Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Fifa corruption thesis statement
Theory of criminal personality
Fifa corruption thesis statement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Fifa corruption thesis statement
Football is one of the most popular sports in the entire world. Nearly every country has some sort of involvement whether being fans or participating in huge events. FIFA is the widely known organization involved with professional football. This report will be used as a tool to provide the HR staffing with advice on how to prevent corruption in leadership.
Recently in the news FIFA has been under fire for the actions that have been taken by a large number of executives. In this report a news article from BBC on September 25 of 2015 was observed (“Fifa Corruption Crisis”, 2015). The issues with the corruption in FIFA will be looked at in a Human Resource Management and Organizational Behavior aspect. Fourteen of the recent top executives were
…show more content…
Soon, allegations of vote-buying surfaced. Former Bayern Munich president Uli Hoeness said “a bid nowadays can only be successful if payments are additionally made under the table” (Daley, 2011).
On 27 May 2015, multiple FIFA officials were arrested on accusations of bribery and laundering. FIFA also launched an internal investigation on the biddings for the 2018 and 2022 World Cup (“2015 FIFA corruption case”, n.d.). Nine FIFA officials were indicted and FIFA was left with loss of face (U.S. Justice, 2015).
As can be concluded from the recent media attention, the accusations of corruption are a vital threat for FIFA. The organization has heard various boycotting claims already, indicating that many people are unhappy. It is therefore of tremendous importance the FIFA takes steps to prevent and root out corruption. The consequences could mean the end of the organization as we know it today unless major changes are made. Proving that FIFA cares enough to build people’s trust once again may be the best way to regain
…show more content…
The definition they give for bribery is the following: “bribery is the bestowing of a benefit in order to unduly influence an action or decision” (2006, p.10). To prevent corruption, it is important to know who is prone to be corrupt. Husted (1999) showed that a culture that is prone to corruption is often highly risk averse, masculine, and has a large power distance, as defined in the work of Hofstede (1984).
On the other hand, it is argued that some individuals are more predisposed to commit crimes than other individuals in the same position. Therefore, according to Hirschi and Gottfredson (1987), the behavior can be attributed to personality traits. Personality measures can be used by HR staffing to detect corruption in this case, as they “tend to categorize individuals by what they are like” (Akkermans, 2014, p.748). To counteract the low validity often paired to personality tests, it is recommendable to obtain information from people other than the job applicant and threaten to run cross-checks between self-rating and other people (Akkermans, 2014,
Corruption is an individual and institutional process where there is a gain by a public official from a briber and in return receives a service. Between the gain and the service, there is an improper connection, (Thompson p.28). The two major categories of bribery is individual and institutional corruption. Receiving personal goods for the pursuit of one’s own benefit is personal fraud. An example of individual distortion is the financial scandal involving David Durenberger. Organizational corruption involves “receiving goods that are useable primarily in the political process and are necessary for doing a job or are essential by-products of doing it,” (Thompson p.30). An instance of institutional fraud is the Keating Five case. There are also times where there is a mixture of both individual and organizational corruption in a scandal. An example of this diverse combination is James C. Wright Jr. actions while he was the Speaker of the House.
Politicians many times have been found guilty of corruption. They use unethical techniques to get higher positions in an election, to gain more money, votes or to lay hands on ungotten wealth. Corruption exists in the police force, in law and order and even in the management of the Olympic Games.
In May 2006 British investigatory reporter Andrew Jennings' book Foul! The Secret World of FIFA: Bribes, Vote-Rigging and Ticket Scandals (Harper Collins) caused contestation within the football world by detailing an alleged international cash-for-contracts scandal following the collapse of FIFA's marketing partner ISL, and disclosed how some football officials have been encouraged to secretly repay the sweeteners they received. The book also alleged that vote-rigging had occurred in the fight for SeppBlatter's continued control of FIFA.
Bribery occurs when money, services, goods, information, or anything else of value is offered with intent to influence a person’s actions, decisions, or opinions of the accuser. Charges can be brought against an individual, whether they offered the bribe or accept it. Bribery and public corruption cases frequently make headlines new stories daily. Bribes can take the forms of gifts or payments of money in exchange for favorable treatment like awards of government contracts (Mince-Didler, n.d.). Government officials tend to gain a huge incentive with bribery while serving their term. Other forms of bribes may include privileges, services, various goods, property and favors. Bribes are always intended to influence or alter the actions of individuals with political and public corruption (Mince-Didler, n.d.).
Corruption is a persistent problem that plagues the world and it knows no boundaries. Transparency International defines it as the “abuse of entrusted power for private gain” (2013). For the purposes of this thread, ‘corruption’ is defined as any individual, collective, or structural act or process that permits the use of public authority or position for private gain. This definition captures the broad and many ways individuals and institutions abuse power and the public trust. In regard to whistleblowing, much conflict stems from the context in which the whistleblower is viewed.
The FIFA’s executives and Officials days of freedom are numbered. Since May 2015 evidence has been released that can incriminate the sixteen members involved in the FIFA scandal. New evidence is released weekly about the FIFA corruption scandal and there comes a point where the arrest need to start to help the organization get passed the scandal. The questions at the start of the investigation were is FIFA actually corrupted? Did FIFA accept bribes during the World Cup voting process? Now the questions have shifted towards when will Sepp Blatter resign or get convicted? Will more evidence get uncovered in the upcoming weeks that will convict more FIFA officials? And can anyone be trusted to run FIFA? FIFA’s problems began with the president’s
But FIFA has gotten to the point where, in terms of scale, it has characteristics of a governmental organization or a big business. We have rules for how those organizations are supposed to behave. The fact that FIFA has gotten so big without any of those same rules is really what's led to its corruption.” The corruption of FIFA further emphasises that money, the root of all evil and the basis of greed, is everywhere you look. In fact, it is instilled so deep now into the very fabric of the game that it has come to represent the game itself.
To make a payment in exchange for special consideration where the recipient has a duty to offer equal consideration to all (more commonly referred to as bribery) is morally reprehensible on three distinct grounds. Not only does it violate inherent principles of justice and equality by enabling one to use their wealth in order to attain or reinforce influence, it also provokes the recipient to violate the positional responsibility that they have tacitly agreed to uphold (this duty is therefore contractually binding): namely that he or she will perform their role in a manner that adheres to the rules of the organisation in question. The covert nature of the bribe is also problematic; once a bribe is uncovered, the vitality of the entire organisation is endangered because people will inevitably question the integrity of all prior actions undertaken by the affected institution. I shall argue that bribery is wrong regardless of whether the bribe has any impact upon the actions of the recipient, for the motivation that underlies an action is as important as the action itself. Only when one knows institutional corruption to rife can bribery be deemed common practice; in this case, one has a moral right to violate the duties of their position, for their duties require them to engage in corrupt practise.
The development of a country depends generally on the work and values of its society. The image of a country can be severely damaged by certain actions and behavior of their citizens, like bribery. When a country is known as a corrupt nation, not only will the facade of the country be affected, but also the economy. Establishing measures to eradicate corruption are urgently necessary. Corruption has been around since the begging of time, but currently is more common in business, more specifically, international business. Although some organizations have been formed, and conventions have been signed in order to end it, corruption is still one of the mayor problems around the world. An ethical view might bring more insight to why bribery and corruption is not a moral act and why more severe measures should be taken into consideration.
The question of why bribery is illegal in the first place is fundamental to the discussion of its practice and legality. Foremost, it can be considered wrong in terms of normative ethics, both deontologically and teleologically. Teleological ethics holds that the outcome of an action is the determining factor in whether or not it is moral. Should bribery create economic distortions resulting in suboptimal development in the aggregate, it would be economically beneficial in the long run to criminalise bribery. Therefore, application of a consequentialist view asserts that bribery, in being detrimental to the economy, i...
In many circumstances, employees’ behaviors are likely to follow their leader. Enron’s leadership has been extremely influential due to exemplified charismatic. For example, Heffrey Skilling and Kenneth Lay, CFO and one of executive member in Enron, greatly encourage employees to follow their lead. Their incompetence accounting profession directly affects lover level of employees. Eventually, those manipulating accounting activities affect company collapse. Once leadership has done unethical professional accounting behaviors, unethical acts become accepted. Employees have many reasons for remaining quiet. While Enron still have ethical internal rules, when leadership in Enron did not abide and did not provide corresponding example of employees to follow (Prentice 2003, p. 417). Which eventually make Enron’s become one of the largest corporate scandal frauds.
The procedure of giving and taking bribe is called ‘corruption’, and almost in all countries around the world it is forbidden; as a result, participating in this procedure leads to some punishments. Kind of punishment may vary depending on countries’ law; therefore, in one country it can be some monetary fine, while in other
Montesh, M. (n.d.). Conceptualizing Corruption: Forms, Causes, Types and Consequences. Retrieved May 4, 2014, from
Global Challenge: Building the New Worldwide Enterprise. McGRAW-HILL Book Company Europe. NEELANKAVIL, James P. (2003). International Business Corruption: A Framework of Causes, Effects, and Prescriptions. Hofstra University Press.
Economists know quite a bit about the causes and consequences of corruption. An important body of knowledge was acquired through theoretical research done in the 1970s by Jagdish Bhagwati, Anne Krueger, and Susan Rose-Ackerman, among others. A key principle is that corruption can occur where rents exist--typically, as a result of government regulation--and public officials have discretion in allocating them. The classic example of a government restriction resulting in rents and rent-seeking behavior is that of an import quota and the associated licenses that civil servants give to those entrepreneurs willing to pay bribes.