Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Understanding legal implications on asking job applicants for their facebook passwords
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“Why Asking For a Job Applicant's Facebook Password is Fair Game” by Alfred Edmond Jr., published in the Black Enterprise Magazine on April 2, 2012, is an essay regarding how employers have the right to ask one’s Facebook password in order to check one’s social media activity. The author discusses how although he would say no if an employer asked for his Facebook password, he as an employer would ask the applicant’s password for background check. Alfred Edmond Jr. says that he would try to negotiate any other way to satisfy an employer’s request for Facebook password by doing something else, although he does agree that looking into employee and applicant’s Facebook may be beneficial to help a business. The author discusses that it is reasonable …show more content…
to ask a Facebook password as it is an essential aspect of the hiring process. Alfred Edmond Jr. concludes his article by giving advice that one must be careful of what they post on Facebook, and to make the right decision on whether the post is private or public and then only post.
Alfred Edmond Jr. claims that companies have a fair say in asking for an applicant’s password, so they may be able to check one’s background and it is up to the applicant to give the password or not, but the applicant should always keep in mind what posts should be public or private, which may ensure a reader’s feeling of security.
Alfred Edmond Jr. supports his claims by giving his personal viewpoint of the topic and by giving examples that support his personal viewpoint and explanation. The author begins to support the claim by explaining how an applicant may be able to face the problem by offering alternatives to the employer. Also, the author discusses how an employer may need the Facebook password to better ensure the background of an employee and to see if the applicant is the best to hire out of all the individuals that have applied. The author begins to bring information and data from examples of jobs in the childcare industry requires one’s background to be checked very thoroughly and in doing this background search, it may be beneficial for the employer to check the applicant’s Facebook to see if the applicant has done some very inappropriate things or is affiliated with doing inappropriate things. Alfred Edmond Jr. states that asking for a person’s
Facebook password is similar to a credit check as they are all a part of background check. The author talks about how liability for a company or workplace is more important than a employees privacy. The author adds in to that statement by giving example of the book, The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding From You by Eli Pariser. The reason the author gives that book as an example is to explain to the reader how he believes that there is no such thing as privacy. The author talks about Facebook is like Times Square and saying something private is like screaming in the middle of hundreds of people. When the article begins to near to the end the author begins to talk about how one should decide wisely when sharing something on social media, whether it is a matter of public or private. The article has an image of a job interview of an employer asking access to an employee’s Facebook page. The applicant says fine as long as she has access to the employer’s page and the employer gets a flashback of him doing something inappropriate. If something is private it may be smart to not publish online, because nothing is private. The author concludes the article by explaining how the laws may change because of the ongoing debate and asking questions regarding the topic of how far can the potential employer can go while investigating one’s background in social media. The author expects the audience to know what Facebook and other types of social medias are. The audience would have to understand how on social media people share private messages and that is one of the primary reasons that the debate for asking an applicant’s Facebook is going on. The audience may need to know that Facebook is internationally popular and that if one shares anything it can be seen by millions around the globe. The audience would have to know what is going on in Congress and how they did not pass the legislation. The people reading this essay would have to understand the kind of confidentiality and privacy others believe they have on social media and how in reality there is not that much privacy as everyone can see everything. The audience may need to know how background checks are very important in obtaining a job, so password to social media allow employers to check the background of applicants. The audience may need to understand that what they do on the internet may not be private and most of time is viewable to the public. The audience would also need to understand that there is a difference between Business and Personal as well as Public and Personal. The audience may need to feel supportive of the idea of employers asking one for his or her Facebook password as fair game. The article was very effective in talking about how the employers’ have the right to ask one’s Facebook password as it addresses the main concerns one may have regarding the topic, but it also gives different viewpoints of people in the workforce. The author provides many examples and gives factual details regarding how background check is necessary and one of the best ways to do it is by checking an applicant’s Facebook to see if he or she is the right one to hire. The author gives a variety amount of facts regarding how privacy may just be an illusion that many individuals just fall for. The author does that by comparing Facebook to Times Square and a ticking bomb. The author concludes the article by giving a powerful statement that one should think public vs. private before sharing anything on multimedia. The weakness for the article mainly was the fact that the author did not have any sources or much credibility rather than himself. Also, the author could have provided more facts on the topic of how Facebook passwords could be very effective by giving an example.
Personal privacy is a very serious case. Your personal items should stay personal to avoid the risk of someone stealing your information. Three key ideas that can help keep your information safe are less information giving, reading guidelines before agreeing to it, and downloading less risky apps that can potential give out any information.
Ever since Mark Zuckerberg created Facebook in 2004, millions of people have flocked to the website, resulting in “1.49 billion active users” (Facebook). Facebook allows users to not only reconnect with old friends, but also share whatever the user deems necessary. Facebook has many privacy settings that enable users to prevent anyone from seeing what they post. Even so, skeptics out in the world strongly attest that Facebook, and similar social media websites, aren’t all they’re cracked up to be. In the essay Why Asking for a Job Applicant’s Facebook Password Is Fair Game, Alfred Edmond Jr. addresses the false security Facebook provides to its users, and uses that notion to support his claim that bosses should
Alfred Edmond Jr. wrote the article, Why Asking for a Job Applicant’s Facebook Password is Fair Game. In the article he assessed and argued that you should provide your potential employer with your Facebook password because nothing is ever really private. Edmond effectively persuades the reader to agree with him by uniting his audience and establishing his credibility, providing scenarios that toy with the reader’s emotions, and by making logical appeals. In addition to making these appeals he successfully incorporates an informal tone that further sways the reader to grasp the essence of his argument. These are the elements that make Edmond’s argument valid and persuasive. He is able to convince us that providing a possible employer with something that is private such as our password will ultimately be beneficial for everyone in the situation.
Fleming begins her argument by paralleling the transformative properties of the invention of the telephone years ago to social networks today (Fleming). But, Fleming states that “students’ online identities and friendships come at a price, as job recruiters, school administrators, law enforcement officers and sexual predators sign on and start searching” (Fleming). Social networking websites like MySpace and Facebook are frequented favorites, especially by college students. These sites have become so popular that “friending” a person is now a dictionary verb. However, Fleming believes that students are not as cautious as they should be. In fact, “thirty percent of students report accepting ‘friend’ reques...
For example, Rosen states, “According to a recent survey by Microsoft, seventy percent of U.S. recruiters report that they have rejected candidates because of information found online,” (Rosen, Para. 3). Most of the time it is a necessity for companies to do online and background research on candidates because of wanting a safe environment to work in. Social media sites are the fastest way to see who a person truly is. But sometimes it can just be a character they posses because that’s what they’re followers want to see rather than their true self. Jokes can be made and other people do not see it that way which leads to your workplace seeing it and thinking that you’re a bad and trouble person. Rosen’s article informs his readers that you don’t want to be that person where one little thing you did on social media defines your whole life and you’re known for it. The new privacy on Facebook made certain parts of a user’s profile public which caused many criticism from users. Rosen also credits four democratic senators, Charles Schumer of New York, Michael Bennet of Colorado, Al Franken of Minnesota, and Mark Begich of Alaska. The four democratic senators were also concerned about the privacy changes Facebook made. They expressed their concern of “instant personalization” feature and new privacy settings to the chief executive of
Persuading an audience requires a bit of tact and respect. A successful persuasive article treats their opposing side’s position as a valid stance, but respectfully informs that side why their stance does not hold up as an argument as it doesn’t have realistic data to support their claim. Alfred Edmond Jr. is a vice president and editor of the magazine, Black Enterprise, and his argument that he articulates, which he published in the magazine he works for, is that business employers should be able to ask for an employee's Facebook password. Edmond fails in succeeding in his argument because he lacks to support his claims substantially, provide credibility and reliability to his ability to take a stance on this issue, and understand and respect
With social media websites being the main hub of personal information, advertisers are consistently monitoring our social media activity, having the ability to look into our personal information. In the article "Advertising and Consumer Privacy: Old Practices and New Challenges." by Justine Rapp states, “Fueled by advances in capabilities and interconnectedness of computer based technology, advertisers are able to collect and assimilate information on consumers like no other time history” (51). Facebook has become the number one, social media website around the globe. It is the most popular website used by personal and business users in today’s society. In the article “Using Social Media to Reach Consumers: A Content Analysis of Official Facebook Pages” by Amy Parsons states, “As of July 2011, the social network site Facebook claims to have over 750 million members and in the terms of activity.” (27), making it easy to meet and connect with others. Facebook is considered the “hot spot” for online social activity, however, it exposes personal information about its consumers to
Problem Statement: In this white paper we will address how privacy and security can be improved on Facebook.
As older siblings, friends, and cousins were denied position at school and in the work force, we realized that adults and employers had found Facebook. Our uncensored character was on display for future bosses, colleges, etc. and they were there to stay. Instead of references being the test of character for a job, it was the online identity that determined whether or not the application got even a second glance. In light of this revelation, we changed. Our Facebooks no longer reflected our true selves, but rather the person that we thought colleges and employers should see. Much like hiding our dirty laundry from prying eyes in the halls of high school, we could no longer wear our proverbial hearts on our internet sleeves, for the future was at stake. Much like what had once been the Old West, the internet was now connected with railroads—each leading back to the offline person. Tame and orderly.
Social network profiles are the most essential tool to judge job applicants because it reflects a good image of the job applicants. For example, if the company is recruiting a writer, it would be better to choose a person who has a blog web page in a blogging website such as Word-Press that shows and reflects his/her ability in writing. In addition to that, a Human Resources manager can check this person’s Facebook and Twitter in order to see his/her grammar and writing skills. This information provides accurate and complete picture about the candidate. (Fish & Lee, n.d). Moreover, social network profiles can prove the application as it shows applicant’s participation in many fields. For instance, when a recruiter enters person’s blog that includes art and design work, it will show his/her passion to work as a designer in the company. Therefore, it is important to judge applicants based on their social media profiles because it shows a good image of the person.
The situation revolving around these sites is not likely to clear up any time soon; in fact, as freshmen enter higher education institutions, more activity regarding social networking will take place. Christine Rosen, “a fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington” (2), said that the amount of freedom and control that technology gives us also provides a direct route for marketers to advertise products to these users. In addition, she says that college administrators use Facebook as a means of snooping around to find evidence of illegal activity of students. Many of these administrators and employers also create fake profiles in order to conduct these investigations, although, as spokesman for Facebook Chris Hughes says, creating...
The growing popularity of information technologies has significantly altered our world, and in particular, the way people interact. Social networking websites are becoming one of the primary forms of communication used by people of all ages and backgrounds. No doubt, we have seen numerous benefits from the impact of social media communication: We can easily meet and stay in touch with people, promote ourselves, and readily find information. However, these changes prompt us to consider how our moral and political values can be threatened. One common fear among users is that their privacy will be violated on the web. In her book, Privacy in Context, Helen Nissenbaum suggests a framework for understanding privacy concerns online. She focuses particularly on monitoring and tracking, and how four “pivotal transformations” caused by technology can endanger the privacy of our personal information. One website that may pose such a threat is Facebook.
This is yet another way of invading privacy. In the past, employers would only know what you told them in your interview. They would assess your skills and determine if you were right for the job, aside from knowing your beliefs or views. However, now with Facebook an employer can see all the personal information, this can negatively influence a candidate’s job. The same goes for those who are currently employed and potential students. “Dr. Nora Barnes, Director for the Center of Marketing Research at University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, published a study that showed more than 20% of colleges and universities search social networks for their admissions candidates” (Fodeman). This is becoming a part of the admissions process, but it is unfair. Searching someone’s Facebook to determine his or her admissions eligibility is wrong and a privacy invasion. As long as a student has fulfilled the school’s requirements and done well in school, why should it matter what their personal lives are like? In the time before Facebook, this would be like a school sending someone to secretly follow a potential student and see what he or she does in their
An example of the pros and cons of privacy in the work place while during the hiring process is in 2012, a company in Maryland decided to ask job seekers to log into personal profiles and search through wall posts. As this is becoming more of trend many creative ways to monitor the posts. Another example within this sector is the athletic program at the University of North Carolina, “Each team must identify at least one coach or administrator who is responsible for having access to and regularly monitoring the content of team member social networking sites and postings”
The first aspect being addressed is the problem with social network sites exposing information. Social networking has created an environment where it is nearly a duty to expose oneself. Profiles on these social websites are updated everyday with personal information such as locations, status, and future plans. Anyone can search another’s name and find information about their history, pictures, and activity. With the help of social networking sites...