. Madison’s solution was the implementation of a Democratic form of government. He felt that majority rule would not eliminate factions, but it would not allow them to be as powerful as they were. With majority rule this would force all parties affiliate and all social classes from the rich white to the poor minorities to work together and for everyone’s opinion and views to be heard.
In the article 10 Reasons for Banning Books and 5 Much Better Reasons not to, it states that the books teach us vocabulary, history, and new ways of thinking. “Every year I receive at least a dozen invitations to be commencement speaker at colleges and high schools. My books are probably more widely used in schools than those of any other living American fiction writer.”-excerpt from Kurt Vonnegut’s letter. Books are known for their choice of complex vocabulary. We use non-fictional books to learn about real events in history. Non-fictional books and articles show children a new way of thinking. Many books are used in an educational
Fahrenheit 451’s Relevance to Today Fahrenheit 451’s relevance to today can be very detailed and prophetic when we take a deep look into our American society. Although we are not living in a communist setting with extreme war waging on, we have gained technologies similar to the ones Bradbury spoke of in Fahrenheit 451 and a stubborn civilization that holds an absence of the little things we should enjoy. Bradbury sees the future of America as a dystopia, yet we still hold problematic issues without the title of disaster, as it is well hidden under our democracy today. Fahrenheit 451 is much like our world today, which includes television, the loss of free speech, and the loss of the education and use of books. Patai explains that Bradbury saw that people would soon be controlled by the television and saw it as the creators chance to “replace lived experience” (Patai 2).
...in high school and are normally subjected to crude language and sexual content throughout the day, so this would also give them a better understanding of the book. Banning of certain books help protect children from the evil ways of the world that they should not see until an older, more mature age. The cruel language and violence within this book may influence children to act out and may possibly alter their future.
Recently censorship has become a major problem in our society. Censorship should not be banned on books. People should not be told they cannot read a book. Unfortunately history has shown that words can be used for ill as well as for good, to destroy lives as well as to enhance them? (Steffens, 9) Words and reading them gives us a better understanding of other peoples views. Censorship should not be placed on books.
Some of the best literature, also happens to be some of the most controversial pieces. The books mentioned above, some were banned because of language, other because of racism and sexuality, but all of them were important pieces about life lessons people should read about. I believe that books like these actually enhance our learning abilities, and not daunt them. I believe that it should not be up to the government, or the FCC, to control what citizens do or do not read in school systems. They have taken away enough by taking The Bible out of schools, it is a right our founding fathers gave to us when this country was first established, t...
It is challenging to choose what types of books are appropriate for children to read. Now in days the choice is even more challenging then it was a couple of centuries ago. There are books that feature violence, sexual content, offensive language or all. These subjects question concern parents because it can teach young children about several subjects that are usually avoided. Times have changed and so have books and what they contain, which makes banned books an important subject. Books can be a great source to learn from whether it history or just a folk tale, but parents and teachers must take into consideration the ages of the audience. Maturity is not achieved until a later time and some children may have difficulty reaching that point.
In the books Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, and Feed by M.T. Anderson, each describes a dystopian future where technology is dominant. In both books, technology takes over and dumbs down the human race, and societies strict social standards creates each person to be similar to one another. The theme of the books, is to not let technology get out of control and negatively change how we live our lives as humans.
People isolate themselves from information in this world to protect themselves and the society as a whole, but in the case of the book they take it to the extreme. The book Fahrenheit 451 shows that individuals or society shouldn’t isolate themselves from information when it could be useful.
Some children shouldn't be exposed to dirty language or book with sexual content. That is why they should ban book from school that contain bad influence on readers. Racial issues on books can be found any were in books. Kids should grow with positive thinking and not negative thinking. Kids would love to read book like adventure,action,and comedy. Those kinds of books don't have negative meanings. You should never judge a book by its cover because the cover may look positive ,but it may be negative.
I believe that by doing so we are limiting the amount of ideas and perspectives there are. We simply should not erase a text and pretend that it didn’t exist. Instead we should use these controversial texts as an outlet to have a thoughtful conversation about issues that may not normally be brought up in school. By stifling ideas we are attempting to uphold the status quo and prevent people from being heard. In addition, people have different opinions. Although you may disagree with a book there a still a lot of people who want to read it. People should not force their views onto others. Books are also vital to our society because they enable people to act, think on their own, and teach empathy.
Many books are written by different writers and are fast selling, but not all these are suitable for the United States of America society because of different reasons. Books are known to be categorized into different sections based on what the books are trying to interpret. Books that are banned do not necessarily reflect on the people generally. Books that are banned are decided by the United States of America society if it will be accepted. Some people in the society argue that some books are not to be banned because they have positive impacts on the United States of America society while some says that such books should be banned.
Books with some controversial topics and books that are offensive to to others have been banned over and over again for decades. There are two sides to this subject, one being that no books should be banned and the other being that every school reading book should be 100 percent appropriate with no controversy whatsoever. We have the right to freedom of speech which helps prove one side, however we must keep education appropriate.
Books are a gateway to knowledge. There are books about history, biology, anything someone would want to learn about. They provide us with facts. This why nazis burned books considered”un- German ”. When people have access to information, they'll rebel against injustice and books lend that wisdom.
As we all know, books play an important role in the process of human development. Especially, books would influence teenagers’ way of thinking or action in a deep and long way. As a result, in the United States, a lot of schools have banned books from their libraries, book stores, and curriculum since they believe that those books target violence, racism, or sexuality content, which are not appropriate to teenagers. According to Modern Library Association, books which are successfully challenged or target racism would be banned, such as Hamlet, The Communist, Manifesto, Lady’ Chatterley’s Lover, and Moll Flanders, which were banned in the past (Strong). However, book censorship inhibits teenagers from gaining more information which could open their minds and challenge the tradition. From my perspective, books should not be banned for teenagers.