Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How mass media form public opinion abstract
Mass media influence on public opinion
Mass media influence on public opinion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How mass media form public opinion abstract
Complexity, Identity, Diversity
What would happen if people were all the same? Seems convenient, right? More like dangerous. In Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, the world is deprived of books. Society is glued to technology, and personalities are monotonous. Montag, a firefighter who burns down houses with books, struggles to find himself after meeting teenager Clarisse who makes him question his ideals. Suddenly, Clarisse disappears, and Montag is lost. He feels tension at his job, and seemingly everyone turns against him. Beatty, Montag’s boss, persecutes him for having books. Montag retaliates and kills Beatty, and running becomes the only option. Fahrenheit 451 teaches many compelling messages for readers today because it poses a warning
…show more content…
for the world to keep diversity. Diversity is powerful and necessary in society because without diversity in an individual’s use of mass media, critical thinking, and definition of happiness, society crumbles. Lack of diversity in the use of media is critical for the balance of society.
In Fahrenheit 451, most of the citizens watch the same television shows and own the same types of technology. Parents use it as a way to entertain kids, get rid of their kids, and also entertain themselves: “’You heave them into the ‘parlor’ and turn on the switch. It’s like washing clothes: stuff laundry in and slam the lid’” (Bradbury 96). The use of technology in their society has become so monotonous that the people are instantly glued to the screen no matter what is playing. This is dangerous to their culture because the lack of technological distinction limits opinions and ultimately makes society tediously boring. Some may argue that watching the same television shows and using the same technology would be beneficial because people would be more likely to agree on tricky subjects, this, though, is not true because if everyone agrees the monotony will be agonizing. Mass media can also override people’s memory and decision-making skills. Montag and Mildred (Montag’s wife) have a heated conversation over a touchy …show more content…
subject: ‘No. The same girl. McClellan. McClellan. Run over by a car. Four days ago. I’m not sure. But I think she’s dead. The family moved out anyway. I don’t know. But I think she’s dead.’ ‘You’re not sure of it!’ ‘No, not sure. Pretty sure.’ ‘Why didn’t you tell me sooner?’ ‘Forgot.’ ‘Four days ago!’ ‘I forgot all about it.’ ‘Four days ago,’ he said, quietly, lying there (Bradbury 47). Mildred is so plagued by her constant use of technology that she forgets to tell Montag that one of his closest friends was hit by a car. This is a dangerous subject because if people overuse their brains using technology, they are less likely to be able to use them for memory and other thinking skills. Uniform use of mass media is not the only aspect that will damage our society, but like forms of creative thinking will also damage culture. Lack of diversity in creative thinking will leave society swirling into a centrally controlled life.
Citizens in the Fahrenheit 451 have a difficult time with critical thinking because they have simply been taught to spit out answers and move on. The central authorities change their rules to make critical thinking a taboo: “It’s a lot of funnels and a lot of water poured down the spout and out the bottom and them telling us it’s wine when it’s not” (Bradbury 29-30). Clarisse struggles with her peer’s lack of critical thinking, and being taught things but not learning their meaning. Without training to think outside the box, students are left with training only to find stale words that are the answer, but have no meaning to them. This in turn leaves society without problem solving skills. Montag also observes Mildred’s friends’ blank minds: “So it was now, in his own parlor, with these women twisting in their chairs under his gaze, lighting cigarettes, blowing smoke, touching their sun-fired hair and examining their blazing fingernails as if they had caught fire from his look” (Bradbury 95). Montag finds the lack of thought in the women to be astonishing. They simply exist, and run through their daily routines without questioning anything. They are nearly clueless without the ability to think critically. Their society lacks depth in different opinions and invention due to their deficiency in critical thinking. Some argue that if we’re all clueless and do not question
anything life would be much easier, but this is not true because if we are all clueless, no one would be able to create and innovate new things. We would be a society that is satisfied with where they currently are, rather than striving to be better everyday. Not only does lack of creative thinking affect society, but having the same definition is extremely dangerous to society, too. Happiness should not be defined or chosen by what others believe brings them satisfaction. Montag realizes throughout the book that by seeking happiness in what society thinks should make a person happy ultimately makes you unhappy. Seeking insincere happiness becomes a routine after a while: Well, after all, this is the age of the disposable tissue. Blow your nose on a person, wad them, flush them away, reach for another, blow, wad, flush. Everyone using everyone else’s coattails. How are you supposed to root for the home team when you don’t even have a program or know the names? For that matter, what color jerseys are they wearing as they trot out on the field? (Bradbury 17). Happiness is the tissue, you watch one program, move on to another, and repeat the cycle over and over again. Soon it becomes so monotonous that you do not know who the “home team” is, and life swallows you whole because you were happy with oblivion. Oblivion is confusion, not satisfaction. Some may argue that if a person is oblivious, they will be happier because they will not comprehend what is happening. This is not true because if a person is oblivious, how are they going to feel any emotion at all, and happiness is an emotion. The children in the story clearly do not feel happiness, so they seek it in unorthodox ways: “God knew, from twelve to sixteen, out whistling, yelling, hurrahing, had seen a man, a very extraordinary sight, a man strolling, a rarity, and simply said, ‘Let’s get him,’ not knowing he was the fugitive Mr. Montag, simply a number of children out for a long night of roaring five or six hundred miles in a few moonlit hours, their faces icy with wind, and coming home or not coming at dawn, alive or not alive, that made the adventure” (Bradbury 128). In the pursuit of happiness, the teenagers are not afraid to take someone else’s life, and not afraid of losing their own. At this point, they do not know how to seek happiness, and never will due to the lack of diversity in their community. Diversity is essential in society because without diversity in a person's use of mass media, critical thinking, and definition of happiness, civilization disintegrates. When people do not have any distinct and defining traits and interests, society becomes boring and monotone. If people all use the same types of media, opinions and decision-making skills are compromised. When critical thinking gets thrown out, opportunities for central government to take full control is heightened. Opinions of the public are only made up of what the central being wants them to believe in. Lastly, when individuals have the same definition of happiness, they ultimately become unhappy. All three of these points are critical for us to maintain diversity in. In current times we are constantly trying to degrade people for their interests and beliefs when in reality, if we make everyone the same, society would be controlling and boring. Diversity is like a flower, beautiful, yet so delicate and special. Such a pleasant thing to have, and yet it is so easily destroyed.
In the novel, FAHRENHEIT 451 by Ray Bradbury, Guy Montag lives in an inverted society, where firemen make fires instead of put them out, and pedestrians are used as bowling pins for cars that are excessively speeding. The people on this society are hypnotized by giant wall size televisions and seashell radios that are attached to everyone’s ears. People in Montag’s society do not think for themselves or even generate their own opinions; everything is given to them by the television stations they watch. In this society, if someone is in possession of a book, their books are burned by the firemen, but not only their books, but their entire home. Montag begins realizing that the things in this society are not right. Montag is influenced and changes over the course of the novel. The strongest influences in Montag’s life are Clarisse, the burning on 11 Elm Street and Captain Beatty.
Imagine living in a world where everything everyone is the same. How would you feel if you were not able to know important matters? Being distracted with technology in order to not feel fear or getting upset. Just like in this society, the real world, where people have their faces glued to their screen. Also the children in this generation, they are mostly using video games, tablets, and phones instead of going outside and being creative with one another. Well in Fahrenheit 451 their society was just like that, dull and conformity all around. But yet the people believed they were “happy” the way things were, just watching TV, not thinking outside the box.
Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 opens with Guy Montag, a fireman, reminiscing of the pleasures of burning. As the story unfolds, we learn that Montag is a fireman who rids the world of books by burning all that are found. Walking home one night Montag meets Clarisse, his strong minded neighbor. She begins peppering him with questions. Clarisse doesn’t go along with societal norms and Montag realizes that immediately. “I rarely watch the 'parlor walls ' or go to races or Fun Parks. So I 've lots of time for crazy thoughts, I guess.” (Bradbury 3) Clarisse uses her imagination brought by stories from books and family instead of watching television. Clarisse helps Montag realize that the government induced censorship and conformation is stifling society’s education and imagination. Montag’s wife, Mildred ,is incapable of having a personal conversation with Montag. She conforms to societal standards and is greatly
In the novel Fahrenheit 451 by author Ray Bradbury we are taken into a place of the future where books have become outlawed, technology is at its prime, life is fast, and human interaction is scarce. The novel is seen through the eyes of middle aged man Guy Montag. A firefighter, Ray Bradbury portrays the common firefighter as a personal who creates the fire rather than extinguishing them in order to accomplish the complete annihilation of books. Throughout the book we get to understand that Montag is a fire hungry man that takes pleasure in the destruction of books. It’s not until interacting with three individuals that open Montag’s eyes helping him realize the errors of his ways. Leading Montag to change his opinion about books, and more over to a new direction in life with a mission to preserve and bring back the life once sought out in books. These three individual characters Clarisse McClellan, Faber, and Granger transformed Montag through the methods of questioning, revealing, and teaching.
There are multiple examples of the degradation of human relationships found in Fahrenheit 451. These examples range from simple seashell radios, which are comparable to in-ear headphones, to a television set that spans over an entire wall, and also interacts with you as if it were human. If you take a look around you as you’re strolling down the street, you’ll notice the vast quantity of people that are plugged into the virtual realm, but disconnected from reality. Even today, you can notice the lack of communication in society.
The society envisioned by Bradbury in Fahrenheit 451 is often compared to Huxley's Brave New World. Though both works definitely have an anti-government theme, this is not the core idea of Bradbury's novel. As Beatty explains in part one, government control of people's lives was not a conspiracy of dictators or tyrants, but a consensus of everyday people. People are weak-minded; they don't want to think for themselves and solve the troubling problems of the world. It is far easier to live a life of seclusion and illusion-a life where the television is reality. Yet more importantly, Fahrenheit 451 is an anti-apathy and anti-dependence and anti-television message. People in the novel are afraid-afraid of themselves. They fear the thought of knowing, which leads them to depend of others (government) to think for them. Since they aren't thinking, they need something to occupy their time. This is where television comes in. A whole host of problems arise from television: violence, depression and even suicide.
As you can see, Technology plays a big role in our lives in Montag's society and our society too. You see technology is an antagonist to nature because it gives us too much tittivation. It manipulates our mind and it changes who we are. Therefore, Ray Bradbury overall message/opinion of Fahrenheit 451 is how technology is bad for alternative ways for people.
Throughout the book, Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, dependency on technology becomes a relevant topic. In the novel, Bradbury depicts that people are obsessed with their technology and have become almost completely dependent on it. Characters such as Mildred exist in today’s modern world and show a perfect example of how society behaves. In today’s society, people use their technology for just about everything: from auto correct to automatic parallel parking; as time goes by people do less manually and let their appliances do the work.
Few people in the world choose to stand out instead of trying to be like everyone else. In Fahrenheit 451, most people are the same because no one ever thinks about anything and their world moves so fast. In Ray Bradbury’s novel Fahrenheit 451, the author uses characterization to show the individuality and sameness of the characters.
In the mid-1900s, the Unites States was rapidly changing from the introduction of a new standard of technology. The television had become the dominant form of entertainment. This seemingly simple thing quickly impacted the average American’s lifestyle and culture by creating new standards for the average household. New, intimidating concepts came about, and they began embedding themselves into American culture. It became clear to some people that some of these ideas could give rise to new social problems, which it did. Sixty- five years ago, in a library basement, a man named Ray Bradbury wrote a book called Fahrenheit 451, which was able to accurately predict social problems that would occur because he saw that Americans are addicted to gaining quick rewards and new technology, and also obsessed with wanting to feel content with their lives.
Imagine a world of uniformity. All people look the same, act the same, and love the same things. There are no original thoughts and no opposing viewpoints. This sort of world is not far from reality. Uniformity in modern day society is caused by the banning of books. The novel "Fahrenheit 451" illustrates a future in which the banning of books has risen to the extent that no books are allowed. The novel follows the social and moral implications of an over censored society. Even though the plot may seem far-fetched, themes from this book are still relevant today. Although some people believe that banning a book is necessary to defend their religion, the negative effects caused by censorship and the redaction of individual thought are reasons why books such as "Fahrenheit 451" should not be banned.
(MIP-1) Technology has many negative effects on a person 's humanity in Fahrenheit 451. (SIP-A) The people in the society that Montag lives in are constantly consuming this media which influences them heavily and damages their traits. (STEWE-1) Mildred is constantly plugged into the sea-shell radios, “She was an expert at lip reading from ten years of apprenticeship at Seashell ear-thimbles” (16). It’s quite astonishing that for 10 years she hasn’t removed the radios, to the point where she just reads the lips of the people
The lost of connections with people, and when people don’t think for themselves can lead to a corrupt and violent society. Thats why in the novel Fahrenheit 451, Montag learns that when thinking for your own self you can achieve your goals. Having connections with other people like Clarisse and Montag is a good thing and not bad. They both learn that thinking different and have a real connection with other people can help society and not turn it into a corrupt and violent society.
Fahrenheit 451’s Relevance to Today Fahrenheit 451’s relevance to today can be very detailed and prophetic when we take a deep look into our American society. Although we are not living in a communist setting with extreme war waging on, we have gained technologies similar to the ones Bradbury spoke of in Fahrenheit 451 and a stubborn civilization that holds an absence of the little things we should enjoy. Bradbury sees the future of America as a dystopia, yet we still hold problematic issues without the title of disaster, as it is well hidden under our democracy today. Fahrenheit 451 is much like our world today, which includes television, the loss of free speech, and the loss of the education and use of books. Patai explains that Bradbury saw that people would soon be controlled by the television and saw it as the creators chance to “replace lived experience” (Patai 2).
In the book Fahrenheit 451 the theme is a society/world that revolves around being basically brain washed or programmed because of the lack of people not thinking for themselves concerning the loss of knowledge, and imagination from books that don't exist to them. In such stories as the Kurt Vonnegut's "You have insulted me letter" also involving censorship to better society from vulgarity and from certain aspects of life that could be seen as disruptive to day to day society which leads to censorship of language and books. Both stories deal with censorship and by that society is destructed in a certain way by the loss of knowledge from books.